test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

Would you like to be able to build ships from scratch?

sovereign47sovereign47 Member Posts: 399 Arc User
Recently I've been thinking about this particular subject. There are already many different ship classes introduced in STO and there will be certainly more to come. Existing canon ships are not problem in this matter since they are already established and accepted by most of the fans or players in this case as good designs (at least majority of them).
However, STO devs have already made (and are still making) their own designs too. Some of them look very good (like Odyssey, Armitage, Venture, Guardian...) while others are not so good or are completely awful. Now we all know that the beauty is in the eye of beholder so that to some people certain designs seem nice and to other they don't.
In order to avoid that problem, I was thinking about the idea of giving players the ability to design their own ships or at least to give more freedom to ship customization. Yes, there are plenty of different ships already that we can choose from and there is some form of customization, but it doesn't seem enough for me and probably for (some) other players too.

So how I would change the way of current ship customization. We already have some key elements of the ships and those are saucer section, secondary hull, nacelles, neck and upper structure/roll-bar/mission pod. With these parameters defined we should be able to expand to more than just familiar ship designs.

For example: You could build a ship with Sovereign's saucer section, Akira's warp nacelles, Intrepid's secondary hull and Nebula's upper structure/roll-bar.

That would be example of easier system which would include already existing models and their parts.

Another more complex systems would be one where you can build entirely new parts and put them together in order to construct your own vessel. Such customization system would be even better and more fun to do. It would give much needed freedom in creating non-canon fan made designs.

For example: You could build a Sovereign class with 3 or 4 nacelles, or you could be entirely new class of ship consisting only of saucer with built in nacelles, or a ship with two saucers connected by secondary hull with nacelles. There would be literally endless options in such customization system and I think that it would please all of the current and new players as well.

So, what do you think of this brilliant idea? Do you think it is possible? Will with ever be realized and when it could be expected if it would? Feel free to discuss.
FED ENG: FA Sirius Verax (USS Leviathan) , FED TAC (Delta): FA Adria Tyllex (USS Thunderblade) , ROM TAC: ADM Kill'ina (IRW Imperix Thrai) , KLING ENG (Delta): LT. GEN Ghol'Vaq Martok (IKS Qeh'Ral II) - 44th Fleet member
SZ1RgUL.jpg
SUPPORTING PLAYABLE CARDASSIAN AND DOMINION FACTIONS!

Would you like to be able to build ships from scratch? 95 votes

Totally!
32%
techmonstercrzymn45timv94stuart1965jonathanlonehawkangrybobhdarkknightucfksathra2lordprotiuswizz2k9kyle223catflyingshoeboxdeadspacex64andyphamxalexsanderitaerikosssraj011thenoname711sovereign47ataloss 31 votes
Yes, but with existing models only.
11%
f9thretxcsolarwraithlordsteve1gofasternowdragnridrdrazziirlak47xaysslifecrux177tsirestardestroyer3 11 votes
Not so sure about it, but yes if it would be possible.
13%
rooster707allyoftheforcesqwishedkodachikunotunebreakerallanon1974goodscotchtacofangsddesjardinsemeraldcrosshairscottstatenbaudlmoises5287 13 votes
Not at all. I'm fine with starship customization as it currently is.
42%
nightkenshpoksmajosea61horizons2052sophlogimocaptainoblivousbobbydazlersmandoknight89jarvisandalfredvivenneanthonyhyplcidjackfleetadmiraltacoceekayzeroarabaturnarthaiswhere2r1aesicatigrovaya13akulamarkhawkman 40 votes
«1

Comments

  • Options
    captainoblivouscaptainoblivous Member Posts: 2,284 Arc User
    Not at all. I'm fine with starship customization as it currently is.
    Nopenope.
    I need a beer.

  • Options
    kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    Not so sure about it, but yes if it would be possible.
    I see only federation ships benefiting from this system as kdf and roms have next to nil in terms of usable bits
  • Options
    rickdankorickdanko Member Posts: 470 Arc User
    Not at all. I'm fine with starship customization as it currently is.
    There's too many starship classes and too much customization of each already.
    They're not really gone, as long as we remember them
    candle_burning.gif
    Plasma Nugget
    Rayzee
    excellentawesome#4589
    torgaddon101
    raeat

    I'm allowed to disagree.
  • Options
    tsiretsire Member Posts: 40 Arc User
    Yes, but with existing models only.
    If there was a way for KDF to benifit from this more so than feds then sure.
  • Options
    sovereign47sovereign47 Member Posts: 399 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    Totally!
    I was having in mind that all factions (yes, KDF and ROM too) would benefit from that system, so that wouldn't be an issue.
    FED ENG: FA Sirius Verax (USS Leviathan) , FED TAC (Delta): FA Adria Tyllex (USS Thunderblade) , ROM TAC: ADM Kill'ina (IRW Imperix Thrai) , KLING ENG (Delta): LT. GEN Ghol'Vaq Martok (IKS Qeh'Ral II) - 44th Fleet member
    SZ1RgUL.jpg
    SUPPORTING PLAYABLE CARDASSIAN AND DOMINION FACTIONS!
  • Options
    thegrandnagus1thegrandnagus1 Member Posts: 5,165 Arc User
    This is an interesting question. After years of combat, my ship has many scratches on it. And every time there is a scratch, it is because some small part of the hull plating was removed. I wonder how many scratches it would take to get enough raw material to build a new ship from scratch?

    The-Grand-Nagus
    Join Date: Sep 2008

    og9Zoh0.jpg
  • Options
    darkknightucfdarkknightucf Member Posts: 1,546 Media Corps
    Totally!
    Yes, I would LOVE TO! Run a few missions to get schematics for basic/rare/unique designs, STF for mats, and DOffs for some sort of specialty system involving bonuses to energy, damage resistance, kinetics, maneuverability, speed, etc. Heck, I have my old notebook (yes, I used one of those) w/ notes on something like this for a game design I had after being inspired by Starship Creator. I can dig that out and see what I am willing to share.
    @Odenknight | U.S.S. Challenger | "Remember The Seven"
    Fleet Defiant Kinetic Heavy Fire Support | Fleet Manticore Kinetic Strike Ship | Tactical Command Kinetic Siege Refit | Fleet Defiant Quantum Phase Escort | Fleet Valiant Kinetic Heavy Fire Support
    Turning the Galaxy-X into a Torpedo Dreadnought & torpedo tutorial, with written torpedo guide.
    "A good weapon and a great strategy will win you many battles." - Marshall
    I knew using Kinetics would be playing the game on hard mode, but what I didn't realize was how bad the deck is stacked against Kinetics.
  • Options
    bobbydazlersbobbydazlers Member Posts: 4,534 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    Not at all. I'm fine with starship customization as it currently is.
    I really don't see the point, the ship you build would not truly be your own design, it would be made up by a selection of parts that cryptic had designed for you to use and due to the limited storage that selection of parts would likely not be all that big.
    therefore you would not end up with a ship that is uniquely you, you would end up with a ship that looks remarkably similar to many of the other designed ships if not at times even identical.

    there is no way cryptic would ever allow you to truly design you own ship by drawing what it looks like in some kind of 3d editor to be uploaded into the game, that is the only way a ship design would be truly your own and unique only to you.

    at the end of the day I would rather see the devs concentrate of creating content and fixing bugs then working on this.
    Yes, I would LOVE TO! Run a few missions to get schematics for basic/rare/unique designs, STF for mats, and DOffs for some sort of specialty system involving bonuses to energy, damage resistance, kinetics, maneuverability, speed, etc. Heck, I have my old notebook (yes, I used one of those) w/ notes on something like this for a game design I had after being inspired by Starship Creator. I can dig that out and see what I am willing to share.

    they could spend a great deal of time working on implementing an idea such as this but at the end of it you would find that those schematics for unique designs were not as unique as you thought they were when you see 100s of players who got the same unique schematics and at the end of the day you would not be building ships from scratch, you would be building a ship that cryptic had designed for you in those unique schematics unless in your wildest dreams you imagine the devs are going to spend hours and hours designing 1000s and 1000s of unique schematics so we would all get a different one.

    at best all you would end up with is a lot of time spent working on your creation only to find many others had the same thing.

    When I think about everything we've been through together,

    maybe it's not the destination that matters, maybe it's the journey,

     and if that journey takes a little longer,

    so we can do something we all believe in,

     I can't think of any place I'd rather be or any people I'd rather be with.

  • Options
    svindal777svindal777 Member Posts: 856 Arc User
    For example: You could build a ship with Sovereign's saucer section, Akira's warp nacelles, Intrepid's secondary hull and Nebula's upper structure/roll-bar.

    I think that would be a nightmare in programming/design to get everything to match up.
    Well excuse me for having enormous flaws that I don't work on.
  • Options
    eldarion79eldarion79 Member Posts: 1,679 Arc User
    svindal777 wrote: »
    For example: You could build a ship with Sovereign's saucer section, Akira's warp nacelles, Intrepid's secondary hull and Nebula's upper structure/roll-bar.

    I think that would be a nightmare in programming/design to get everything to match up.

    This question has been asked before and that was the answer that was given.
  • Options
    flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    Not your initial ship, no, else you'd spend the first couple of hours/days flying around in a Shuttle that you've borrowed from Starfleet. :tongue:

    However, it would be nice if we could say, craft an actual ship, and we could visit our own personalized dry dock and see the various stages of it's construction, maybe even space walk around the frame and walk among various ship sections that are undergoing work, have a chat with the construction crew etc. That however would be no easy feature for Cryptic ti implement (especially with all the ship variants).

    Maybe one day...
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • Options
    azurealli4nceazurealli4nce Member Posts: 80 Arc User
    Not at all. I'm fine with starship customization as it currently is.
    rickdanko wrote: »
    There's too many starship classes and too much customization of each already.


    This .
    DPS-Bronze, DPS-Silver, DPS-Gold, etc. are FAKE! They were created by an outvoted minority who destroyed the original DPS channels!

    Tactical Team sucked, once upon a time. I got it buffed. Don't think for a minute that Cryptic ignores forum feedback.
  • Options
    davefenestratordavefenestrator Member Posts: 10,529 Arc User
    Not at all. I'm fine with starship customization as it currently is.
    I'm fine with model / bundle based customization. I'd like to see more rep-set / shield-type skin and lighting effects, and I'd like to be able to separate the effect (costume) from the shield, deflector, engine. Make ownership give costume unlocks like with ground armor.
  • Options
    aesicaaesica Member Posts: 736 Arc User
    Not at all. I'm fine with starship customization as it currently is.
    Nope. The last thing we want is to see a bunch of ships customized to look like "male organs" flying around.
    Rubberband Dance has been unlocked!
    kNqxcCf.gif
  • Options
    sqwishedsqwished Member Posts: 1,475 Bug Hunter
    Not so sure about it, but yes if it would be possible.
    I'd like more options to customise the way a ship looks, not going as far as a ships exterior but maybe something concerning the interior of them. Something like Trion's dimension system. Where we have a base map, and we can build pretty much what ever we wanted in terms of internal layout, taking into account the available bridge packs.
    Oh, it's not broken? We can soon fix that!

  • Options
    lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,828 Arc User
    How would you control it? Make your tiny little Escort into a big hulking Oddy with cannons that can turn on a dime? Turn your Gal-X into a tiny little Defiant? How would you account for Saucer Separation multiple ships have access to?

    There is so many what ifs and restrictions that would need to be built in...right now I think the time would be spent better elsewhere.
  • Options
    solarwraithsolarwraith Member Posts: 188 Arc User
    Yes, but with existing models only.
    Total customization of ships would be a welcome addition, of course it would take cryptic a lot of time to make ship bits fit hulls they were never meant to be on.
  • Options
    horizons2052horizons2052 Member Posts: 184 Arc User
    Not at all. I'm fine with starship customization as it currently is.
    This poll is rigged with a specific agenda in mind. Basically, a biased poll.

    Which do you like?

    Nuking the entire world?
    Nuking the city you live in?
    Giving horizons2052 all your money?

    See? In option 1 and 2 you die. In option 3 you live. Which one do you logically choose? Number 3 of course. But that is not how polls work though, is it? NOPE! So this is a failed poll.

  • Options
    leviathan99#2867 leviathan99 Member Posts: 7,747 Arc User
    There are three big reasons I don't see this happening:

    1) Cryptic makes money off of individual ships. I think it may be overdone as a cash cow option for them but I also get that you go with what works.

    2) While individual ships have a development cost for each, I think most are fairly profitable now. And they keep people employed and so even if having US design ships could be more profitable in the very long run (say, with a fee each time we customize), Cryptic developers do work closely together and I doubt we'd see a boat rocking disruption that would involve laying off longterm employees in ship art or systems. If what works keeps your friends employed (and it does work) then something that may or may not work that would involve laying off trusted coworkers doesn't strike me as the Cryptic way. I think the artists might fare okay here but systems designers would be in more jeopardy... again, for an unproven system.

    3) IP rules and considerations.

    I think it could happen but it would involve either the game going into a maintenance mode for parts of development or would end up only happening in the event that some series of updates and player departures/influxes turned ground into the dominant play form and cash cow of the game. You can imagine what the odds are for that yourself.

    Now... I could imagine the basic idea you describe being applied to ground weapons. Because ground already gets less focus (revamping ground weapons wouldn't involve layoffs) and it could create new forms of player interest/affection for ground. It's a revamp of a product that ISN'T as financially lucrative if they build a gun customization system.
  • Options
    baudlbaudl Member Posts: 4,060 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    Not so sure about it, but yes if it would be possible.
    I tend to be between "not sure about it" and "not at all" for 2 reasons.
    1.) The attrocities some people are capable of creating is immersion breaking to say the least and sometimes even induces spontanious vomiting at the screen. But on the other hand I wouldn't want to be against such a tool since for every abomination people create, they also create beautiful ships.
    2.) It would be already enough (for me) if I could choose the shield visual effect at the starship tailor...I mean, why isn't this option in the game already similar to the ground armor which can be made visible at any time.
    Go pro or go home
  • Options
    xparr15xparr15 Member Posts: 283 Arc User
    Cryptic has also stated in the past that they want players to be able to tell what ship another player is using easily by appearance. Fully customizable ships would prevent this.
  • Options
    scarlingscarling Member Posts: 708 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    I'd honestly just like to be able to control whether or not the animated pylons are up or down on the Intrepid. I dont really care why they are up for warp and down for sub light. It just looks way better up.
  • Options
    bobbydazlersbobbydazlers Member Posts: 4,534 Arc User
    Not at all. I'm fine with starship customization as it currently is.
    if they introduced a ship building feature at all I think it would be best handled as a fleet holding with members donating to different projects within the holding, naturally all fleets would be working on the same ships but there still might be the possibility of a certain amount of individuality to the end product depending on what limited time projects they were able to complete, then when all the projects are completed to T5 every fleet member can buy for a nominal fleet credit cost one of the final ships, naturally they would be T6 fleet ships and perhaps come with a dedicated console set, weapons set and warp core, shield, impulse, deflector set that can all be purchased for fleet credits also.

    When I think about everything we've been through together,

    maybe it's not the destination that matters, maybe it's the journey,

     and if that journey takes a little longer,

    so we can do something we all believe in,

     I can't think of any place I'd rather be or any people I'd rather be with.

  • Options
    azurianstarazurianstar Member Posts: 6,985 Arc User
    This was brought up years go, before STO went F2P. The Answer is - not going to happen.

    Why? CBS said so.

    The closest we will likely to ever come to making our own ships is if Cryptic implemented a Ship building system that resulted in the infamous Star Trek Kitbashes. For an example, you having to own the Peregrine and the Intrepid, and the result is the Yeager. Or owning the Ambassador and Galaxy to get access to the Niagra-class.

  • Options
    deadspacex64deadspacex64 Member Posts: 565 Arc User
    Totally!
    wow, just rofl @ people posting 'there's too much customization already' what customization? you given a set amount of bits and that's it. further building your own wouldn't only be for the exterior look but internal configuration as well such as boff seating and console slots.

    such incredibly easily satisfied players around here. guess that comes with being with sto so long perhaps for some people. makes cryptics job incredibly easy though and explains much of the direction and mechanic changes they tend to go. and seriously, i am laughing, a sad, rueful laugh at how little can make some players content. why strive for new frontiers, the calling card of star trek franchise when you can just be happy with what little you already have.

    no great adventurers in that group that's for sure.
    Dr. Patricia Tanis ~ "Bacon is for sycophants and products of incest."
    Donate Brains, zombies in Washington DC are starving.
  • Options
    angrybobhangrybobh Member Posts: 420 Arc User
    Totally!
    While those against the idea bring up very good points that are pertinent to the game and the company that develops it, and the fact that it will never happen, I love building my own ships. I have played many games that have allowed for customization in this way and it is something that I would probably spend a great deal of time (and money if need be) on. Sadly, it is a wish equal to winning the lottery. It's not realistically ever going to happen. But, for the purpose of the poll, I would vote for it.
  • Options
    baudlbaudl Member Posts: 4,060 Arc User
    Not so sure about it, but yes if it would be possible.
    angrybobh wrote: »
    While those against the idea bring up very good points that are pertinent to the game and the company that develops it, and the fact that it will never happen, I love building my own ships. I have played many games that have allowed for customization in this way and it is something that I would probably spend a great deal of time (and money if need be) on. Sadly, it is a wish equal to winning the lottery. It's not realistically ever going to happen. But, for the purpose of the poll, I would vote for it.

    hmm, maybe they could insert a kind of minigame at Utopia planitia, where you can build your ships from scratch. Not to use it or anything just as a passtime. Maybe even extend that by making people poll on some designs.
    I'm not against it really, but I just know that giving players free hand means that we'll be looking at some extremely ugly ships in earth orbit and that actually bothers me.
    Go pro or go home
  • Options
    bobbydazlersbobbydazlers Member Posts: 4,534 Arc User
    edited September 2015
    Not at all. I'm fine with starship customization as it currently is.
    wow, just rofl @ people posting 'there's too much customization already' what customization? you given a set amount of bits and that's it. further building your own wouldn't only be for the exterior look but internal configuration as well such as boff seating and console slots.

    such incredibly easily satisfied players around here. guess that comes with being with sto so long perhaps for some people. makes cryptics job incredibly easy though and explains much of the direction and mechanic changes they tend to go. and seriously, i am laughing, a sad, rueful laugh at how little can make some players content. why strive for new frontiers, the calling card of star trek franchise when you can just be happy with what little you already have.

    no great adventurers in that group that's for sure.

    yet again I will remind you that whatever parts you use to build your ship you will only be using the parts that cryptic have programed for you to use and add to this there would likely be restrictions on what parts could be used with what parts, this will inevitably end up with many players building a ship that looks remarkably similar to yours.
    just think of the amount of different uniform choices we have, we can customize to our hearts content yet you still find yourself standing next to someone who has exactly the same outfit as you do.

    I just don't see the point, sure I want to strive for new frontiers in the game but this does not include playing starship lego with a load of pre designed parts the devs have put there for me to use, this involves exploring new content the devs have put there for me to explore, hopefully with new star systems, new planets and new aliens.

    that new content will not be there for me to explore if the devs are wasting their time on this starship building lego set.

    and seriously, i am laughing, a sad, rueful laugh at how little can make some players content. why strive for new frontiers, the calling card of star trek franchise when you can just be happy with starship lego.

    When I think about everything we've been through together,

    maybe it's not the destination that matters, maybe it's the journey,

     and if that journey takes a little longer,

    so we can do something we all believe in,

     I can't think of any place I'd rather be or any people I'd rather be with.

Sign In or Register to comment.