test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

CBS Invovlment in STO stories?

2»

Comments

  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,016 Arc User
    artan42 wrote: »
    If 'soft-canon' is being used as a synonym for licenced material that is not canon the that's what STO is. All works published under the Star Trek IP under the authority of CBS (or Paramount for KT material) is so called 'soft-canon' (except the 7 shows and 13 films) and requires CBS to sign off on the story or content therein. This is the same weather it's a game or a comic or a book or what ever.

    "Soft" is synonymous for "no"?​​
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    angrytarg wrote: »
    artan42 wrote: »
    If 'soft-canon' is being used as a synonym for licenced material that is not canon the that's what STO is. All works published under the Star Trek IP under the authority of CBS (or Paramount for KT material) is so called 'soft-canon' (except the 7 shows and 13 films) and requires CBS to sign off on the story or content therein. This is the same weather it's a game or a comic or a book or what ever.

    "Soft" is synonymous for "no"?​​

    It's not but that's how it's being used. The alternative is that it means 'canon until contradicted by on-screen works' which is mostly how Star Wars used to roll and kinda how Doctor Who does. Obiously this isn't how Star Trek canon works so we'll have to assume people are just bad at synanoms.
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • tacofangstacofangs Member Posts: 2,951 Cryptic Developer
    edited June 2017
    artan42 wrote: »
    If 'soft-canon' is being used as a synonym for licenced material that is not canon the that's what STO is. All works published under the Star Trek IP under the authority of CBS (or Paramount for KT material) is so called 'soft-canon' (except the 7 shows and 13 films) and requires CBS to sign off on the story or content therein. This is the same weather it's a game or a comic or a book or what ever.

    This is my interpretation of Canon vs. Soft-Canon as well.

    If it was seen/heard on screen in any of the official shows/movies (yes, including Enterprise and TAS), it is Canon. If it was seen/heard/read in any of the officially licensed Star Trek products that were NOT the shows/movies, it is Soft-Canon. That includes STO, as well as things like the TNG/DS9 Tech Manuals, Star Trek Star Charts, etc. which are generally held in high regard, and are often referred to as though they are canon. Anything created by fans, without a license, including Fan Productions like Continues/Renegades/etc. are neither Canon nor Soft-Canon.

    Anything that is Soft-Canon is owned by CBS, and can be insta-converted to Canon if/when they please, just by including it in the shows/movies. That includes STO. CBS can take anything they want out of STO, and Canonize it by including it in a show.

    Only YOU can prevent forum fires!
    19843299196_235e44bcf6_o.jpg
  • legendarylycan#5411 legendarylycan Member Posts: 37,284 Arc User
    or having a CBS exec come out and say it's canon, which is how they ORIGINALLY defined their canon policy​​
    Like special weapons from other Star Trek games? Wondering if they can be replicated in STO even a little bit? Check this out: https://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1262277/a-mostly-comprehensive-guide-to-star-trek-videogame-special-weapons-and-their-sto-equivalents

    #LegalizeAwoo

    A normie goes "Oh, what's this?"
    An otaku goes "UwU, what's this?"
    A furry goes "OwO, what's this?"
    A werewolf goes "Awoo, what's this?"


    "It's nothing personal, I just don't feel like I've gotten to know a person until I've sniffed their crotch."
    "We said 'no' to Mr. Curiosity. We're not home. Curiosity is not welcome, it is not to be invited in. Curiosity...is bad. It gets you in trouble, it gets you killed, and more importantly...it makes you poor!"
    Passion and Serenity are one.
    I gain power by understanding both.
    In the chaos of their battle, I bring order.
    I am a shadow, darkness born from light.
    The Force is united within me.
  • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    tacofangs wrote: »
    artan42 wrote: »
    If 'soft-canon' is being used as a synonym for licenced material that is not canon the that's what STO is. All works published under the Star Trek IP under the authority of CBS (or Paramount for KT material) is so called 'soft-canon' (except the 7 shows and 13 films) and requires CBS to sign off on the story or content therein. This is the same weather it's a game or a comic or a book or what ever.

    This is my interpretation of Canon vs. Soft-Canon as well.

    If it was seen/heard on screen in any of the official shows/movies (yes, including Enterprise and TAS), it is Canon. If it was seen/heard/read in any of the officially licensed Star Trek products that were NOT the shows/movies, it is Soft-Canon. That includes STO, as well as things like the TNG/DS9 Tech Manuals, Star Trek Star Charts, etc. which are generally held in high regard, and are often referred to as though they are canon. Anything created by fans, without a license, including Fan Productions like Continues/Renegades/etc. are neither Canon nor Soft-Canon.

    Anything that is Soft-Canon is owned by CBS, and can be insta-converted to Canon if/when they please, just by including it in the shows/movies. That includes STO. CBS can take anything they want out of STO, and Canonize it by including it in a show.


    @baddmoonrizin And with that fine explanation, wouldn't mind seeing this added to the F.C.T. list too.
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • lancerviolatorlancerviolator Member Posts: 21 Arc User
    Do NOT forget @AxanarFilm

    > @tacofangs said:
    > artan42 wrote: »
    >
    > If 'soft-canon' is being used as a synonym for licenced material that is not canon the that's what STO is. All works published under the Star Trek IP under the authority of CBS (or Paramount for KT material) is so called 'soft-canon' (except the 7 shows and 13 films) and requires CBS to sign off on the story or content therein. This is the same weather it's a game or a comic or a book or what ever.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > This is my interpretation of Canon vs. Soft-Canon as well.
    >
    > If it was seen/heard on screen in any of the official shows/movies (yes, including Enterprise and TAS), it is Canon. If it was seen/heard/read in any of the officially licensed Star Trek products that were NOT the shows/movies, it is Soft-Canon. That includes STO, as well as things like the TNG/DS9 Tech Manuals, Star Trek Star Charts, etc. which are generally held in high regard, and are often referred to as though they are canon. Anything created by fans, without a license, including Fan Productions like Continues/Renegades/etc. are neither Canon nor Soft-Canon.
    >
    > Anything that is Soft-Canon is owned by CBS, and can be insta-converted to Canon if/when they please, just by including it in the shows/movies. That includes STO. CBS can take anything they want out of STO, and Canonize it by including it in a show.
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    Do NOT forget @AxanarFilm

    They are the people responsible for forcing CBS to issue strict guidelines on fan films thus they've negatively affected Phase II, Horizons, and Renegades. So no, I don't think any of us will forget Axanar.​​
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • ltminnsltminns Member Posts: 12,572 Arc User
    I thought cannons weren't as good. Oh, wait a minute, we're babbling on about canon again, not cannons. ;)
    'But to be logical is not to be right', and 'nothing' on God's earth could ever 'make it' right!'
    Judge Dan Haywood
    'As l speak now, the words are forming in my head.
    l don't know.
    l really don't know what l'm about to say, except l have a feeling about it.
    That l must repeat the words that come without my knowledge.'
    Lt. Philip J. Minns
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • silverlobes#2676 silverlobes Member Posts: 1,953 Arc User
    The scam part is that the guy asked for an took a million dollars from people to make his own star trek movie even though he knew he hadn't gotten permission to make his own star trek movie.
    That wasn't the scam, the scam was that he used the $$s to create a studio he intended to be for ongoing commercial use ;)
    "I fight for the Users!" - Tron

    "I was here before you, I will be here after you are gone. I am here, regardless of your acknowledgement or acceptance..." - The Truth
  • This content has been removed.
  • feiqafeiqa Member Posts: 2,410 Arc User
    jonsills wrote: »
    Starfleet doesn't have dentists, any more than they have toilets.

    actually, they do http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Starfleet_Dental​​

    So they actually have someone named Dunsel go through the academy? Cadet Dunsel?

    Originally Posted by pwlaughingtrendy
    Network engineers are not ship designers.
    Nor should they be. Their ships would look weird.
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,511 Arc User
    angrytarg wrote: »
    They also have http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Toilet - that's a double defeat right here pig-26.gif​​
    "Canon is what's seen on the screen."

    Even when we've seen where the toilet would reasonably be in someone's quarters, there were no toilets. And while we have seen a barber aboard the Ent-D (and a chapel aboard TOS Ent, thus implying a chaplain), we've never seen a dentist, nor any sign of dental tools. (The existence of the protoplaser, on the other hand, implies that damaged or missing dental material can simply be resynthesized in the same fashion as missing flesh or damaged bones.)

    (It may be necessary at this point, given the way these discussions have gone in the past, to point out that I'm not being entirely serious - that, in fact, my tongue is so far in cheek that it threatens to push through my beard.)
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • alonaralonar Member Posts: 280 Arc User
    I'll say it again, there is NO canon in Star Trek. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Trek_canon
  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 11,256 Community Moderator
    Taco has weighed in on this thread twice. So... answered and closed.
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
This discussion has been closed.