test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

Tier IV Dyson Rep is OP

macroniusmacronius Member Posts: 2,526
Maybe I am overreacting but I think Tier IV ... especially the tac one is OP. Definitely can see it making alpha strikes even more outrageously devastating.
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

- Judge Aaron Satie
Post edited by macronius on
«1

Comments

  • Options
    mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Yep.

    /10chars
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • Options
    nagrom7nagrom7 Member Posts: 995 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    I'll reserve my opinion until I actually see it in action/have it, but it certainly does look like it could be a bit OP.

    -Edit- Didn't realize it was only 15, that's the same as a weak attack pattern.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Harden up Princess
    Looking for an Oceanic fleet? Check out our website:
    www.ausmonauts.com
  • Options
    dahminusdahminus Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    15 -damage resistance is op now?

    The defensive one looks amazing...then again I don't room for any engineer consoles, so perhaps I'm biased
    Chive on and prosper, eh?

    My PvE/PvP hybrid skill tree
  • Options
    macroniusmacronius Member Posts: 2,526
    edited November 2013
    It is so painful to make an alt now ... well less painful with the sponsorship tokens ... but still punishing. 4 reps with 5 tiers + fleet and rep gear and fleet and lock box ships. It is no longer a gap but a chasm to get up and running with PvP.

    Definitely needs some attention from the devs.
    "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

    - Judge Aaron Satie
  • Options
    trhrangerxmltrhrangerxml Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Honestly, -15 isn't bad, the resistance one is nice though.
    Hi, my name is: Elim Garak, Former Cardassian Oppressor

    LTS, here since...when did this game launch again? :D
  • Options
    sechserpackungsechserpackung Member Posts: 135 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    It is only -15 and only starts taking effect if the enemy is under 50% health.

    The +75 does look nice, but it also has the stacking penalty on it, so more usefull for tacs with few res. consoles.
  • Options
    nagrom7nagrom7 Member Posts: 995 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    It is only -15 and only starts taking effect if the enemy is under 50% health.

    The +75 does look nice, but it also has the stacking penalty on it, so more usefull for tacs with few res. consoles.

    It would be good for those who like to maintain low health for GDF too
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Harden up Princess
    Looking for an Oceanic fleet? Check out our website:
    www.ausmonauts.com
  • Options
    mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Well the real question is:

    Is this -15 player-based, or team-based? If it's player based, then sure, probably won't be so bad depending on how things go. At most that is only -15 per player that is shooting at something, and while it is there, might not break things too much.

    If it's team-based (which I worry about), then that brings up a secondary question of, 'does it stack'? Should it be team-based, that means potentially up to -75 resist on a player. Sure if they took the defensive option, then they are no worse off than they are now; but if they didn't, that -75 is nothing small anymore, and is a very potent force multiplier if you are shooting something that is weakened.
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • Options
    rylanadionysisrylanadionysis Member Posts: 3,359 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Wait til you meet an escort in go down fighting that has this defensive rep, gets to 10 percent hull and starts to go into WTFPWN mode. Than youll know what op truly is.
    Gold.jpg
    Fleet Admiral Rylana - Fed Tac - U.S.S Wild Card - Tactical Miracle Worker Cruiser
    Lifetime Subscriber since 2012 == 17,200 Accolades = RIP PvP and Vice Squad
    Chief of Starfleet Intelligence Service == Praise Cheesus
  • Options
    szimszim Member Posts: 2,503 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    yes yes. Tier IV ability is OP, every lockbox ship is OP, every new ship for the FEDs is OP, OP, OP, OP. Always the same old story when something new is introduced into the game.
  • Options
    reginamala78reginamala78 Member Posts: 4,593 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Except with the way resistance does diminishing returns, throw the resistance one on a ship that has say 30% resistance normally, drop them to 10% hull, this buff would ultimately boost them to what 40? 45?

    And the tac one, it makes the target most vulnerable when they're about to die anyways, so really wouldn't that only make much of a difference for pushing a finishing blow over the top, or tagging people that run the defensive ability plus GDF. Maybe I'm missing something but it seems like the real use is only for PVP where targets heal up and mostly irrelevant elsewhere?
  • Options
    warpetwarpet Member Posts: 506 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    for me it is to weak 15 resist is very weak paterns beta drain over 30 and it works all time u do not need traget to have less then 50% and it can stack from diffrent players and if u have 2 difrent lvls they also stack
  • Options
    agresiel2agresiel2 Member Posts: 99 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    ok its really simple so lets break this down :

    first off cryptic stated that these modifiers will be added OUTSIDE of the normal resistance and wont suffer from conventional DR

    second this ability performs completely differently depending where you are using it: pve/pvp

    and finally lets look at in a bit of detail from those perspectives:


    offensive-
    maxs out at -15 resistance and this is important to note that this ISNT a percentage value

    defensive-
    this maxes out at +75 resistance which again should note THIS ISNT PERCENTAGE!

    PVE application offensive
    due to increaseing of beta spam possible and the promise that it wont suffer from DR this is an attractive ability and will increase dps quite some way.


    PVE application defensive
    this will go along way to keeping you alive when you have your GDF as again no DR combined with your gdf bonus (if tac) and armour consoles and captian skills will make killing you much much harder, it will however make getting GDF that little bit harder proportionality and all top end dps players (the 40k+) getting a good GDF is crutial so its ability to maintain a GDF once achieved will be offset buy the increased difficulty to achieve it, over all taking this will increase survivability and dps for weaker players but not so much experianced players, so inessance going a small way to close the gap of perceieved ability in playerbase.

    PVP APPLICATION offensive-
    do to the increased bleedthrough damage that the powercreep is presenting alot of the "skill" has been gradually whittled away from pvp and at first glance this ability only appears to make things worse however look closely and with the knowlegde that it doesnt suffer from DR this ability will make sure squishy aggresive escorts are squishyier if taken. WITHOUT INCREASEING THIER DPS against defensive targets like healers.

    PVP APPLICATION defensive
    ok so if a damage dealer takes this ability you might think them mad but actually from a pvp perspective its really the only option as it doesnt suffer from DR and like the offensive bonuse scales with hp you can see doing a simple bit of maths that from a pvp standpoint this ability is either defence creep or a balanceing agent to counter power creep from the offinsive side of this same ability

    offensive abilty stacks in 15 times table there are 5 men to a team

    15 30 45 60 75

    you can see that if you take this for pvp you will offset the entire team even if they all took the offensive bonus and all focus you

    IF ONE single person took the defensive bonus on the other team then they only have a maximum of 60 they can debuff you by so you net gain 15 resistance, knowing that shows that there really isnt any need to take the offensive version of this other that in the attempt to offset some of the defensive bonus they might have taken

    in short

    PVE= take offensive
    PVP= take defensive

    if you do both take defensive (unless your a specific vaper style then take offensive)

    that is all hope that was clear.
    side not i think this is a good ability that has alot of discrete balancing properties and i only wish cryptic/PWE did things like this more often.
    MY SPEED RECORDS KASE: 13:38 CSE: 13:52 ISE: 13:51 HSE: 2:58 NWS: 6:35

    Solo STF's With Optional ISE: 3:34
    i have all logs saved of these so if you would like to view them send me a pm and it can be arranged :)
  • Options
    smokeybacon90smokeybacon90 Member Posts: 2,252 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Remember, you will only get -15 at just before 0% target health. An alpha on a undamaged target, or even any target above 50% health, will not be affected at all.

    Even then, -15 is a drop in the ocean to the types of resists than some people can stack, and especially to those who will be picking the other tier IV passive.

    You guys should have seen what the tac passive used to be on tribble: Instead of 0-15 damage resist debuff, it was 0-25% damage buff, with no 50% health limit.
    EnYn9p9.jpg
  • Options
    macroniusmacronius Member Posts: 2,526
    edited November 2013
    So no diminishing returns? I guess the defensive one is superior. I still think this will make ships too hard to kill. Oh well.
    "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

    - Judge Aaron Satie
  • Options
    stirling191stirling191 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    macronius wrote: »
    So no diminishing returns?

    Only on the T1 / T2 choice. The scaling one is affected by the regular DR curve (Per Gorn I believe it was, going to go hunt down the quote...).

    Found it:
    Sorry, I think I might have confused some folks when I mentioned that the resistances are not affected by the damage resistance curve. That's partially true, let me explain:

    1) The +5 All Damage bonus Resistance rating found in Tier 1 and 2 passives ignores the diminishing return curves and will give you a more substantial boost to your damage resistance than +5 Damage Resistance rating would normally get you.

    2) 1 Damage Resistance rating does not equal 1% Damage Resistance.

    3) The Damage Resistance bonuses granting from the Tier 3 and 4 powers *IS* affected by diminishing returns and it only reaches this very high value when you're critically low on health. It's also important to note that your damage resistance hard caps at 75%.

    4) We're actually changing the passives that boost your damage based on your target's health. There was a number of problems in its initial implementation. This change should be hitting Tribble soon.

    I hope that clears things up a bit.

    Regards,
    Phil "Gorngonzolla" Zeleski

    Of note, item 4 was the change to make the scaling damage resist debuff what it is now.
  • Options
    derbeelzebotderbeelzebot Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Except with the way resistance does diminishing returns, throw the resistance one on a ship that has say 30% resistance normally, drop them to 10% hull, this buff would ultimately boost them to what 40? 45?

    And the tac one, it makes the target most vulnerable when they're about to die anyways, so really wouldn't that only make much of a difference for pushing a finishing blow over the top, or tagging people that run the defensive ability plus GDF. Maybe I'm missing something but it seems like the real use is only for PVP where targets heal up and mostly irrelevant elsewhere?

    Actually, the diminishing returns on damage resists in STO aren't that bad.

    You have to remember, that 5% additional resist can have vastly different effectiveness, depending on whether they're added on top of a 0%, 45% or 90% baseline.

    If you calculate the numbers for the damage you'll receive (damage received=100% - damage mitigated) and then do a relative comparison (how many % of damage received is gone when adding each successive resist console), you'll see that there are some diminishing returns, but the decrease in effectiveness is surprisingly small.

    To give an example: Going from 0% to 10% mitigation only results in 10% less damage taken. Going from 30% to 36,3% mitigation, also results about 10% (actually 9,89%) less damage taken. In a way you can say that both are similarly efficient, as one effect (reduce received damage by 10%) is the same in both cases.

    On the other hand, that if every console gave a fixed percentage of mitigation, it would be growing returns, as every console beyond the first was becoming more and more effective.

    The ultimate question here is "what do you want?" (Or is it "Who are you?" :D). Having a better than linear increase for stacking may be wanted, for example to make more dramatic differences from ship with 3 engineering consoles to one with 4 or 5. I prefer the current system, as it allows more variety (unlike the stack-stack-stack paradigm of tactical consoles), but you can make the opposite argument. You just be careful with your math, if you introduce anything that scales better than linearly.
  • Options
    sonnikkusonnikku Member Posts: 77 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Wait til you meet an escort in go down fighting that has this defensive rep, gets to 10 percent hull and starts to go into WTFPWN mode. Than youll know what op truly is.

    That's what I do already. It's no good on escorts or birds of prey because by the time your shields are down, you're dead. But on my fleet regent that can take it right on the chin on my hull and keep on going I'll wait until I just barely dip to 48-49% and immeditely go down fighting/transfer shield strength/tac team/auxiliry2struc/EmPtW/Bfaw/AttpnAlpha and omega/tactical fleet ect. and I'll just scorch whatever enemies are in my path.
  • Options
    capnshadow27capnshadow27 Member Posts: 1,731 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Can we at least wait until you know people have it. Jesus Crying nerf and OP before most people are at T4 in dyson? You guys are getting out of control....
    Inertia just means you can do Powerslides in you carrier!
    I am Il Shadow and i approve these Shennanigans!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    macroniusmacronius Member Posts: 2,526
    edited November 2013
    I think the problem is all the "stuff" put together unbalances PvP ... which sadly they don't care about. Frankly, I wouldn't really care if this stuff is on in PvE since most PvE is rofl-stomp easy anyways. Zomg, it now takes 1 minute less to do. PvP is the only part I find really entertaining. It is just so damn hard to keep up with more than 1 toon.

    Wish we had a queue where you could turn off all the TRIBBLE and have your gear level adjusted to MK XI purple or something with 0 set bonuses.
    "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

    - Judge Aaron Satie
  • Options
    capnshadow27capnshadow27 Member Posts: 1,731 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    macronius wrote: »
    I think the problem is all the "stuff" put together unbalances PvP ... which sadly they don't care about. Frankly, I wouldn't really care if this stuff is on in PvE since most PvE is rofl-stomp easy anyways. Zomg, it now takes 1 minute less to do. PvP is the only part I find really entertaining. It is just so damn hard to keep up with more than 1 toon.

    Wish we had a queue where you could turn off all the TRIBBLE and have your gear level adjusted to MK XI purple or something with 0 set bonuses.

    you are correct. But no matter what wether it be because of gear, powers or passives, PvP will never see balance. That would require a retooling of the ENTIRE game. Consoles, Powers, Passives, Ships, Sets, Weapons and literally EVERYTHING else. After all that, unless they extremely carefully looked at EVERY POSSIBLE INTERACTION this would still end up unbalanced. And that would take them months of work, and at the end of it all people would still complain.

    Cause guess nobodies ever happy with what they get. So they nerf everything into Oblivion until so many things have been nerfed that the original item is back to be OP but at 1/2 strength.
    Inertia just means you can do Powerslides in you carrier!
    I am Il Shadow and i approve these Shennanigans!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    john98837john98837 Member Posts: 761 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    So far this all sounds like another nerf something because of PvP so that it becomes completely useless in PvE just like you people did with the subspace console. This is a PvE game, evidenced by the fact that we get new PvE content every 4 months or so and there hasn't been new PvP content for years. Its time they stopped breaking things that are useful in PvE just to appease the small minority that actually care about PvP.

    So far if anything this ability sounds weak, sure -15 damage resistance is like an extra APB1 on your target, but its only going to get -15 near death as I understand it. A -5 or 6 resistance is nothing. That being said both romulan and omega tier 4 passives are weak, so I can't really complain about this one being inline with them. All this is speculation of course, will test it more in 4 or 5 days when i unlock it.
  • Options
    mightyleptonmightylepton Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    I always wondered why PVEers care about OP/UP stuff. What or whom are you competing with? Isnt that a prerequisite for a basis on discussing OP?

    Seriously a borg cube wont complain about your use of the tier 4 passive.

    Seriously im mind buckled about 99% of the player base kirking it up against senseless npcs they find hard on elite and call stuff like this OP lol.

    Cryptic is giving new OP toys for a reason are they? Obviously they do it for players like you.

    Or are you competing with your fellow teammates on whoever does the most damage against a borg cube? lolol

    explain, there is absolutely no goal or incentive to do this.


    Oh and something else, how can it be OP if the direct 'counter' is equally strong?
    And fyi the tier 2 resistance passive is probably alt better then the 10% severity a offensive tac gets. It roughly equals 1% flat dmg boost on a ROMULAN, even less on a fed.

    The +5 flat hull res is alot more bang for buck is my feeling. Even if its almost impossible to calculate.
    Read the book of the Rihannsu.
  • Options
    capnshadow27capnshadow27 Member Posts: 1,731 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    I always wondered why PVEers care about OP/UP stuff. What or whom are you competing with? Isnt that a prerequisite for a basis on discussing OP?

    Seriously a borg cube wont complain about your use of the tier 4 passive.

    Seriously im mind buckled about 99% of the player base kirking it up against senseless npcs they find hard on elite and call stuff like this OP lol.

    Cryptic is giving new OP toys for a reason are they? Obviously they do it for players like you.

    Or are you competing with your fellow teammates on whoever does the most damage against a borg cube? lolol

    explain, there is absolutely no goal or incentive to do this.

    Mainline PvE'ers aren't complaining, maybe PvP Dabblers that primarily PvE. But if in fact PvE players are crying OP its because someone is doing better/ dying less than them and they are jealous little children.

    Though in the defense of PvE'ers when you aske for something to be nerfed or cry out OP, certain things we put a lot off effort into building, get junked overnight.

    Now i understand something being ludicrously OP shoulds be toned down. But they should seperate power functions in PvE and PvP. Cause im sorry but im tired of my builds getting sharted upon because something new came out and added something that breaks the way the mechanics where supposed to work.
    Inertia just means you can do Powerslides in you carrier!
    I am Il Shadow and i approve these Shennanigans!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    bpharmabpharma Member Posts: 2,022
    edited November 2013
    Meh, who cares? No-one has it yet and let's face it, there are WAY bigger balancing problems than this. I mean let's face it, there's very little reason to use a science ship in today's PvE meta which most people play.

    Attack pattern beta is far more powerful than this ability and spammable to such an extent that it has rendered all PvE content pointless.

    Beams are laughably out performing every other weapon type due to drain mechanics.

    Torpedoes are mostly a gimmick.

    FAW and it's double procs with dem etc leading to maybe more procs on things than there really should be.

    Anyone else want to add to the list of way bigger problems? So let's just give it 3 weeks when people will have it and be able to test it?

    It is through repetition that we learn our weakness.
    A master with a stone is better than a novice with a sword.

    Has damage got out of control?
    This is the last thing I will post.
  • Options
    meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    macronius wrote: »
    Maybe I am overreacting but I think Tier IV ... especially the tac one is OP. Definitely can see it making alpha strikes even more outrageously devastating.

    Nah. It will finally give an engineer like a 'Go Down Fighting' kinda ability. Want! :)
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • Options
    dahminusdahminus Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    What is the disruptor proc again? Rating or straight resistance?
    Chive on and prosper, eh?

    My PvE/PvP hybrid skill tree
  • Options
    hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    dahminus wrote: »
    What is the disruptor proc again? Rating or straight resistance?

    Straight resistance. So basically this passive at max power is like a weak disruptor proc.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • Options
    dahminusdahminus Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Straight resistance. So basically this passive at max power is like a weak disruptor proc.

    /thread I'd say...

    Defense definitely tastier for the ones full of universal consoles
    Chive on and prosper, eh?

    My PvE/PvP hybrid skill tree
  • Options
    hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    dahminus wrote: »
    /thread I'd say...

    Defense definitely tastier for the ones full of universal consoles

    Aka most Scimitars.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
Sign In or Register to comment.