test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Lukari Ho'kunn Review

2»

Comments

  • djf021djf021 Member Posts: 1,382 Arc User
    edited February 2017
    I got it all set and ready to grind out the trait today. It looks really beautiful imo. I am running a torp/particle gens build, and was able to make up for the loss of the lt commander science slot somewhat by using an engie in the uni lt and slotting structural integrity collapse and endothermic inhibitor beam. I think it's going to be fine, and offer some variety.
    However, I did switch from the Eternal to try out this ship, and I can tell I'm going to miss the Temporal deconstruction beam gimmick as well as the hanger.
    C4117709-1498929112732780large.jpg

    Don't let them promote you. Don't let them transfer you. Don't let them do anything that takes you off the bridge of that ship, because while you're there... you can make a difference.
    -Captain James T. Kirk
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    rename it the Lukari Ho'hum? :D lol
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • lucho80lucho80 Member Posts: 6,600 Bug Hunter
    The ugly :

    The real ugly business is the protomatter console thats part of a multi part set that unlocks its multi mission capabilities, however you have to buy the new multi mission bundle to get those consoles , the fact the ho'kunns' true potential can only be tapped by buying the bundle is just sad.

    Same deal as the Samsar. Like last time, I'll wait for the next ship sale.

  • lucho80lucho80 Member Posts: 6,600 Bug Hunter
    edited February 2017
    I have to do an extra post. Yes, for most people the boff layout may be a nagative against flying this ship. Having said that, if I can pull 35K-40K DPS with a ship that has:
    1) No tac consoles
    2) The sci tree topped off and just a couple of tac skills filled in
    3) Non-damage related doffs
    4) No FAW/BO/HY, just a single copy of TS3 (and it's a beam boat with a single torp on front).
    5) No Iconian set
    6) I suck at piloting and targeting and I'm the first to admit it. I know there are some game settings I should change and some things I should keybind but never have.

    Then I'm pretty sure someone can slap a bunch of UR/Epic gear on this thing, fly it perfectly, and put out at least 50K DPS without breaking a sweat. The ship isn't bad, it just needs the right captain.
  • gerwalk0769gerwalk0769 Member Posts: 1,095 Arc User
    angrytarg wrote: »
    acxVVtw.jpg?1

    pig-24.gif​​
    IN this context, it almost seems as if the renovations in DS9 are the problem.

    I cannot stand the single image split view screen. A complete image on each screen would be fine.
    Joined STO in September 2010.
  • nickodaemusnickodaemus Member Posts: 711 Arc User
    Quick tip for budget conscious cap'ns- I put the dyson secondary deflector on mine since I had access to it. Exchange can be pricey for secondary deflectors.
  • lordsteve1lordsteve1 Member Posts: 3,492 Arc User
    Lol, geez people.

    It's a SCIENCE vessel, it doesn't need space for BFAW or 3 engineering slots to survive or any of the other bangs and whistles you think are required for a DPS build. Because that's not what you need to get a good sci build.
    Seriously, if you're gonna try to fly it like a tac boat it'll fly like TRIBBLE. But if you build and fly it like a science boat it'll shine. I'd say 50k should be fairly easy if you know what you're doing.
    It maybe won't be as good as a T6 Vesta, Eternal or Daemosh etc. perhaps but it's gonna be a perfectly serviceable science ship.
    SulMatuul.png
  • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    lucho80 wrote: »
    The ship isn't bad, it just needs the right captain.


    Absolutely true. Nonetheless, this ship isn't for me. :) I trained her up, using primarily Photonic Shockwave 3 (with the Trait), GW, etc. Lotsa fun ensued. :) Still, I would have loved to have been able to slot at least 1 copy of APB or something (without giving up the BFAW2).
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • tunebreakertunebreaker Member Posts: 1,222 Arc User
    lordsteve1 wrote: »
    Lol, geez people.

    It's a SCIENCE vessel, it doesn't need space for BFAW or 3 engineering slots to survive or any of the other bangs and whistles you think are required for a DPS build. Because that's not what you need to get a good sci build.
    Seriously, if you're gonna try to fly it like a tac boat it'll fly like ****. But if you build and fly it like a science boat it'll shine. I'd say 50k should be fairly easy if you know what you're doing.
    It maybe won't be as good as a T6 Vesta, Eternal or Daemosh etc. perhaps but it's gonna be a perfectly serviceable science ship.

    Yeah, this. OP just doesn't seem to know how to science.
  • jorantomalakjorantomalak Member Posts: 7,133 Arc User
    lordsteve1 wrote: »
    Lol, geez people.

    It's a SCIENCE vessel, it doesn't need space for BFAW or 3 engineering slots to survive or any of the other bangs and whistles you think are required for a DPS build. Because that's not what you need to get a good sci build.
    Seriously, if you're gonna try to fly it like a tac boat it'll fly like ****. But if you build and fly it like a science boat it'll shine. I'd say 50k should be fairly easy if you know what you're doing.
    It maybe won't be as good as a T6 Vesta, Eternal or Daemosh etc. perhaps but it's gonna be a perfectly serviceable science ship.

    Yeah, this. OP just doesn't seem to know how to science.

    Its a review of the ship its not like i punched your momma in the mouth, you dont have to get snarky about it.
  • tunebreakertunebreaker Member Posts: 1,222 Arc User
    lordsteve1 wrote: »
    Lol, geez people.

    It's a SCIENCE vessel, it doesn't need space for BFAW or 3 engineering slots to survive or any of the other bangs and whistles you think are required for a DPS build. Because that's not what you need to get a good sci build.
    Seriously, if you're gonna try to fly it like a tac boat it'll fly like ****. But if you build and fly it like a science boat it'll shine. I'd say 50k should be fairly easy if you know what you're doing.
    It maybe won't be as good as a T6 Vesta, Eternal or Daemosh etc. perhaps but it's gonna be a perfectly serviceable science ship.

    Yeah, this. OP just doesn't seem to know how to science.

    Its a review of the ship its not like i punched your momma in the mouth, you dont have to get snarky about it.

    Your review is subjective and displays signs of ignorance.

    Also good job with mature insults. :D
  • lordsteve1lordsteve1 Member Posts: 3,492 Arc User
    Mmmmmm......salty.

    That went south pretty fast didn't it!
    SulMatuul.png
  • chastity1337chastity1337 Member Posts: 1,606 Arc User
    lordsteve1 wrote: »
    Mmmmmm......salty.

    That went south pretty fast didn't it!

    You weren't exactly helping, steve. Both here and in my thread in Builds, Powers, and Game Mechanics you have been, hmmm, somewhat less than courteous in your disparagement of the ideas of others.

    Why don't we all take a step back, pause for a couple deep breaths, and try to resume in a more civil tone before this thread gets locked.
  • chastity1337chastity1337 Member Posts: 1,606 Arc User
    edited February 2017
    lucho80 wrote: »
    I have to do an extra post. Yes, for most people the boff layout may be a nagative against flying this ship. Having said that, if I can pull 35K-40K DPS with a ship that has:
    1) No tac consoles
    2) The sci tree topped off and just a couple of tac skills filled in
    3) Non-damage related doffs
    4) No FAW/BO/HY, just a single copy of TS3 (and it's a beam boat with a single torp on front).
    5) No Iconian set
    6) I suck at piloting and targeting and I'm the first to admit it. I know there are some game settings I should change and some things I should keybind but never have.

    Then I'm pretty sure someone can slap a bunch of UR/Epic gear on this thing, fly it perfectly, and put out at least 50K DPS without breaking a sweat. The ship isn't bad, it just needs the right captain.

    If the Dorito had room for a TS3, I would be doing the happydance. My point is just that the Engineering Lt Cmdr seat is a very poor substitute. SIC and Endothermic are right next to worthless.

    None the less, lucho, you make good points, as always. You do know your stuff, and I respect you for it :)

  • postagepaidpostagepaid Member Posts: 2,899 Arc User
    Under the ugly would have to be that if you answer a hail in the ship it shows they were too lazy to think it might be a better idea to have the person on a single viewscreen rather than split across a pair of them.
  • mailman650mailman650 Member Posts: 159 Arc User
    But....can you paint the ship orange? :D
  • chastity1337chastity1337 Member Posts: 1,606 Arc User
    mailman650 wrote: »
    But....can you paint the ship orange? :D

    Well, yeah, you can, but then it stains your hands and uniform that same bright orange ;)
  • harlequinpixieharlequinpixie Member Posts: 172 Arc User
    Been testing it out myself, and I usually make some odd builds. Anyhow, I stuck some polarized disruptor turrets on it with override subsystem safeties 3. It's not exactly a dps queen, but it surely does shut things down quite quickly. To the point things don't actually hurt me on advanced.

    With gravity well 3, vortex 2, energy siphon 1 and tbr 2 (with the pull doff), it does work rather well. I'm actually rather surprised how resilient the ship is and I've not even leveled it yet. But saying all that, there are better ships out there to use. But I feel this one is quite fun, then again. I tend to make whacky builds for kicks.

    The seating is not that bad really. But I do miss torpedo spread 3, which is a big shame. I'm glad I stepped away from the cheesy build (pun intended) and didn't bother with bfaw.

    To end this off, it's different, it's fun, but there are better ships. I'll stick with it for a little while, till I think up a new strange and whacky project on a different ship.
  • echattyechatty Member Posts: 5,916 Arc User
    I can't wait to test mine out, but it'll be awhile. My desktop needs a new processor, which means shoveling some money to my paypal. Unless my S-I-L can find me one somewhere in his computer stuff.

    My laptop won't run the game at all beyond just doing doffing or admiralty if I feel like wrestling with it. Just trotting around DS9 was a real struggle as the lag is horrible. At least I can do my arc quests since I'm attempting to save up enough zen to get the new sci bundle.

    I did manage to unbox it and set it up with stuff I already had. Looks like it just might be a fun ship to fly when I'm able to get ingame. Just glad I was able to get it before my computer crashed. That morning actually.
    Now a LTS and loving it.
    Just because you spend money on this game, it does not entitle you to be a jerk if things don't go your way.
    I have come to the conclusion that I have a memory like Etch-A-Sketch. I shake my head and forget everything. :D
  • lucho80lucho80 Member Posts: 6,600 Bug Hunter
    I'm actually rather surprised how resilient the ship is and I've not even leveled it yet.

    If you look at the Lukari parts and bonuses, they seem to be focused on hull and shield regen bonuses and healing.

Sign In or Register to comment.