Module 12b Preview Patch Notes: NW.90.20170911a.4 (Updated 9/22)

aimsies

terramak said:

• The amount of daily bonus AD granted by Random: Skirmish has been increased from 3000 to 6000.
  
• The amount of repeatable bonus AD granted by Random: Skirmish has been increased from 400 to 600.
  
• The amount of daily bonus AD granted by Random: Dungeon has been increased from 4000 to 7000.
  
• The amount of repeatable bonus AD granted by Random: Dungeon has been increased from 600 to 900.
  
• The amount of repeatable bonus AD granted by Random: Epic Dungeon has been increased from 800 to 900.
  
• The amount of daily bonus AD granted by Random: Trial has been increased from 3000 to 5000.
  
• The amount of repeatable bonus AD granted by Random: Trial has been increased from 500 to 600.
  
• The daily and repeatable AD bonus rewards granted by Random: Hero's Accord has been removed.
  
• In lieu of AD, the daily reward will award a jadeite while the repeatable reward will award a black pearl.
  
  

Sorry if I missed this somewhere, but daily AD bonus for Random Epic Dungeons is what now? It's not listed above, just the repeatable.

hustin1

@terramak , I'd like to bring to your attention a bug with Arcane Singularity. I posted a thread on it in the Bug Reports section. Somewhere along the line it was broken, and it's drastically hurting effectiveness of CC-build CWs. It seems like it only works somewhat properly against HE-difficulty-level enemies, which I presume have more control resistance. Against normal enemies, it pulls them so hard they overshoot the singularity at something approaching orbital velocity.

Unknown

This content has been removed.

bitt3rnightmar3

Question: Is it a visual bug only or does the final boon of chult "Death's Blessing" not give item level?

It also says in the tool tip that it's a 'feat' not a boon. Is this intended?

revan06100

My question might sound a bit stupid or might have been discussed about already but : Does the new daily AD in random queues gain mean that there will be no more rough AD reward from completing Dungeons in private queues?
If yes, then why make this new system a couple of weeks ago to nerf it now ?

rafaelda

maxthakilla said:

Overall, a good patch. Now, will you consider giving some love to PVE TR and SW?

from someone that never played a SW before, i cant understand why isnt SW the debufer on this game, at first look no class is more sutiablle to be a debuffer, theres no mechanic that should be beter to debuff than a curse... and yet the debuff here comes from DC or MOF CW...

lipasgutom

This will hit new player big time on there gear

nirafelos

terramak said:

• Unparalleled Vorpal Enhancement now properly grants 55% Crit Severity, rather than 50%.

Can you take a look at possibly adding Vorpal's %Crit Severity to a player's character sheet? Currently it is not at all reflected, and must manually be added to any math you're attempting when calculating the diminishing returns from combined CA+Crit Sev%s.

I understand why Dread's isn't included -- since it only applies on Encounter Powers -- but Vorpal applies on everything, so it feels weird to have it not included.

panteleelee

bitt3rnightmar3 said:

Question: Is it a visual bug only or does the final boon of chult "Death's Blessing" not give item level?

It also says in the tool tip that it's a 'feat' not a boon. Is this intended?

This bug is also in main server...its not visual, i have this boon but i dont get the item level

Unknown

This content has been removed.

beckylunatic

revan06100 said:

My question might sound a bit stupid or might have been discussed about already but : Does the new daily AD in random queues gain mean that there will be no more rough AD reward from completing Dungeons in private queues?
If yes, then why make this new system a couple of weeks ago to nerf it now ?

I would say that they permitted rewards from solo private queueing only because they knew this new system was imminent, and felt that the impact of allowing solo queueing to grant AD for a few weeks or months wouldn't be sufficient to hold it back.

(But my first reaction of "that can't possibly be intentional" turned out more accurate than it initially appeared.)

Unknown

This content has been removed.