test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Generantional NX-01 for T-6

it;s been asked long ago, but I know a lot of people would love to see the NX-01 Generational ship we saw in E2 (enterprise squared).

I'd like to believe the story which goes along with the ship follows.....

Tucker went into the imaging chamber, but a temporal clone came out, the real Commander Tucker was brought to Daniels's ship, where he received emergency care, and augmentations to stay alive. He was recruited into the Temporal Agency.

Tucker's first request upon being made an agent, was to see his sister once more, he got that chance...we don't know more than that, but his second request was that he find Lorien again, since Daniels was aware of the now isolated and decaying timeline of E2, he intervened, tucker offered his son the chance to become a Temporal Agency crew, Lorien accepted, and together, they began to augment the Generational Enterprise NX-01 with the technology of the century they'd be stationed in....2410.

I'd also like to see an arc where most if not all of the crew from enterprise makes a return, I know Tucker would like to bring T'Pol with him if possible, but that's just fan dreaming.



«1

Comments

  • bonzodog01bonzodog01 Member Posts: 147 Arc User
    Yeah, I would love to see a T6 NX-01. It was my favourite of the fed ships.
    XBox One - NFV Rylon - T6 Kolasi Siege Destroyer
    British Imperial Armada
  • necreliosis#4763 necreliosis Member Posts: 112 Arc User
    I'm onboard with this idea as well. I love the Nx-01 design.
  • lexusk19lexusk19 Member Posts: 1,425 Arc User
    Temporal NX-01 pls! Sept put it in the zen store. >.>
    5qq2uyi63rep.jpg
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    Id rather see the NX-Refit for a t6 version myself
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • dragnridrdragnridr Member Posts: 671 Arc User
    edited November 2016
    Id rather see the NX-Refit for a t6 version myself

    Agreed 100X. Must has T-6 Refit NX-01 which can part swap with the T-1 variant. But as a token for the other factions, which are still there. The Romulans and the KDF, we will needs ships for them as well.
    latest?cb=20141230104800&path-prefix=en
  • psycoticvulcanpsycoticvulcan Member Posts: 4,160 Arc User
    edited November 2016
    I wanted to make a Foundry mission about Lorian's Enterprise, but I couldn't get around the rule that prohibits the recreation of canon characters. :P

    But I'll happily accept an endgame NX-class, in whatever form it takes.
    NJ9oXSO.png
    "Critics who say that the optimistic utopia Star Trek depicted is now outmoded forget the cultural context that gave birth to it: Star Trek was not a manifestation of optimism when optimism was easy. Star Trek declared a hope for a future that nobody stuck in the present could believe in. For all our struggles today, we haven’t outgrown the need for stories like Star Trek. We need tales of optimism, of heroes, of courage and goodness now as much as we’ve ever needed them."
    -Thomas Marrone
  • duncanidaho11duncanidaho11 Member Posts: 7,980 Arc User
    edited November 2016

    But I'll happily accept an endgame NX-class, in whatever form it takes.

    Good news!
    akiracgi.jpg

    I know people want something that's specifically called NX but when there's strong canonical reasons why that ship can't go back into mass service (either it's T1 or part of a very rare promo reward which doesn't really offer much to the general population) you do have to find the next best thing.

    And...well, this is pretty much perfect except for the pylon angle. Imagine what the NX would look like in 24c/25c and what you have is the Akira class (because the NX was essentially designed as a 22c Akira.) And if you want to go a step further, you can get an even stronger look (emulating the NX's dynamics, ie. being less squat) by using the Thunderchild nacelles.

    NX%20Akira.jpg
    Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
    Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
    Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
  • redeyedravenredeyedraven Member Posts: 1,297 Arc User

    But I'll happily accept an endgame NX-class, in whatever form it takes.

    Good news!
    *snip*

    GG
  • thunderfoot#5163 thunderfoot Member Posts: 4,545 Arc User
    no. just. no. Here's why. Do you currently own or drive to work in a Model T Ford? And if I put power steering and ABS and AC and Bluetooth in my Model T Ford, then all it is is a 2016 Mustang which has Model T Ford sheet metal.

    Which means it is not a true Model T Ford. Which apparently the OP does not want in the first place.
    A six year old boy and his starship. Living the dream.
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User

    But I'll happily accept an endgame NX-class, in whatever form it takes.

    Good news!
    akiracgi.jpg

    I know people want something that's specifically called NX but when there's strong canonical reasons why that ship can't go back into mass service (either it's T1 or part of a very rare promo reward which doesn't really offer much to the general population) you do have to find the next best thing.

    And...well, this is pretty much perfect except for the pylon angle. Imagine what the NX would look like in 24c/25c and what you have is the Akira class (because the NX was essentially designed as a 22c Akira.) And if you want to go a step further, you can get an even stronger look (emulating the NX's dynamics, ie. being less squat) by using the Thunderchild nacelles.

    NX%20Akira.jpg

    If they could make the Nacells go up instead of down, you'd have a point. Till then

    3CFcHZU.gif
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    no. just. no. Here's why. Do you currently own or drive to work in a Model T Ford? And if I put power steering and ABS and AC and Bluetooth in my Model T Ford, then all it is is a 2016 Mustang which has Model T Ford sheet metal.

    Which means it is not a true Model T Ford. Which apparently the OP does not want in the first place.

    This argument had credibility until they introduced the 26th Century C-Store ships that could use a 23rd Century C-Store ship look and the Tier 6 TOS Constitution.
  • eldarion79eldarion79 Member Posts: 1,679 Arc User
    The Paladin Class battlecruiser!
  • roebotsixtyfiveroebotsixtyfive Member Posts: 286 Arc User
    eldarion79 wrote: »
    The Paladin Class battlecruiser!

    Yeah, an NX Skin for the Paladin would work, as that ship is for all intensive purposes NX Mk III (Ranger being NX Mk II).

    Also, throwing it out, Oberth skin for Nautilus/Daedalus, it's even roughly the same tiny size.
    sto_forum_sig_gif_by_roebot56-d9as2al.gif
    If you can't solve it logically, solve it like a moron.

    51 + 1 Foundry Character Slots is NOT enough. Some of us love our characters. If I want to buy more character slots, why can't I? I couldn't experience the entire Delta Recruitment event without deleting a character.

    The Iconians themselves can't time travel because their memories revert, but there is nothing to say an Iconian couldn't write everything she needed to do on a PADD, pin it to herself, travel back, read the PADD, do the tasks and return. Or just get one of her Non-Herald underlings to go back in time for her.

    Want a Star Trek themed starship command fan-made Board Game that isn't fiendishly complicated but not so easy it's a joke? Download mine for free here. https://roebot56.deviantart.com/art/BOARD-GAME-R56-s-Starship-Command-STAR-TREK-Edn-682732468 A Stargate version of the game is available from a link in the description.

    Oh yeah, I do Foundry missions for both KDFs and Feds. Just search KSTF (Short for Kinas Special Task Force, where Kinas is the name of the Admiral you will be serving under). The earlier ones are less story based and more combat based, while the later ones have a much heavier story element, but keep the large battles.
  • thunderfoot#5163 thunderfoot Member Posts: 4,545 Arc User
    starkaos wrote: »
    This argument had credibility until they introduced the 26th Century C-Store ships that could use a 23rd Century C-Store ship look and the Tier 6 TOS Constitution.

    And I really wish they had not done so. Sometimes, fanservice turns into a disservice. How many threads like this have we seen over the years? One of the biggest problems Star Trek fandom has is its wants all new stuff. Just as long as the new stuff
    exactly matches all the old stuff. Right down to the color of the socks the Gamma shift Transporter tech wears. And whenever Star Trek fandom is given new stuff, the response is invariably, "The new stuff sucks! Bring back the old stuff because reasons!" So the owners of the IP and all people working on related projects begin painstakingly recreating the old stuff. To which the fandom replies, "Man! This stuff is old! And boring! We want new stuff!"
    A six year old boy and his starship. Living the dream.
  • neoakiraiineoakiraii Member Posts: 7,468 Arc User
    no. just. no. Here's why. Do you currently own or drive to work in a Model T Ford? And if I put power steering and ABS and AC and Bluetooth in my Model T Ford, then all it is is a 2016 Mustang which has Model T Ford sheet metal.

    Which means it is not a true Model T Ford. Which apparently the OP does not want in the first place.

    Sorry but this no longer applies anymore in this game....so in other words YES TO T6 NX class
    GwaoHAD.png
  • saurializardsaurializard Member Posts: 4,409 Arc User
    *holds a "Will buy Zen to buy T6 NX-01 and Franklin" sign*.
    #TASforSTO
    Iconian_Trio_sign.jpg?raw=1
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    neoakiraii wrote: »
    no. just. no. Here's why. Do you currently own or drive to work in a Model T Ford? And if I put power steering and ABS and AC and Bluetooth in my Model T Ford, then all it is is a 2016 Mustang which has Model T Ford sheet metal.

    Which means it is not a true Model T Ford. Which apparently the OP does not want in the first place.

    Sorry but this no longer applies anymore in this game....so in other words YES TO T6 NX class

    Personally, I am waiting for the Tier 6 Phoenix.
  • dragnridrdragnridr Member Posts: 671 Arc User
    starkaos wrote: »
    neoakiraii wrote: »
    no. just. no. Here's why. Do you currently own or drive to work in a Model T Ford? And if I put power steering and ABS and AC and Bluetooth in my Model T Ford, then all it is is a 2016 Mustang which has Model T Ford sheet metal.

    Which means it is not a true Model T Ford. Which apparently the OP does not want in the first place.

    Sorry but this no longer applies anymore in this game....so in other words YES TO T6 NX class

    Personally, I am waiting for the Tier 6 Phoenix.

    th?id=OIP.Me2a729bb0ac8f0aaee27209c82335224o0&pid=15.1&P=0&w=257&h=172[img][/img]
    latest?cb=20141230104800&path-prefix=en
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • daedalus304daedalus304 Member Posts: 1,049 Arc User
    edited November 2016
    starkaos wrote: »
    This argument had credibility until they introduced the 26th Century C-Store ships that could use a 23rd Century C-Store ship look and the Tier 6 TOS Constitution.

    And I really wish they had not done so. Sometimes, fanservice turns into a disservice. How many threads like this have we seen over the years? One of the biggest problems Star Trek fandom has is its wants all new stuff. Just as long as the new stuff
    exactly matches all the old stuff. Right down to the color of the socks the Gamma shift Transporter tech wears. And whenever Star Trek fandom is given new stuff, the response is invariably, "The new stuff sucks! Bring back the old stuff because reasons!" So the owners of the IP and all people working on related projects begin painstakingly recreating the old stuff. To which the fandom replies, "Man! This stuff is old! And boring! We want new stuff!"

    while I agree it's a double edged sword, temporal plots are usually the saving grace of a writer for any series which has faltered.

    not "Enterprise" mind you, since it was there pretty much from day one and just relayed a message of "we're out of steam, we don't know why they even greenlit this". but in STO it opens up HUGE possibilities. one angle it allows for people to stick with TOS if they'd like, and still be competative in the multiverse (since the holodeck is technically fantasy for us, people keep forgetting that). and it allows for people to expand outward. we aren't tied directly to one time frame, or storyline.
    coolbatman wrote: »
    and speaking of which.......FORD , go back to your roots....BRING BACK THE MODEL-T !!!!!

    they did a few years back, technically. They made a single production of three cars, technically hotrods in that stupid car pimping show with that guy who advises the pawn shop dude on history channel.
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    edited November 2016
    NX is too modern. T6 Sarajevo first.

    NC Class.
    latest?cb=20140427161136
    10377611_856140544405616_4343907224742339922_n.jpg?oh=196069373a676151c9c9d175530ba9f2&oe=58C0ABF0
    ​​
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,016 Arc User
    artan42 wrote: »
    NX is too modern. T6 Sarajevo first.

    NC Class.
    latest?cb=20140427161136
    10377611_856140544405616_4343907224742339922_n.jpg?oh=196069373a676151c9c9d175530ba9f2&oe=58C0ABF0

    Boo what a TRIBBLE design, it looks like a shovel without handle. So stupid, it's just a chevron. So uncreative. I hate it!

    (Actually it shows the plausibility of the Lukari "prime" ship design and can now, kinda sorta shut up the whiners).​​
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    angrytarg wrote: »
    artan42 wrote: »
    NX is too modern. T6 Sarajevo first.

    NC Class.
    latest?cb=20140427161136
    10377611_856140544405616_4343907224742339922_n.jpg?oh=196069373a676151c9c9d175530ba9f2&oe=58C0ABF0

    Boo what a **** design, it looks like a shovel without handle. So stupid, it's just a chevron. So uncreative. I hate it!

    (Actually it shows the plausibility of the Lukari "prime" ship design and can now, kinda sorta shut up the whiners).

    It's a billion times better than the Nebula. Oh look, let's take this Galaxy (a hideous design by itself) and stick it up all upside down. That'll fool everyone.​​
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,016 Arc User
    artan42 wrote: »
    It's a billion times better than the Nebula. Oh look, let's take this Galaxy (a hideous design by itself) and stick it up all upside down. That'll fool everyone.

    And it worked, everybody thinks it's a new ship. Success! pig-2.gif​​
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • theotherscotty#9105 theotherscotty Member Posts: 385 Arc User
    Yes. Especially the NX-refit with the secondary hull added (from the fifth season that was canceled). And the Franklin.
  • This content has been removed.
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    coolbatman wrote: »
    points upthread at my previous post.......and i don't mean some cra*ppy hot-rod shi*te........

    You're correct. The NC Class is still too modern.

    So here's our next T6 ship, the warp 3 SS Emmette
    SS_Emmette10.jpg
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • avoozuulavoozuul Member Posts: 3,215 Arc User
    I'd want to see a T6 Oberth first.
    I stream on Twitch, look for Avoozl_
  • jbmonroejbmonroe Member Posts: 809 Arc User
    Right down to the color of the socks the Gamma shift Transporter tech wears.

    Well, great. Now I have to go back and watch every episode to see if there are any scenes where someone is wearing socks. What if it turns out socks aren't canon?

    boldly-watched.png
Sign In or Register to comment.