test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

would you support a large, pay for it expansion?

Kinda like the blizz game does with their expansions, you could get the Gamma Quadrant expansion, Andromeda expansion, etc. I'm talking about whole new maps, explorable worlds, new villains and allies, and a largse storyline.. like on the oder of legacy of Romulus and the delta expansion combined. in addition, an add on pack with 12 ships, 4 fed Klink and Rom 1 sci 1 cruiser 1 escort one carrier.
Spock.jpg

«13

Comments

  • Options
    comrademococomrademoco Member Posts: 1,694 Bug Hunter
    pay for them? no.
    6tviTDx.png

  • Options
    vegeta50024vegeta50024 Member Posts: 2,335 Arc User
    Kinda like the blizz game does with their expansions, you could get the Gamma Quadrant expansion, Andromeda expansion, etc. I'm talking about whole new maps, explorable worlds, new villains and allies, and a largse storyline.. like on the oder of legacy of Romulus and the delta expansion combined. in addition, an add on pack with 12 ships, 4 fed Klink and Rom 1 sci 1 cruiser 1 escort one carrier.

    You should know by now that Cryptic NEVER asks anyone to pay for an expansion. No one would be willing to pay for the next expansion when LoR and DR have both been free.

    TSC_Signature_Gen_4_-_Vegeta_Small.png
  • Options
    happyhappyj0yj0yhappyhappyj0yj0y Member Posts: 699 Arc User
    A single ship in STO costs about as much as most expansions. A "discount" pack of a handful of ships cost more than most games. I can only imagine what Cryptic would charge for a full expansion...

    Beyond which, who would pay for content in a game this buggy? For a lot of people on a good day it's questionable, on a bad day unplayable.
  • Options
    warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    There are already enough things that can cost you: Lockboxes, Keys for those Lockboxes, C-Store / Lobi / Promo Ships, various character increases. Every big expansion, there was also a big expansion related pack. LOR got a huge LOR Pack. Delta Rising got us a... Delta Rising Pack. These 2 mega packs were not cheap either.

    Between all these things, paid expansion on top of that? No way.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • Options
    seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,918 Arc User
    I would not be interested in this as 'paid content.' I have spent enough money on ships over the years, asking to also pay for content would not go over well with me.
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • Options
    lessley00lessley00 Member Posts: 1,200 Arc User
    What is this? SWTOR? No no thats worse, cause in swtor you have to pay to KEEP your expansion. I like this game, I like how its entirly f2p freindly, and I like how all the content is free
    Captain Joseph Riker, U.S.S. Odyssey==General V'Mar, U.S.S. Blackwater-A==Admiral Laura Holmes, U.S.S. Forward Unto Dawn
    Grand Master Thotok, son of Koloth, I.K.S. Sompek==Dahar Master Shanara, I.K.S. Balth'Quv

    Admiral R'Tath V'Tirex, R.R.W. Dhael Glohha'enh==Commander Ta'eth Korval, R.R.W Hachae ch'Rhian==Admiral Vranuk, R.R.W Delevhas
  • Options
    theanothernametheanothername Member Posts: 1,504 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    Kinda like the blizz game does with their expansions, you could get the Gamma Quadrant expansion, Andromeda expansion, etc. I'm talking about whole new maps, explorable worlds, new villains and allies, and a largse storyline.. like on the oder of legacy of Romulus and the delta expansion combined. in addition, an add on pack with 12 ships, 4 fed Klink and Rom 1 sci 1 cruiser 1 escort one carrier.

    If it is made with the mindset of a full paid expansion then sure; most likely. If its good.

    Currently there are no real incentives to spend money on STO. Its all always new ships related or odd skills related or those meta-game things like doffs and similar. Its always massive amount of new toys for stuff I'm not to eager to repeat again. And when they sell something cool out of the norm like the Intrepid interior they love to shoot their own foot even when told to not shoot their own foot by pulling stunts like not separating the bridge from the rest of the interior.
  • Options
    hyefatherhyefather Member Posts: 1,286 Arc User
    At one time, yeah I would have agreed to buy a STO exp. every year for 59.99. Not now. I mean cryptic charges like $129 just for a pack of ships that go to what they consider a expansion. In all honesty if STO got a expansion equal to a exp for wow it would cost thousands of dollors. Nope that ship has sailed.

    P.S. I kinda know where your thinking is coming from. You want a STO game that is on the quality level of wow. I do to and everyone one else most likely. Its not going to happen. Your just not going to get the level of quality out of a game that maybe 10 people work on compared to a game that 3000 people work on. There is a place in every sto players journey that takes him to this point in his thinking. Some people move past it and some don't. Who will you be. (there is no right answer btw).
  • Options
    nikephorusnikephorus Member Posts: 2,744 Arc User
    I'd rather pay for content then for ship's, but with how much cryptic charges for ship's, they cost as much as a full game on their own, I'd be concerned what they would charge for an expansion. I'm still blown away by $30 dollars for a single top tier ship. Oh and another $5 for a fleet module if it's not already fleet level. Anyway, I digress. I'd be willing depending on price point.
    Tza0PEl.png
  • Options
    angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,001 Arc User
    I will only either pay to play (subscription/game) without any restrictions or I won't pay a cent and crawl through the hoops and paywalls as long as I get some enjoyment out of it. But I would not pay for a expansion on top of having all the F2P awfulness of STO and asking prices of full retail games for in-game starships.​​
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • Options
    nikephorusnikephorus Member Posts: 2,744 Arc User
    My favorite mmo model is the one used by guild wars. You pay for the game once and play all you want only paying for the expansions you want. Sto annoys me with the nickel and dime everything approach. With that said I'm very glad they have the dilithium to Zen transfer. So that you can at least play to earn stuff.
    Tza0PEl.png
  • Options
    ikonn#1068 ikonn Member Posts: 1,449 Arc User
    No!

    If the game remained a subscription based game, I might, provided the quality of the game and it's subsequent expansions were much better than they are under the current F2P model.

    Cryptic already has a lifetime subscription from me for STO and for Champions Online. Under the current circumstances, I see no reason to pay extra for rushed and broken content.
    -AoP- Warrior's Blood (KDF Armada) / -AoP- Qu' raD qulbo'Degh / -AoP- Project Phoenix
    Join Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2010
  • Options
    spaceeagle20spaceeagle20 Member Posts: 971 Arc User
    Where I'm from, there's a saying : you eat as you pay.
    P58WJe7.jpg


  • Options
    cidjackcidjack Member Posts: 2,017 Arc User
    OP,

    Please explain the reasons that lead you to your idea.
    Armada: Multiplying fleet projects in need of dilithium by 13."
    95bced8038c91ec6f880d510e6fd302f366a776c4c5761e5f7931d491667a45e.jpgvia Imgflip Meme Generator
  • Options
    bobbydazlersbobbydazlers Member Posts: 4,534 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    if you feel you need to pay towards the next expansion feel free to buy the mega ship pack that is sure to come with it, that is your choice.
    forcing players into spending money or be locked out of content is not a policy cryptic would ever tolerate.
    nikephorus wrote: »
    I'd rather pay for content then for ship's, but with how much cryptic charges for ship's, they cost as much as a full game on their own, I'd be concerned what they would charge for an expansion. I'm still blown away by $30 dollars for a single top tier ship. Oh and another $5 for a fleet module if it's not already fleet level. Anyway, I digress. I'd be willing depending on price point.

    $30 for a single top tier ship might seem a lot for you but don't forget you are not forced into buying these ships you do it out of choice, also bare in mind that a lot of players have never spent a penny on the game.
    if the game was monthly subscription only you could pay as much as $180 a year to play this game and still have to pay for ships and other extras on top of that.
    paying for extra content does not necessarily mean you will not have to pay for game items also, swtor charge players to unlock certain content but also charge for the purchase of certain game items.
    having said that I don't find $30 for a ship that expensive, take that well known tank game, a yearly sub is about $120 but just one gold tier 10 tanks can cost around as much as a years subscription price.
    Post edited by bobbydazlers on

    When I think about everything we've been through together,

    maybe it's not the destination that matters, maybe it's the journey,

     and if that journey takes a little longer,

    so we can do something we all believe in,

     I can't think of any place I'd rather be or any people I'd rather be with.

  • Options
    whistlerdavidwhistlerdavid Member Posts: 418 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    you guys do know that paying 60 dollars for an expansion on an mmo are the best ways to get high quality content? every major mmo worth anything does it GW2 and wow are the best examples of this. cost more money then they make buying zen to pay for high quality voice acting and bringing people like lets say Patrick Stewart on.with better graphics and game play micanics and better writing. sorry i love star trek i would be more then happy to pay for an expantion
  • Options
    asuran14asuran14 Member Posts: 2,335 Arc User
    The only way i could see being willing to pay for new content like in a expansion would be if afew things were done. First that you could buy portions of the expansion thru the zen-store, without having to buy the whole expansion in a one time purchase like in stores or online. I mean if lets say the expansion cost 100 bucks US. than you could look at maybe buying the expansion which might have ten to 15 parts to it (like new features, ships, missions, what not) at about 15 bucks a pieces. Which would cost you more in the end (about 150 dollars), yet would be easier for some to buy in the short term that can't for some reason pay out 100 dollars for a expansion like those on a budget. Add in maybe something like a discount for future ships released in that expansion time-line, along side some other bonuses that are tied to buying the whole expansion at one time, and i could easily see it being worth it for both parties to purchase it in either format.

    Second would be that with this expansion elements fo the game that are either lacking or unfinished were completed, balanced, and reworked to function better. Such as fleshing out the Romulan faction into its own pure faction thru a story arc that leads to New Romulus becoming a full hub world like the Kdf an Feds have, while than the fed/kdf Romulan characters dropping their sub-faction links to consolidate into a solid faction. Also it would be nice to see the star ship rooster on both the Romulan an Kdf side bolstered up to atleast have 75% of the verity an size of the Fed faction has.

    -On a side note always found it funny that to get a true science ship on the KDF side you had to buy it in the Zen-store, when it feels like that the zen-store ships should be unique or upgraded ships of existing ships, and would love to see things like a basic model version of the Gorn/Orion/Nausicaan ships able to be gotten in game. I would not mind if these ships had weaker stats, reduced consoles slots maybe, and did not have the console item the zen store version had, just so that as a science character I had more of a ship suiting that style of play. As well as that the other three races in the Kdf were actually shown in teh ship line up, allowing a us to choose to fly a ship from chosen race in the faction. Though to me it was weird that the Orion a race that to me seem more science like has alot of cruisers/carriers, but the Gorn are the ones that bring the science ships even though to me they seem more of those that would use carriers an cruisers.-

    Third would be more balancing an fleshing out of the abilities, mechanics, and even expanding into more areas like a true sub-career of your main-career. Like that an engineer could sub into more of a fabrication type an gain access to more unique modules/abilities, as well as buffing other existing fabrication abilities he/she had. Seeing more mechanics for the different ships like an evolution on some of the current mechanics of ships we have would be nice, such as cruiser commands or even reworks of things like how hanger/separation pets work thru the UI or AI they have. Also a rework or atleast on going attempt to push us away from the current state of the meta would be nice, like not completely going the route of the trinity but more reducing the importance of dps, while pushing more importance on team work an verity in the style of stfs an mission types.

    I actually like the idea of buying an expansion if is a true flushed out expansion that adds elements to all areas of the game,or even just adding to areas that are less profitable to do on an individual circumstance. Like areas such as with vanity items, less popular ships (ie small craft, or science ships), small scale story arcs (like getting a full story arc detailing what the collective/cooperative is doing or happening with them, or history between the blue-gil an trill symbiot). Revamps/reworks to mechanics an elements of the game that are less used by the larger market of the game, such as with a rework to hanger-pets, or with less popular abilities of careers an even ground combat content.
  • Options
    mirrorchaosmirrorchaos Member Posts: 9,844 Arc User
    Kinda like the blizz game does with their expansions, you could get the Gamma Quadrant expansion, Andromeda expansion, etc. I'm talking about whole new maps, explorable worlds, new villains and allies, and a largse storyline.. like on the oder of legacy of Romulus and the delta expansion combined. in addition, an add on pack with 12 ships, 4 fed Klink and Rom 1 sci 1 cruiser 1 escort one carrier.

    cryptic wants my money for content? firts thing they got to do again is send their content through some QA first, get rid of those nasty bugs they leave in their product. and then prove it with a track record. the content also has to be worth the cost as well.

    until they can match the standards other good mmos are setting, no i wont buy into a paid expansion on sto until then.
    T6 Miranda Hero Ship FTW.
    Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
  • Options
    risian4risian4 Member Posts: 3,711 Arc User
    Expansion sounds great, but it wouldn't be great if you have to buy an expansion pack.

    Most of the stuff in the Delta and Legacy of Romulus packs were, to me, not useful. I bought the Phantom, and some smaller things from the Delta pack. Those things were worth paying for. If I would have had to buy the whole pack with titles and ships I would never use, I would've rather paid nothing and not get the Phantom either.
  • Options
    risian4risian4 Member Posts: 3,711 Arc User
    Oh and while it would be great to explore Andromeda, that option was basically removed when the Iconian sphere jumped from Andromeda to the Iconian system.

    It's no longer possible to reach Andromeda.
  • Options
    whistlerdavidwhistlerdavid Member Posts: 418 Arc User
    risian4 wrote: »
    Expansion sounds great, but it wouldn't be great if you have to buy an expansion pack.

    Most of the stuff in the Delta and Legacy of Romulus packs were, to me, not useful. I bought the Phantom, and some smaller things from the Delta pack. Those things were worth paying for. If I would have had to buy the whole pack with titles and ships I would never use, I would've rather paid nothing and not get the Phantom either.
    thats not really an expantion.you just payed for more gear.an expansion would not just be new gear.it would be more like a different game with new maps,story's,new major npcs,some expansions even improve graphics has well
  • Options
    risian4risian4 Member Posts: 3,711 Arc User
    risian4 wrote: »
    Expansion sounds great, but it wouldn't be great if you have to buy an expansion pack.

    Most of the stuff in the Delta and Legacy of Romulus packs were, to me, not useful. I bought the Phantom, and some smaller things from the Delta pack. Those things were worth paying for. If I would have had to buy the whole pack with titles and ships I would never use, I would've rather paid nothing and not get the Phantom either.
    thats not really an expantion.you just payed for more gear.an expansion would not just be new gear.it would be more like a different game with new maps,story's,new major npcs,some expansions even improve graphics has well

    As others have pointed out, the content part of those expansions were free. So no, I wouldn't pay for that, as we already pay for ships, fleet projects etc. to cover the costs for content development.
  • Options
    bobbydazlersbobbydazlers Member Posts: 4,534 Arc User
    risian4 wrote: »
    Expansion sounds great, but it wouldn't be great if you have to buy an expansion pack.

    Most of the stuff in the Delta and Legacy of Romulus packs were, to me, not useful. I bought the Phantom, and some smaller things from the Delta pack. Those things were worth paying for. If I would have had to buy the whole pack with titles and ships I would never use, I would've rather paid nothing and not get the Phantom either.
    thats not really an expantion.you just payed for more gear.an expansion would not just be new gear.it would be more like a different game with new maps,story's,new major npcs,some expansions even improve graphics has well

    they cant really improve the graphics within extra content without improving graphics in the rest of the game, sure they can tweak certain items to make them look slightly better but they are still working within the confines of the existing graphics engine.

    When I think about everything we've been through together,

    maybe it's not the destination that matters, maybe it's the journey,

     and if that journey takes a little longer,

    so we can do something we all believe in,

     I can't think of any place I'd rather be or any people I'd rather be with.

  • Options
    lan451lan451 Member Posts: 3,386 Arc User
    No. Because paid expansions split the player base into those who can afford it and those who can't. Suddenly those who can't find themselves not being able to play with their friends or fleet mates who can. I've dealt with that in other MMOs over the years and hate it. No paid expansions.
    JWZrsUV.jpg
    Mine Trap Supporter
  • Options
    asuran14asuran14 Member Posts: 2,335 Arc User
    lan451 wrote: »
    No. Because paid expansions split the player base into those who can afford it and those who can't. Suddenly those who can't find themselves not being able to play with their friends or fleet mates who can. I've dealt with that in other MMOs over the years and hate it. No paid expansions.

    I agree if they do/did a paid expansion method it would need to not have the main story-line as well as zones tied to buying the expansion, kinda like how rifts does it that the main story and zones of the game are all free an open to all players. Though i could see side content, side story elements that are not directly tied to the expansion outside of just expanding on things (like how some would like to hear more on the collective/cooperative from delta), as well as things like adding new careers to the game being tied to buying the expansion.
  • Options
    leemwatsonleemwatson Member Posts: 5,355 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    Going F2P was the best thing for this game. Most people won't pay subscriptions for games they would rather buy outright and never have to pay for again. The current model probably has brought them more money than the original subs did. I for one have no issue buying ship packs. I also have very little issue with the game. All these 'bugs', lag etc people claim to have for some reason I don't experience (the lag, from my perspective is with-in the US's net infrastructure. Over here in the UK, we very rarely get any lag beyond that which is caused by the distance to the servers. SNR's are also rare). The game is not broken, it's not dying nor is it poor quality either.

    When Cryptic do decide to use a new one or update their graphics engine, they will need to ensure that older machines are still capable of running it. I run STO on a 6 year old laptop, and any update could rule out me playing because my machine isn't capable. Granted I also have a brand new shiny lappy, but why should I get rid of 'old-faithful'?

    With this year being the 50th Anni, I would hope Cryptic have something MASSIVE in the works, but I wouldn't risk segregating groups by making people pay for access to content.
    "You don't want to patrol!? You don't want to escort!? You don't want to defend the Federation's Starbases!? Then why are you flying my Starships!? If you were a Klingon you'd be killed on the spot, but lucky for you.....you WERE in Starfleet. Let's see how New Zealand Penal Colony suits you." Adm A. Necheyev.
  • Options
    yoda2005yoda2005 Member Posts: 151 Arc User
    I wouldn't pay for any content updates, look at what they did with DR release :tongue:
    And of course, DR and LoR habe both been free, so why pay for the next one?
    s7CQHZ3.jpg
  • Options
    tarran61tarran61 Member Posts: 827 Arc User
    Bad idea, if its a pay to play it should be for the start like it was. Why did it change?
    Positive thoughts.
    NeAC.gif
This discussion has been closed.