Like the title says. Yesterday i got the Heart of Fire Enchantment from the campaign then I put it in my ring Gravestriker +5 (BoA of course), first ring slot of the chultan tiger. Now that I log on, I realize that the ring had become BoC
3
Comments
greywyndMember, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 7,155Arc User
That isn't a bug. That enchant is BtC. It will contaminate anything you slot it into, binding it to that character.
I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission. Earth just lost her best defender, so we're here to fight. And if you want to stand in our way, we'll fight you too.
That isn't a bug. That enchant is BtC. It will contaminate anything you slot it into, binding it to that character.
This makes no sense since the rank 14 from Jubilee is also BTC and didn't make EVERY gear BTC. Even my companion MW III rings (used to be BTA when equipped on comp and BTC when you equip it yourself) were bound to character. This some bug related to the enchantment, as it's not supposed to turn bind the gear.
0
greywyndMember, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 7,155Arc User
The Anniversary Enchant is BtA. I was just looking at mine.
I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission. Earth just lost her best defender, so we're here to fight. And if you want to stand in our way, we'll fight you too.
That isn't a bug. That enchant is BtC. It will contaminate anything you slot it into, binding it to that character.
The fact that the enchantment is BtC doesn't make it any less of a bug. Under no conditions should a BtC enchantment ever change the bind status on a piece of gear.
4
greywyndMember, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 7,155Arc User
Then the only other alternative is to not let BtC enchants be placed in anything other than BtC gear.
I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission. Earth just lost her best defender, so we're here to fight. And if you want to stand in our way, we'll fight you too.
An item will take on the binding status of an enchant. So using a BtC enchant will turn an item, regardless of its original binding status, to BtC. This is by design.
I understand why - so you can't put it in a BtA ring and move the ring to another toon on your account - however could you confirm if you then remove the enchant the item returns to BtA status?
I understand why - so you can't put it in a BtA ring and move the ring to another toon on your account - however could you confirm if you then remove the enchant the item returns to BtA status?
I doesn't.
It is by design but a very faulty design. There should a big warning window with red text appearing asking you to type "yes i want to make my bta item btc because of this stupid enchantment"
That isn't a bug. That enchant is BtC. It will contaminate anything you slot it into, binding it to that character.
The fact that the enchantment is BtC doesn't make it any less of a bug. Under no conditions should a BtC enchantment ever change the bind status on a piece of gear.
It always has, crafted black ice overloads did this.
What there should be is a warning/confirmation box that it's about to do this
An item will take on the binding status of an enchant. So using a BtC enchant will turn an item, regardless of its original binding status, to BtC. This is by design.
You can surely understand how this is not a good answer to the issue. By design does not equate to good design. The fact that there's no warning whatsoever that the binding status of your equipment will be changed is just plain horrible design.
Your response is basically saying, "Yes, we're aware you're getting screwed but that's by design so deal with it."
5
obsiddiaMember, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 1,025Arc User
Yep. If items are permanently being changed by a temporary use and then removal of an enchant, that is a bug, and needs attention and correction.
Did you really think anyone could steal the power of the god of thieves?
Imo the design here is good, there should be a warning before slotting though..But lots of ppl are trying to cheat by moving a BoC enchantment to another character using a BoA ring, its good that dosent work..
A better solution would be to remove "Bound to Character" altogether and replace it with "Bound to Account".
While I wouldn't want people farming this enchantment to sell it on the AH, I certainly don't care if they have several on one of their characters.
And this also applies to all other "Bound to Character" items.
Bound to account means you can farm many r14 of this enchantment for one character. One can keep on create character, get this enchantment, delete character, get this enchantment, ..... It will not be several. It will fill all offensive slots. These are low/no cost r14. You don't even need a well equipment character to get it. I have 2 brand new characters got that already.
*** The game can read your mind. If you want it, you won't get it. If you don't expect to get it, you will. ***
Bound to account means you can farm many r14 of this enchantment for one character. One can keep on create character, get this enchantment, delete character, get this enchantment, ..... It will not be several. It will fill all offensive slots. These are low/no cost r14. You don't even need a well equipment character to get it. I have 2 brand new characters got that already.
So what? What does it matter to me if you have 12 of those enchantments? You can't make any profit from them nor did you produce any AD by making them. Getting 12 is going to be a long and boring process. I won't do it and I don't mind other people doing it. At least it won't benefit botters and gold sellers in any way.
greywyndMember, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 7,155Arc User
Doesn't matter if it does or doesn't bother you. TPTB said "one to a customer and it is THEIRS", so each character can only have one.
I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission. Earth just lost her best defender, so we're here to fight. And if you want to stand in our way, we'll fight you too.
Doesn't matter if it does or doesn't bother you. TPTB said "one to a customer and it is THEIRS", so each character can only have one.
I see what you mean, and it makes sense.
I thought of the unique tag, but it probably wouldn't work once slotted or make things even worse. So in the case of a unique enchantment, "bound to character" seems to be the only solution.
Bound to account means you can farm many r14 of this enchantment for one character. One can keep on create character, get this enchantment, delete character, get this enchantment, ..... It will not be several. It will fill all offensive slots. These are low/no cost r14. You don't even need a well equipment character to get it. I have 2 brand new characters got that already.
So what? What does it matter to me if you have 12 of those enchantments? You can't make any profit from them nor did you produce any AD by making them. Getting 12 is going to be a long and boring process. I won't do it and I don't mind other people doing it. At least it won't benefit botters and gold sellers in any way.
Actually, it is not as hard as you think. I already have 8 because I play 8 characters. Anyway, that is the nature of the item. The same as I want 2 mako rings for one character but I can't have my way (and I shouldn't have).
*** The game can read your mind. If you want it, you won't get it. If you don't expect to get it, you will. ***
I apologize if my earlier reply came off as flippant. I agree that we can always do a better job at issuing warnings for actions taken in-game and we have, over the years, incorporated much of that feedback. I'll pass it on to the team.
Since I'm not a designer, I'm not honestly equipped to answer the logic as to why something is designed a certain way or to pass evaluative judgement. But it's something to keep in mind next time we have a systems Q&A
If the concern is that a BtC enchant can be slotted into a BtA ring and then passed through the bank than the answer seems pretty clear to me. Write logic into the game that checks the slots of an item to see if there's a BtC item slotted and don't allow it to be added to the bank until the enchant is unslotted.
That requires some work and programming logic though. So the second best option is to warn your players that they're about to change the bind status of an item. That also requires some work and programming logic though.
I guess the easiest and fastest option to implement is to give no warning and screw over an unsuspecting player.
as ecrana said they could warning you in the description of the enchantment or better solution could be transorm the item in btc only when the enchantment was slotted in it... bad bad work
1
feanor70118Member, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 1,170Arc User
Having the enchantment change the status of an item is a terrible idea and simply obnoxious. Doing it without warning is just negligent. This calls for a reversal and compensation to affected players. If it's by design, this design is bad and the team should just admit their mistake and reverse it.
There are LOTS of details in this game to keep track of and the fact that in normal play enchants can fly around all the time, in and out of eq with no problem, it's understandable that someone might miss that detail. It's easy to look at it after the damage is done and understand WHY it happened, but that doesn't make it ok.
What seems obvious to designers, or old time players, maybe not be to others. A warning does not seem too much to ask.
1
plasticbatMember, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 12,439Arc User
There are many area that should warn the player about bounding an item. e.g. profession tools.
*** The game can read your mind. If you want it, you won't get it. If you don't expect to get it, you will. ***
There is no excuse for implementing something like this without also putting a big red warning/confirmation window to inform the player of what is about to happen. The game issues exactly such warnings for other things. I slotted this piece of garbage enchantment in my Gravestriker +4, my Gravestriker +5 and my Ring of Offensive action before I figured out what happened. I didn't need the enchantment that badly. If I had gotten a warning, I would have thrown the stupid thing away, or fed it to the stronghold mimic, if I could. I initially thought it was a nice thing to give away a rank 14 enchantment. Now I'm feeling like I got the shaft. Thanks, Cryptic.
It would be nice for a warning about the item being converted to BtC. That said, frankly, I have no sympathy for people who slotted it into their gravestrike rings. I got so many gravestriker +4 that I have five of them in my bank after equipping five toons and companions with them. I got only one gravestriker +5 that will probably stay on my DC forever.
I've seen so many trashy toons in REQ recently. Often, they have only hunts gear and no mythic artifacts, but somehow have +5 gravestriker/shadowstalker with R14s in them. Obviously they moved the rings around to trash toons to get carried for invoke bonus RAD.
Comments
This some bug related to the enchantment, as it's not supposed to turn bind the gear.
It is by design but a very faulty design. There should a big warning window with red text appearing asking you to type "yes i want to make my bta item btc because of this stupid enchantment"
What there should be is a warning/confirmation box that it's about to do this
You can surely understand how this is not a good answer to the issue. By design does not equate to good design. The fact that there's no warning whatsoever that the binding status of your equipment will be changed is just plain horrible design.
Your response is basically saying, "Yes, we're aware you're getting screwed but that's by design so deal with it."
then removal of an enchant, that is a bug, and needs attention and correction.
While I wouldn't want people farming this enchantment to sell it on the AH, I certainly don't care if they have several on one of their characters.
And this also applies to all other "Bound to Character" items.
You don't even need a well equipment character to get it. I have 2 brand new characters got that already.
I thought of the unique tag, but it probably wouldn't work once slotted or make things even worse. So in the case of a unique enchantment, "bound to character" seems to be the only solution.
Since I'm not a designer, I'm not honestly equipped to answer the logic as to why something is designed a certain way or to pass evaluative judgement. But it's something to keep in mind next time we have a systems Q&A
That requires some work and programming logic though. So the second best option is to warn your players that they're about to change the bind status of an item. That also requires some work and programming logic though.
I guess the easiest and fastest option to implement is to give no warning and screw over an unsuspecting player.
What seems obvious to designers, or old time players, maybe not be to others. A warning does not seem too much to ask.
e.g. profession tools.
I've seen so many trashy toons in REQ recently. Often, they have only hunts gear and no mythic artifacts, but somehow have +5 gravestriker/shadowstalker with R14s in them. Obviously they moved the rings around to trash toons to get carried for invoke bonus RAD.