test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

A Fed Carrier Pet has Battle Cloak (The KDF is over)

illcadiaillcadia Member Posts: 1,412 Bug Hunter
edited May 2013 in Klingon Discussion
A Fed starbase just hit tier 5 science, getting access to elite fleet hangar pets. Normally this wouldn't be cause for concern- just more spam, except for one little problem.

http://i.imgur.com/hwLHSBB.jpg

Take a look at the lower right. I'll wait.




And yes, I can hear the scream of outrage from here. That's right: Fed Battle Cloaks.

It's on their fighters- only a matter of time before every ship in their fleet has it, completely wrecking any sense of unique play the KDF faction has.


With the Romulans getting their own unique play options via singularity cores, we KDF are officially bent over a rail here.

Welcome to the end of STO.

I kid, but I thought I'd pre-empt the inevitable 'omg trek is teh overz' thread since they'll start up as more people hit T5 science and the old 'the feds are stealing our uniquenessez!' guys come out of hiding.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«134

Comments

  • chalpenchalpen Member Posts: 2,207 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    i can't beleive they did T5 science.
    It is really hard to get the doffs. Our fleet has been working on other stuff.
    Should I start posting again after all this time?
  • drkfrontiersdrkfrontiers Member Posts: 2,477 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    I am not concerned about the pets having battle-cloak seriously.

    I am more worried about the Yellowstone. I really do not believe that after all the problems Danubes caused, the developers could be this shortsighted.

    reasons why the aforementioned not a problem.

    1.) Pet logic is laughable.

    2.) Do I need to tell you what happens when a TS III, GW III, TR III, CPB II, PSW III hits a cloaking ship?

    3.) Theta, Acetone Assimilators - the parties getting started!
  • thecosmic1thecosmic1 Member Posts: 9,365 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    chalpen wrote: »
    Welcome to the end of STO.
    The KDF is about to get 1-50 Mission Content, the Roms are about to be introduced, and you think a Pet with battle cloak is the end of STO? Can we be any more dramatic here? :)
    STO is about my Liberated Borg Federation Captain with his Breen 1st Officer, Jem'Hadar Tactical Officer, Liberated Borg Engineering Officer, Android Ops Officer, Photonic Science Officer, Gorn Science Officer, and Reman Medical Officer jumping into their Jem'Hadar Carrier and flying off to do missions for the new Romulan Empire. But for some players allowing a T5 Connie to be used breaks the canon in the game.
  • erockererocker Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Ponies are dramagic. :D

    I had no idea they snuck elite jem hadar fighters in there... Dammit.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • travelingmastertravelingmaster Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Looks like a nice versatile selection of fighter pets for Feddies. Once these become more common, maybe the Feddies will stop whining about the KDF having frigate pets. Especially with that Yellowstone runabout. . .good god, chronitons, TT3, AND Warp Plasma. . .on a carrier pet? What the hell, devs?
    My PvP toon is Krov, of The House of Snoo. Beware of my Hegh'ta of doom.
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    First impression: Yay, this means when we make it availible at my fleet my Fedcat can have somewhat better cat-craft in her Atrox and she could use Caitian fighters on the Caitian carrier rather than the current carp. :P It will take some time though. :( And I agree, not as impressive as the Yellowstones anyway.

    Second impression: To any forum moderator that stumbles upon these forums, please now and in the future immidiately close threads with such titles. I'm even willing to pay cold hard zen for that! :cool:

    So the Stalker pets have a battle cloak. So what?
    "Only a matter of time when every ship in their fleet has it". Really? Unless you're working at Cryptic I have no idea how you can know that.
    They already shortcutted through that with the Romulan Republic having alliances with the Federation & KDF. That is the way for Fed. players to have starships with cloak and still play the content on their prefered side of STO. With the exception of the Defiant & Galaxy-X, Starfleet's ships will never have cloaks. CBS won't allow it. Especially after the option for Romulans to allign with Feds.
    And the cloak is more of a gimmick. It's not the holy grail of STO.

    For Star Trek sake, "KDF is over", "End of KDF" and such titles of threads are becomming very old very fast. Give it a rest. The KDF survived much harder times, so it's not about to fall apart when it finally is shaping up to become a proper full faction.
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • sander233sander233 Member Posts: 3,992 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    shpoks wrote: »

    So the Stalker pets have a battle cloak. So what?
    "Only a matter of time when every ship in their fleet has it"...

    For Star Trek sake, "KDF is over", "End of KDF" and such titles of threads are becomming very old very fast. Give it a rest. The KDF survived much harder times, so it's not about to fall apart when it finally is shaping up to become a proper full faction.

    What he said.

    Overreact much? I mean for crying out loud, it's just one fighter, which is supposed to be a stealth fighter, and it's nigh unobtainable anyway.

    As for this "every ship in the fleet" nonsense, yes, like every Fed ship already has a cloaking device, fully universal BOff layouts, plasmonic leach...

    Ow. I just strained my eyes by rolling them too hard.
    16d89073-5444-45ad-9053-45434ac9498f.png~original

    ...Oh, baby, you know, I've really got to leave you / Oh, I can hear it callin 'me / I said don't you hear it callin' me the way it used to do?...
    - Anne Bredon
  • kalvorax#3775 kalvorax Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    truthfully...i could careless about seeing people USING elite stalkers...its rare to see atrox flying around these days. I for one like the battle cloak for the elite stalkers. makes them that much more easier to hide from sensors :P The thoron pulse is pretty nice thought thats for sure (even the normal ones hahh)

    these guys are shield strippers :D
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    I find this line of replies sadly hilarious. We put a lot of work into the massive list of fixes/changes above, and ya'll are hung up on the ability to skip our content. =p
  • cmdrskyfallercmdrskyfaller Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The AI of the stalkers is the same as the other fighter types: They fly to target, swarm around it. Battle cloak is of no use since the AI decloaks them when they 'attack' .. hence the only time they will actually cloak is when they are on recall.

    The yellowstone and delta flyer are a much bigger concern. Tractor and tachyon beam ... under AI rules (not player rules). That is scary shiznit.

    Jemhadar bug fighter with BO2. yikes...

    I wonder what the elite BOP is like though.
  • majesticmsfcmajesticmsfc Member Posts: 1,401 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Pets with Battlecloak, doesn't matter to me, as long as they don't give player ships battlecloak or any more cloaks for Federation ships. Cloak should be Romulan and KDF exclusive.

    So meh on pets, I say let them have their victory it doesn't really matter I think to a lot of KDF players.
    Support the Game by Supporting the KDF, equality and uniqueness for all factions!
  • mimey2mimey2 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    I think that while the Stalkers getting BC is a bit annoying, it's a minor thing in the big picture.

    End of the KDF? Not really.



    What will probably happen is this:

    An increase (maybe not immediately) in the amount of Fed-whining for adding more cloaking/battle cloaking ships (playable ones, not fighters) to their roster, using these Stalker Fighters as one of their 'reasons' along-side the Defiant and Gal-X.
    I remain empathetic to the concerns of my community, but do me a favor and lay off the god damn name calling and petty remarks. It will get you nowhere.
    I must admit, respect points to Trendy for laying down the law like that.
  • majesticmsfcmajesticmsfc Member Posts: 1,401 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    mimey2 wrote: »
    What will probably happen is this:

    An increase (maybe not immediately) in the amount of Fed-whining for adding more cloaking/battle cloaking ships (playable ones, not fighters) to their roster, using these Stalker Fighters as one of their 'reasons' along-side the Defiant and Gal-X.

    Sounds about right, they seem to want everything on that faction rather than playing and developing characters on both.
    Support the Game by Supporting the KDF, equality and uniqueness for all factions!
  • zeuxidemus001zeuxidemus001 Member Posts: 3,357 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    I'm not worried because of a few things with this topic.

    #1. New romulans who choose fed side will have battle cloak so that uniqueness goes out the window (in all sense tho it was the first romulan-klingon alliance that Klingons got battle cloaks in the first place).

    #2. After reading #1 as a mostly KDF player who likes to play fed once in awhile mostly just for the looks of the nice looking fed ships if you are introducing Romulans in this manner might as well just give the defiant a battle cloak with the option of having the fed version console + a romulan console for a set effect of having a battle cloak its not taking any uniqueness from what the may update is going to bring but will also achieve the balance needed for ships like the defiant.

    As far as pets though... Pets don't do much besides give you like 1 turrets worth of damage and projectile damage on ships that can't turn fast enough to use them in actual combat so not a big deal.
  • stirling191stirling191 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Given that pet AI is beyond pants-on-head moronic, and the one pet that has the BC doesn't have a torpedo, it's not a big deal.

    Though if the next Caitian C-Store ship comes out with the BC, then there's a place for some belligerence.
  • tenkaritenkari Member Posts: 2,906 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    so, a fighter that is created by a separate government in the federation, ships designed that can only be used on the Atrox if i recall, are getting a skill that isn't very useful on pets except for their first attack since they don't use it much. on a FIGHTER rather than frigate class ship.... ehhh might make them do slightly more DPS but not enough to be worried.
  • mikenight00mikenight00 Member Posts: 101 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The Treaty of Algeron that was signed between the RSE and the UFP is why the Feds don't have cloaks on the vast majority of their ships. While looking at it from a gameplay standpoint I could care less if a AI fighter has a battlecloak, it is however a treaty violation for those fighters to even have that cloak. So if canon is being used as a basis to deny something, then the canon reason needs to be applied across the board and not selectively.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Never Forget 5/21
  • westx211westx211 Member Posts: 42,326 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The Treaty of Algeron that was signed between the RSE and the UFP is why the Feds don't have cloaks on the vast majority of their ships. While looking at it from a gameplay standpoint I could care less if a AI fighter has a battlecloak, it is however a treaty violation for those fighters to even have that cloak. So if canon is being used as a basis to deny something, then the canon reason needs to be applied across the board and not selectively.

    The treaty was ended when the RSE collapsed I mean sure its still there but the treaty doesn't really matter with how weak the RSE is now and there has been no agreement with the NRR to restrict cloaks on fed ships. Really the only reason feds don't have more cloak ships is because of Klingon tears.
    Men are not punished for their sins, but by them.
  • mikenight00mikenight00 Member Posts: 101 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The Feds don't have cloaks now is not because of Klingon tears its because in The Path to 2409 the president of the UFP reaffirmed the UFP's commitment to the treaty despite the loss of Romulus. So the treaty still stands.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Never Forget 5/21
  • thecosmic1thecosmic1 Member Posts: 9,365 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The Feds don't have cloaks now is not because of Klingon tears its because in The Path to 2409 the president of the UFP reaffirmed the UFP's commitment to the treaty despite the loss of Romulus. So the treaty still stands.
    That's a meta-game concept, though.

    Most Fed ships don't have cloaks simply because it's not canon - even the Defiant was supposed to return its cloak to the Roms after the war. In the game Feds don't have a lot of cloaks because they are part of the KDF identity - it is there game trope. STO's background was written to uphold that trope.
    STO is about my Liberated Borg Federation Captain with his Breen 1st Officer, Jem'Hadar Tactical Officer, Liberated Borg Engineering Officer, Android Ops Officer, Photonic Science Officer, Gorn Science Officer, and Reman Medical Officer jumping into their Jem'Hadar Carrier and flying off to do missions for the new Romulan Empire. But for some players allowing a T5 Connie to be used breaks the canon in the game.
  • admgreeradmgreer Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The OP is too funny, One pet gets a battlecloak and now all the KDF players will delete there accounts and no new players will start KDF toons due to this new item. And thus the STO game as a whole will fail and cryptic will shut down the servers. Great post chicken little.
  • stirling191stirling191 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    westx211 wrote: »
    The treaty was ended when the RSE collapsed I mean sure its still there but the treaty doesn't really matter with how weak the RSE is now and there has been no agreement with the NRR to restrict cloaks on fed ships. Really the only reason feds don't have more cloak ships is because of Klingon tears.

    Per the path to 2409, the Federation is still ostensibly enforcing the treaty. Please note I'm making no argument as to the intelligence of that decision, simply pointing out that said decision was in fact made.

    How that's all going to work with the way LoR is setup however, I have no idea.
  • hevachhevach Member Posts: 2,777 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    According to the Path to 2409 they are, but according to events during 2409 they have stopped. The Galaxy-X was one of the first two ships available outside of the regular ship progression (TOS Connie preorder being the other), and was a flagrant violation of the Trety of Algeron. The VA ships were also pretty early additions (I think the next three out Fed side after those two? Or was the Excelsior out before that?), and include a second violation.

    Whether the Federation now considers the treaty invalid or if they've declared it in abeyance because of Romulan violations of it isn't clear, but either way it's no longer in force somehow - the Federation has developed a cloaking device, and is now using a short term cloaking device acquired from New Romulus (the treaty also forbade the use of cloaking devices acquired from elsewhere).
  • stirling191stirling191 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    hevach wrote: »
    According to the Path to 2409 they are, but according to events during 2409 they have stopped. The Galaxy-X was one of the first two ships available outside of the regular ship progression (TOS Connie preorder being the other), and was a flagrant violation of the Trety of Algeron. The VA ships were also pretty early additions (I think the next three out Fed side after those two? Or was the Excelsior out before that?), and include a second violation.

    STO and time have always had...strange...relationships. It should be at least 2412 in-game, but it isn't.

    Also, did the Defiant-R come with a cloak out of the box or was that added later? It's been so long now that I honestly can't remember.
    hevach wrote: »
    Whether the Federation now considers the treaty invalid or if they've declared it in abeyance because of Romulan violations of it isn't clear, but either way it's no longer in force somehow.

    It's something that very badly needs an in-universe explanation. Anek Okeeg made a pretty big (albeit not exactly strategically brilliant) ethical stand when he stood up for the Treaty, but suddenly because Cryptic needed the dough that went out the window with the Gal-X and Defiant-R.

    Toss in the giant mess that is the state of the Romulan species and you get all manner of contradictory stuffs.
  • knuhteb5knuhteb5 Member Posts: 1,831 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    illcadia wrote: »
    A Fed starbase just hit tier 5 science, getting access to elite fleet hangar pets. Normally this wouldn't be cause for concern- just more spam, except for one little problem.

    http://i.imgur.com/hwLHSBB.jpg

    Take a look at the lower right. I'll wait.




    And yes, I can hear the scream of outrage from here. That's right: Fed Battle Cloaks.

    It's on their fighters- only a matter of time before every ship in their fleet has it, completely wrecking any sense of unique play the KDF faction has.


    With the Romulans getting their own unique play options via singularity cores, we KDF are officially bent over a rail here.

    Welcome to the end of STO.

    I kid, but I thought I'd pre-empt the inevitable 'omg trek is teh overz' thread since they'll start up as more people hit T5 science and the old 'the feds are stealing our uniquenessez!' guys come out of hiding.

    I agree with the general sentiment I see in here that battle cloaking fed pets are a slippery slope that will lead to more begging from feds and eventually Fed ships with battle cloak. Every single time I come on to these forums it seems the devs are taking another shot at Klingon uniqueness by eroding any sort of distinctive feature the Klings have, whether it's the klingon STF space and ground sets, carriers, etc.
    aGHGQIKr41KNi.gif
  • glados122glados122 Member Posts: 109 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    sander233 wrote: »
    What he said.

    Overreact much? I mean for crying out loud, it's just one fighter, which is supposed to be a stealth fighter, and it's nigh unobtainable anyway.

    .

    Agreed its called STALKER. so doesn't any cloak help? besides its battle cloak not the enhanced version.
  • tangolighttangolight Member Posts: 777 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Also, did the Defiant-R come with a cloak out of the box or was that added later? It's been so long now that I honestly can't remember.

    The Defiant-R and Galaxy-X always came with a cloak from the moment they were introduced into the game.
  • diogene0diogene0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The AI is so stupid that it's afraid of its own torpedoes and will cloak immediately to stay safe. No worries. There's no danger here.
    Lenny Barre, lvl 60 DC. 18k.
    God, lvl 60 CW. 17k.
  • age03age03 Member Posts: 1,664 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Where is it I can't it and those are the exact same as I got from the Dilthium store?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Age StarTrek-Gamers Administrator
    USS WARRIOR NCC 1720 Commanding Officer
    Star Trek Gamers
  • wifflecondomwifflecondom Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    It should be at least 2412 in-game, but it isn't.

    Why do you say that? DS9 ran from 1993-1999 and was set in 2369-2375... So, there's no direct analogue.

    Edit: Or maybe you just meant it's strange that the year hasn't ticked up since the game was released? Apologies if I misread.
    "Nihil aliud scit necessitas quam vincere." -Syrus
  • doffingcomradedoffingcomrade Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    No doubt he says that because it's been 2409 forever, like we're stuck in that endless time loop.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sign In or Register to comment.