test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Federation Styled Cloak

rosetyler51rosetyler51 Member Posts: 1,631 Arc User
edited December 2013 in Federation Discussion
There is a monster of a thread asking for built in cloak on 3 Starfleet ships. Please go look at that if you want to speak out on that.

This thread is to talk about how we will make a cloak that is not like the Klingons or Romulans.

My idea is it should be a pure defensive skill so a lot of this will sound crazy.

Battlecloak
No ambush bonus
and pretty sure more things are needed

So what do you think?
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • dahminusdahminus Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Mask energy signature...?
    Chive on and prosper, eh?

    My PvE/PvP hybrid skill tree
  • rosetyler51rosetyler51 Member Posts: 1,631 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    That is really want I want to give them but I want to make it better
  • capnshadow27capnshadow27 Member Posts: 1,731 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    dahminus wrote: »
    Mask energy signature...?

    Essentially i think so.

    Almost like a placate ability, you can still SEE your target, but your weapons and sensors cant lock on.

    Emission seeking torpedoes would still work.

    Upside, because we wouldnt get a buff to the decloak, we could keep our shields.

    Essentially giving us the cloak, but taking away what everyone wants it for :D
    Inertia just means you can do Powerslides in you carrier!
    I am Il Shadow and i approve these Shennanigans!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • feiqafeiqa Member Posts: 2,410 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Drat, I was hoping this was a thread for a formal cloak for our characters to wear. :(

    Originally Posted by pwlaughingtrendy
    Network engineers are not ship designers.
    Nor should they be. Their ships would look weird.
  • capnshadow27capnshadow27 Member Posts: 1,731 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    feiqa wrote: »
    Drat, I was hoping this was a thread for a formal cloak for our characters to wear. :(

    5 EC says feds get trenchcoats ad long coats before the Klingons :D
    Inertia just means you can do Powerslides in you carrier!
    I am Il Shadow and i approve these Shennanigans!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • unangbangkayunangbangkay Member Posts: 10 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Sorry, double reply.
  • unangbangkayunangbangkay Member Posts: 10 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    5 EC says feds get trenchcoats ad long coats before the Klingons :D

    There are already trench coats and long coats in the game. The Winter jackets are there, and available to all factions. The romulan veteran outfit is a pretty cool trenchcoat as well.

    Essentially i think so.

    Almost like a placate ability, you can still SEE your target, but your weapons and sensors cant lock on.

    Emission seeking torpedoes would still work.

    Upside, because we wouldnt get a buff to the decloak, we could keep our shields.

    Essentially giving us the cloak, but taking away what everyone wants it for :D

    What's the point then? Anyone who wants to use this "purely defensive" idea will just slot Mask Energy Signature (which they already do!), and everyone else will STILL slot the cloak console.
  • annemarie30annemarie30 Member Posts: 2,671 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    like the ones on the original BSG. tan with gold trim, or purple with silver trim.

    oh, and for the ship cloak, just say no. I'd rather they put a CDR tac slot on the galaxy
    We Want Vic Fontaine
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    We need cloaks for our characters. Cloaks makes anyone look cooler and they are very practical pieces of clothing. Especially cloaks with lots of pockets.

    As far as an actual Federation Cloak goes, the Phase Shift Generator from the Kar'Fi Battle Carrier. 10 second duration, 3 minute cooldown, cannot be attacked, cannot be targetted, cannot attack, can only use abilities that affect yourself. In other words, an Oh **** power.
  • rylanadionysisrylanadionysis Member Posts: 3,359 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    We do NOT need more cloaking in this game.

    It has already turned into spy vs spy enough as is.
    Gold.jpg
    Fleet Admiral Rylana - Fed Tac - U.S.S Wild Card - Tactical Miracle Worker Cruiser
    Lifetime Subscriber since 2012 == 17,200 Accolades = RIP PvP and Vice Squad
    Chief of Starfleet Intelligence Service == Praise Cheesus
  • daan2006daan2006 Member Posts: 5,346 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    It has already turned into spy vs spy enough as is.

    that cartoon comes to mind :)
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    swimwear off risa not fixed
    system Lord Baal is dead
    macronius wrote: »
    This! Their ability to outdo their own failures is quite impressive. If only this power could be harnessed for good.
  • ameristamerist Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    I suspect that the Federation's capability with holo-technology would be good for this. A "cloak" that just makes the ship difficult-impossible to target while projecting multiple holo images of the ship. The images can be targeted, cannot be destroyed, but also don't shoot.
  • feiqafeiqa Member Posts: 2,410 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    f2pdrakron wrote: »
    http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j319/SF1701st/The%20Admirable/DS9desertsuit8.jpg

    Only cloak I accept for the Federation considering the OP proposal, otherwise ... nope.

    Does it have to have the green stripe and does the hood have to be up?

    Originally Posted by pwlaughingtrendy
    Network engineers are not ship designers.
    Nor should they be. Their ships would look weird.
  • rybrarianrybrarian Member Posts: 32 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Probably in a minority, but the skill should not be built in on FED ships.

    I mean, if you really want to cloak all the time and soak up the advantages of that, there's literally two additional factions you can play as - Romulans and Klingons - that allow you to do that. That's kind of why you would play as one of them, partially for the cloak.
  • rosetyler51rosetyler51 Member Posts: 1,631 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    rybrarian wrote: »
    Probably in a minority, but the skill should not be built in on FED ships.

    I mean, if you really want to cloak all the time and soak up the advantages of that, there's literally two additional factions you can play as - Romulans and Klingons - that allow you to do that. That's kind of why you would play as one of them, partially for the cloak.

    You are right but it looks like Starfleet will not stop until they have a fleet of cloakable ships on par or better then the KDF. This thread is me trying to stop them for just getting a pure copy of an other faction cloak.
  • terongrayterongray Member Posts: 272 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Only one thing I can think to say to any idea that keeps a game mechanic inferior along factional lines...

    Nope.

    You are right but it looks like Starfleet will not stop until they have a fleet of cloakable ships on par or better then the KDF. This thread is me trying to stop them for just getting a pure copy of an other faction cloak.

    Oh look, it's this wild accusation again... :rolleyes:
  • rosetyler51rosetyler51 Member Posts: 1,631 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    I would like to get this thread back on topic please so if you have an idea for a Starfleet Styled Cloak please speak up. If you have other topics to bring up please make your own thread or look for a better thread to bring it up.
  • terongrayterongray Member Posts: 272 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Just to note, there should be no 'Federation styled cloak' as it would imply they designed and created the technology they use, which violates the Treaty of Algernon. Starfleet however could logically be using cloaking systems provided by the Romulan Republic on approved spaceframes in the lend-lease program that appears to exist. The Federation sends ships and support, for access to assets they otherwise wouldn't have.

    That what feels off to me with the proposal. At best you're asking for an enhanced MES, or at worst a massive continuity breach.

    At least you aren't asking for the ships to blow up every fourth use. XD
  • kintishokintisho Member Posts: 1,040 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    None of the Romulan/KDF treaties exist with each other OR the Federation at all. the KDF is (supposedly)at all out no holds barred war with the Fed and the FED spread itself to protect the Rommies after there star went all SPLODIE.. The Romulans cant be trusted as far as thrown in any case so why would the FEDs honor an obsolete treaty from a bygone era that no one else honors at all? case in point the wide spread use of thaeleron weaponry.. aLL illegal under all prior accords and low and behold romulans and remans eradicating life on entire worlds in one shot... Tell me Feds cant have cloaks Ill tell you romulans cant have scimitars but guess what THEY DO. End of argument FEDs get cloaks since no ones been playing by ANY rules since well before 2409... (TNG: all good things proves this message "starship stealth" said the Riker)
  • rosetyler51rosetyler51 Member Posts: 1,631 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    But like you said. Lore should not matter more then game balance so this thread is about how to make Starfleet's cloak something is good but not a pure copy of an other faction. Each faction should have something that make them play different and cause Crusiers, Sci ships, Sci carriers, Escort carriers, and Escorts is not unique for Starfleet I felt like this thread should be made. :P
  • ameristamerist Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    terongray wrote: »
    Just to note, there should be no 'Federation styled cloak' as it would imply they designed and created the technology they use, which violates the Treaty of Algernon. Starfleet however could logically be using cloaking systems provided by the Romulan Republic on approved spaceframes in the lend-lease program that appears to exist. The Federation sends ships and support, for access to assets they otherwise wouldn't have.

    That what feels off to me with the proposal. At best you're asking for an enhanced MES, or at worst a massive continuity breach.

    At least you aren't asking for the ships to blow up every fourth use. XD

    I agree, a cloak is really not Federation style. (...and then there's the pesky treaty.)

    I think that something like a toggled holographic displacement is more likely along the lines of what Federation does. Look like a small fleet and force the enemy to choose a ship to fire on.

    Energy signature masking to not show up on radar or fall off of TAB-target beyond a certain range.

    Turning invisible is certainly the Romulan and Klingon shtick; but there's more than one way to be "invisible" or mitigate detection using the technology at hand.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    kintisho wrote: »
    None of the Romulan/KDF treaties exist with each other OR the Federation at all. the KDF is (supposedly)at all out no holds barred war with the Fed and the FED spread itself to protect the Rommies after there star went all SPLODIE.. The Romulans cant be trusted as far as thrown in any case so why would the FEDs honor an obsolete treaty from a bygone era that no one else honors at all? case in point the wide spread use of thaeleron weaponry.. aLL illegal under all prior accords and low and behold romulans and remans eradicating life on entire worlds in one shot... Tell me Feds cant have cloaks Ill tell you romulans cant have scimitars but guess what THEY DO. End of argument FEDs get cloaks since no ones been playing by ANY rules since well before 2409... (TNG: all good things proves this message "starship stealth" said the Riker)

    Here is the Path to 2409: Volume 16 Chapter 1 and 2:

    "Tragedy struck for Starfleet on Stardate 72487.91, when the U.S.S. Kelso was lost with all hands.

    The Kelso was supposed to be on a routine mission to study the long-term effects of the Hobus supernova on star systems in the Devron Sector when it was destroyed. Initial reports indicated that the Kelso could have come under attack. However, when the remains of the vessel were recovered by the U.S.S. April, it was found that a coolant leak caused by an experimental cloaking device onboard the Kelso caused plasma to vent from the ship. The plasma reacted with ionizing radiation present in the area, causing the explosion which destroyed the Kelso.

    After careful consideration, Captain Barax Wenn of the April revealed the cause of the Kelso's destruction to the captains of the Romulan ships assisting in the search for the vessel. In response, Praetor Taris lodged an immediate complaint with the Federation Council, and, as a "gesture of good faith," informed the Klingon Empire of the details of the Kelso's destruction as well.

    Starfleet Security admitted that the U.S.S. Kelso was testing a Federation cloaking device. The Romulans then ejected all Federation diplomats and ships from their space in protest, and Chancellor J'mpok recalled the Klingon ambassador to the Federation back to Qo'noS for "strategic discussions."

    After the revelation that Starfleet was testing a cloaking device, tensions between the Federation, Romulans and Klingons were at their highest point since the destruction of the Romulan homeworld in 2387. After a full inquiry, six members of Starfleet Security were court-martialed.

    It took three months for Federation President Aennik Okeg to convince the Romulans and the Klingons to send representatives to a summit to discuss the situation. When the meeting finally began, Okeg made the Federation's position clear. He apologized for the experiments into cloaking technology, and said that he had signed an executive order banning all research into or creation of Federation cloaking technology.

    "The narrow legal view may be that the Treaty of Algeron ended when Romulus was destroyed," Okeg said. "The Romulan Star Empire we knew is gone, and you are a new people. What has not changed is the Federation's commitment to peace."

    And all of this happened in 2395 or 8 years after the destruction of the Romulus system. This is Star Trek Online lore so any Starfleet Captain using a cloaking device on a Starfleet vessel means they are breaking the law.

    Also, the timeline from the All Good Things episodes where the Galaxy-X was introduced no longer exists. So what happens in one timeline stays in that timeline.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    amerist wrote: »
    I agree, a cloak is really not Federation style. (...and then there's the pesky treaty.)

    I think that something like a toggled holographic displacement is more likely along the lines of what Federation does. Look like a small fleet and force the enemy to choose a ship to fire on.

    Energy signature masking to not show up on radar or fall off of TAB-target beyond a certain range.

    Turning invisible is certainly the Romulan and Klingon shtick; but there's more than one way to be "invisible" or mitigate detection using the technology at hand.

    We already have the Photonic Displacement console from the Rhode Island and the Photonic Fleet ability so it is entirely possible to have a better version of the console only available to Federation ships. I believe that any Federation Cloak should be strictly for escaping combat instead of the Romulan and KDF cloaks where they are for initiating combat.
  • rosetyler51rosetyler51 Member Posts: 1,631 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Yes! It should be a defensive skill. Make the KDF and Romulans think about going out of cloak.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    f2pdrakron wrote: »
    Rubbish.

    Cloak is basically this, you are walking down the street at night some someone with a knife comes from a alley and stabs you, you are surprised because he was hiding and so cannot defend yourself as well because the element of surprise.

    The cloak is that, something that just SURPRISE TORPEDO ATTACK ON THE SHIP AFT!!! and it deals extra damage because everyone is just saying "what?", this is why cloak is both a offensive and a defensive ability since it gives +15 Damage for 5 seconds when coming out and +25% Defense when engaged.

    Oh and if we want to be canon about it ... I have no idea were the Enterprise-D Dreadnought Cloak come from but fact it, the ship come out of cloak and fired the Lance so it certainly not to escape combat as the Defiant cloaking device was Romulan even if the Defiant didnt really used it the same way as the Enterprise-D but thats were it come from.

    I dont see any merit in this tread because trying to twist the Cloaking Device into a neutered form just in a attempt to please a subset minority of KDF exclusive players is exactly that, we should not attempt to make concessions to please a fringe minority that will never be pleased until STO becomes Klingon Defense Force Online.

    And how is ambushing ships behaviour that the Federation would condone? Starfleet are about protecting themselves and other people rather than attacking first. A 15% attack bonus for ambushing ships is not what Starfleet is about. Personally, Starfleet should never get any cloak, but if Starfleet gets a unique cloak, then it should be about escaping rather than attacking which is why the Phase Shift Generator would work.
  • rosetyler51rosetyler51 Member Posts: 1,631 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    The Cloaking console would still here is a console.I don't think the cloaking console needs a nerf. This is thread is about a new kind of cloak that could built in to the 3 cloakable starfleet ships and maybe some other ships. If a ship wants to this 'Federation Styled Cloak' along with the console that would be fine. There would be a something to stop them from using them both back to back ofc.
  • kintishokintisho Member Posts: 1,040 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    starkaos wrote: »
    Here is the Path to 2409: Volume 16 Chapter 1 and 2:

    "Tragedy struck for Starfleet on Stardate 72487.91, when the U.S.S. Kelso was lost with all hands.

    The Kelso was supposed to be on a routine mission to study the long-term effects of the Hobus supernova on star systems in the Devron Sector when it was destroyed. Initial reports indicated that the Kelso could have come under attack. However, when the remains of the vessel were recovered by the U.S.S. April, it was found that a coolant leak caused by an experimental cloaking device onboard the Kelso caused plasma to vent from the ship. The plasma reacted with ionizing radiation present in the area, causing the explosion which destroyed the Kelso.

    After careful consideration, Captain Barax Wenn of the April revealed the cause of the Kelso's destruction to the captains of the Romulan ships assisting in the search for the vessel. In response, Praetor Taris lodged an immediate complaint with the Federation Council, and, as a "gesture of good faith," informed the Klingon Empire of the details of the Kelso's destruction as well.

    Starfleet Security admitted that the U.S.S. Kelso was testing a Federation cloaking device. The Romulans then ejected all Federation diplomats and ships from their space in protest, and Chancellor J'mpok recalled the Klingon ambassador to the Federation back to Qo'noS for "strategic discussions."

    After the revelation that Starfleet was testing a cloaking device, tensions between the Federation, Romulans and Klingons were at their highest point since the destruction of the Romulan homeworld in 2387. After a full inquiry, six members of Starfleet Security were court-martialed.

    It took three months for Federation President Aennik Okeg to convince the Romulans and the Klingons to send representatives to a summit to discuss the situation. When the meeting finally began, Okeg made the Federation's position clear. He apologized for the experiments into cloaking technology, and said that he had signed an executive order banning all research into or creation of Federation cloaking technology.

    "The narrow legal view may be that the Treaty of Algeron ended when Romulus was destroyed," Okeg said. "The Romulan Star Empire we knew is gone, and you are a new people. What has not changed is the Federation's commitment to peace."

    And all of this happened in 2395 or 8 years after the destruction of the Romulus system. This is Star Trek Online lore so any Starfleet Captain using a cloaking device on a Starfleet vessel means they are breaking the law.

    Also, the timeline from the All Good Things episodes where the Galaxy-X was introduced no longer exists. So what happens in one timeline stays in that timeline.

    Nice esoteric detail which invalidates this entire game from all canon for the supposed timeline position.. All good things is not canon or we aren't period... I prefer to Go canon with actual trek not the cryptic supposed trek in any case.
  • evilbsg62evilbsg62 Member Posts: 172 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    if fed cloak gets anymore useless than it is i will stop using it, already penalized a console slot and have to be out of combat to cloak. Mask energy sig gives 15 percent def buff plz leave cloak alone its already useless enough as it is
    and by your canon logic wells class shouldn be in this game, mirror ships and a buttload of other ships. i will just continue breaking the law using cloak on every ship i fly
    Section 31Lane/Jeffjr/Varek @jeffjr USS Stadi/USS Grendel/USS AshigaruDreadnought Class Refit / Avenger Class Refit/Rhode Island Class Refit"With your shield or on it"/"Mors venit ad omnes."/"One with courage is a majority"https://www.youtube.com/@jeffjr84
  • rosetyler51rosetyler51 Member Posts: 1,631 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Ow. Just ow. I said the console still there. You still have have your cloak you been had if you are willing to use the console. This idea is for a cloak that would not replace it. Just give you a built in cloak that is not like the other factions.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    kintisho wrote: »
    Nice esoteric detail which invalidates this entire game from all canon for the supposed timeline position.. All good things is not canon or we aren't period... I prefer to Go canon with actual trek not the cryptic supposed trek in any case.

    We all know that Star Trek Online is not Canon just like any Star Trek novel is not Canon. The only Canon is what the TV series and movies set in the Prime Universe dictate. The Star Trek Online universe and Novel universe are in completely different universes than the Prime universe.

    What I quoted is the canon of Star Trek Online and anything that happens in Star Trek Online has to follow its established canon. So the Federation of the Star Trek Online universe was caught developing a Federation cloaking device and the President reconfirmed that the Federation could not research cloaking technology. So cloaking is still illegal in the Federation.

    If next fall introduced a new Star Trek series that was set in the Prime universe and after Nemesis, then STO wouldn't use the new history even though it is Canon. Although, if CBS granted access to Cryptic to use the content of the new Star Trek series, then we could use the ships, technology, races, and some stories from it.
Sign In or Register to comment.