Well it optimizes profit, at the risk of player interest. Ultimately the monopoly of it could ruin this game. Character bound emotes can easily be over looked as something trivial seeing as some are specific to certain archetypes. But character bound tailoring options, are a huge risk! Especially when players literally…
See, this is information I was not fully aware of. Regardless, it is nice that you both understand the plight of the game. But aren't willing to vote against something, just because of priority.
I agree, and if they said "We're increasing the level cap", then I would be over the moon excited. But ultimately content like a new map, etc, in a free to play game could take years. There is not a time limit on the cosmetic change I proposed, but it would likely take less resources and less time to implement.
How do you think I got so many yes votes? My experience with forums has led me to believe that i'm more likely to come across three types of people. 1. People who demand change in a game, but stopped playing it years ago. 2. People who troll forums to feed their sociopathic amusement. 3. People who actually play the game,…
Well there is the difference in this statement versus previous ones, you're detailing things a bit more. If there is something extremely specific that you'd like changed, and want to use that in opposition to something else that someone would like to see, then you'd be sure to clearly state what it is that you want…
Your opinion is your own. I am not attacking people for their opinion, I am just not buying into some of the reasons as to why something small could not be implemented into a game. And I started a poll to make a change into a game, it's mostly others who wish to make this into more of a debate. Thank you for voting,…
Both yes, and no. There are many businesses who would disagree with this statement due to the fact that little to no money has been invested in their product by the consumer. They merely give them the right to play in a harassment free environment, with few benefits compared to an actual subscriber. Granted they'd likely…
In addition to all of this, I am a regularly paying player when it comes to this games cash shop. My account is likely worth more than this game 100 times over. On top of that, I am a lifetime subscriber. So I would humbly say, that even if politics were being a portion to the driving force for this post, I have paid for…
Well if you want to label my intentions as such, you're asking for a debate that doesn't belong in this thread. As for the player I was responding to, he attempted to make it such. I am attempting to make this game enjoyable. And prejudice does come in many forms, it doesn't need to be blatant to be obvious. Back on track…
The purpose behind only two options, is to make the voting more absolute in gauging interest/disinterest in this. If the devs were to look at something convoluted with too many ideas, they wouldn't have anything to work with. It would just be a mess of ideas. I am not trying to stir up trouble on the forums, my intentions…
Because they hide behind reasons that can't be all bed addressed immediately, and would likely take years to fix. But if you read through the entire thread, which you probably didn't, you'd see this is something not demanded to be implemented right away. Not to mention, with each fix, may spawn more problems. Kinda harsh…
A poll with only two options yields more results. It shows absolute interest/disinterest, rather than eventually sounding convoluted with too many ideas. Like spinnytop said, this isn't anything that is being demanded as an immediate change. But with how society is evolving, it benefits any game to flow with such change.…
Thank you for the guidance in this. I have always seemed to enter endless debates when it comes to certain topics in forums. Especially ones that are met with adversity. The major benefit to this, would be that players would have an additional option to add more personality to their online character. As Freakyfenton…
Agreed, but I am also focusing on the movements of the characters as well. The vixen stance provides certain ones that would allow for a better customization of the character.
They make new content every freakin month LOL. You vote NO, but you say YES only if it can be worked into the game. Why didn't you just say yes, but provide your feedback in the thread?
This is literally not much to put up as a defense as to why inclusion should be put on hold. Especially since there is a population within this game, that is also "being put on hold". All games have bugs, and will continue to have bugs. They crawl out from the coding at any point.. I make funny. As you just said as well,…
If they do lifetimers would have an advantage potentially. But if it has to be done, why not? As it stands people who create LGBTQ+ heroes are forced to use the female model, and alter them. Even with alterations, they appear odd and inaccurate to the body of a hero they are trying to emulate within the game. They are also…
I doubt each stance/movement/walk would have to be redone in order to add in a stance that is already coded in the game, for the male characters. Also the word impossible was not used, so it is something that could be done. It is something that would show progression, and would likely increase the player base, albeit for a…
If they put the effort in, I am sure the pay off would be a great benefit to them. Especially since MMOS like Final Fantasy, which are subscription based, are catering with same gender marriage. This would however be at their advantage, because no other MMO is fully catering to the feminine members of the LGBTQ+ community.…