test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Please remove skirmish events.

sturmwaffel2sturmwaffel2 Banned Users, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 219 Bounty Hunter
edited July 2013 in PvE Discussion
They are boring. Nobody does them. Nobody likes them. They don't pay off.

Thank you.
Post edited by sturmwaffel2 on
«13

Comments

  • malkaviermalkavier Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Nobody likes or does any of them other than the first two.
    How Cryptic trolls the entire NWO playerbase: 9200 GS listed for CN, implying anyone who needs more has no skill.
  • driftrunnerdriftrunner Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 8 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Well, I for 1 DO still like them... in that they are something to do in the event I can get matched to one...
  • stoosh72stoosh72 Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Oh no! Someone doesn't like it! He must speak for all of us... we should do as he says.
  • sturmwaffel2sturmwaffel2 Banned Users, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 219 Bounty Hunter
    edited July 2013
    stoosh72 wrote: »
    Oh no! Someone doesn't like it! He must speak for all of us... we should do as he says.

    Fine. Go waste 45 minutes for 1000 AD. I speak for the majority, I am sure.
  • nick1sternnick1stern Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Knight of the Feywild Users Posts: 330 Bounty Hunter
    edited July 2013
    They are boring. Nobody does them. Nobody likes them. They don't pay off.

    Thank you.

    Clearly you are doing it wrong.
    I never have issues getting into skirmish events completing the multiple times
    and recieving not only Lots of AD but also Items to sell for coin.

    Many people enjoy them and run them regularly.
  • nick1sternnick1stern Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Knight of the Feywild Users Posts: 330 Bounty Hunter
    edited July 2013
    Fine. Go waste 45 minutes for 1000 AD. I speak for the majority, I am sure.

    WOW if it takes you 45 minutes to run one skirmish....
    I do 2-3 in an hour easily.
    No you speak only for yourself not the majority.
  • naoriko121naoriko121 Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    need skirmishes for lvl 60
  • chudovishyechudovishye Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    I mean, if you have a fast party, you can run a skirmish at 60 in like 7 minutes, and get like 5-6 of them in, which is like 6000 AD if you don't include the extra AD ground drops that sometimes appear. So I mean, it's really not that pointless. I like the speed element of it and the timer.
  • runebanerunebane Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    nick1stern wrote: »
    WOW if it takes you 45 minutes to run one skirmish....
    I do 2-3 in an hour easily.
    No you speak only for yourself not the majority.

    Depends on the level. And the team you get put with if you random it. I've spent greater than 30 minutes just waiting in queue for the level 60 skirmish. And that was during a skirmish hour. But I can run the low level Blacklake one 12 times in an hour.

    I don't want skirmishes gone myself. I want them improved. If they want to get the masses running skirmishes other than Blacklake, then they should (imo) to adjust the skirmish hour rewards based on the level, average run time, and difficulty of the skirmish.
    Halgarth's Legacy - NWS-DSTGFZHFR
  • parp12parp12 Member Posts: 642 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    They are boring. Nobody does them. Nobody likes them. They don't pay off.

    Thank you.

    Isn't it great that cryptic invented this thing called choice. Now people who want to do skirmishes can do them, and people who don't want to do skirmishes don't have to do them!
  • sockmunkeysockmunkey Member Posts: 4,622 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Fine. Go waste 45 minutes for 1000 AD. I speak for the majority, I am sure.

    I rarely have a skirmish go longer then 15 minutes. Granted, there are exceptions like, "Garrundar the Vile" and "Battle for the bridge." Those two can be painful. But I find the others fun and well worth the time. In some ways I enjoy them more then dungeons. You can beat up a boss with less trash, less annoyances, and less time involved.

    Now if only the rewards where better and you had more choice over what one you could do.
  • abell39abell39 Member Posts: 1,175 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    The majority of us would probably prefer having the skirmish event, if the Zone chats are any indication. I try to time my skirmishing so that my daily skirmish lines up with the skirmish event, so it actually works out well for me. And since I usually don't have time to plow through multiple skirmishes for my daily skirmish quest on my higher-leveled characters, the skirmish event is a decent substitute. Far better than nothing at all.
    Kerensa Loreweaver, level 60 DC | Rilla Turtledove, level 60 CW | Calvin Meriwether, level 60 TR
    Kaylee Krankenwagen, level 60 GF | Tavandruil Wayfinder, level 49 GWF | Aldith Langley, level 51 HR
  • yokanaanyokanaan Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 151 Bounty Hunter
    edited July 2013
    Except that you can run only one skirmish over and over again at 60 because there is only one available.
    Sounds like a lot of fun - same instance - 5 times in a row. Umm... no thx.

    Why after so many patches it's still impossible to enter previous skirmishes with a party?
  • nick1sternnick1stern Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Knight of the Feywild Users Posts: 330 Bounty Hunter
    edited July 2013
    runebane wrote: »
    Depends on the level. And the team you get put with if you random it. I've spent greater than 30 minutes just waiting in queue for the level 60 skirmish. And that was during a skirmish hour. But I can run the low level Blacklake one 12 times in an hour.

    I don't want skirmishes gone myself. I want them improved. If they want to get the masses running skirmishes other than Blacklake, then they should (imo) to adjust the skirmish hour rewards based on the level, average run time, and difficulty of the skirmish.

    How do you run low level skirmishes with over level characters?
    There is currently no way to run out leveled skirms.
  • abell39abell39 Member Posts: 1,175 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Probably they don't want level-12s in Blacklake roflstomping the skirmish 10 times in a row by bringing a level-60 along with them. The solution for that would be something akin to epic versions of skirmishes, though.
    Kerensa Loreweaver, level 60 DC | Rilla Turtledove, level 60 CW | Calvin Meriwether, level 60 TR
    Kaylee Krankenwagen, level 60 GF | Tavandruil Wayfinder, level 49 GWF | Aldith Langley, level 51 HR
  • azmoran11azmoran11 Member Posts: 51
    edited July 2013
    I will not throw food under the OP's bridge!
  • chudovishyechudovishye Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    runebane wrote: »
    Depends on the level. And the team you get put with if you random it.

    Don't do random then? Duh.
  • chudovishyechudovishye Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    yokanaan wrote: »
    Except that you can run only one skirmish over and over again at 60 because there is only one available.
    Sounds like a lot of fun - same instance - 5 times in a row. Umm... no thx.

    Why after so many patches it's still impossible to enter previous skirmishes with a party?

    It's fun because you work with the time, but maybe that's just me. I love running them. I can get in 5-6 in the time limit anymore with a premade team. You can run past certain points to maximize speed and get more AD. But, I will say this, it would be nice to have other skirm options, not the same one.
  • mconosrepmconosrep Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    azmoran11 wrote: »
    I will not throw food under the OP's bridge!

    +1

    /10chars.
  • rapticorrapticor Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,078 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Oh no Cryptic is forcing us to do Skirmishes!

    Wait.. No they're not.
  • chudovishyechudovishye Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    rapticor wrote: »
    Oh no Cryptic is forcing us to do Skirmishes!

    Wait.. No they're not.

    I think the point they're making, though I like Skirmish, is that it's taking up space and thus time on the daily log for various events.
  • tang56tang56 Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users, Neverwinter Knight of the Feywild Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    abell39 wrote: »
    Probably they don't want level-12s in Blacklake roflstomping the skirmish 10 times in a row by bringing a level-60 along with them. The solution for that would be something akin to epic versions of skirmishes, though.

    Except even a L10 can roflstomp blacklake 10 times in a single skirmish hour.
    RIP Neverwinter 26/06/2014
  • gutbotgutbot Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 28 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Perhaps change the main mechanic at end game. You get 5 bosses and two teams, each team starts off at opposite ends of the map(will have no interaction with each other). Each team must kill 2 bosses to go onto the the final boss who resides in the middle of the map and can only be reached by two gates on either side and can only be opened to the ones who downs their second boss first. The middle/final boss would drop epic tier loot. the losing team wont lose anything because they still get the AD from the daily, as it is, its stale and uninteresting imo.
  • abell39abell39 Member Posts: 1,175 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    tang56 wrote: »
    Except even a L10 can roflstomp blacklake 10 times in a single skirmish hour.

    Yeah, Blacklake wasn't the best example for that, but I couldn't remember the average level for any of the other skirmishes so I went with it. I think the point I was trying to make is still valid for skirmishes after Blacklake, but if I'm wrong feel free to argue me.
    Kerensa Loreweaver, level 60 DC | Rilla Turtledove, level 60 CW | Calvin Meriwether, level 60 TR
    Kaylee Krankenwagen, level 60 GF | Tavandruil Wayfinder, level 49 GWF | Aldith Langley, level 51 HR
  • kshoksho Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 85
    edited July 2013
    Fine. Go waste 45 minutes for 1000 AD. I speak for the majority, I am sure.

    Lol, you waste time every time you sit to the game, kid.
  • zydrateacademyzydrateacademy Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    I thought Skirmishes were 10-15 minute ordeals?

    Though, I'm newb so I don't know things.
  • b100d31fb100d31f Member Posts: 64 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    No way SKIRMISHES are the best part! Absolutely love them! But yeah some epic ones would be icing on the cake!
  • lordgrimmwoodlordgrimmwood Member Posts: 128 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    I for one like the skirmishes. They add a break to the routine of leveling, plus a good way to earn AD's. And btw, please don't say that you speak for the majority, it only makes you look stupid OP.
    tumblr_mm7g22WQog1spm248o1_1280.png

    My first Foundry mission, The Valley of Darkness NW-DG9DOTZLU
  • pelkastpelkast Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    Why on earth remove something that has potential? Improve it instead!

    Open all the skirmishes at 60 lvl, make them harder and more rewarding like dropping t1 and t2 loot. Change the event to similar than the DD event bonus reward, like the chest for finishing. More things to do and enjoy the game.
  • wylonuswylonus Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 2,376 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    i like doing those for 15 mins, it is only way to earn astrals beside than that 45 mins which could need some "bigger and better" rewards.
    i had too many that "quits" and made it unfinishable without getting replacement adventures, that DCUO's grouping with dropping/rejoining was way better format.
    most of time we get 'griefers' that only get in to loot and then bailout.
Sign In or Register to comment.