test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

Why are the T6 ships so ugly?

littlesarbonnlittlesarbonn Member Posts: 486 Arc User
I apologize if this comes off as a rant, as I'm not the ranting kind. I like the game. I have problems with some of the recent decisions like a lot of others, but mostly I'm still signing on every day and spending money on the things that are significant to me.

I have the new ships, but wow, they are extremely ugly. And I mean most of them. The Klingon and Romulan T6 ships are kind of throwaway, in that they don't appear to be that much different than most. Although I will say my favorite ship is the Romulan bird one (the bigger one), even though it's not as functional as I sometimes need for a ship that needs to turn every now and then.

But the Federation ships are extremely unattractive.

Intel escort: Looks like it just is a flat pancake with a couple of nozzles on it. Not sure why they didn't just go with a Defiant or something of that type.

Intel cruiser: Not even sure what to say about this thing, other than it's probably the most functional, but I'm sometimes embarrassed to actually be flying it because it looks awful, like it's some kind of alien ship that doesn't believe is aesthetics.

The Guardian: Okay, this one looks mostly like a Starfleet vessel, but it's not all that special in any way. It looks like they just took one of the earlier ships, puffed it up and then said "hey, this is a Guardian".

The Dauntless: Yeah, I understand that it needs to look like the ship in the episode, but when flying it, it's kind of a crappy triangular thing that doesn't really seem like much of a ship. I fly it with one of my characters and finally decided it looked too stupid to fly around so I traded to the Scryer instead.

The Scryer: This is probably the better of the shapes of the new ships, but basically it looks like they took a regular starship, set it on fire and then whatever was left over was the style of the new ship. It's one of the ugliest ships I've ever used.

I'm sure there were a couple of other ships as well, but those are the main ones I've actually unlocked and used.

I'm really hoping they go back and revisit some of these ships, or at least offer us a whole lot more that are either more canonical, or just more impressive looking. I run around with a Jem'hadar dreadnaught carrier (or whatever it's called), and I really like the look of that thing. The earlier types of ships looked pretty good, too. The Odyssey will always be my favorite look of a ship, even if they outdated it by leaving it as only a T5u.

Anyway, anyone like these ships? I mean, I understand it's a matter of taste, and maybe I'm just wrong and there are people who really like these new styles of ships.
Fleet Admiral Duane Gundrum, U.S.S. Merrimack
Fleet Admiral Ventaxa Proxmire, U.S.S. Shaka Walls Fell
Blog: http://www.sarbonn.com/?page_id=1990
Foundry series: Bob From Accounting & For the Sake of the Empire
Post edited by littlesarbonn on
«1

Comments

  • Options
    questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,426 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    Because beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

    Pretty to one is hideous to another and the other way around.

    Edit: 43 seconds delay because the 300 sec rule is still in effect.
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • Options
    dragonsbrethrendragonsbrethren Member Posts: 1,854 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    They had some really nice concepts for the intel ships, but my guess is they looked too "Federation" so they had to push the intel style to the extreme on them, resulting in what we got. It's sort of the Dyson destroyers all over again. At least they gave us the Guardian to make up for it.

    The Phantom's nice, at least. The Scryer is easily the worst of them -- laugh everytime I see one using a normal Federation material, because the model looks like it came out of a Quake 1 mod without the intel material to compliment the angularness. Just like with the DSDs, the KDF and Romulans lucked out and got something closer to their normal style.
  • Options
    desertjetsdesertjets Member Posts: 207 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I personally think my Scryer looks pretty damn good. Now with the type 7 hull material available, which has a lot more surface detail, really makes it look good. Plus the Adapted MACO shield visual complements it quite well.
  • Options
    wilbor2wilbor2 Member Posts: 1,684 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I like the look of my T6 rom 5 tac console ship and my kdf T6 raptor.

    But the fed ships i wont get any of them. One reason is because i dont like the look of them 2nd reason is im only supporting the smaller factions ships from now on. Unless its to upgrade my ships ive allready payed for.
    gs9kwcxytstg.jpg
  • Options
    szimszim Member Posts: 2,503 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    To me the MatHa Raptor, the Faeth Intel Warbird and the Aelahl Light Warbird Battlecruiser are among the best looking ships in the game. I really like them.

    The Eclypse Intel Cruiser, the Guardian Cruiser and the Scryer Intel Science Vessel are ok. I did not like them very much at first but I kind of got used to them. With the right hull material and warp nacelles they don't look too bad.

    I don't like the looks of the Phantom Intel Escort and the Dauntless. But the ugliest ship by far is the Qib Intel Battlecruiser. It's the only ship I haven't tried out yet. It's... hideous. It looks like an Origami figure, like a paper plane. It's terrible!
  • Options
    nickcastletonnickcastleton Member Posts: 1,212 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I beleive the Intel ship, are loosly based on the U.S.S. Vengeance.

    If i recall the intel ships were a section 31 design, just like the Vengeance is in the jj universe.
    0bzJyzP.gif





    "It appears we have lost our sex appeal, captain."- Tuvok
  • Options
    mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I beleive the Intel ship, are loosly based on the U.S.S. Vengeance.

    If i recall the intel ships were a section 31 design, just like the Vengeance is in the jj universe.
    Not really seeing the similarity there. The Vengeance just seems a bit "blockier" or whatever you want to call it version of the standard "Constitution"-type design with saucer, engineering section and 2 nacelles.

    The Intel ships are extremely flat, and otherwise follow standard Starfleet designs. A Miranda/Nebula Type design (2 nacelles + saucer, no engineering section, some kind of bar roll), a Constellation/Prometheus design (4 nacelles, saucer), and Defiant (pylon-less uni-body with nacelles). The non-Intel ship follows the Constitution design (with a definite throwback to the Ambassador specifically).

    I definitely like the Eclipse and Phantom. The Scryer is a bit of a mixed bag, but it has grown on me to. I can't get excited about the Guardian design, but I was never a big fan of the Ambassador either. Constitution Refit, Excelsior, Galaxy, Sovereign, those are the good ones.

    What I don't like are the Intel materials. I use Type 2 and Type 6 currently instead.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • Options
    hyperionx09hyperionx09 Member Posts: 1,709 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I like the Intel ships, especially the Federation ones, and actually wish the Guardian and Dauntless had an alternate "Intel" like skin and part customization, even if it turned the Guardian into some Vengeance ripoff (using a similar design of the Scryer Saucer) and the Dauntless into a flying Pyramid Head's head (from Resident Evil).

    The best part though is that the Federation Intel ships still carry the spirit of existing Federation designs, unlike the Temporal ships (which are nice too, but very far future).

    It's ok to call the Qib "Un-Klingon" though because they never were big on trying to be extravagant compared to functional (though the Krenn and Korath Temporal ships do have a bit of the faceted look going on in the command section).

    I hope we get more Intel ships in the Intel style, along with some non-Intel T6s just to placate the rest of the playerbase who don't enjoy the Intel design, like we got with the Guardian and Dauntless for Feds, Aelahl for Roms, and the Mat'Ha. It's a refreshing series of unique designs that still fit into the general canon of the game (if they didn't, CBS wouldn't even green-light the inclusion of the Intel ships in the first place).
  • Options
    starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I beleive the Intel ship, are loosly based on the U.S.S. Vengeance.

    If i recall the intel ships were a section 31 design, just like the Vengeance is in the jj universe.

    The Intel ships were based off of Stealth Fighters not the USS Vengeance according to this blog.

    The Starfleet Intel ships are a Starfleet Intelligence design not a Section 31 design. Section 31 would not release their designs to Starfleet Admirals.
  • Options
    dragonsbrethrendragonsbrethren Member Posts: 1,854 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I'd like to think Section 31 would be more low key in their starship designs, but they do have those fetish leather uniforms, so who knows.
  • Options
    norobladnoroblad Member Posts: 2,624 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    just about every ship released has a "why it gotta look like that" thread.

    I kind of like the new KDF ships, the raptor looks nice, the battlcruiser a little odd (looks like a raptor and the head is too wide) but its "ok". Both are sort of rehashes, not very creative.

    The rehash of the DD for the third time (dyson, DD, and now the new lite thing) is boring for roms, and the other one also is just another birdish shape. Nothing exciting, not really ugly, but nothing new either.

    The fed ships... are all over the place. Guardian is a rehash, and the scryer isnt too far off the usual. The intel ship is new and interesting. The experimental is different as well. At least a little creativity showed up here. Of course, they had twice as many new ships as anyone else, so they had more chances to branch out and do stuff....
  • Options
    littlesarbonnlittlesarbonn Member Posts: 486 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    starkaos wrote: »
    The Starfleet Intel ships are a Starfleet Intelligence design not a Section 31 design. Section 31 would not release their designs to Starfleet Admirals.

    Maybe Dr. Bashir saw them while walking around in Sloan's brain.
    Fleet Admiral Duane Gundrum, U.S.S. Merrimack
    Fleet Admiral Ventaxa Proxmire, U.S.S. Shaka Walls Fell
    Blog: http://www.sarbonn.com/?page_id=1990
    Foundry series: Bob From Accounting & For the Sake of the Empire
  • Options
    desertjetsdesertjets Member Posts: 207 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I'd like to think Section 31 would be more low key in their starship designs, but they do have those fetish leather uniforms, so who knows.

    I'd bet they'd look a lot like civilian ships, you know the whole hiding in plain sight thing. I am willing to be all those Mudd Co. freighters hanging about are nothing but a front for Section 31 operatives.
  • Options
    ciranferaciranfera Member Posts: 58 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I personally love the Eclipse and the way it looks.
  • Options
    meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    It's truly amazing I haven't seen the word TRON yet in this thread! :P

    So, are these T6 really that fugly? I used to think so, but gotten kinda used to em by now, I guess. One of them really just looks like an elongated Fleet Advanced Escort, though.
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • Options
    lawstanzlawstanz Member Posts: 70 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    The stated designed inspiration for the intel ships were the latest Lamborghini sports cars and stealth fighters like the F-117. Whether you care for that particular aesthetic is really just a matter of preference.

    For the record, I don't care for the current federation Tier 6 line up, and hope they role out some more options soon.
  • Options
    strykewolf67strykewolf67 Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I think they look alright. <<shrugs>>
    [SIGPIC]http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=91438543000&dateline=1409236387[/SIGPIC]

    Sarah Knightly - Co-leader; Frontier Explorers - U.S.S. Witchblade
    Rias Gremory - Leader; Frontier Marauders - I.K.S. B'ullwinkle
  • Options
    maxvitormaxvitor Member Posts: 2,213 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I have seen the Federation intel ships in standard colors and it does put them in a much better light, although, to me, the Scryer is always going to look like a chew toy. I have long said that I'm a fan of the Reman shield sets dark color scheme so it hardly seems right now to complain when a ship is designed with a dark color scheme, although I'm no fan of the bright blue highlights. That said, I do hope that the developers start thinking more about designing ships that follow more familiar themes, rather than always trying to go off into strange territory, or even consider upgrading the graphics on some of the many existing popular ships, like they upgraded the Intrepid.
    If something is not broken, don't fix it, if it is broken, don't leave it broken.
    Oh Hell NO to ARC
  • Options
    vengefuldjinnvengefuldjinn Member Posts: 1,520 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I love both Romulan T6 designs.

    I love both KDF ships, especially the raptor. The raptor is a work of art. :o

    I love the Dauntless and Guardian design. The Guardian's lines remind me of a newer Ambassador class. I like it a lot.

    The Other three Fed ships, well, They aren't my favorite, but you can customize them interchanging the nacelles, and hull textures into something more pleasing.

    The escort is actually the better looking of the three fed intell ships IMO, with the Scryer being my least favorite, as a fleet mate said, "It looks like a flying bottle opener.' :D

    But they are different, just like the Solenee science ships are. It's nice to see a evolution of Starfleet vessels. Think of them as prototypes. That's what I do.

    What I really would love to see is Cryptic's take on an updated Excelsior class. A T6 ship preferably.
    tumblr_o2aau3b7nh1rkvl19o1_400.gif








  • Options
    darkjeffdarkjeff Member Posts: 2,590 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I rather like the Eclipse with Scryer nacelles. With a dark hull and bright windows, it's like an advanced warship based off the Intrepid.
  • Options
    saeynsaeyn Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I'm sure that I'm not the first to notice this, but the design for the Guardian cruiser looks almost exactly like Andrew Probert's initial concept for the Ambassador class.

    The resemblance is uncanny, I think: http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Ambassador_class_model
  • Options
    hyperionx09hyperionx09 Member Posts: 1,709 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    Well, the Guardian was stated to be a successor design to the Ambassador and Galaxy classes when the Devs discussed it, carrying the spirit of both (and a rather similar loadout as well). They also did state the possibility of adding a variant that could succeed the Galaxy-X as well (including Saucer Sep and a Lance) in the same discussion.

    Which I personally would very much enjoy, since the Guardian hits all the right design cues I like compared to the Galaxy or Ambassador designs, while still retaining the Federation look (same reason I love the Odyssey over the Excelsior and Sovereign looks).
  • Options
    sinn74sinn74 Member Posts: 1,149 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    The Fed ships are plain Fugly, in my opinion. Every last one. The Kdf ships are nice (Although I keep the Borg set visuals enabled on my Matha- else it looks like flying genitalia). The Romulan ships are FANTASTIC.
  • Options
    cbrjwrrcbrjwrr Member Posts: 2,782 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    Because making the first ones ugly but good means people buy them for stats.

    Then they can do pretty but not so good, so people will buy for looks.

    Then they can do ugly but OP because OP sells.

    They then can do pretty and good, and people will buy it.

    Then they can do Fleet Versions.

    Then they can do TX-U Versions.

    Then they can do TX+1, and the whole frakking process begins again.



    And the best part is, we will all still want our canon T5s to be as good...
  • Options
    yorethelyorethel Member Posts: 125 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I can't help but feel there's something wrong with a few Tier 6 ships and the way they look overall some of them could have done with some extra work being done on them to make them look less bland compared to the older ships. I know they are supposed to be stealth intel ships but that doesn't mean they should look half done or bland.

    The Phantom intel Escort: has a deflector array half buried in the front, as if someone forgot there was supposed to be a cut out chunk at the front, which would look alot better than the current rounded biscuit look and less boring IMO. It would also allow us to show our deflector animations instead of them being stuck half inside the ship. I love the homage to the Defiant Class but the forward section needs looking at and maybe given a choice of cut outs and/or deflector looks. At the moment it looks like an ugly duckling a bit half arsed.

    Btw all fed intel ships could do with having a different deflector look when in intel skin as a bright blue light looks bland and cheap as hell, more detail needed on deflector surfaces, Devs you have some wonderful deflectors already in game like the Aventine, Sovereign, even Intrepid and probably some more. Actually Deflector look would be a nice customization option to have on ships in future.

    The Faeht intel Warbird: Scale is wrong compared to other warbird/escorts, it looks like it should be slightly bigger, neck is slightly too short too and what is with the big gaps under it's wings, surely adding some cannons under there would have been nice tbh it looks pretty bland, small and not enough windows (we could have had intel windows like the KDF cruiser except in green lights) Also when the wings are pointed down they look longer than in other configurations, to be honest that length looks fine, makes it look like a BoP.

    The Aelahl Warbird Battlecruiser: This ships is lovely except for the forward Bridge section, theres no deflector at all which looks incredibly silly with the effects flashing out of nowhere. We could have done with an alternate Config one where it was less bullet shaped and more like the Ar'kif with all that detail which looks very nice as it has a deflector albeit a tiny one

    Qib intel Battlecruiser: Well it is rather flat, fan cake style and again scale looks a bit small, neck is a touch too short especially when it is in the config with the wings swept forward. Would have loved a config with wings forward and turned down slightly at the ends with nacelles underneath. Oh by the way, what is with the odd L shaped carrying handle on it's neck? as if something was supposed to be attached there, it looks weird and out of place, perhaps a longer neck and a mid T piece attachment insired by th Vor'Cha could be used here. This is supposed to be a Battlecruiser and looks a bit wimpy. Other than that I love the colours the skin detail and cannon placements forward section etc.

    I know people reading this will think I'm obsessed with defectors, well tbh I'm not I just think if your going to go to the trouble of designing new effects for deflector arrays then the least you can do is allow us to see them properly and incorporate this into your designs as a feature.

    I hope someone reads this feedback, just my opinions on a few of the ships, btw I love the Guardian it is faultless. And the Dauntless is pretty cool I call it my little bag of dirty tricks.
  • Options
    themetalstickmanthemetalstickman Member Posts: 1,010 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    It's ok to call the Qib "Un-Klingon" though because they never were big on trying to be extravagant compared to functional (though the Krenn and Korath Temporal ships do have a bit of the faceted look going on in the command section).

    It's weird because the design is un-Klingon, but the stealth functionality is not. I always thought it was strange that the Klingons accuse the Romulans of being honorless, and then turn around and use cloaking technology just like the Romulans.
    Og12TbC.jpg

    Your father was captain of a starship for twelve minutes. He saved 800 lives, including your mother's, and yours.

    I dare you to do better.
  • Options
    guilli88guilli88 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    They really need to hire a few art developers and start churning out hundreds of variations on hulls, nacelles, saucers, pylons, and so forth. And start selling them as 250 zen a pop. The variations dont need to be huge but could spice things up.

    sig

    http://img825.imageshack.us/img825/5451/om71.jpg

    It is a peculiar phenomenon that we can imagine events that defy the laws of the universe.
  • Options
    kayajaykayajay Member Posts: 1,990 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    My favourite design is still the Nova/Rhode Island...since the Excelsior has been used for over 100-years, why can't they just upgrade fantastic canon designs?
  • Options
    oldravenman3025oldravenman3025 Member Posts: 1,892 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    The Eclipse actually looks pretty good in "Raptor Gray", with red bussard collectors and the nacelles straightened out instead of bent. It looks like an ultra-tech Dakota or Prometheus.


    I've warmed up to it.
  • Options
    arcanum70arcanum70 Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited November 2014
    I don't think that they are ugly. Actually, the ugliest ship in the game (IMO) is the Avenger. I like the look of the new ships myself. I kind of get where people are coming from in that they are not "standard Star Trek", but to me that is a good thing. They have the same basic design, but I like how they are changing it up a little with the design.

    I suppose if there weren't other changes in the game that have pissed me off I would give more thought to what the ships look like, but a ship model compared to the nerf hammer on too many things is irrelevant.
Sign In or Register to comment.