I have a stack of unbound Mark of Potency (99) in the personal bank and some character bound Mark of Potency (8) in inventory.
Before I do refine, I can see 2/107. That is normal.
When I refine enchantment, it picks up the unbound Mark of Potency from the personal bank instead of those from inventory. Ok, I can deal with that.
I went ahead to protect the stack in the personal bank (with the chain symbol in the top right corner).
Before I do refine, I can still see 2/107. Ok, may be a gui glitch.
I do refine, well, it takes 2 from the protected stack in the personal bank although there is a chain symbol.
Of course, knowing its behaviour, my current workaround is to move the stack to the shared bank but it is a bug.
*** The game can read your mind. If you want it, you won't get it. If you don't expect to get it, you will. ***
1
Comments
For me, if reagent is "protected", it should not be used too.
if ward, reagent, mark, material, etc, are 'exceptions' during refinement/crafting, they should inform us. If it is already documented, I missed it and have not seen it.
I fully expected I could protect unbound ward, reagent, mark so that they won't be used. So that, the game will use whatever I did not protect such as character bound bunch.
For ward, I did not try myself. If you choose "try until success", will it use another stack when the first stack is done?
e.g. I have 8 character bound p-ward, 99 protected unbound p-ward. The refinement takes up to 15. I put 8 bound p-ward stack into the slot. I choose "try until success". 8 tries is not enough. Will it use the "protected" unbound p-ward to do the next 7 tries?
It would be nice if the game prioritized bound resources first when refining. I put my unbounded resources in the mail if I have bound ones I want to be consumed for sure.
Let say it can do "try until success" and will use the 2nd stack as you claimed.
I have a stack of 8 and put into the refinement slot.
I have (A) a protected stack unbound p-ward and (B) an unprotected stack of bound p-ward.
Which stack should be used based on your common sense?
Anyway, it appears your common sense is not the same as mine. My common sense says "protected" means protected.
My common sense also says a bug is a bug. if something is not a bug, it will only because it is not a bug and not because there are other more important or annoying and unrelated bugs.