test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Feedback› Federation Discussion

Breen Raider is OP, please nerf

ferdzso0ferdzso0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
edited December 2013 in Federation Discussion
as the title says, please nerf. it has too much stats. atleast take away a front weapon, or something.

my suggestion would be, to take away a weapon slot from front, and add it as a device slot (so it does not become under powered). also, please lower the turnrate, and decrease the crew size, if possible.

my other suggestion would be, to shorten the event length, or increase the price of the ship. as of now, the event is 35 days, and you need 25 * 20 hours to finish the project. my suggestion would be, to lower the event length to 10 days, or increase the price of the sip to 50 * 20 hours. this way, it is not accessible to everyone, and the imbalance makes less damage.
10k DPS Vesta threads: 1; 2
Post edited by ferdzso0 on
«1

Comments

  • phoenixfettphoenixfett Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Wow, really its not even in game yet and your crying about it!?
  • oldkirkfanoldkirkfan Member Posts: 1,263 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    What a stupid idea.

    The only thing that needs to be done is to run the event from 12:54 am to 1:00 am every day. In a different RANDOM time zone every day.
    Caitian Star Pride
    Ferasan Shadow Force
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited December 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Hasn't even been put in game and already cries of it being OP...wow just wow...
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • matchstick606matchstick606 Member Posts: 233 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    ferdzso0 wrote: »
    my other suggestion would be, to shorten the event length, or increase the price of the ship. as of now, the event is 35 days, and you need 25 * 20 hours to finish the project. my suggestion would be, to lower the event length to 10 days, or increase the price of the sip to 50 * 20 hours. this way, it is not accessible to everyone, and the imbalance makes less damage.

    good luck with that, as for everyone getting an op ship how is it at all different from players having the scimitar? besides its going to be just like last year, everyone flying the new ship then within a matter of months they move on.

    stop crying over stuff thats not in the game yet and deal with it.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    MY FLEET:http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=498091
  • asdfjkadfjkasfasdfjkadfjkasf Member Posts: 345 Media Corps
    edited December 2013
    I kill all my crew before entering a battle anyway, I find they get in the way of important ship duties.

    But yeah, it's not going to be anything OP, there are better ships around, it is a nice ship to get for free though, it gives the full free to play players something that can compete with some of the higher end ships.
    ==Join the United Federation of Planets==
    ThreeofSeven.png
  • oldkirkfanoldkirkfan Member Posts: 1,263 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Wow...

    Sarcasm is lost on these threads, isn't it.
    Caitian Star Pride
    Ferasan Shadow Force
  • mrgrocer56mrgrocer56 Member Posts: 370 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    oldkirkfan wrote: »
    Wow...

    Sarcasm is lost on these threads, isn't it.

    totally and completely
  • blazingblitzblazingblitz Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Sarcasm is lost on people it seems.
  • peetapipmacpeetapipmac Member Posts: 2,131 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    srsly did no one else get that he was joking?

    people
    It's not my fault if you feel trolled by my Disco ball... Sorry'boutit.



    R.I.P. Leonard Nimoy
  • robdmcrobdmc Member Posts: 1,619 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    ferdzso0 wrote: »
    please nerf.

    I got a better idea. Let's bring all the other ships up to its level. How about we start by giving my bug ship a 5th fore weapon slot? :)
  • twg042370twg042370 Member Posts: 2,312 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    peetapipmac wrote: »
    srsly did no one else get that he was joking?

    people

    Poe's Law applies to MMM forum posts as well.
    <3
  • ferdzso0ferdzso0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    robdmc wrote: »
    I got a better idea. Let's bring all the other ships up to its level. How about we start by giving my bug ship a 5th fore weapon slot? :)

    well, considering how hard they made the new dyson rep missions, I could go for that. tho only the obelisk is stronger now, and that makes only 2 ships strong enough for endgame content. it is a shame
    10k DPS Vesta threads: 1; 2
  • rakija879rakija879 Member Posts: 646 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    ferdzso0 wrote: »
    as the title says, please nerf. it has too much stats. atleast take away a front weapon, or something.

    my suggestion would be, to take away a weapon slot from front, and add it as a device slot (so it does not become under powered). also, please lower the turnrate, and decrease the crew size, if possible.

    my other suggestion would be, to shorten the event length, or increase the price of the ship. as of now, the event is 35 days, and you need 25 * 20 hours to finish the project. my suggestion would be, to lower the event length to 10 days, or increase the price of the sip to 50 * 20 hours. this way, it is not accessible to everyone, and the imbalance makes less damage.

    bla bla bla
  • irre00nudelirre00nudel Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Hull: 29.700

    MORE hull than fleet aquarius

    Shieldmodifier: 0,88
    a bit less than fleet aquarius

    Mannschaft: 50
    wep: 4 Bug, 2 Heck
    same amount of weps

    Ger?tepl?tze: 2
    turnrate : 19 Grad pro Sekunde
    MORE turnrate than fleet aquarius

    Impulsmodifizierer: 0,21
    MORE impulsemodifier than fleet aquarius

    Beschleunigung: 75
    Br?ckenoffiziersstationen: 1 taktischer Commander, 1universal ensign, 2 universal lts , 1 universal lt com

    MORE universal BO layout than fleet aquarius

    Konsolenpl?tze: 5 Taktik, 2 Technik, 3 Wissenschaft

    MORE tac consoles than fleet aquarius D E S T R O Y E R

    +15 Energie f?r Waffensysteme
    Mit Kanonen best?ckbar
    Konsole ? Universal ? Sensorenst?rfeld

    an special console ? ... (fleet)aquarius has none

    Verbessertes Flankieren
    new flankdamage skill ..



    thats a joke ? :D i want back my 20 euro i wasted for fleet aquarius xD
    >.< well .. i start to like that new ship even if its totally ugly ! <.<
  • mercuriciodidemercuriciodide Member Posts: 342
    edited December 2013
    ferdzso0 wrote: »
    as the title says, please nerf. it has too much stats. atleast take away a front weapon, or something.

    my suggestion would be, to take away a weapon slot from front, and add it as a device slot (so it does not become under powered). also, please lower the turnrate, and decrease the crew size, if possible.
    You've clearly never played end-game content with the Oberth. :rolleyes:

    Now that is an OP ship. It's hilarious how it's remained a secret so long.
  • bitemepwebitemepwe Member Posts: 6,760 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    <in soccer announcer voice> "Troooooolllllllll thread!!"
    Leonard Nimoy, Spock.....:(

    R.I.P
  • sonnikkusonnikku Member Posts: 77 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Can someone link me to the specs so that I might formulate a passionate opinion of this ship before flying it?
    [SIGPIC]http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=94154940000&dateline=1390007378[/SIGPIC]
  • bitemepwebitemepwe Member Posts: 6,760 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    sonnikku wrote: »
    Can someone link me to the specs so that I might formulate a passionate opinion of this ship before flying it?

    Dev blog #27
    Leonard Nimoy, Spock.....:(

    R.I.P
  • majortiraomegamajortiraomega Member Posts: 2,214 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Heh, if nobody has noticed, the OP has made "X Ship is Overpowered" threads for the last several ships because such a thread always pops up. They are obviously intended to be sarcastic and humorous.
    --->Ground PvP Concerns Directory 4.0
    --->Ground Combat General Bugs Directory
    Real join date: March 2012 / PvP Veteran since May 2012 (Ground and Space)
  • oschwoschw Member Posts: 10 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    majortiraomega wrote: »
    Heh, if nobody has noticed, the OP has made "X Ship is Overpowered" threads for the last several ships because such a thread always pops up. They are obviously intended to be sarcastic and humorous.

    To bad they are neither, as he totaly lacks any understanding of humour and sarcasm.
  • majortiraomegamajortiraomega Member Posts: 2,214 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    oschw wrote: »
    To bad they are neither, as he totaly lacks any understanding of humour and sarcasm.

    (sigh), Vulcans.

    Whenever a new ship comes out, in the past someone has always started a thread complaining about XYZ making the ship overpowered. The OP of this thread is merely creating a parody here via sarcasm to demonstrate how silly it is for such threads to pop up every time a ship is released. This is where the humor lies in the thread.
    --->Ground PvP Concerns Directory 4.0
    --->Ground Combat General Bugs Directory
    Real join date: March 2012 / PvP Veteran since May 2012 (Ground and Space)
  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    majortiraomega wrote: »
    (sigh), Vulcans.

    Whenever a new ship comes out, in the past someone has always started a thread complaining about XYZ making the ship overpowered. The OP of this thread is merely creating a parody here via sarcasm to demonstrate how silly it is for such threads to pop up every time a ship is released. This is where the humor lies in the thread.

    Don't forget that there must now be an "X Ship is Underpowered, please buff" thread, started by some idiot who doesn't know how to use said ship.

    Like the Chel'gret Sucks thread XD.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,490 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    The problem is, the style of the post is identical to the usual "this is OP, please nerf" thread. If you want to parody something, you have to either get ridiculous, or go over the top (perhaps demanding that the ship be nerfed by replacing its duranium hull with spongecake, or complaining about how it grants its captain the ability to Force-choke his opposition, or something).

    As noted, the OP has little grasp of humor or sarcasm; the post comes across as being completely serious. This may be an example of Poe's Law, as some of the serious threads of this nature have been so earnestly ridiculous...
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • galadimangaladiman Member Posts: 346 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    jonsills wrote: »
    The problem is, the style of the post is identical to the usual "this is OP, please nerf" thread. If you want to parody something, you have to either get ridiculous, or go over the top (perhaps demanding that the ship be nerfed by replacing its duranium hull with spongecake, or complaining about how it grants its captain the ability to Force-choke his opposition, or something).

    As noted, the OP has little grasp of humor or sarcasm; the post comes across as being completely serious. This may be an example of Poe's Law, as some of the serious threads of this nature have been so earnestly ridiculous...

    I agree. Sarcasm that is too close to realistic, or too believable, misses the point of sarcasm. Some people can do sarcasm, some people can't .

    In other news, Nelson Mandela passed away today. What a total jerk that guy was.
    Please reconsider ARC. Please make it optional, at the least. PLEASE.
    It seems the vast majority of your most active players (forum regulars) hate the idea... and while that's a small subset of the playerbase, I think it's an important constituency.
    THE PLAYERS DO NOT WANT THIS.
  • torvinecho25torvinecho25 Member Posts: 49 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    ferdzso0 wrote: »
    as the title says, please nerf. it has too much stats. atleast take away a front weapon, or something.

    my suggestion would be, to take away a weapon slot from front, and add it as a device slot (so it does not become under powered). also, please lower the turnrate, and decrease the crew size, if possible.

    my other suggestion would be, to shorten the event length, or increase the price of the ship. as of now, the event is 35 days, and you need 25 * 20 hours to finish the project. my suggestion would be, to lower the event length to 10 days, or increase the price of the sip to 50 * 20 hours. this way, it is not accessible to everyone, and the imbalance makes less damage.

    Don't be a baby.

    The new Breen ship will be great. Get out of town and quit crying.
  • timezargtimezarg Member Posts: 1,268
    edited December 2013
    hereticknight085 wrote: »
    Don't forget that there must now be an "X Ship is Underpowered, please buff" thread, started by some idiot who doesn't know how to use said ship.

    Like the Chel'gret Sucks thread XD.

    Or the Avenger feedback thread. I told the OP directly that he sucks and doesn't know how to use battlecruisers :P
    tIqIpqu' 'ej nom tIqIp
  • thunderfoot#5163 thunderfoot
    thunderfoot#5163
         Member Posts: 4,545 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    To me, the funniest part of these is how many other people don't get what he's doing and go all righteous. And he's the one with no sense of humor. Yeeaaahh. Riiight.

    And BTW, his statement the new ship is OP is completely correct. I went and polled a learned panel of Star Trek experts who surfaced from their basements and gasped in horror at the specs of the new ship.

    "Clearly this is not canon! Blasphemy and heresy most foul! Avert Thine eyes, Child! Quickly! Before this dark evil corrupts Thy soul and condemns Thee to suffer eternal torment! Use not the New Shiny, lest Thee become a tool of the Ebil Forces afoot in the world!"

    Some suggestions to reduce the blatant power creep and imba which this new ship embodies.

    -Replace the weapons with Ship mounted versions of The Big One. That'll gum up the works enough to slow it down.

    -Only allow Voth player characters to own this ship.

    -Require all players who own this ship to post a warning label over their toons which fly it.

    -Make the crew allergic to seafood.

    - Make the player recite any famous passage from any Douglas Adams book. Such as, "42. This is the correct answer."
    A six year old boy and his starship. Living the dream.
  • goldendharmnygoldendharmny Member Posts: 56 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    Lost count on the it is to OP of a ship only to find out one it hit game for a few weeks that was not true.
    "Of course you know, this means war!" Bugs Bunny
  • maliusnightmaliusnight Member Posts: 30 Arc User
    edited December 2013
    The trolls are strong in this thread.
Sign In or Register to comment.