test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

No Romulans in May: click and see why

2456710

Comments

  • lazarus51166lazarus51166 Member Posts: 646 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    "Launching May 2013" Bookmark our new teaser site and check back often for updates surrounding our upcoming content release.

    The choice of words used gives a lot away. What sort of released content would be "launched"?

    What? Thats the same term used to describe the release of just about every update in every game. You're reading far too much into that
  • twg042370twg042370 Member Posts: 2,312 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    neoakiraii wrote: »
    If it's not a Romulan faction and a showdown with the Iconians i still will be happy


    Why


    The Iconians must Pay...they are the reason we are at war....they are the reason there is chaos in the Quadrant...they are the reason the Romulans lost their way and most of all....they are the reason for JJ trek.


    FED players KDF players can we all agree we need to finish what was started and wipe the Iconians out of existence :mad:

    Tonight we dine in Gre'thor

    I am in agreement with the president of Cardassia.
    <3
  • centersolacecentersolace Member Posts: 11,178 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Addendum: I personally would love to see the FE's taken out of the levelling progression for BOTH factions. They were put there when Free to Play happened. UFP players have options. Looking forward to when a starting STO player can choose to start KDF and also have options other then just do the featured mission progression or grind exploration zones.

    FE's were never ment to be levelling content!

    I like this idea. I like it very much.
  • pyryckpyryck Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    What? Thats the same term used to describe the release of just about every update in every game. You're reading far too much into that

    19 days to go...and I'll be watching for any information out of the PWI quarterly earnings report and info regarding future plans for Cryptic and STO.
  • tsurutafan01tsurutafan01 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    I need to start some sort of Paypal thing where I can fine people who say "JJ Trek" on purpose.

    Like Rick Berman, Ira Behr, and Brannon Braga were all saints. My goodness.

    Hell, Roddenberry wrote plenty of garbage while we're at it.


    "We are smart." - Grebnedlog

    Member of Alliance Central Command/boq botlhra'ghom
  • edna#7310 edna Member Posts: 21 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Im pretty sure its something JJ trek related.The movie will be realeased in may and people will want to JJ trek in STO.

    cant wait the new people pew pewing elite stfs in t1 connie ...like in the movie :rolleyes:
    I need to start some sort of Paypal thing where I can fine people who say "JJ Trek" on purpose.


    JJ trek sounds better than Abrams Trek imo.
    Hell, Roddenberry wrote plenty of garbage while we're at it.

    and what has that to do with JJ Trek and may update?
  • centersolacecentersolace Member Posts: 11,178 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    I need to start some sort of Paypal thing where I can fine people who say "JJ Trek" on purpose.

    Like Rick Berman, Ira Behr, and Brannon Braga were all saints. My goodness.

    Hell, Roddenberry wrote plenty of garbage while we're at it.

    Yes, but JJ Trek is a special kind of garbage. :P

    In all seriousness, it's easier than saying Star Trek: Two-Thousand-Nine.
  • glasgow4glasgow4 Member Posts: 20 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    What the teaser is meant to tease is fairly obvious. Don't really see how there can be much debate on that point.

    Could be that Cryptic will weasel their way out of it in one of the many ways suggested, but playable Romulans is exactly what they want us to think, so it shouldn't be a surprise that that's what many people are thinking.
  • cybersquirrel1cybersquirrel1 Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    This better be the best ****ing thing ever... else they need to fire their PR guy.. because they should know that you don't ****ing hype something for 20+ days and not deliver something amazing.

    I'm pretty sure this is going to end in a disaster if its not a Romulan faction lol.
  • born2bwild1born2bwild1 Member Posts: 1,329 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Someone must have asked Stahl if there will be playable Romulans in May - if his response was not - yes

    Well you know that it's not going to happen. Heck he could even say yes like he does for the KDF then say "sorry had to put it off for later - promise it will get done - double promise!"
  • zulisvelzulisvel Member Posts: 518 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    I'm not really sure what the May Update is anymore. I'm just trying to keep my expectations low so as not to be let down yet again.

    What I do know is this: After allowing speculation to run rampant and not quashing the idea that the May Update is a playable RSE, if the May Update is not a playable RSE then the STO team will deserve all that rage and vitriol that is cast at them by the disappointed players.
    This better be the best ****ing thing ever... else they need to fire their PR guy.. because they should know that you don't ****ing hype something for 20+ days and not deliver something amazing.
    They have a PR person? Because the evidence of the last few years says otherwise.
  • thutmosis85thutmosis85 Member Posts: 2,358 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Someone must have asked Stahl if there will be playable Romulans in May - if his response was not - yes

    Already happened ... check the OP ... or Ask Cryptic February ...
    Dstahl: We are not ready to begin discussing the details of what is in our May update, however the reference definitely suggests that it is related to Romulans in some way. We will share more news about the update and give a clearer response to your question as we get closer to May.
    Patch Notes : Resolved an Issue, where people would accidently experience Fun.
  • born2bwild1born2bwild1 Member Posts: 1,329 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    zulisvel wrote: »
    I'm not really sure what the May Update is anymore. I'm just trying to keep my expectations low so as not to be let down yet again.

    What I do know is this: After allowing speculation to run rampant and not quashing the idea that the May Update is a playable RSE, if the May Update is not a playable RSE then the STO team will deserve all that rage and vitriol that is cast at them by the disappointed players.

    hope you have stocked up on lots of Peto bismol - or Rolaids
  • cybersquirrel1cybersquirrel1 Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    wrote:
    They have a PR person? Because the evidence of the last few years says otherwise.

    Pretty sure its Mr. Stahl.. he moonlights as a PR guy.. well anyway.. he should stop doing PR and get back to freaking work lol.
  • purplegamerpurplegamer Member Posts: 1,015 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Cryptic isn't stupid; they know we want an RSE faction and they know people are setting their hopes on one for May thanks to the vague and suggestive teaser page. If May doesn't see an RSE faction, Cryptic is in for a world of hurt.
  • thutmosis85thutmosis85 Member Posts: 2,358 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    zulisvel wrote: »
    What I do know is this: After allowing speculation to run rampant and not quashing the idea that the May Update is a playable RSE, if the May Update is not a playable RSE then the STO team will deserve all that rage and vitriol that is cast at them by the disappointed players.

    To be fair ... it's next to impossible to quash the idea anyway ... even if Dtahl confirms there will never be a Romulan Faction, a lot of people will still speculate they are secretly working on it for years ... because he kind of did it already ... :P
    Patch Notes : Resolved an Issue, where people would accidently experience Fun.
  • diogene0diogene0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Someone must have asked Stahl if there will be playable Romulans in May - if his response was not - yes

    Well you know that it's not going to happen. Heck he could even say yes like he does for the KDF then say "sorry had to put it off for later - promise it will get done - double promise!"
    Dstahl: We are not ready to begin discussing the details of what is in our May update, however the reference definitely suggests that it is related to Romulans in some way. We will share more news about the update and give a clearer response to your question as we get closer to May.

    Now it's underlined. "In a way" is quite explicit. :D
    Lenny Barre, lvl 60 DC. 18k.
    God, lvl 60 CW. 17k.
  • nyniknynik Member Posts: 1,628 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Either way, its going to be another PR fiasco, as is par for the course at Cryptic.
  • thutmosis85thutmosis85 Member Posts: 2,358 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    diogene0 wrote: »
    Now it's underlined. "In a way" is quite explicit. :D

    Not to forget :
    Dstahl: We have always had a plan for how we wanted to implement additional factions and we have polls dating back to early in the game?s life when we were looking to see which future factions players were most interested in. If and when we release a Romulan faction, you can expect that it would set the stage for how a Cardassian, Borg, or any other faction would be introduced into the game.
    Patch Notes : Resolved an Issue, where people would accidently experience Fun.
  • sovairsovair Member Posts: 14 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    I think it would be awesome for new Playable Factions to be added. However I simply feel that the KDF needs the love first and actually be finished before a new faction is released. Hell maybe for all we know with this large update the KDF does get finished as they promised 3 years ago before launch and add the Romulans. But.... Alas that is an unrealistic wish. Will be interested in seeing what all the noise and hype end up being when the time comes.
  • lordagamemnonb5lordagamemnonb5 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Any talk of a Romulan faction is irrelevant. Without more facts, speculation is futile.
    How the Devs see Star Trek, apparently:
    Star Trek: The Original Grind
    Star Trek: The Next Grind
    Star Trek: Deep Space Grind
    Star Trek: Voyage to the Grind
  • diogene0diogene0 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Not to forget :

    Good point, added to the OP.
    Any talk of a Romulan faction is irrelevant. Without more facts, speculation is futile.

    We do have some facts. We roughly know what season 8/ the "meh update" is about. There is no dev blog saying it explicitely but if you put together all the little elements we get occasionally then you have what I mentionned in my OP. And time constraints are also a hard fact.
    Lenny Barre, lvl 60 DC. 18k.
    God, lvl 60 CW. 17k.
  • lordagamemnonb5lordagamemnonb5 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    diogene0 wrote: »
    And time constraints are also a hard fact.

    The only problem with bringing up any apparent time constraints is that it requires one to believe that Cryptic only recently started working on whatever it is they are working on.

    Knowing how much the devs like to keep things close to the chest whatever the May update is could have been worked on since the end of Season 7.

    I don't care either way (I'm neither a believer nor a skeptic) but we have ZERO facts as to the precise nature of the May update is. Any attempt to prove or disprove a Romulan faction is, as the Borg would say, futile. There is not enough hard evidence to support either position.
    How the Devs see Star Trek, apparently:
    Star Trek: The Original Grind
    Star Trek: The Next Grind
    Star Trek: Deep Space Grind
    Star Trek: Voyage to the Grind
  • hartzillahartzilla Member Posts: 1,177 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    After replacing "March beneath the Raptors Wings" with "Our shadow will dim the stars."

    You mean the one that goes with the picture of Romulan Warships near a nebula that doesn't seem to show anything Iconian related.
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    pyryck wrote: »
    The choice of words used gives a lot away. What sort of released content would be "launched"?

    A brand new FE series. I got emails about the one from last year.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    neoakiraii wrote: »
    they are the reason we are at war....

    The Undine would like a word with you. Please report to fluidic space ASAP.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • acoldtacoldt Member Posts: 64 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    The image in the new teaser shows at least 3 ships, possibly 4, that we have never seen before, all Romulan silhouettes, why would they suddenly pump out 3 or 4 new ships that we've never seen and aren't really needed to progress the storyline, except to provide additional content where it is needed?
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    The only problem with bringing up any apparent time constraints is that it requires one to believe that Cryptic only recently started working on whatever it is they are working on.

    Let's check the timeline!

    There wasn't anything being done in the year leading up to Atari selling to PWE. That is verified by DSthal's own statements. The whole "no cups in the kitchen" commentary.

    The work being done right after the sale was all F2P conversion. That's also confirmed, and well tracked with the dev blog series.

    So you're looking at a pretty small stretch of time where they could have been working on a Romulan factino, but then again, there was the statement "no new factions until the KDF is complete." Also, those comments can be combined with the DStahl statements about how "PWE loves multi-faction, and PvP so the KDF will get some development attention with this sale." Backed up by Stormshade posts.

    Then we know they worked on Starbases, and "crafting" which became resource sinks and more grinding. Then reputation systems.

    So I don't know, it seems like there just isn't a whole lot of wiggle room in their history to show they were working on Romulans.

    I think they've done more work on "New Hair Tech."
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • pyryckpyryck Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    A brand new FE series. I got emails about the one from last year.

    A brand new FE series would require the entire STO team to work 6-day weeks for a couple of months?

    Dan already mentioned there being a revamp of the character creation system coming with the May update. Why would they need to revamp the character creation system for just a couple of FE missions?
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    acoldt wrote: »
    The image in the new teaser shows at least 3 ships, possibly 4, that we have never seen before, all Romulan silhouettes, why would they suddenly pump out 3 or 4 new ships that we've never seen and aren't really needed, except to provide additional content where it is needed?

    Lockboxes. A Romulan super lotto 3-pack! Call it a hypercrate! Wait, that's taken already isn't it?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sign In or Register to comment.