test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Ten Forward

Are the new Forums...

zedbrightlander1zedbrightlander1 Member Posts: 14,782 Arc User
edited June 2015 in Ten Forward
Answer what flavor you think the new forums are: Vanilla or Chocolate or Strawberry.
f5cc65bc8f3b91f963e328314df7c48d.jpg
Sig? What sig? I don't see any sig.

Are the new Forums... 18 votes

Vanilla
72%
comrademocomeurikoldravenman3025robdmczedbrightlander1dartdukiihawku001xmjarbarrandom909artan42cidjackryan218ayradyss 13 votes
Chocolate
16%
takeshi6rattler2torgaddon101 3 votes
Strawberry
11%
tehbubbalookimony 2 votes
Post edited by zedbrightlander1 on
«1

Comments

  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,667 Community Moderator
    Chocolate
    What can I say? I'm a chocoholic. :smile:
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    Yang Xiao Long wrote:
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
    normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
    colored text = mod mode
  • zedbrightlander1zedbrightlander1 Member Posts: 14,782 Arc User
    Vanilla
    Well, that looks weird. The Vanilla is pink, the Chocolate is blue and it look like Strawberry is going to show as yellow.
    f5cc65bc8f3b91f963e328314df7c48d.jpg
    Sig? What sig? I don't see any sig.
  • kojirohellfirekojirohellfire Member Posts: 1,606 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    D : Mud and worms.
  • hawku001xhawku001x Member Posts: 10,769 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    Vanilla
    E: Puppies and kittens. Wait. Vanilla.
    Phoenix_Compendium_1.jpg
    USS Phoenix-X Literary Index | Comics | Most recent story: "The Opposite of That"
  • alexmakepeacealexmakepeace Member Posts: 10,633 Arc User
    F: Moldy Socks
    a1tg90.jpg
    Check out my YouTube channel!
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,008 Arc User
    L: Bad.

    Yeah, can't come up with something witty right now ;)
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
    #TASforSTO
    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    Vanilla
    Vanilla, uninteresting, bland, and not a proper flavour for ice cream.
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.
    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    A blended concoction of liverwurst and scrapple.
  • ryan218ryan218 Member Posts: 36,106 Arc User
    Vanilla
    Personally, I like vanilla ice cream!
    Old Wounds
    Trials of Blood and Fire
    Moving On Parts 1-3 - Part 4
    In Cold Blood
  • mjarbarmjarbar Member Posts: 2,084 Arc User
    Vanilla
    Vanilla is okay but I prefer Rasberry Ripple of Key Lime Pie more!
    hZbIdbh.jpg
    THANK YOU FOUNDRY - YOUR CONTENT GAVE ME MANY HAPPY HOURS
    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • tfcztfcz Member Posts: 20
    Judging by the rather bland design, I would be surprised if they had any flavor at all.
    This is a new account I had to create, because the old one does not work with the new forums. :/
  • aloishammeraloishammer Member Posts: 3,294 Arc User
    tfcz wrote: »
    Judging by the rather bland design, I would be surprised if they had any flavor at all.

    Oh, they do. Remember that nasty-looking nutrient paste they fed the original Robocop? :p
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    tfcz wrote: »
    Judging by the rather bland design, I would be surprised if they had any flavor at all.

    They're not much off from what they were before. Avatars are smaller. There's no "titles" under the names. But...hrmm...

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:5KKlf_qvvjMJ:sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1122341+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

    ...it's a cached copy, so some stuff is off - but generally speaking, the colors we've got are the colors we had.

    Sure, the quoting stood out better...but all in all...yeah, I'm finding the "bland" comments confusing given what it was.
  • zedbrightlander1zedbrightlander1 Member Posts: 14,782 Arc User
    Vanilla
    kojirohellfire wrote: »
    D : Mud and worms.
    No. That sig image isn't gonna cause anyone a seizure. :/

    f5cc65bc8f3b91f963e328314df7c48d.jpg
    Sig? What sig? I don't see any sig.
  • kojirohellfirekojirohellfire Member Posts: 1,606 Arc User
    zedbrightlander1 wrote: »
    kojirohellfire wrote: »
    D : Mud and worms.
    No. That sig image isn't gonna cause anyone a seizure. :/

    Shove off.
  • aloishammeraloishammer Member Posts: 3,294 Arc User
    virusdancer wrote: »
    Sure, the quoting stood out better...but all in all...yeah, I'm finding the "bland" comments confusing given what it was.

    Thought: A lot of us, after the old forums got that "Fifty Shades of Boring" revamp, were running Stylist with a setup some forum user had made thus not looking at grey on grey on grey. Me, I'm missing the black background with white text I was using until this last migration something fierce.

    Currently investigating use of something similar to rectify the new (to me) blandnado, too.

  • alexmakepeacealexmakepeace Member Posts: 10,633 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    You know, it really might cause a seizure in people who suffer from reflex epilepsy. Not saying it to be mean or anything, but I live with a person with "brain variables" so such things kind of stand out to me.

    On another off-topic note, I had someone in my public speaking class give her speech on how her cousin who worked at a casino was possessed by a demon because her parents must have made a deal with the Devil. One of the symptoms was an episode of loss of consciousness while at work at the casino. I immediately suspected epilepsy.
    a1tg90.jpg
    Check out my YouTube channel!
  • tehbubbalootehbubbaloo Member Posts: 2,003 Arc User
    Strawberry
    the forum is kinda fruity, so i picked strawberry.
    eY5eKAV.png
    free jkname
    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • kojirohellfirekojirohellfire Member Posts: 1,606 Arc User
    alexmakepeace wrote: »
    You know, it really might cause a seizure in people who suffer from reflex epilepsy. Not saying it to be mean or anything,

    Oh TRIBBLE. Like the few usual suspects in CO that I'm always squabbling with? I'm really sure your intentions are noble. Take a hike.
  • alexmakepeacealexmakepeace Member Posts: 10,633 Arc User
    Already did. Yesterday. My legs ache. And yes, my intentions are noble, though I have been known to be overly concerned about little things.
    a1tg90.jpg
    Check out my YouTube channel!
  • kojirohellfirekojirohellfire Member Posts: 1,606 Arc User
    Well take your "concern" elsewhere. I've been trolled enough already.
  • alexmakepeacealexmakepeace Member Posts: 10,633 Arc User
    No one's stopping you from deciding that my concern is unwarranted, or to point out why I'm wrong (I would listen, even if I didn't agree), but to dismiss it out of hand as "trolling" is... reactionary. If you had just said that you disagreed, I'd have been okay with it, but the hostility just ticks me off and makes me stay to write semi-long off-topic posts like this one. I can understand why you'd be annoyed about the subject, since I've seen people poke you about it before, but that doesn't mean you get to jump to conclusions about my intent and slap a "troll" label on me.

    And while I'm ranting, everybody uses the term "troll" too casually. They slap it on anyone they don't like, turning them from people into things, because people have nuance and insight and feelings, but things do not. There's a lot of terms like this: troll, TRIBBLE, bigot, moron, liberal, conservative, true believer, unbeliever/denier, etc. Ways to not think about things and turn a person into "the enemy" which can be comfortably vanquished.

    Meanwhile, actual trolls (used according to Wikipedia's definition) can lurk comrotably amongst all the noise.
    a1tg90.jpg
    Check out my YouTube channel!
  • kojirohellfirekojirohellfire Member Posts: 1,606 Arc User
    alexmakepeace wrote: »
    No one's stopping you from deciding that my concern is unwarranted, or to point out why I'm wrong (I would listen, even if I didn't agree), but to dismiss it out of hand as "trolling" is... reactionary. If you had just said that you disagreed, I'd have been okay with it, but the hostility just ticks me off and makes me stay to write semi-long off-topic posts like this one. I can understand why you'd be annoyed about the subject, since I've seen people poke you about it before, but that doesn't mean you get to jump to conclusions about my intent and slap a "troll" label on me.

    And while I'm ranting, everybody uses the term "troll" too casually. They slap it on anyone they don't like, turning them from people into things, because people have nuance and insight and feelings, but things do not. There's a lot of terms like this: troll, TRIBBLE, bigot, moron, liberal, conservative, true believer, unbeliever/denier, etc. Ways to not think about things and turn a person into "the enemy" which can be comfortably vanquished.

    Meanwhile, actual trolls (used according to Wikipedia's definition) can lurk comrotably amongst all the noise.

    Maybe you should take your own advice then and look up what "reactionary" actually means.
  • aloishammeraloishammer Member Posts: 3,294 Arc User
    kojirohellfire wrote: »
    Maybe you should take your own advice then and look up what "reactionary" actually means.

    Maybe you should look at that strobe light you're passing off as a signature then look up what "troll" means.
  • alexmakepeacealexmakepeace Member Posts: 10,633 Arc User
    kojirohellfire wrote: »

    Maybe you should take your own advice then and look up what "reactionary" actually means.
    Eh. Silly me for assuming that it means what it sounds like it means. Politics. Meh. I guess volatile more closely matches my intended meaning, but not quite. I meant to say you reacted strongly based only on what you assumed were hostile intentions, even though I gave no evidence of intended hostility.

    From now on, I think I'll hijack that word to mean that. It's gotta be better than saying "literally" as an intensifier for figurative events. Maybe I can get it into the dictionary.
    a1tg90.jpg
    Check out my YouTube channel!
  • kojirohellfirekojirohellfire Member Posts: 1,606 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    alexmakepeace wrote: »
    I guess volatile more closely matches my intended meaning, but not quite. I meant to say you reacted strongly based only on what you assumed were hostile intentions, even though I gave no evidence of intended hostility.

    Look up "passive-aggressive" now and see how I can easily suspect ill intent from allegedly kindly-worded posts.
  • alexmakepeacealexmakepeace Member Posts: 10,633 Arc User
    I guess I can understand that. Maybe you'll just take my word for it, then: I bear you no ill intentions, and I meant exactly what I said and no more. Like I said, I live with someone who's literally (literally literally, not figuratively literally) missing a big chunk of her brain, so even though she doesn't suffer from epilepsy, I think about how things affect brain-injured people more than most folks do.
    a1tg90.jpg
    Check out my YouTube channel!
  • kojirohellfirekojirohellfire Member Posts: 1,606 Arc User
    That would make you the first in a sea of sewage.
  • cptjhuntercptjhunter Member Posts: 2,288 Arc User
    "It tastes like Burning...."-Ralph Wiggums
  • marcusdkanemarcusdkane Member Posts: 7,439 Arc User
    Having to use Chrome rather than safari on the iPADD... Not happy...
Sign In or Register to comment.