test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Pvp System - Open World Pvp System

Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
edited October 2013 in General Discussion (PC)
Hello Guy's,

Just a little topic about PVP again. If there is to have open world pvp, what do you think the best system would be ?

Here is an example of a great system, in my point of view:

- Notoriety System. You have for example, 5 kills before to be flagged red ( murderer ) and then you can not enter town. ( That is where a housing system is great, or guild keep ).
-Your kill count can go away if you defend town from a great threat ( example ). Lich attack town, you help the militia so if give your notoriety point.

- Kill count goes away with time etc...

Please suggest here, don't talk about anything else.

OJ
Post edited by Archived Post on
«1345678

Comments

  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    well guild keeps would be funny and open world PvP funny at times also, think about assassin guild/murderer guild. overall i am actually slightly interested about your idea
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    I'm strongly against to any system that allows PK's. Let PvP be only duels or Arena, but since classes have roles like defender, striker, controller, leader - I would prefer only group vs group in the Arena.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    That's the UO system or the old system. And considering how easily people could cheese it. Finally, open world PvP is unlikely to happen. Best you can expect is Arena style PvP. This is not a sandbox game.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    Don't get me wrong, I still prefer that Arena thing but it would sound cool :P
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    PvP in this game is not going to be good because it simply was not developed with PvP in mind. It wasn't on the table at all a year ago, now it is but won't even make it to release. So the mediocre PvP needs to be confined to arenas because you'd ruin the entire game by foisting a bad version of open world PvP onto people retroactively.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    I would prefer a realm type of pvp where there is an area where guilds can setup towns or keeps and other guilds can war with them. That way if you go there you can expect pvp where as if you stay out of that zone or zones then you don't have to pvp.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    Arena PvP or BG systems is a joke. There is a need for open world PvP in a mmorpg. It is not even a question to be asked. There should be non pvp server and pvp server to fit the need of everyone.

    BUT in a PvP server, restriction to BGs and Duel is totally..... WoWish, familly value, non competitive, non interesting.

    Please only suggest about systems. If you are against PvP, go in a non PvP server.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    In MMORPG maybe there is, but not in a group/cooperation centered game like Neverwinter with strict class divisions. Not to mention high level players going after low level players.

    WOW is an open world PVP with its faction system.

    PK's are simply not worth it. It's frustrating, annoying and no-fun.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    Qumi wrote: »
    In MMORPG maybe there is, but not in a group/cooperation centered game like Neverwinter with strict class divisions. Not to mention high level players going after low level players.

    WOW is an open world PVP with its faction system.

    PK's are simply not worth it. It's frustrating, annoying and no-fun.

    Ye i never myself bothered to play WoW *that* much but i remember when my friends raged when they were in Outlands and then there came something like 80level druid and killed him when he was doing quests and then that alliance member started to hunt him :D
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    grummush wrote: »
    Arena PvP or BG systems is a joke. There is a need for open world PvP in a mmorpg. It is not even a question to be asked. There should be non pvp server and pvp server to fit the need of everyone.

    BUT in a PvP server, restriction to BGs and Duel is totally..... WoWish, familly value, non competitive, non interesting.

    Please only suggest about systems. If you are against PvP, go in a non PvP server.

    The only game that open world PvP can even be called successful is EVE Online and that's kept in check because there are a lot of checks and balances. Every other game that has focused heavily on PvP and PK style gameplay has failed utterly, so saying there is a need for it seems to be a huge misnomer.

    I'm sorry, but that's pretty much the facts.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    OK, here is another take on open pvp...
    Considering its a post-apocalyptic world where spellplague is rampant, and every area is dangerous with abominations, only safe place being city walls - think about the morale of residents when they see adventurers backstabbing each other instead of co-operating and saving people.
    Why would they give you quests?
    And you think the Mayor of cities would allow you to brandish weapons and terrorize the citizens in such a world where human (and others) co-operation is necessary ... sheesh.
    I would say its better if you are thrown out of city for even brandishing weapons unless city is under attack!
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    I do not care if they have PvP servers BUT I do not want them on my server nor do I want see what I've seen in other PvE games.

    To "BALANCE" PvP they screwup PvE. :eek:

    If you perceive another class has an advantage then play that class and do not scream "NERF". :mad:
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    I do realise that alot of you don't want PvP since...obviously...you aren't good at it and don't like to be annoyed while you do your quests and have your own fun! AND i do respect that.

    But there is a big potential here to bring the other part of the MMORPG community and make servers with GREAT pvp system to make it a GREAT game for everyone.

    I don't think the debate should be about: Is it a coop game or not. MMORPG aren't coop game where you log into a LAN and play with your friends. It is about having a dynamic world where stuff happen.

    As i said before, IF there is to have world PVP, there will be non PVP servers so you will have YOUR fun also. But i can tell you that, the other part of MMORPG community want open world PvP, just because it give the games an aspect of competition and it make it more real.

    Trust me, in medieval times, you couldn't tell the warlord hunting you:' Hey this is a cooperative world, please leave me alone'. You had to fight for your life, for your familly and for your clan.

    Bringing a game closer to reality is simply, the right away to go. Because in the long run, when you finish the 'casette'. What will you do? Wait for expantion and farm for golds? .... Boring ..... Roleplay ? I love to roleplay, but without real social, economic, war implication, it is totally useless. I am not too much into writing poems.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    Zynk, i agree with you 100%.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    grummush wrote: »
    I do realise that alot of you don't want PvP since...obviously...you aren't good at it and don't like to be annoyed while you do your quests and have your own fun! AND i do respect that.

    But there is a big potential here to bring the other part of the MMORPG community and make servers with GREAT pvp system to make it a GREAT game for everyone.

    I don't think the debate should be about: Is it a coop game or not. MMORPG aren't coop game where you log into a LAN and play with your friends. It is about having a dynamic world where stuff happen.

    As i said before, IF there is to have world PVP, there will be non PVP servers so you will have YOUR fun also. But i can tell you that, the other part of MMORPG community want open world PvP, just because it give the games an aspect of competition and it make it more real.

    Trust me, in medieval times, you couldn't tell the warlord hunting you:' Hey this is a cooperative world, please leave me alone'. You had to fight for your life, for your familly and for your clan.

    Bringing a game closer to reality is simply, the right away to go. Because in the long run, when you finish the 'casette'. What will you do? Wait for expantion and farm for golds? .... Boring ..... Roleplay ? I love to roleplay, but without real social, economic, war implication, it is totally useless. I am not too much into writing poems.

    Sorry to say but to me that sounds like babbling of PvP freak, if they wont do PvP servers deal with it, play the game, dont play it. JUST WAIT
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    Grill - Yes yes sir Paladin. That is nice speech, thanks for thy theory and ideas. Now show me ya' golds or ya skilled tongue shall fall.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    grummush wrote: »
    I do realise that alot of you don't want PvP since...obviously...you aren't good at it and don't like to be annoyed while you do your quests and have your own fun! AND i do respect that.
    You assume a lot of things. Considering I am old UO PK hunter.
    But there is a big potential here to bring the other part of the MMORPG community and make servers with GREAT pvp system to make it a GREAT game for everyone.
    No, there isn't. Again, you have no precendent or even anything that proves your view correct. Everything that has focused on that facet has failed utterly. The only exception is EVE Online, which has a lot of checks and balances in place.
    I don't think the debate should be about: Is it a coop game or not. MMORPG aren't coop game where you log into a LAN and play with your friends. It is about having a dynamic world where stuff happen.
    You are discussing a sandbox. Neverwinter is not a sandbox game.
    As i said before, IF there is to have world PVP, there will be non PVP servers so you will have YOUR fun also. But i can tell you that, the other part of MMORPG community want open world PvP, just because it give the games an aspect of competition and it make it more real.
    There won't be multiple servers. Cryptic will undoubtedly continue what they've done and have one world server with many shards of specific zones to accommodate populations.
    Trust me, in medieval times, you couldn't tell the warlord hunting you:' Hey this is a cooperative world, please leave me alone'. You had to fight for your life, for your familly and for your clan.
    DnD is not a real life simulator.
    Bringing a game closer to reality is simply, the right away to go. Because in the long run, when you finish the 'casette'. What will you do? Wait for expantion and farm for golds? .... Boring ..... Roleplay ? I love to roleplay, but without real social, economic, war implication, it is totally useless. I am not too much into writing poems.

    No, it is not. A game is a game. Reality is reality. One is meant to entertain, the other is what you live in. People play games to escape, have fun, and not feel stress or pressure. Real life is where you live and take care of things.

    You can try to state stuff, but DnD is not and never has been a PvP game. At best, an arena will be placed in. At most for open world you can expect is duels. This is a theme park game first and foremost.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    I agree with you Silverspar!
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    A pvp freak ? Obviously i must admit i am a dungeons and dragons freak, a reality freak, someone who seek adrenaline. I will beat the game in about a week or two because obviously monsters are BOT and have no talents. So ya, i need an another dimension.... Sorry for asking for challenge ;)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    Its not that I am too much worried about pvp, as I will travel with friends and groups, so overall deficiencies of class would be balanced out and may be good in the long run to find that certain build.

    What I really worried about is the new players who will jump in and are unfamiliar with dnd. Those who know dnd and have player before, may pvp and discourage those people.
    Besides there are people who will be annoyed by pvp because they come here for rp, some may even have perma-death characters.
    Considering all such players, people who want OPEN pvp are quite the minority and such a thing would hurt the prospects of the game. I want NWO to be popular so that the world is alive ... I don't want it to be a place which is equivalent of Mortal Combat on console.
    The are other games which have better pvp. If you want to show your epeen-ness, show there instead of here, I would suggest.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    Silver something. NWN 2 best servers were the open world PVP servers. You can go check by yourself, they are the only one still alive.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    wow! A rage post generated so many replies. I have a feeling I have been trolled!
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    People who want open world PVP ARENT the minority, they are the majority. The difference is that they won't go on forum and express their interest of it. You have to attract most of them by challenging them differently then just saying, hey let's play AD&D ! What i like about this community yet is that it is non-trolling, great! But it seem that it doesnt want any challenge either........:eek:
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    gillrmn wrote:
    wow! A rage post generated so many replies. I have a feeling I have been trolled!

    Get used to it!
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    The problem I have is the fact NW will be 1 server for both PvE and PvP.

    Why do I think that? Because I play CO & STO.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    grummush wrote: »
    Silver something. NWN 2 best servers were the open world PVP servers. You can go check by yourself, they are the only one still alive.

    Wrong, for example Aeris is not an open pvp world and it works very well till today. Don't make up facts.

    Meh, let's just ignore this topic. There are plenty other PvP topics on the forum.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    grummush wrote: »
    Silver something. NWN 2 best servers were the open world PVP servers. You can go check by yourself, they are the only one still alive.

    Hyperbole doesn't prove your point, since the last I recalled, NWN 2 wasn't all that popular to begin with, compared to NWN 1. Again, I can easily prove this facet; How many MMOs are strictly PvP versus all the rest, and how successful are they? The real answer, they aren't very successful with most on the edge of death or already dead. EVE Online, again, is the only successful game on the market that offers that type of game play.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    Zynk wrote:
    The problem I have is the fact NW will be 1 server for both PvE and PvP.

    Why do I think that? Because I play CO & STO.

    Oh well that's too bad. I shall beat the game in a week and change for something else :P
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    grummush wrote: »
    People who want open world PVP ARENT the minority, they are the majority. The difference is that they won't go on forum and express their interest of it. You have to attract most of them by challenging them differently then just saying, hey let's play AD&D ! What i like about this community yet is that it is non-trolling, great! But it seem that it doesnt want any challenge either........:eek:

    ok this made me laugh. If this is true then Xsyon and Mortal online wouldn't be such failures.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 5,050,278 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2012
    Silverspar, i don't know where you are coming from or what experience you have with MMORPG but ... The best game to have ever existed were UO, dark age of camelot and EQ and let's not forget WOW ( wow was the most popular but not the greatest in my point of view ). And those game were all...hmm.... ;) YA ! PVP games. Except for EQ who was really freaking heavy on lore !!! Great old day's.
This discussion has been closed.