We'd all join you there if you'd drop just a small bit of information we like to call 'what's next?' Spill the beans on FB and we'll overwhelm your page :)
Fair enough. My frustration is mostly at his Title... 'I've Said it Before...' If you've said it before, then go back to that post and continue your argument. Posting again on the same topic, but now with a picture is (to me) a bit redundant and spam'ish. I just immediately took from the title (coming into the post) that…
Thats flawed logic. Cryptic could never make a game identical to 4E rules. Its a video game. Its going to need tweeks here and there, along with sacrifices and painful decisions. According to your statement, Cryptic will ONLY be allowed to create a game done in partial spirit of D&D 4E. They could never achieve supreme…
Yep... your right. SO? They chose to go with what they have gone with. Its what you get. You've made your point (apparently a few times). Are you hoping for a 'Oh, sorry Mr Elminban! What were we thinking?!?!? We'll get on that asap and correct this horrible error.' Cryptic has chosen to do the Cleric in this way. Don't…
THIS. And it seams that if it includes alpha compnents, then its restricted. So, summing up... NO UI and NO ALPHA pieces. Everything else can be talked about.
I Agree. Dont take a great and fun game and drive people off because you dont do the simpler things. I know models take time and space, but making even the simplest of changes would go a long way.