test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Dear devs, I know you won't but please think about giving us ...

zyinnia#9399 zyinnia Member Posts: 5 Arc User
The option to kill J'Ula in the end. She is evil and just as corrupt as J'mpok.

I would like the option to side with J'mpok instead of J'Ula after he steals her super-gun. I know he's evil but by the time that happens, with everything I've done, I feel like I would still side with J'mpok (at least initially). I know he's got to go. Eventually I do have to switch sides or stay out of that whole story line and somehow let it play out without me. The switch just happens way too soon for me.

For TOS (and possibly others) I need a mission that ends in me killing Daniels. Slowly, painfully, and repeatedly. Ideally tied to the current Terran invasion so that I can put him in an agonizing chamber for a couple of weeks and let it slowly (and very painfully) destroy his nervous system.

The Adamant Heavy Raider seams to have a Temporal Ops station. Perhaps I need the T6 Adamant Heavy Raider to get the mission to off Daniels repeatedly? Of course, that would require work on ship interiors AND potentially optional shipboard mini-missions.
Post edited by baddmoonrizin on

Comments

  • edited February 2022
    This content has been removed.
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,596 Community Moderator
    westmetals wrote: »
    The closest they've come to that is, I think there's a mission where you can choose whether or not to kill one of the NPCs... but if you choose not to, one of the other NPCs kills them anyway.

    Only instances I can think of involved either a no name Benthan ship (Dies either by your hand or Eldax) or that one Ferengi woman (Either dies by your hand or is let go). Either way... they were not major characters involved with the overall plot of the arcs they were in, or potential future stories. Think you get accolades depending on your choice, and can get the one you didn't get on a replay.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • zyinnia#9399 zyinnia Member Posts: 5 Arc User
    westmetals wrote: »
    problem: if they do a mission with options like that (killing off a storyline character), then they have to:
    ...

    Hence "but won't" in the title.
  • vegeta50024vegeta50024 Member Posts: 2,336 Arc User
    westmetals wrote: »
    problem: if they do a mission with options like that (killing off a storyline character), then they have to:
    ...

    Hence "but won't" in the title.

    So what is the purpose of the thread then if you already know this is something they won't do?

    Just to see if people out there share the same opinions out there that you do?

    TSC_Signature_Gen_4_-_Vegeta_Small.png
  • edited February 2022
    This content has been removed.
  • edited February 2022
    This content has been removed.
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,596 Community Moderator
    westmetals wrote: »
    In either case... that was my point. If they did something like that with a major character, and didn't force a particular outcome, they would have to account for it in later story.

    I wasn't trying to say that the existing case was a major character.

    I wasn't trying to dispute you actually. I was backing you up with what I could recall off the top of my head regarding character choice and fate vs story progression.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
  • edited February 2022
    This content has been removed.
  • khan1000khan1000 Member Posts: 264 Arc User
    I will maintain until the end of the my days that J'mpok did literally nothing wrong and J'Ula should be executed on sight. Either way, Martok should have become Chancellor
    giphy.gif
    Fear the Dominion
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,596 Community Moderator
    khan1000 wrote: »
    I will maintain until the end of the my days that J'mpok did literally nothing wrong and J'Ula should be executed on sight. Either way, Martok should have become Chancellor

    The problem with that is that in many Klingon missions, its the Chancellor who gives the player their missions. Was easy when it was J'mpok because that was an internal VA. With L'rell now Chancellor, they can't do that. So J'ula is most likely going to be a mission giver in the future in her stead. The same issue would have come up if Martok was Chancellor again. However... Martok never really WANTED to be Chancellor in the first place. He just accepted it because they needed a leader, and Worf wasn't interested either when he handed Martok the cloak back in DS9 after defeating Gowron in single combat.

    J'ula isn't innocent with her antics either, but the real villain in the group was Aakar. J'ula can probably be best described as an overzealous patriot. She was in her element in the 23rd Century. The Empire was at war with the Federation, and her House was one of those at the front lines. Catapulted into the 25th Century, she finds the universe has changed, and she hates it. She sees the Empire as weak and wants a return to the glory days of the 23rd Century Fed-Klingon War. Also she finds out her House is all but extinct.
    She just couldn't accept the universe changed, tried to force it back into what she viewed as the proper way of things, and had to take the mother of all reality checks to accept that things change.

    On the other hand, J'mpok ignored a growing crisis in the Gamma Quadrant, attacked Alliance headquarters in an effort to anger the Alliance to go after J'ula after being PUBLICALLY called out by J'ula for being an illigitimate Chancellor since Martok was alive, tried to martyr the player character (a known hero in the galaxy) and Martok to do it, and basically went mad dictator and could have destroyed Qo'noS because of his ego and thirst for power.

    AFAIK, J'mpok was a coward and a traitor by Klingon standards. His biggest strength was his cunning and political skills. Make no mistake, J'ula is no saint, but she at least owns up to her mistakes.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
This discussion has been closed.