test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Galactic News Network [PC]

Modeling the Omega

pwlaughingtrendypwlaughingtrendy Member Posts: 2,966 Arc User
in Galactic News Network [PC]
The team has taken your design and built the ship! Check out the Omega design as it goes from sketch to in-game model!

It's happening!

~LaughingTrendy
«134567

Comments

  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    Cool!
    So what is the purpose of the smaller lower nacelles?
    B)
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,889 Arc User
    Still not a huge fan of the Saucer design...I'm not big on the shape of it...the new nacelles do looks great though!
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • pwlaughingtrendypwlaughingtrendy Member Posts: 2,966 Arc User
    lianthelia wrote: »
    Still not a huge fan of the Saucer design...I'm not big on the shape of it...the new nacelles do looks great though!
    At first I was hesitant. I was a fan of the Alpha. That being said, after seeing this come to life I really really enjoy it.
  • baelogventurebaelogventure Member Posts: 1,002 Arc User
    Oh look, you people managed to collectively pick something that looks so much like a modified Eclipse-class that it hurts my soul.
  • thay8472thay8472 Member Posts: 6,163 Arc User
    Jupiter Jupiter Jupiter !!!

    zx2t8tuj4i10.png
    Thank you for the Typhoon!
  • rangerryurangerryu Member Posts: 284 Arc User
    That......actually looks better than I was expecting to be honest,but I'll wait until I see the full 3d model in the shipyard before saying if it looks really good or not,but good signs so far.
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    thay8472 wrote: »
    Jupiter Jupiter Jupiter !!!


    Uranus, Uranus, Uranus...!!!


    sorry, couldn't resist... >:)
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • walterofbishopwalterofbishop Member Posts: 14 Arc User
    The Omega looks great - excellent work everyone. Liked hearing about your research into modern carrier vessels for insights and inspiration. Looking forward to flying this ship!
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    Can we assume that perhaps some or all of the other 'rejected' designs will eventually make it into the game?
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • orangeitisorangeitis Member Posts: 5,222 Arc User
    If this ship has a commander Science seat on it, you can bet I'm gonna be running it on the PriorityOne livestream from now on.
    U.S.S.%20Mastermind%20Signature_zpsgsyjxxz1.jpg~original
    Helpful Tools: Dictionary.com - Logical fallacies - Random generator - Word generator - Color tool - Extra Credits - List of common English language errors - New T6 Big booty tutorial
  • cuchulainn74cuchulainn74 Member Posts: 831 Arc User
    U.S.S. Jupiter indeed! Love the insight into the modeling process. Thanks, team. And very impressive work. Can't wait to see it in game.
    Fleet Admiral CuChulainn - U.S.S. Aegis KT Intel Dreadnought Cruiser
    vGdvFsX.jpg


  • ladytiamat666ladytiamat666 Member Posts: 276 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    I'm still trying to understand why / how the community has chosen the least-starfleet, least-beautiful design among the eight initially suggested. I honestly can't. But i do respect the work of the art team anyways.
    daveyny wrote: »
    Can we assume that perhaps some or all of the other 'rejected' designs will eventually make it into the game?

    It would be nice.

    signature%201.jpg_zpsklpuyd7v.png
  • jslynjslyn Member Posts: 1,788 Arc User
    That is interesting. Thank you for sharing your process with us.
  • galattgalatt Member Posts: 708 Arc User
    Well done. She looks massive just like a carrier should.
    And I love the details on the planet behind her as well.

    Any idea what her class name will be?
    sig_picture_resize_by_gx_9901-db9d1v1.png
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    galatt wrote: »
    Well done. She looks massive just like a carrier should.
    And I love the details on the planet behind her as well.

    Any idea what her class name will be?

    U.S.S. UGLY BETTY

    <snicker>
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • keletteskelettes Member Posts: 488 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    Neat looking addition. I'll need some more info (like the item and boff layouts) before I can decide whether it suits my playstyle or not; but I'm looking forward to seeing it in-game.

    Since we're through with our war with the Iconians and we are coming back from the brink of annihilation, I think this shippie deserves a fitting name to reflect that :smile:

    I name thee... <drumbeat> U.S.S. Resurgent! :smile:
    We look forward to potentially doing something like this in the future again.

    So the Romulans and Klingons can look forward to a similar pipeline, eh? :smile: I may be wrong, but nonetheless, I'm still calling it! XD
    "Ad astra audacter eamus in alis fidelium."
    -
    "To boldly go to the stars on the wings of the faithful."
  • roamingmuttroamingmutt Member Posts: 117 Arc User
    There! You have your Jupiter so no more calls for one. lol
  • chipg7chipg7 Member Posts: 1,577 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    That's a solid-looking design. Really like it. Wasn't sure how a re-imagination of the old Jupiter would turn out, but... I'm impressed yet again.

    I assume it's eng-heavy, but those black domes towards the aft of the saucer could easily be sensor suites. So... a sci carrier? Plus that forward deflector looks fancy as all heck - could support a secondary deflector.
    galatt wrote: »
    Well done. She looks massive just like a carrier should.
    And I love the details on the planet behind her as well.

    Any idea what her class name will be?

    Well, the the ship in the final image is named the USS Jupiter, so... :wink:
  • daveynydaveyny Member Posts: 8,227 Arc User
    kelettes wrote: »
    Neat looking addition. I'll need some more info (like the item and boff layouts) before I can decide whether it suits my playstyle or not; but I'm looking forward to seeing it in-game.

    Since we're through with our war with the Iconians and we are coming back from the brink of annihilation, I think this shippie deserves a fitting name :smile:

    I name thee... <drumbeat> U.S.S. Resurgent! :smile:
    We look forward to potentially doing something like this in the future again.

    So the Romulans and Klingons can look forward to a similar pipeline, eh? :smile: I may be wrong, but nonetheless, I'm still calling it! XD

    Naaaaa...

    Her Captain is going to be a 21st century TV nostalgia nut and his favorite show is "Ugly Betty".

    So he unofficially christens her the same.

    B)
    STO Member since February 2009.
    I Was A Trekkie Before It Was Cool ... Sept. 8th, 1966 ... Not To Mention Before Most Folks Around Here Were Born!
    Forever a STO Veteran-Minion
    upside-down-banana-smiley-emoticon.gif
  • thegreathibikithegreathibiki Member Posts: 98 Arc User
    Sniff sniff... Alpha.... I miss my Alpha....
  • leemwatsonleemwatson Member Posts: 5,470 Arc User
    daveyny wrote: »
    Cool!
    So what is the purpose of the smaller lower nacelles?
    B)

    Most likely, the canon explanation is to provide efficiency when creating a warp field, and with the ship being so huge, it would need it. It could also be that the nacelles would need to be alot bigger if there was just the 2. Playing on 4, for the immersion, would be correct if this vessel was going to be a long range, multi-purpose vessel. It could also be the future for colonization.
    "You don't want to patrol!? You don't want to escort!? You don't want to defend the Federation's Starbases!? Then why are you flying my Starships!? If you were a Klingon you'd be killed on the spot, but lucky for you.....you WERE in Starfleet. Let's see how New Zealand Penal Colony suits you." Adm A. Necheyev.
  • mayito2009mayito2009 Member Posts: 643 Arc User
    Looks nice I really like it.
    Seek and ye shall find. Ask and ye shall receive. Rabboni
    Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" (Benjamin Franklin).

    Most unexpectedly, this turned into a flame-fest! Closed it goes!. /sigh What flamefestery is this? pwlaughingtrendy
  • iconiansiconians Member Posts: 6,987 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    Please tell me this is the new Jupiter-class that will be replacing all the current Jupiter-class NPC starships in the game.
    ladytiamat666 wrote: »
    I'm still trying to understand why / how the community has chosen the least-starfleet, least-beautiful design among the eight initially suggested. I honestly can't. But i do respect the work of the art team anyways.

    That's impossible. I'm told by expert Scotsmen that only Cryptic creates the least-Starfleet designs in the game.
    ExtxpTp.jpg
  • captainmal3captainmal3 Member Posts: 436 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    Not the one I voted for but I'll admit it looks better than I expected. Not that it matters, unless we get a huge buff to pets, some bug fixes and an AI update, carriers are still a pain in the TRIBBLE to play. I don't even bother launching my pets on my presidio half the time. I'm certainly not going to spend $30 on one without all those issues fixed.
  • misterperseusmisterperseus Member Posts: 71 Arc User
    Looks nice. Please have those little engines be optional in the customizer. I like it best with 2 nacells.
  • theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 6,015 Arc User
    Looks nice from the top, need to have a look at the ventral point of view before I make my mind up
    NMXb2ph.png
      "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
      -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
    • galattgalatt Member Posts: 708 Arc User
      thegreathibiki wrote: »
      Sniff sniff... Alpha.... I miss my Alpha....
      *pats on the shoulder*
      Don't be sad, she's in a better place now. Away from all the hurtful comments people made about her.
      sig_picture_resize_by_gx_9901-db9d1v1.png
    • lamyrslamyrs Member Posts: 312 Arc User
      edited November 2015
      Can we have more views angles of it?
      I am from Belgium and english isn't my main language, sorry if I make mistakes.
    • sorceror01sorceror01 Member Posts: 1,042 Arc User
      iconians wrote: »
      Please tell me this is the new Jupiter-class that will be replacing all the current Jupiter-class NPC starships in the game.
      ladytiamat666 wrote: »
      I'm still trying to understand why / how the community has chosen the least-starfleet, least-beautiful design among the eight initially suggested. I honestly can't. But i do respect the work of the art team anyways.

      That's impossible. I'm told by expert Scotsmen that only Cryptic creates the least-Starfleet designs in the game.

      It could more than likely replace the old Jupiter NPC ships, as this one is tellingly marked as "U.S.S. Jupiter".....

      Also, as to the "least Starfleet looking ship", I can direct you to ships like.... the Oberth, the Olympic, and the Defiant for ships that break the mold when it comes to "Starfleet looking". People do like it when these things occasionally break from tradition.
      People hated the Defiant at first, almost moreso than they hated the Galaxy class, for practically the same reasons. But it grew on people and now it's undeniably a Starfleet ship.
      And beauty is in the eye of the beholder, bub.
      ".... you're gonna have a bad time."
    • jaturnleyjaturnley Member Posts: 1,218 Arc User
      lamyrs wrote: »
      Can we have more views angles of it?

      Patience. They have two more posts to make about it, so they need to stretch out the hype.
    This discussion has been closed.