test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Other Things To Do While Waiting Out OMs

Due to the new OM features, every knows that having more than 10 per OM is a really, really bad idea. This means, it is nearly impossible to do the 3 OMs to open Eido with team numbers between 11 and 23. In some very rare cases, it might be possible to do it with some number between 15 and 23, but only if you have a very high percentage of top-tier players that can do an Om with very few combatants (I have been on a team that did Slug with 5, so it is possible).

But, to be realistic, there are two effective ways to complete the OMs and open Eido.
1) Have a small group (6-10) of powerful players run the three OMs one after another.
2) Have three groups of 8-10 each do all 3 simultaneously. For this, you need 6 tanks and at least 3 healers. Then, once Eido is open, you end up with too many tanks and possibly too many healers.

After significant testing, it has been determined that the first method is much more likely to succeed. I've been on any number of runs like the second method because one or more of the groups failed. Whereas about 90 percent of the first method succeeds, and only fails if unscheduled people show up.

One of the main issues with the second method is that, when one group finishes quickly, they tend to go try to "help" one of the slower groups. This, of course, results in that OM ramping way up, well above whatever help any of the individuals brings. This inevitably leads to screaming and failure.

One of the main benefits to the former method is that it frees everyone else up to do whatever. My recommendation is to do Alerts or QWZ Dailies or OV Dailies or UNITY. Or just hang around in Caprice for a bit. The cool thing is, if there are several people waiting around in QWZ for Eido, it will be a good time to team up and do the QWZ dailies! However, If you do decide to do that, please remember to stay away from the OM areas, so as not to slow the progress. Heck, you could even level up a new character.

Then, once Eido is opened up, you can come and just finish that off and get your GCR. Works out great for everyone.
- - - - -
SIGNATURE:
Used to be coach on the forums. Still @coach in game.
«13

Comments

  • jaazaniah1jaazaniah1 Posts: 5,543 Arc User
    Doing Qzone dailies while killing time has the potential to interfere with the people trying to unlock Eido since the OMs are in the same areas as the dailies. Maybe the Devs can set up some card tables or a Caprice branch at the base so we can have something to do while we wait to be able to play?

    Or, maybe the devs can put some more thought into this so that Option 1 (elite death squad) isn't the only relatively manageable way to unlock Edio?
    JwLmWoa.png
    Perseus, Captain Arcane, Tectonic Knight, Pankration, Siberiad, Sekhmet, Black Seraph, Clockwork
    Project Attalus: Saving the world so you don't have to!
  • lezard21lezard21 Posts: 1,510 Arc User


    Or, maybe the devs can put some more thought into this so that Option 1 (elite death squad) isn't the only relatively manageable way to unlock Edio?

    I....agree with this?

    No, seriously, this is something to take notes of. One of the reason why the second method doesn't happen very frequently (aside from the fact that coordinating is a ****) is because 6 tanks and 3 healers are needed, and once the fight with Eido is unlocked, only 1-3 tanks are needed. So the extra tanks have to either switch to another toon quickly enough so as not to get locked out from the zone, or join the fight knowing that they won't be contributing much potentially.

    Suggestion: Well, it's a bit late now because the fight was already designed around a core mechanic that would be hard to rework now, but Eidolon could summon a Shadow or sth around a certain point in the battle that would require some extra tanks to take apart from the group so that it doesn't gib everyone (Kinda like Teleiosaurus Hatchling). This way, both the OMs and the Eido fight require more or less the same number of roles and are more seamlessly integrated with each other.

    Of course, the way the fight is designed to flow currently, this would bring trouble with orbs spawning on a faraway offtank.

    Now if only we could have the orbs spawning on fixed locations independent of people mmmmm....
  • jaazaniah1jaazaniah1 Posts: 5,543 Arc User
    Or, simply roll back the recent change.

    I mean, the point of the change was to force players to simultaneously attack all 3 OMs (that was the intent all along). Well, it's been determined that that option is less viable than the elite death squad option, which takes down the 3 OMs one after the other, not simultaneously. Hmm, so we are back to doing them non-simultaneously, but the only difference is that it is the best players doing it, rather than including the not-quite-so-best players. In effect, the change did nothing except reduce the number of players who can meaningfully contribute to Phase 1 (OMs).

    Gotta say that the change really did not accomplish what the devs wanted, so why not roll it back rather than set up card tables at the base?
    JwLmWoa.png
    Perseus, Captain Arcane, Tectonic Knight, Pankration, Siberiad, Sekhmet, Black Seraph, Clockwork
    Project Attalus: Saving the world so you don't have to!
  • lezard21lezard21 Posts: 1,510 Arc User

    but the only difference is that it is the best players doing it, rather than including the not-quite-so-best players.

    This statement on the other hand I don't agree with.

    What is currently happening is that "the best players" as you put it are the ones that are doing the OMs while "the not-quite-so-best" players much rather wait to jump in on a free ride when they see "the best players" doing OMs, instead of, for example right now that none of said "best players" are online, attempting to form a raid and do the OMs by themselves.

    Sure the first times you will fail a lot. But so did "the best players", that's how they became "the best", by repetitiveness and trial and error.

    It's not currently a thing that "the best players" and the "not quite so best players" are both doing the OMs, but only the runs by "the best players" succeed. The "not quite so best players" are not attempting at all. That's where the problem lays.
  • jaazaniah1jaazaniah1 Posts: 5,543 Arc User
    Missing the actual main point though, and that is that the change didn't accomplish the stated goal of the devs, which was to force players to attack the 3 OMs simultaneously! It's easier to still do it in a sequence, for all the reasons you noted. If the change didn't accomplish the stated goal, why keep it? Sure, in time maybe more players will get to doing the 3 OMs successfully in sequence, but that still doesn't get the devs the stated goal of 3 simultaneous attacks. I don't see the point to keeping a failed mechanic.
    JwLmWoa.png
    Perseus, Captain Arcane, Tectonic Knight, Pankration, Siberiad, Sekhmet, Black Seraph, Clockwork
    Project Attalus: Saving the world so you don't have to!
  • lezard21lezard21 Posts: 1,510 Arc User
    If anything they should actually buff it harder to actually force the players solo raiding it to have to 3 raid it.

    Personally I do agree that the current way to buff it was bad, rushed and lazy. I would have much rather have the 2 other bosses start gaining scaling buffs after the first and 2nd OM are completed, like the FnI bosses do (like a stack per minute, and a 2nd stack per minute for the 3rd OM) so that it would be doable by a solo raid of 20 people but incredibly way more harder and challenging than if you had splitted; or have the other OMs gain reinforcement adds; or gain new mechanics (for example kill PG first, Oub and Slug now also have the Enervating Crystal mechanic, kill Slug next, now Oub has Ennervating Crystal and Confuse mechanic on top of all her other attacks); or each OM gives the other 2 a specific buff upon defeat (Kill Slug first the other 2 gain a huge buff to power, Kill Oub first the other 2 gain a huge buff to Hp, kill PG first the other 2 gain a huge buff to damage resistance); or be even lazier and reduce the time to complete each OM to 5 minutes instead of 10 while keeping the old stats.

    But if the current buff is the way the devs are gonna roll, then yeah, they need to buff it even more.
  • pwestolemynamepwestolemyname Posts: 978 Arc User
    lezard21 said:


    I....agree with this?

    Congrats on having the fastest closed thread ever in the history of CO. Waiting for this one to be locked.
    - - - - -
    SIGNATURE:
    Used to be coach on the forums. Still @coach in game.
  • pantagruel01pantagruel01 Posts: 7,091 Arc User
    Splitting up would work a lot better if the OMs were redesigned to allow single-tanking at low numbers. Changing the adds around would be the easiest way to do that -- make it so you can suppress them by just killing them all (increased respawn timer, and don't make them overly durable), and have the number of adds scale with player count. Three healers and three tanks isn't a horrible mix at Eido.
  • jaazaniah1jaazaniah1 Posts: 5,543 Arc User
    Not sure why it would be closed? Still relatively on topic and no one is insulting anyone. My first post, in particular, corrected a partial error in the OP, that doing Qzone dailies was a viable way to kill time in the Qzone while waiting for the death squad to finish, since other players being in the vicinity of the OMs can very much affect the success of the death squad by buffing the villains.
    JwLmWoa.png
    Perseus, Captain Arcane, Tectonic Knight, Pankration, Siberiad, Sekhmet, Black Seraph, Clockwork
    Project Attalus: Saving the world so you don't have to!
  • pantagruel01pantagruel01 Posts: 7,091 Arc User

    Not sure why it would be closed? Still relatively on topic and no one is insulting anyone. My first post, in particular, corrected a partial error in the OP, that doing Qzone dailies was a viable way to kill time in the Qzone while waiting for the death squad to finish, since other players being in the vicinity of the OMs can very much affect the success of the death squad by buffing the villains.

    Well, there are I think six subregions in the QZ, so you can do dailies in regions that don't have OMs (that only applies to the defeat horrors and part of the supply mission), regions that are already completed, or regions that won't be attempted for a bit.
  • jaazaniah1jaazaniah1 Posts: 5,543 Arc User
    I see your point, but that's also going to require some reasonable communication between the death squad and those killing time. E.g. every day there are missions at the worms, so the death squad would have to remember to give a shout out when they are about to move on to deal with Slug so that time killers know to clear out and or stay far away. But doing dailies there isn't quite casual either.
    JwLmWoa.png
    Perseus, Captain Arcane, Tectonic Knight, Pankration, Siberiad, Sekhmet, Black Seraph, Clockwork
    Project Attalus: Saving the world so you don't have to!
  • kaiserin#0958 kaiserin Posts: 3,193 Cryptic Developer
    Some thoughts:
    • Open missions were designed with the intent you'd bring a tank, a mezzer/offtank (for the ads), a healer and the rest dps/whatevs. Those respawning ads can be mezzed, and I haven't really seen people taking advantage of that.
    • Eidolon was intended to have 3~4 tanks (3 to split attacks, 1 as backup), 2~3 mezzers, 2~3 healers, and the rest dps/whatevs. Meaning that you shouldn't have to switch characters if you're tackling the OMs. This is currently not how teams are set up, and I do have some changes in the works for Eidolon, but they may take a little while longer due to the current pts updates being worked on and as I wait to get some tech ported into the game that will make certain aspects of his phases easier to make work on my end.
    • Eidolon will likely see some adjustments to rewards when we're able to roll out some changes to justify the extra amount of work it takes to get to him and defeat him.
    ​​
  • jaazaniah1jaazaniah1 Posts: 5,543 Arc User
    Thanks. It's encouraging to hear that problems are understood and that work is still being done. I actually like the idea of 3 teams. I do hope you are not intending to force real trinity like play; i.e. it would be nice if hybrids can make a positive contribution (not thinking of those who are in tank role, but shouldn't be).
    JwLmWoa.png
    Perseus, Captain Arcane, Tectonic Knight, Pankration, Siberiad, Sekhmet, Black Seraph, Clockwork
    Project Attalus: Saving the world so you don't have to!
  • pantagruel01pantagruel01 Posts: 7,091 Arc User
    edited February 2017
    kaizerin said:

    Some thoughts:

    • Open missions were designed with the intent you'd bring a tank, a mezzer/offtank (for the ads), a healer and the rest dps/whatevs. Those respawning ads can be mezzed, and I haven't really seen people taking advantage of that.
    Because the adds spawn in three separate locations, you need a tank to drag them all into a single location before you can practically mez them (wtb a CC power that allows you to lead your victims about) -- at which point you've got 2 tanks per OM. Also, there are 6 adds and area holds generally only hit 5 targets, and a non-tank trying to control the adds in Slug is gonna die horribly because they're SVs and they hit really really hard.
    kaizerin said:


    Eidolon was intended to have 3~4 tanks (3 to split attacks, 1 as backup), 2~3 mezzers, 2~3 healers, and the rest dps/whatevs. Meaning that you shouldn't have to switch characters if you're tackling the OMs.
    As long as the challenge of Eido is dominated by dps checks (kill green crystals before they kill everyone, kill portals before they mess up dealing with a subsequent green or red) you're going to want to skimp on everything that isn't DPS.
  • > @lezard21 said:
    > What is currently happening is that "the best players" as you put it are the ones that are doing the OMs while "the not-quite-so-best" players much rather wait to jump in on a free ride when they see "the best players" doing OMs, instead of, for example right now that none of said "best players" are online, attempting to form a raid and do the OMs by themselves.

    FWIW, yes well your are offline and not there players do and have attempted OM. Some organized, some zergy. Fairly sure they've not even intended to unlocked Eldy yet, mostly playing OM.

    As for waiting for the free ride, 'best players' hardly have their hands clean of poor behavior with respect to their own made up cosmic rule. But that's another fight for another thread. Most people just want to play the dumb game, that's OM an Eldy.

    > @kaizerin said:
    > * Eidolon will likely see some adjustments to rewards when we're able to roll out some changes to justify the extra amount of work it takes to get to him and defeat him.

    *Big Stop Sign* Wrong direction IMO, problem isn't Eldy (well there's problems there too), problem is OM (changes, as well as players attitudes). Like @pantagruel01 pointed out the 'watevs', scaling and players-being-jerks (to put it nicely) really don't mix.

    Better rewards only make the current situation worse with the elitism to unlock Eld.

    Not sure how fine the scaling can be but I'll propose a SS like DR curve for player size, rather than linear.

    0-5: No scaling same as 10 man, or even reverse penalty if this is truly a 10 man job (if we can't play you can't either rule?)
    6-10: Neutral, no per person change
    10-15: Very light scaling, make room for whatevs, new people, oddballs, and tourists
    15-20: About Current scaling (or a bit less)
    20-30: The no you can't do them 1 by 1 scaling to unlock, but OM is playable.

    Prevents 30 man rush, allows for desired 3 way split, allows for leeway with 15 man (1 then split to 2), puts needed wiggle room in game design (too much math, not enough flexibility-playability), tempers death squad.
  • kamokamikamokami Posts: 1,633 Arc User
    kaizerin said:

    Some thoughts:

    • Open missions were designed with the intent you'd bring a tank, a mezzer/offtank (for the ads), a healer and the rest dps/whatevs. Those respawning ads can be mezzed, and I haven't really seen people taking advantage of that.
    • Eidolon was intended to have 3~4 tanks (3 to split attacks, 1 as backup), 2~3 mezzers, 2~3 healers, and the rest dps/whatevs. Meaning that you shouldn't have to switch characters if you're tackling the OMs. This is currently not how teams are set up, and I do have some changes in the works for Eidolon, but they may take a little while longer due to the current pts updates being worked on and as I wait to get some tech ported into the game that will make certain aspects of his phases easier to make work on my end.
    • Eidolon will likely see some adjustments to rewards when we're able to roll out some changes to justify the extra amount of work it takes to get to him and defeat him.
    ​​
    Sounds exciting!

    I would say that getting all those roles in place is relatively rare and takes quite a bit of waiting and cat herding on the organizational side. So it doesn't happen much. If the design intends for that level of organization and wait time then ok. Just so you know..that's what's happening.

    It'd be great if there was some way to help on the organizing side. Could the private queue system from rampages be used for each OM?
  • lezard21lezard21 Posts: 1,510 Arc User
    kaizerin said:

    Some thoughts:

    • Open missions were designed with the intent you'd bring a tank, a mezzer/offtank (for the ads), a healer and the rest dps/whatevs. Those respawning ads can be mezzed, and I haven't really seen people taking advantage of that.
    • ​​
    Pretty sure that Slug's High Annelids cannot be mezzed at all. Maybe this was changed in a recent patch? But also Panta's statement stands true:

    - Most Mezzes are AoE, max target of 5, there are 6 adds per OM
    - If the intention is to mezz targets one by one with single target mezzes, you are asking for a very very veeeeeeeeeeery specific Tank CCer build that would only be useful for this particular situation.

  • lezard21lezard21 Posts: 1,510 Arc User
    edited February 2017


    Not sure how fine the scaling can be but I'll propose a SS like DR curve for player size, rather than linear.

    OMs already scale that way. 0-10th player add 100-200k each, 11th~12th player add 400k, 13+ player add 500k each, haven't checked how much it scales for bigger teams.

    I mean, there is a very valid reason as to why the curve gets so steep with players past 10, and it's cause of the number of debuffs the boss will get. A theoretical team of 15 people all with DPS around the 2.5k mark could burn through all OMs, but you will never find such homogenous group, not even within "Elite" players.
  • spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    edited February 2017
    I actually saw option 3 work a few times:

    3) One group starts at slug, one group starts at oub, whoever finishes first does pb


    I dunno, it's almost like you just gotta work with what you have and not limit yourself to one way of doing things O3o
    lezard21 said:


    - Most Mezzes are AoE, max target of 5, there are 6 adds per OM
    - If the intention is to mezz targets one by one with single target mezzes, you are asking for a very very veeeeeeeeeeery specific Tank CCer build that would only be useful for this particular situation.



    Last boss in TA has 6 adds and I've managed to have all of them mezzed at once without even having a single target CC. This other guy I knew managed to keep them all CC'd while he was the healer with no off tank. So, it's likely quite possible.
  • > @lezard21 said:
    > Not sure how fine the scaling can be but I'll propose a SS like DR curve for player size, rather than linear.
    >
    > OMs already scale that way. 0-10th player add 100-200k each, 11th~12th player add 400k, 13+ player add 500k each, haven't checked how much it scales for bigger teams.
    >
    > I mean, there is a very valid reason as to why the curve gets so steep with players past 10, and it's cause of the number of debuffs the boss will get. A theoretical team of 15 people all with DPS around the 2.5k mark could burn through all OMs, but you will never find such homogenous group, not even within "Elite" players.

    So partially miss informed / can't math (hard to do live with people running in/out). But what I was typing is essentially shifted 1 easier than scaling you provided.
    0-10: 0 [acts as 10 man] / 11-13 200k / 14-16 400k / 17+ OMG

    A small issue with duffs tipping at 14 vs 10, (I'm balancing to a different player-base than devs are sadly) but the +1 GCR for Eldy isn't worth the stupidity-drama the OM scaling/players created. Either way a pointless attempt for less drama and spazzing out, and too optimistic to co-ordinate into 2 separate groups.

    Thinking late last night the more likely successful option to be able to actually play the zone a total nuke:

    Eldy - reduced to 4 hour zone cosmic boss. We can put a RNG QWZ boss in front of him if he needs a timer, but then fail cool down is reduced. Timer accounts for the extra +1 GCR

    OM - 10 to 20 man Rampage style OM. Daily gives 1GCR or if fancy some new QWZ token for use to buy BOE QWZ gear for your alts or sell to players to not be naked at cosmics. (Sadly won't happen cause they'll loose merc gear money). Large # QWZ tokens = 1 rampage token? Plus random drops + Q at OM.
  • mithrosnomoremithrosnomore Posts: 521 Arc User
    spinnytop said:

    I actually saw option 3 work a few times:

    3) One group starts at slug, one group starts at oub, whoever finishes first does pb


    I dunno, it's almost like you just gotta work with what you have and not limit yourself to one way of doing things O3o

    This seems like it would have been the obvious way to go.

    Way back when we were splitting up with one group doing PG, another doing Slug, then joining up at Oubliette.

    This is basically a variation of that with the difference being that they never meet at the third OM. The first one done just does the third OM while the others wait.

    But I have not taken part in any Eidolon attempt, never mind takedown, since the changes.

    Only been online while one or two were attempted.
    It really seems to have dried up from where it was before I took my month+ hiatus.

    =============

    All that said, it still seems like it is pushing people towards "You guys do nothing and do not unlock the perks for defeating PG, Slug, or Oubliette. Leave that to these specific people/characters that have defeated them many times in the past because we trust them and do not have the patience for anyone else's failures".

    Because there are some people that I just can not see sitting around in the Q Warzone for long if those other players struggle with the OMs.
  • pantagruel01pantagruel01 Posts: 7,091 Arc User
    spinnytop said:

    I actually saw option 3 work a few times:

    3) One group starts at slug, one group starts at oub, whoever finishes first does pb

    It does work, as long as both groups are able to finish their respective OM. The problem is that making sure both groups have all necessary roles and know what they're doing is fairly time consuming, and the more people you have the higher the probability of someone going Leeroy Jenkins and screwing everything up (for example, the last time I did this, while we were trying to get organized someone started Oubliette, despite people telling them not to do it).
  • pwestolemynamepwestolemyname Posts: 978 Arc User
    kaizerin said:

    Some thoughts:

    • Open missions were designed with the intent you'd bring a tank, a mezzer/offtank (for the ads), a healer and the rest dps/whatevs. Those respawning ads can be mezzed, and I haven't really seen people taking advantage of that.
    • Eidolon was intended to have 3~4 tanks (3 to split attacks, 1 as backup), 2~3 mezzers, 2~3 healers, and the rest dps/whatevs. Meaning that you shouldn't have to switch characters if you're tackling the OMs. This is currently not how teams are set up, and I do have some changes in the works for Eidolon, but they may take a little while longer due to the current pts updates being worked on and as I wait to get some tech ported into the game that will make certain aspects of his phases easier to make work on my end.
    • Eidolon will likely see some adjustments to rewards when we're able to roll out some changes to justify the extra amount of work it takes to get to him and defeat him.
    ​​
    This may have been the intent of the character makeup, but it turns out that these are pretty much the absolute worst character mixes possible.

    For OMs, the prime group is 1 main tank, 1 offtank, 1 healer and 2+ DPS.

    The vast majority of mezzers cannot handle adds because 1) there's too many, and 2) they spawn too far apart and 3) If one guy gets loose from the mezz, he can squash the mezzer in one hit. The the real problem 4) is that a mezzer cannot "pull" mobs. Look at PG. Mobs spawn very far apart and then immediately head towards PG or the closes DPS/Healer. Mezzing stops them where they stand. That would mean mobs standing all over the place. And if any were ever accidentally hit, they would wake up. Without aggro control, a mezzer cannot place the mobs where necessary. Of course, if we had any useful powers like "Wormhole" this might be a problem we could manage, but we don't. Conversely, an off-tank can tag them with aggro, turtle up and pull them off to the side where they aren't in the way. That latter tactic is so far much better than the former that it is just preposterous to even suggest it.

    For Eddy, the above suggested team make-up is just literally insane. From lots of experience, you need 1 or 2 tanks, *maybe* if they suck. But, then again, if you have sucky tanks, it doesn't really matter how many you have, you're just gonna wipe eventually, anyway, or they'll lose aggro.

    What in Odin's name would you do with 3 mezzers? Maaaaaaaybe 2, but really only 1. Their only real use is they mezz the shadow crystals to slow down the healing. The rest of the time, they basically stand around not contributing much. Whee. The Shadow Crystals can easily be mezzed by 1 person. 2-3 healzors, yeah, that's actually about right.

    But NONE of that is the issue. I mean, if people need to swap toons to go from OMs to Eddy, it's not that much of a big deal. The real issue is coordination. It turns out to be nearly impossible to coordinate people from across the zone. For whatever reason, only a minuscule percent of the participants pay any attention to what is going on. This is, of course, because the rest of the game is a solo-lovers faceroll. It has become clear that there is no intent to fix that, so we end up with this situation.

    Basically, without revamping the entire game to be a cooperative team-based system, nothing will fix the problem. Rolling it back to where it was more doable by everyone, that, at least, would allow everyone to participate. Maybe reduce the awards in that case. Otherwise, it is going to be much more efficient to let the elite death-squad clear out the OMs and then invite everyone to partake in Eddy (much to my chagrin).
    - - - - -
    SIGNATURE:
    Used to be coach on the forums. Still @coach in game.
  • rtmartma Posts: 1,198 Arc User
    edited February 2017
    Thumbs up to the post removal (/sarcasm) and failing to grasp a joke, frigg'n brilliant.
    *Slow Claps sarcastically*

    Post edited by rtma on
    Want to get to know me a bit better, Click me and take a read of My Dragon Profile Page, it's a bit dated but still relevant.

    I take this quote from a review that I agree with.

    "customisation is so linear; everyone is after the optimal dps:survivability ratio with 0 reliance on other players = autonomous gameplay... Players don't need each other anymore... which in my opinion is a bad thing."
  • roughbearmattachroughbearmattach Posts: 4,784 Arc User
    lezard21 said:



    Pretty sure that Slug's High Annelids cannot be mezzed at all. Maybe this was changed in a recent patch? But also Panta's statement stands true:

    High Annelids cannot be mezzed. I've tried.

    The Elite Death Squad model is not the only way to work this, but it seems the easiest to organize, and has a high success rate.
    Basic behavioral economics would suggest that this strategy comes to dominate. The side effect is a pile of SCR for the death squad.

    Some changes would be nice to shake things up a bit.
    ___________________________________________________________

    Whoever you are, be that person one hundred percent. Don't compromise on your identity.
  • rtmartma Posts: 1,198 Arc User
    Elite Death Squad?
    Want to get to know me a bit better, Click me and take a read of My Dragon Profile Page, it's a bit dated but still relevant.

    I take this quote from a review that I agree with.

    "customisation is so linear; everyone is after the optimal dps:survivability ratio with 0 reliance on other players = autonomous gameplay... Players don't need each other anymore... which in my opinion is a bad thing."
  • mithrosnomoremithrosnomore Posts: 521 Arc User
    rtma said:

    Elite Death Squad?

    Yes.
    It's spoken of earlier in this thread.

    Basically a hand-picked team of 10 proven characters/players and that same small group goes out and beats all three OMs while the other 20 wait around and only join in for the actual Eidolon fight.
  • pantagruel01pantagruel01 Posts: 7,091 Arc User

    Basically a hand-picked team of 10 proven characters/players and that same small group goes out and beats all three OMs while the other 20 wait around and only join in for the actual Eidolon fight.

    Not quite. The other 20 aren't told about the attempt until Eidelon has been unlocked.

    It's one of the general problems with encounters that scale with the group size: adding a person adds power to your group, but also increases the power needed. If the increase in power needed is greater than the power that person adds, that person is a liability and should be excluded if possible. If you're a novice and don't know the fight, or have a limited character list and your role is already filled, you're almost certainly a net liability -- but the only way to become not a novice is practice, ideally along with people who already know the fight and can show you what to do.

    If the open mission scaling were less severe, there would be a lot more room to add people who are learning, but then you wind up with the roving death band of 30 people. You could cut down on that by, say, limiting how many people can get rewards, but the open mission scoring system is dubious enough that you'd almost certainly wind up excluding people who deserve credit (in particular, off-tank/CC tends to have low score relative to their value to the mission).
  • rtmartma Posts: 1,198 Arc User
    @pantagruel01 Sounds like segregation, I haven't played OM's since the scaling patch, is it really that bad that you're willing to exclude fellow players from participating?
    Want to get to know me a bit better, Click me and take a read of My Dragon Profile Page, it's a bit dated but still relevant.

    I take this quote from a review that I agree with.

    "customisation is so linear; everyone is after the optimal dps:survivability ratio with 0 reliance on other players = autonomous gameplay... Players don't need each other anymore... which in my opinion is a bad thing."
  • morigosamorigosa Posts: 710 Arc User
    It's really that bad. If you get twelve players showing up to OMs, you don't get Eidolon unlocked. If you get twenty players showing up to OMs, you don't get the OMs done at all because they start killing tanks.

    And, of course, that's looking at things from the perspective that Eidolon kills are the only important part; if you have a character that needs SCR, or is trying to get the OM perks... well, that's pretty much not going to happen anymore. The OM changes are pretty solidly bad all around.
  • aiqaaiqa Posts: 2,620 Arc User
    Yes it's really that bad. When there are numerous players that don't read chat or think that things like "no more players at Slug please" does not apply to them, the few people willing to organize will look to players and or groups that are willing to play as a team or at least follow directions.
  • spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    edited February 2017

    All that said, it still seems like it is pushing people towards "You guys do nothing and do not unlock the perks for defeating PG, Slug, or Oubliette. Leave that to these specific people/characters that have defeated them many times in the past because we trust them and do not have the patience for anyone else's failures".

    Well, one would hope that those players feel they are pushed towards getting better at the game so that they can be one of the people trusted to do the OMs. After all there are plenty of opportunities during the day to just go and do the OMs to practice them since they unlock fairly quickly after being beaten. They could go practice until they feel confident that they could do them, then when it comes time to unlock Eido just say "Hey we've been practicing, can we give it a shot?". From what I've seen the vets would be happy to let them do so.

    Conversely, vets could host some "grab a bunch of newbies and do a few rotations of OMs to get better at them" events since apparently vets are the only players with any motivation to actually do anything proactive u3u
  • pantagruel01pantagruel01 Posts: 7,091 Arc User
    edited February 2017
    Note: it is certainly possible to just get your own group together and run the open missions. If you aren't trying to unlock the Eidelon, the open missions are still tough, but you don't need an Elite Death Squad because you've got 10 minutes to beat the boss instead of under 5.

    Hm. Ponder running open training; have a veteran or two and the rest public, with no expectation of unlocking Eidolon or even winning the OMs.
  • lezard21lezard21 Posts: 1,510 Arc User
    morigosa said:

    if you have a character that needs SCR, or is trying to get the OM perks... well, that's pretty much not going to happen anymore. The OM changes are pretty solidly bad all around.

    Actually this is wrong. In fact, now more than ever if you have a character that needs OM perks or SCR it is more likely to happen than prepatch.

    Before you would gather a team to farm OMs, stating beforehand that the objective was to farm OMs and only OMs, and you accidentally ended up unlocking Eido, and everyone would leave to bash their heads against Eido for 1 hour and fail, after which point interest in farming OMs would have died.

    Right now there is absolutely nothing stopping people from announcing a group for OM farming in Cosmic Chat, since as the people above me have stated, you have 10 minutes as opposed to 4, and can even spare to bring an extra healer to be safer.

    Hell, you don't even have to assemble a huge team. Yesterday just for shits and giggles we decided to tackle Slug with a team of 5 people: tank (Me), offtank, healer and 2 DPS. It took us around 6 mins but despite having run Slug a thousand times already, running it with such a little team allowed me to pay more attention (and actually be able to see due to not being covered in ten thousand skills FX) to Slug's attack pattern and find some neat tells to it's attacks (need to update guide with this).

    Unlike Cosmics, the OMs are always up for practice runnings due to their short cooldowns.
  • jaazaniah1jaazaniah1 Posts: 5,543 Arc User
    It's kind of like Kiga. Sure, once the dogs are all killed you can keep them under control without a dog ccer by using 4 tanks and at least several healers, but it is so much more efficient to have a dog ccer there. Players will always aim for what is easieist.


    The Elite Death Squad model is not the only way to work this, but it seems the easiest to organize, and has a high success rate.
    Basic behavioral economics would suggest that this strategy comes to dominate. The side effect is a pile of SCR for the death squad.

    JwLmWoa.png
    Perseus, Captain Arcane, Tectonic Knight, Pankration, Siberiad, Sekhmet, Black Seraph, Clockwork
    Project Attalus: Saving the world so you don't have to!
  • spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User

    Note: it is certainly possible to just get your own group together and run the open missions. If you aren't trying to unlock the Eidelon, the open missions are still tough, but you don't need an Elite Death Squad because you've got 10 minutes to beat the boss instead of under 5.

    ^ solution for anyone with the "But I need the X kills of Y OM perk!" problem. Just get a group together and do it whenever. If you don't feel like even putting that much effort in then oh well.
  • roughbearmattachroughbearmattach Posts: 4,784 Arc User
    I agree with the idea of "just organize your own groups", "there is plenty of Eidolon and OMs to go around".

    It just isn't happening that way. Organizing a group takes a skill not all possess. Also, there is simply the convenience factor of logging in, poking around, and joining a run in progress.

    It is possible that vets running this mission will tire of others hopping in and taking spaces, wrecking a run, or being the only ones to organize. If that happens, maybe the mission will change again in some way.

    It is also possible that more folks could figure out the mission and organize runs themselves. That is what happened with Kiga, Telei, and Qwijy.

    Guess we'll see.
    ___________________________________________________________

    Whoever you are, be that person one hundred percent. Don't compromise on your identity.
  • pantagruel01pantagruel01 Posts: 7,091 Arc User

    It is possible that vets running this mission will tire of others hopping in and taking spaces, wrecking a run, or being the only ones to organize.

    The way that would manifest is unannounced private runs...
  • roughbearmattachroughbearmattach Posts: 4,784 Arc User
    edited February 2017

    It is possible that vets running this mission will tire of others hopping in and taking spaces, wrecking a run, or being the only ones to organize.

    The way that would manifest is unannounced private runs...
    You, mean, manifest again as unannounced private runs. Or maybe, manifest as we speak.
    ___________________________________________________________

    Whoever you are, be that person one hundred percent. Don't compromise on your identity.
  • spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    When it comes to Eidelon, considering the timers involved, I think the phrase "what you don't know doesn't hurt you" generally sums up the "private run" situation, so I'm not particularly concerned about that. With the other 3 cosmics, "stealth runs" basically swoop in and snatch up the opportunity to do those things. With Eido that's not the case.

    I'm actually wondering... if "the vets" just stopped announcing eido runs wholesale, would the rest of the population start doing their own runs?
  • pantagruel01pantagruel01 Posts: 7,091 Arc User
    spinnytop said:

    I'm actually wondering... if "the vets" just stopped announcing eido runs wholesale, would the rest of the population start doing their own runs?

    I've seen people try to organize Eido runs on Cosmic HQ. They're prone to failing. There may also be other groups that privately run the OMs; since they're private, I have no information about their success rate.
  • spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User
    Well sure, everything is prone to failing the first time someone tries it. My question wasn't if they would fail or not - my question was if they would actually start doing it regularly.
  • lezard21lezard21 Posts: 1,510 Arc User
    The main issue I see with learning runs was demonstrated today. Vixy and Foxi organized one, but at the first chance things didn't go nilly willy I started seeing people left. Learning runs are prone to fail, you learn from that failure.
  • pantagruel01pantagruel01 Posts: 7,091 Arc User
    Had a publicly recruited attempt on CHQ, which I joined in on. Ran all the OMs at least twice, failed once on slug. Never unlocked Eido, but people did get practice (I was offtanking, so they didn't get practice on that, but everything else yes).
  • mithrosnomoremithrosnomore Posts: 521 Arc User
    spinnytop said:

    Well sure, everything is prone to failing the first time someone tries it. My question wasn't if they would fail or not - my question was if they would actually start doing it regularly.

    Some people will try and try again no matter the outcome.
    They will be willing to work towards the goal and not worry so much about whether it happens now or not.

    But a lot of people?
    They want the payoff.
    They may be willing to come along for this run and that run, but after a while the interest will drop.

    That will vary from person to person, but everyone that has been involved in cosmic hunting for any time at all has seen the sort of thing that can happen.

    =============

    It's funny in a sense that success breeds impatience, but it is true.

    It varies from person to person, but as people learn what is "supposed" to happen they get more and more frustrated when it doesn't.

    So the OMs?

    Some amount of vets might get out there and try to teach folks, and some may become "vets" themselves, but how long will they stick it out when things go poorly?

    How many times will they tell people to block if they are rooted before Oubliette heals one time too many?
    How many times will they tell people to take out the mind worms before deciding that they have died one time too many?
    How many times will they accept that extra people came into the area raising the difficulty of the fight? And this could be anything from over-eager people wanting to learn the fights to people just passing through for their own reasons.

    And with no chance at getting to the Eidolon himself (or no real chance of success if they do happen to unlock him)?

    I think for many people the patience will run out sooner rather than later.

    And I am not putting myself above anyone here.
    I think I am reasonably patient in most regards, certainly involving the game.
    I have no problem beating my head against some walls as long as I feel the attempts are being done in earnest.

    But that Qwyjibo mess last night?
    I was standing on a hillside, and had been for a while, when the call went out looking for Eidolon fighters last night and I was all too happy to leave.

    I had zero reason to believe that there was any success to be had, I had "taught" all that I could teach but it seemed some people refused to learn, and was at a point where I felt that people just had to be trolling because there was no good explanation for the amount of stupid happening in that fight otherwise.

    And there will no doubt be the same sort of thing happening in these training runs, where a few people can mess them up for everyone.

    What may end up being trained is that the fights are too much trouble to bother with.
  • spinnytopspinnytop Posts: 16,450 Arc User

    What may end up being trained is that the fights are too much trouble to bother with.

    If this is what someone learns, then they're the kind of person we benefit from not having there more than likely, so I'm fine with that outcome. After all, we're not desperate for people to show up - when anyone does these training runs it is literally out of the goodness of their heart and in the spirit of building the community.

    Personally I think your horror story of 'mass give up' is a bit melodramatic. I have my doubts that it would be quite as apocalyptic as that. After all, I'm sure there's at least 20 people out there who aren't classified as vets who just play this game to have fun, don't really take it that seriously, and are up to a challenge - and those people would find each other in the process ( and I think there's likely more than 20 ). The huffy pants would do what they usually do - run away and eventually return when things are smooth again, being of little consequence in the process.
  • roughbearmattachroughbearmattach Posts: 4,784 Arc User
    spinnytop said:



    If this is what someone learns, then they're the kind of person we benefit from not having there more than likely, so I'm fine with that outcome. After all, we're not desperate for people to show up - when anyone does these training runs it is literally out of the goodness of their heart and in the spirit of building the community.

    I agree with this sentiment, though sometimes I wish it weren't true. It's the reality, though.
    ___________________________________________________________

    Whoever you are, be that person one hundred percent. Don't compromise on your identity.
  • jaazaniah1jaazaniah1 Posts: 5,543 Arc User
    I guess I wonder how the devs measure the success of their developments for CO? E.g., just to pick some arbitrary numbers, lets say there are 15 players who show up regularly to try the OMs (I'm not counting the dailies here) and another 5-10 who join in now and then. Is that considered enough participation to justify the amount of dev time that gets put into this content? Would it have to be 30 regular participants, more? If they don't see the desired participation rates after they are done tweaking content do they scratch plans to expand that content (as seems to have happened with OVs), or to replicate the experiment by creating another zone, and decide move on to something that will be more successful (meaning a certain number of people participating in said content)?

    At the end of the day they are, I assume, trying to create content to both draw in and retain customers who put some money into the game. Is the Qzone helping to do that? If not, do they tweak it to make it in some way more desirable for more people to play there? I don't know. If, say, 20 people do Qzone regularly, is that enough to justify additional development there, or similar content elsewhere? These are just things I wonder about.
    JwLmWoa.png
    Perseus, Captain Arcane, Tectonic Knight, Pankration, Siberiad, Sekhmet, Black Seraph, Clockwork
    Project Attalus: Saving the world so you don't have to!
  • avianosavianos Posts: 6,178 Arc User
    This is a really sad state that the Warzone turned into​​
    POWERFRAME REVAMPS, NEW POWERS and BUG FIXES > Recycled Content and Events and even costumes at this point Introvert guy who use CO to make his characters playable and get experimental with Viable FF Theme builds! Running out of Unique FF builds due to the lack of updates and synergies! Playing since 1 February 2011 128 + Characters (21 ATs, 107 FFs) ALTitis for Life!
  • mithrosnomoremithrosnomore Posts: 521 Arc User
    edited February 2017
    spinnytop said:

    What may end up being trained is that the fights are too much trouble to bother with.

    If this is what someone learns, then they're the kind of person we benefit from not having there more than likely, so I'm fine with that outcome. After all, we're not desperate for people to show up - when anyone does these training runs it is literally out of the goodness of their heart and in the spirit of building the community.

    Personally I think your horror story of 'mass give up' is a bit melodramatic. I have my doubts that it would be quite as apocalyptic as that. After all, I'm sure there's at least 20 people out there who aren't classified as vets who just play this game to have fun, don't really take it that seriously, and are up to a challenge - and those people would find each other in the process ( and I think there's likely more than 20 ). The huffy pants would do what they usually do - run away and eventually return when things are smooth again, being of little consequence in the process.
    And then yesterday happened.

    Advertising in zone, advertising in Cosmic HQ. Trying to put together teams for the OMs.

    Hey, I had nothing better to do, so sure, I'll join in.

    So the person that took lead decided that five was the number.
    Even though the real buffing doesn't happen until after the 11th person appears, they wanted five at Oubliette and five at Slug, with whoever got finished first to go on to PG. Considering the poor turnout, deciding to go at five wasn't bad unto itself, but we'll get back to that in a bit.

    So we eventually get the right mix. Two tanks, a healer, and two DPS at each location.

    One of those players says "I just want Slug and Eidolon for the perks/unlocks, but I am not very good".

    So what does this "leader", doing things "out of the kindness of their heart" say?

    "Well, if you aren't good enough then you'll just have to leave the zone and make room for someone else" or something very close to that.

    What the heck is that nonsense? How is that "building community"?

    And then two people show up after the Oubliette fight started and the "leader" is telling them to go away. That they have to leave.
    Now that only made seven and the fight is going on with the timer counting down, and I was laying in the dirt at that time. I figured "no harm, I'll leave, and there will still only be six of them", but even that wasn't good enough.
    I'm all the way back at base, two other people were right there, but the "leader" is telling me to come back. What was wrong with one (or both) of those other DPSers?

    By then round 1 had pretty much failed though, so I decided that for round 2 I would go to Slug.
    You even showed up for that and tanked everything but we ended up running out of time.

    Might have been nice to have had some extra DPS. You know? Person 6-10 that the "leader" was hell-bent on chasing away.

    That whole thing yesterday reeked of "You noobs stay out. The leets will let you know when you are allowed to participate".

    But with the sort of people skills (or lack thereof) demonstrated by the "leader", I do not know how many others would have been around to join in for the Eidolon.
    But hey, maybe other folks from Cosmic_HQ would have come running at that point, right?

    Shame there weren't more trying to help (and maybe helping try to moderate the "leader") with the OMs, though.

    If a few extra bodies with name recognition, even if not one of the "leets" would have shown at Slug and Oubliette saying that 10 and under was fine, that they did not have to limit the fight to five, it might have helped a lot.
Sign In or Register to comment.