test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

The Achilles. Did everyone forget about it?

mikey002mikey002 Member Posts: 15 Arc User
edited November 2013 in Federation Discussion
So what ever happened to the Achilles? It played a roll in the Dominion war but seems to be forgotten about. Am I the only one who wants this ship in the game? I think it should of been added instead of the avenger.
Post edited by mikey002 on
«1

Comments

  • tlamstriketlamstrike Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Not a canon ship. Cryptic can't use it since it is owned by Gizmo Games/Simon and Schuster.
    My Romulan Liberated Borg character made it to Level 30 and beat the (old) Defense of New Romulus with the skill point bug. :D
  • galadimangaladiman Member Posts: 346 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    We should get a ship 'inspired by' this one... I have not seen a ship (until now) that had a pointed-Delta shape that I liked the look of. This one I like...
    Please reconsider ARC. Please make it optional, at the least. PLEASE.
    It seems the vast majority of your most active players (forum regulars) hate the idea... and while that's a small subset of the playerbase, I think it's an important constituency.
    THE PLAYERS DO NOT WANT THIS.
  • mikey002mikey002 Member Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Lame, I really liked that ship.
  • mikey002mikey002 Member Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    I think maybe the Avenger was partly inspired bu the Achilles. Its a close look, the fleet version more so. But The Intrepid look added to it really took away from it I think. Needed to be more linear. Ah well, maybe we might get one close to it one day.
  • qweeble#7491 qweeble Member Posts: 164 Cryptic Developer
    edited November 2013
    Currently, the closest design we have in-game to the Achilles, would be a mixture of Star Cruiser parts. Though, far from exact, it may work for you if that's the look you're going for.
    I make space ships!
    Twitter! STO_JamJamz
  • zeuxidemus001zeuxidemus001 Member Posts: 3,357 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Currently, the closest design we have in-game to the Achilles, would be a mixture of Star Cruiser parts. Though, far from exact, it may work for you if that's the look you're going for.

    What would be cool is if there was an Achilles/K'vort hybrid cross faction ship that both sides can buy lol :D
  • a3001a3001 Member Posts: 1,132 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    btw, welcome to STO!
    Rejoice JJ Trek people....

    http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/10052253

    Why are you not rejoicing?
  • davidwforddavidwford Member Posts: 1,836 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    Currently, the closest design we have in-game to the Achilles, would be a mixture of Star Cruiser parts. Though, far from exact, it may work for you if that's the look you're going for.

    That is better than nothing, I suppose. Still, I fail to see why more effort could be made to make more designs that are similar enough to be reminiscent of ships seen in other games, yet different enough to not cause a "copyright infringement".
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    davidwford wrote: »
    That is better than nothing, I suppose. Still, I fail to see why more effort could be made to make more designs that are similar enough to be reminiscent of ships seen in other games, yet different enough to not cause a "copyright infringement".

    Because doing something like that would require Cryptic walking a very fine line and could hurt them in the long run. Some game company that is hurting for money could sue Cryptic for using a ship that is similar to their ship. So either Cryptic has to get their permission for using a ship similar to it or just not bother with getting into that mess.
  • zeuxidemus001zeuxidemus001 Member Posts: 3,357 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    starkaos wrote: »
    Because doing something like that would require Cryptic walking a very fine line and could hurt them in the long run. Some game company that is hurting for money could sue Cryptic for using a ship that is similar to their ship. So either Cryptic has to get their permission for using a ship similar to it or just not bother with getting into that mess.

    I don't think that is the case look at the bortasqu' and then look at the bohemoth from star craft.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    I don't think that is the case look at the bortasqu' and then look at the bohemoth from star craft.

    Can't find anything about a Bohemoth. There is some similarities between the Behemoth and Bortasqu', but there are far more differences in design. They only share a basic shape. Legalities are always based on a certain percentage of a product matching another. If a product is 75% similar, then there are legal issues. If a product is only 30% similar, then there are no legal issues. Don't know the actual number, the 75% and 30% are only examples.
  • davidwforddavidwford Member Posts: 1,836 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    starkaos wrote: »
    Because doing something like that would require Cryptic walking a very fine line and could hurt them in the long run. Some game company that is hurting for money could sue Cryptic for using a ship that is similar to their ship. So either Cryptic has to get their permission for using a ship similar to it or just not bother with getting into that mess.

    And yet, the numerous crossover/in-jokes in the series could easily consitute a copyright violation. When the property is owned by the same company, they can get away with it, but not all of them are.

    http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/crossovers.htm

    While it is true that my argument only applys to the series, it can be used as the presidence as far as "fair use" is concerned. Time change and people who did loose cases 10 or more years ago have been able to reargue their cases and win more recently.
  • zeuxidemus001zeuxidemus001 Member Posts: 3,357 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    starkaos wrote: »
    Can't find anything about a Bohemoth. There is some similarities between the Behemoth and Bortasqu', but there are far more differences in design. They only share a basic shape. Legalities are always based on a certain percentage of a product matching another. If a product is 75% similar, then there are legal issues. If a product is only 30% similar, then there are no legal issues. Don't know the actual number, the 75% and 30% are only examples.

    LOL surprised there its not hard to find and it is the exact same thing lol :D
  • sparhawksparhawk Member Posts: 796 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    tlamstrike wrote: »
    Not a canon ship. Cryptic can't use it since it is owned by Gizmo Games/Simon and Schuster.

    This basically. I'd love to have it added but it isn't likely to happen. Nothing stopping Cryptic from creating a similar ship though if they wanted to (they just need to make it look completely different to avoid issues).

    The new Avenger class is vaguely similar to the Achilles. It doesn't have the Achilles phalanx torpedo system though.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    LOL surprised there its not hard to find and it is the exact same thing lol :D

    And the Behemoth has a similar shape to numerous Klingon ships. Only difference is the front portion of the ship. The Raptor-class and Vor'cha-class have the same basic ship as the Behemoth and Bortasqu'. So Starcraft is the one that is copying Star Trek ships. Also, there is enough differences between the Bortasqu' and Behemoth that they are not the same ship.
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    I don't think that is the case look at the bortasqu' and then look at the bohemoth from star craft.

    Look at the D7 from the top

    http://www.philgiunta.com/plasticgalaxy/photos_full/d7_top.jpg

    and you'll see it already has a vestigal hammerhead almost 30 years before Starcraft came out. And as I recall from a post that's what Captn Logan went with: the good'ol D7 since he claimed he never played Starcraft.
  • unangbangkayunangbangkay Member Posts: 10 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    If you want to mix Star Cruiser parts to get an Achilles-like ship, but would rather have a more tactical layout to your ship, try the Mirror Universe Assault Cruiser. The appearance of a Star Cruiser and stats of a Sovereign.

    As for the Bortas line and their similarity to the Starcraft Battlecruiser, I'd bet a few Zen that there was at least some element of homage to it (like the disruptor autocannon v. the Yamato Cannon), but there are more than enough differences in the ships, the game, and the IP that there should be no realistic case for copyright violations.

    Heck, it reminds of when Champions Online introducing the VERY Sith-like "Unleashed" character archetype shortly before The Old Republic launched.
  • mikey002mikey002 Member Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    sparhawk wrote: »
    This basically. I'd love to have it added but it isn't likely to happen. Nothing stopping Cryptic from creating a similar ship though if they wanted to (they just need to make it look completely different to avoid issues).

    The new Avenger class is vaguely similar to the Achilles. It doesn't have the Achilles phalanx torpedo system though.

    Agreed, it does have a type of torpedo system on it though. I really do believe the Avenger was STO's attempt at an Achilles. With your command set to Weapons.

    "While the Weapon System Efficiency cruiser command is active, or no cruiser commands are active, the V.A.T.A. will fire a pair of Quantum Armament Projectiles. These projectiles launch Micro Quantum Torpedoes at a nearby target every second. Upon impact, the Quantum Armament Projectiles will detonate, dealing very high kinetic damage. The Quantum Armament Projectiles and its Micro Torpedoes lack any secondary effects, but deal significantly more damage."

    Much like the Phalanx torpedo system. They are roughly the same size and I would assume crew compliment. Both are the only Federation warships ever made. Avenger being STO's and the Achilles being any other Star trek game they show up in. The look maybe varied but the idea for the Design of the Avenger was a ship able to bring enough firepower to a fight as well as operate deep in enemy lines. The Achilles was designed to do just that.

    "The Defiant-class had too limited an operating range, the Klingon B'rel had the stealth but lacked the firepower, and while the Galaxy and Negh'Var had the range, they were considered too expensive to be feasible for this role."

    I think the Avenger is the closest thing we will see to an Achilles class warship.
  • unangbangkayunangbangkay Member Posts: 10 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    mikey002 wrote: »
    Both are the only Federation warships ever made.

    The vast new array of heavy destroyers, assault cruisers, and many flavors of dedicated tactical vessel would beg to differ.
  • mikey002mikey002 Member Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    The vast new array of heavy destroyers, assault cruisers, and many flavors of dedicated tactical vessel would beg to differ.

    I would almost agree with you. But they are just refitted designs they already have. Anything new they have made such as the Odyssey, is still classified as an exploration cruiser. Big and powerful, but not a warship. Just like the dominion war, current ships are being outfitted to be more battle ready. But not a single new ship has been designed as a warship. Like the Avenger and Achilles. The defiant could be argued as a warship, but I think its size is an issue :p

    Now we have the Prometheus, which I would say is Star treks warship, which was also from the Dominion war. But it wasn't created by a game company, and STO is able to use it. So that would bring the Feds to only two, dedicated warships.
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    mikey002 wrote: »
    So what ever happened to the Achilles? It played a roll in the Dominion war but seems to be forgotten about. Am I the only one who wants this ship in the game? I think it should of been added instead of the avenger.

    Well I HAD forgotten about that abomination... now you reminded me...

    Also, it's not, as most have said, a original ship and played no part in the Dominion wars what so ever...
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • mikey002mikey002 Member Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    anazonda wrote: »
    Well I HAD forgotten about that abomination... now you reminded me...

    Also, it's not, as most have said, a original ship and played no part in the Dominion wars what so ever...

    Well not as Star trek Cannon no. It was only seen in the Dominion Wars game, as just a new ship the game company used.
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    mikey002 wrote: »
    Well not as Star trek Cannon no. It was only seen in the Dominion Wars game, as just a new ship the game company used.

    Point is: It belongs to another company... it's not worth wasting money on, when they could allocate said funds to current game development.
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • mikey002mikey002 Member Posts: 15 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    I now know that. I had no Idea it belonged to another company. When the Avenger came out it just made me think of the Achilles, and I had to ask.
  • eternal0solsticeeternal0solstice Member Posts: 20 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    If anyone has been playing Star Trek Games back when Windows 98 was "Top of the Line" and the Deep Space Nine Series was at its peak. Then you would remember the game Star Trek: Dominion Wars. And one of my favorite Starship designs that never made it to the series was a feature vessel in the game for the Federation.

    Achilles Class (Dorsal In-game View)
    Original Concept Art
    ModDB Concept
    Fan Concept by Admiral Horton (DA)

    Overall this was my favorite Federation vessel that I thought was made for combat just like the Defiant and the Prometheus. The few and far between Warships of the Federation all have their distinct flavor. The Defiant Class is a fast, maneuverable, and small combat ship that requires small crew compliments and can dodge weapon fire while still packing a punch. The Prometheus was designed to be able to out gun an enemy by attacking it from multiple directions with three Warp-Capable sections of the ship independently operating.

    I wanted this to be the third warship of the fleet. And like other warships this also has a special feature. In the Intro Video of Dominion Wars (and in the final patch gameplay), the Achilles class had a feature that was unlike any other; the Phalanx Array. The Phalanx Array was a set of multiple rows of torpedo launchers arrayed on the dorsal side of the primary hull. These launchers would cripple ships that would happen to fly over the Achilles' dorsal quarter with a volley of torpedoes. Combined with also the forward facing Pulsed Phaser Cannons, this vessel was deadly to the Dominion.

    I was hoping that this could be introduced into the Federation. It can be bought in the C-Store and is available to Rear-Admirals or higher. It also sacrifices one of the Aft Weapon Slots that a Tier 5 Escort would normally have so that there is an extra console slot for the Phalanx array. Here is a idea of what its stats would look like. But they are not final!


    Rank: Rear Admiral
    Tier: 5
    Type: Escort
    Hull: 33,000
    Standard Shields: 4,400 (Mk X)
    Shield Modifier: 0.85
    Weapons: 4 Fore ; 2 Aft
    Crew: 720
    Bridge Officers: 1 Commander Tactical, 1 Lieutenant Tactical, 1 Commander Engineering, 1 Lieutenant Science, 1 Lieutenant Universal
    Device Slots: 2
    Consoles: 5 Tactical, 3 Engineering, 2 Science
    Turn Rate: 12
    Impulse Modifier: 0.15
    Inertia Rating: 50
    Bonus Power: +10 Weapons +10 Engines
    Cost: 2000 Zen
    Abilities: Phalanx Array

    Exclusive Items:
    Phalanx Array Tactical Console (Achilles Only; Bound): Enables the Achilles to utilize the Phalanx Array. Only attacks vessels in Dorsal, and 45 Degree vectors on Port and Starboard.
    "I was born under fire. I am a soldier from birth..."
  • jer5488jer5488 Member Posts: 506 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    As much as I would like an Achilles, CBS and Cryptic would have to go through a LOT of trouble to get her. The ship design is partially owned by Activision, the original ship designer, and Paramount who owned the entire franchise at the time.

    The cost of licensing the Achilles would probably be somewhere in the same cost of 'Michael Dorn doing a voice over'...
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    There is still a thread titled "The Achilles. Did everyone forget about it?" visible on this gameplay thead's page 1 why do we need another thread about it?

    Also since this point has not been beaten into the ground enough at this point:
    The Achilles class has beeen suggested so often that using the SEARCH FUNCTION (which exists for a reason) gives you a whole page of results on it. And that's just those with the name in the title.

    http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/search.php?searchid=79137641

    here's the official stance on the subject:

    http://sto.perfectworld.com/news/?p=800861
    Q: (flash525) What is the Cryptic's policy where other designs from other games are concerned? The DS9: Dominion Wars game has the Federation Achilles, Klingon K'vorcha and a couple of Cardassian designs, the ST: Armada game has the Romulan Griffin and Shrike, along with a bunch of other Cardassian and Klingon designs. I'm sure there are other Trek games out there with further designs. Are we ever likely to see any of these within STO?

    Dstahl: Good question. Our license with CBS is restricted to the TV Shows, the movies (up to Nemesis), the Animated Series, and some of the book fiction. Unfortunately, this license doesn't extend to other video games. However, if those ships or factions appeared in any of the previously mentioned properties, then it is fair game.
  • doffingcomradedoffingcomrade Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    The rules are quite clear on what things can be put into the game, and this isn't one of them.

    Plus, the specs you listed aren't even legal. TWO Commander slots and THREE Lieutenant slots? Are you out of your MIND? Fed doesn't need more ships, any new ship is already treading on the toes of an existing ship. KDF and Rom need more ships, but Rom doesn't need more escorts. No more freaking Romulan Escorts!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,005 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    In addition to the legal issues: Two Commander BOFFs? 5 Tac consoles? Seriously?
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • ijimithyijimithy Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2013
    I'm more bemused at how many threads pop up asking for more and more federation ships, seems like one a day these days..

    The federation has so many ships as it is, you have a ship for every possible build and yet people want more. I would rather see the KDF or the Romulans get more ships (yes even the Silver Spoon Romulans could do with more ships and i really hate romulans at times).

    If the issue is that the current ships need a revamp fair enough phrase it like that but asking for more ships especially way overpowered ships is just blah. Don't be greedy feds it makes us look bad. Roms need more Cruiser and Science type ships and KDF need more Sciencey ships. Plus that and the BoFF layout is ridiculous you may as well ask for a ship that has one button on it titled "I Win" on any enemy.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    No Drama, No Fuss, Just good old fashioned pew pew!
Sign In or Register to comment.