test content
Logo
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Howdy, Stranger!
purplegamer Arc User
Reactions
Comments
-
You will explore strange new worlds, pay PWE for the privilege, and you will like it.
-
Cryptic is on autopilot with this game; you can almost feel the burn-out.
-
This is STILL an issue. C'mon, we paid for these ships.
-
Confirmed. This is an issue.
-
I'm incredibly tired of persistent niggling bugs. It seems each time I come back to the game from a break, something new is broken on my paid-for ships--things that have no business being broken (like the port-side nacelle covers on the Avenger). My only regret is I couldn't vote for more than one option; this game has…
-
These forums are a design nightmare. Is this serious?
-
Indeed, but they were also better at developing meaningful content for all players. As time ticked by, I noticed a major shift in focus--including a substantial price hike for paid items.
-
There is no way to assure the validity of the reviews. What we can do is compare what is written to our own experiences, and if the two match up we can reasonably infer that there's some truth to what is being said. Regardless of the validity of any specific review, I do see a correlation between the experiences posted by…
-
Given that the Avenger is a 'paid' ship, you'd think this would be high on the priority list.
-
The quality control process at Cryptic is either broken or non-existent. This is a laughable oversight and if they aren't ashamed of themselves, they should be.
-
Cool, thanks! :)
-
"We're gonna change things. You've been warned." ... so what's changing, specifically?
-
There's a bug where the female Odyssey Long Coat matches the 'undershirt' color to the color of the coat itself. Conversely, the male Odyssey Long Coat undershirt is matched to the color of the stripe (which makes more sense).
-
The windows of the Avenger can be seen through the drop-down shields when it enters combat.
-
What does a 'product manager' do, exactly?
-
While the Steam statistics do not represent a quantitative majority, it's reasonable to think that they represent a qualitative assessment of general player behavior; that's not a small sample size by any stretch of the imagination.
-
Agreed. Seems there's a lack of principle here.
-
The highlighted line above (my edit) seems to suggest that the developers a) didn't know about the changes, b) did not know what effect the changes would have, or c) were forced into making the changes. This leaves only two possibilities: they're either lying or incompetent.
-
He's not anonymous. ;)
-
I had this happen at ESD and managed to stack the FX on another player by using my own ability.
-
The whales will disappear when there aren't enough krill around to impress with their massive size.
-
I think it has more to do with Cryptic's insistence on using an engine that is incapable of representing the IP with any meaningful fidelity.
-
My assertion has been pretty clear from the beginning, but you're welcome to keep trying to move the goal posts...
-
It's locked behind the pay wall. You need to spend more, brah.
-
No, I'm not going to agree to disagree because my assertion remains fact: a minority sample can represent a majority opinion. As stated, this is the entire premise for scientific polling--which can be conducted by both selected and random means. You're welcome to stop arguing, however. :P
-
Yet you can't prove your assertion in this specific case without resorting to your own anecdotal evidence. It simply doesn't hold up.
-
No, I don't agree. My premise remains unchallenged: a minority sample can represent majority opinion. Ever seen a scientific poll? ;)
-
Responses in green.
-
No, it's definitely a misconception and I'm starting to wonder if its willful. Since you're the one making an assertion, I'd kindly request that you cite your sources--specifically with regard to how you could possibly know the opinions expressed on the forum do not align with the majority of the wider community.