test content
Logo
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options
Can we kill Drizzt?
Archived Post
Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
Cause if we can I think that would make up for a lot of stuff if the game doesn't have it.
Post edited by Archived Post on
0
Comments
How about we wait and see what the game has or has not before we attempt a suicide mission.
Officially? Who knows - but we have the Foundry. 5 minutes, one room, and a level 1 Drow placed in the middle. Wa-la... you can kill Drizzt as many times as you like.
Darn, you've stolen my idea for my first award winning foundry adventure!
- Bar
Yay!
I will be playing that one over and over and over endlessly.
LOL! Ok, that was just awesome, and I totally agree.
Make him look a little like Justin Bieber or something and you can appease even more people when we kill him.
Has this been confirmed?
No pvp possibility, generic clerics with no deities .. Sure sounds like fun.
Perhaps I might just find that module and kill Drizzt anyway.
As for clerics... no confirmation whether you will choose or not, seriously what's this thing with people claiming non-confirmed info as real? There was actually no mention of gods by dev team.
Yes there was in one of the interviews by jack. He said no alignment no deities.
This Interview
Searching does wonders
They might have a box that you can put your Deity in or what ever name you wish to. As for adding powers/abilites on your choice. Don't count on that anytime soon. just my opinion of course
Plus, in 4 ed a deity has like 1-2 specific powers for a cleric that worships it. So I don't see that as necessary at the launch. They work like feats. You have to take a feat to have a deity specific power.
It just means you can say you worship whoever you want and role play it.
Thats how I see it anyway. I could be wrong. I am a lot of times
It's not that I "like" pvp, hell, I'm usually the one ending up with my behind being kicked. But pvp adds realism, you might get in trouble if you're being an <font color="orange">HAMSTER</font> towards other players. Forcing non-pvp removes a lot of that realism for me, which is why I'm against the idea. It's not that free pvp turns everything into a slaughter fest. On all the pw's I've been playing, pvp was a pretty rare event.
As for clerics, the interview has already been quoted, first by me, secondly by another user. Looks like clerics will be generic, void of deity RP. One of the things I actually preferred in NWN2 was the fact that picking deities and domains made your cleric stand out from the crowd, having its own unique flavour. Seems like this is going down the drain, which will make me want to play anything but a cleric, sadly.
Poor Drizzt. No one likes him.
As to generic clerics. Aren't all clerics in 4e generic anyways? I mean I thought it didn't matter which god you worship because you will be still getting same powers?
So nothing prevents cleric of Shar casting "divine glow" or "blazing beacon" just because the god itself happens to be tied to darkness and shadows. Similarly nothing prevents cleric of Auril from casting "sacred flame" or "fire storm" just because she happens to be the frostmaiden.
Guess that's one of my least favourite things about 4E.
In the DnD PHB you at least get access to some feats that are tied to your god. So, yeah, while nothing rule-wise prevents a cleric of Shar to cast dazzling light spells, or a cleric of Auril to throw fire around left and right, I still think it's sort of iffy.
But then again, I'm one of those people who chose not to cast fire based spells in NWN2 while on my aurilite cleric. Guess the joke's on me then.
Yep. 4e pretty much separated mechanics from "story" which is pretty obvious in spots like this. Looking at the classes there doesn't seem to be that much mechanically supported flavor within a class itself.
I suppose in PnP I'd just convert those all those fire spells to cold spells while keeping the effect otherwise same. Not so easy in a CRPG.