The right handside (cstore) Heavy Escort Carrier (akira) should have 2 not 3 science consoles. Should also mention +15 weapon power, noticed when compared to the steamrunner next to it. (a bunch of other ships are missing the + power)
Next on the left, the tier 3 Fleet Science Vessel Retrofit (the improved version of the two novas) has the wrong bridge officer layout.
Sto Wiki says; Tac 3, Eng 2, Sci 4, Sci 2, Sci 1
Both versions of the nova have 14 turn rate instead of 15.
Something else that might want to include on all the ships is the impulse modifier...
Final wish, any chance of putting the lock box ships up?
The right handside (cstore) Heavy Escort Carrier (akira) should have 2 not 3 science consoles. Should also mention +15 weapon power, noticed when compared to the steamrunner next to it. (a bunch of other ships are missing the + power)
Next on the left, the tier 3 Fleet Science Vessel Retrofit (the improved version of the two novas) has the wrong bridge officer layout.
Sto Wiki says; Tac 3, Eng 2, Sci 4, Sci 2, Sci 1
Both versions of the nova have 14 turn rate instead of 15.
Something else that might want to include on all the ships is the impulse modifier...
Final wish, any chance of putting the lock box ships up?
Anyhow Great Work! Keep it up!
Thanks for that. Very much appreciated.
According to the ingame requisition screen it seems the fleet store Novas have 15 turn rate. I don't actually own one so I can't verify. If someone can, that would be excellent, as requisitions might be wrong.
The power layouts on the fleet ships are there because they are sorted by tier, and not by type. In the VA section the typical power layouts are in the title block on the left. Only where it varies have I added the ships power layout, except for the Vesta variants because they don't seem to follow the normal rules. :P I've actually taken the layout off the Steamrunner, as it was added in error.
Okay, this is where my chart gets political... I haven't added the lock box or lobi ships on purpose. I only wanted to add ships that were reasonably obtainable. Some may disagree with that, and it might be my undoing, but it's a choice I've made and plan on sticking to for as long as I continue doing this. I've only added the Chel Grett as it's basically free.
I might add the impulse modifier at some point. I should probably have done that to begin with.
Many thanks again, for yours and everyone elses comments.
According to the ingame requisition screen it seems the fleet store Novas have 15 turn rate. I don't actually own one so I can't verify. If someone can, that would be excellent, as requisitions might be wrong.
The power layouts on the fleet ships are there because they are sorted by tier, and not by type. In the VA section the typical power layouts are in the title block on the left. Only where it varies have I added the ships power layout, except for the Vesta variants because they don't seem to follow the normal rules. :P I've actually taken the layout off the Steamrunner, as it was added in error.
Okay, this is where my chart gets political... I haven't added the lock box or lobi ships on purpose. I only wanted to add ships that were reasonably obtainable. Some may disagree with that, and it might be my undoing, but it's a choice I've made and plan on sticking to for as long as I continue doing this. I've only added the Chel Grett as it's basically free.
I might add the impulse modifier at some point. I should probably have done that to begin with.
Many thanks again, for yours and everyone elses comments.
Looks great.
Don't have any of the fleet Novas, however i clearly remember patchnotes mentioning their turn rate bumped from 14 to 15 a while back. So i'd think the wiki's got the old turn rate listed.
TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class. Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider. Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.
Okay, this is where my chart gets political... I haven't added the lock box or lobi ships on purpose. I only wanted to add ships that were reasonably obtainable. Some may disagree with that, and it might be my undoing, but it's a choice I've made and plan on sticking to for as long as I continue doing this. I've only added the Chel Grett as it's basically free.
Well I understand your view and respect it, and agree a little - I just think everyone wants a chart that has everything.
Still your doing the work so it up too you how much or little you do. Looks great and hope you change your mind.
TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class. Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider. Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.
Starfish, I just noticed there's a mistake in your chart:
The Fleet science vessel retrofit (Fleet Nova) should have a Lt.Comm. Tac boff slot instead of Lt. and vice versa (the Lt.Comm. Sci boff slot should be Lt. only).
What about the Ferengi ship and the Cardassian ship?
Those aren't Vice-Admiral (and Lt. General), but Rear Admiral (and Brigadier General) level ships, unlike all others in this chart.
TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class. Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider. Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.
Starfish, I just noticed there's a mistake in your chart:
The Fleet science vessel retrofit (Fleet Nova) should have a Lt.Comm. Tac boff slot instead of Lt. and vice versa (the Lt.Comm. Sci boff slot should be Lt. only).
Thank you very much for that Toiva. Much appreciated. Well spotted, and sorry about that mistake.
I have corrected it and uploaded, so that should be correct now.
Thank you very much for that Toiva. Much appreciated. Well spotted, and sorry about that mistake.
I have corrected it and uploaded, so that should be correct now.
You're welcome, that's the least I can do.
TOIVA, Toi Vaxx, Toia Vix, Toveg, T'vritha, To Vrax: Bring in the Allegiance class. Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider. Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.
All Federation faction playable ships and shuttles now added
Chart re-orientated and transposed to a new 'portrait style'
Created a device graphic to replace the text
Impulse modifier added
Inertia rating graphic added
Ship base hull graphic area updated
Console block updated to include console image
Colour coded 'bonus power' graphics section added (my favourite bit)
Graphic to represent dual cannons
Graphics to represent sensor analysis and subsystem targeting
Race specific watermarks added to appropriate ships
Hope you like all the changes. There is potentially an overview and tutorial video to follow later, which some might find useful.
Before anyone asks, yes a KDF chart is already in the works, and the first version will probably be ready in the next week or so. I will likely create a separate thread for the KDF to keep all the suggested corrections specific to its particular chart, so keep your eyes open if you are interested in that one too.
As always, please let me know if you spot any errors. It takes a fair bit of time and concentration to put something this big together, so a few errors might creep in (no matter how careful I might be).
Please let me know what you think. If I know people are still using it and continue to find it useful (and I hope they do) it helps motivate me to keep updating it and make changes like these ones above.
Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though. JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.
#TASforSTO
'...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
'...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
'...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek
- Background is pretty dark. Maybe bright elements (like SpiderMitch's beam effect) could lighten up a little.
- Have you thought of doing the chart from left (Starter ships) to right (End/Fleet Ships)? Using the common reading order, it would be nicer to navigate.
- I can't open the chart with Firefox or the standard Microsoft Picture Viewer. Both programs say the file is broken.
- Background is pretty dark. Maybe bright elements (like SpiderMitch's beam effect) could lighten up a little.
- Have you thought of doing the chart from left (Starter ships) to right (End/Fleet Ships)? Using the common reading order, it would be nicer to navigate.
- I can't open the chart with Firefox or the standard Microsoft Picture Viewer. Both programs say the file is broken.
By the way, when do we see your next vid?
Thanks Manfred.
The background is dark on purpose. When I began this chart back last year I could see we were heading in the direction of lots more ships, so I wanted to create something that could be easily cut and pasted. Each frame and each block are modular. It makes for a plain design, but it's super easy for me to keep it updated, or expand it if I need to (and I suspect I will need to for some time to come). I only have Microsoft Word and MS Paint, if I ever get something more professional, I might be able to do more with it. Keeping it easy to update though means that I am more likely to do so, and not get burn out or fed up with it.
I tested opening it with Chrome and Microsoft Internet Explorer and in Windows Photo Viewer. You can't open it with Paint anymore as it's so big now, it claims it is an invalid file. It could be that your Microsoft Picture Viewer is having that same issue. Out of interest, what have you managed to open it in?
The vids are taking a rest I'm afraid. I will resume making those later in the year, and have lots of ideas, but I want to do the charts and maybe a tutorial or two first. But next week (I think) will be a short tutorial video with the fleet KDF chart which some people might find useful. I also want to make a tutorial video on the basics of using Demo Record (or how I use it at least), so people can take epic screenshots or make their own videos.
With regards of the right to left, I changed it to the style it's in now to make it different to the charts that already exist from Spidermitch and Suricata, but that's not to say that I won't change it again at some point if the mood ever takes me.
Agree with a previous poster that this should be stickied.
I'll bet there is more work in this than in most foundry projects. Shame we can't tip you with some dilithium!
Thank you, you are very kind. No dilithium is necessary though, just knowing that people find the chart useful is more than enough of a reward for the effort of making it.
And thanks for the comment Artan42. Very much appreciated.
Great work! Your revision adding more end-game ships is great. I am glad that you are continuing the work of Suricata and Spidermitch.
My only criticism is that the Advanced Transwarp Drive is not a universal console included with the Advanced Heavy Cruiser Retrofit; it is an innate ability that gives the ship additional transwarp destinations. The universal console that provides the Efficiency buff is included with purchase of the commander level Advanced Heavy Cruiser only.
Great work! Your revision adding more end-game ships is great. I am glad that you are continuing the work of Suricata and Spidermitch.
My only criticism is that the Advanced Transwarp Drive is not a universal console included with the Advanced Heavy Cruiser Retrofit; it is an innate ability that gives the ship additional transwarp destinations. The universal console that provides the Efficiency buff is included with purchase of the commander level Advanced Heavy Cruiser only.
You know, I had a funny feeling about that when I was creating that frame. Thank you very much. Much appreciated. I will get that altered and upload it as v3.1 in the next few days. I will add a new post here as usual when I do.
Great work, starfish! It's really great to have a graphical ship chart again.
Just a few tiny things:
- On the Wells and Mobius class it shows the image of the Jem'Hadar bridge instead of the 29th century one.
- You might want to put in a key to all thode symbols to make it easier to read.
- I noticed you have the link to the chart in your sig. However posting a textlink as agraphic is not exactly the most user-friendly version. I would suggest using actual text peaople can copy, or just actually link your signature to the chart.
Enaough of the nitpicking already. Keep up the great work!
Great work, starfish! It's really great to have a graphical ship chart again.
Just a few tiny things:
- On the Wells and Mobius class it shows the image of the Jem'Hadar bridge instead of the 29th century one.
- You might want to put in a key to all thode symbols to make it easier to read.
- I noticed you have the link to the chart in your sig. However posting a textlink as agraphic is not exactly the most user-friendly version. I would suggest using actual text peaople can copy, or just actually link your signature to the chart.
Enaough of the nitpicking already. Keep up the great work!
Thanks for the feedback!
I can't believe I let those wrong bridge images sneak in, and I should have spotted that before I uploaded it. I have an image of the 29th Century bridge which I thought I had used, so it's an easy alteration to make. I will add that to the list of changes, and upload that next week with the other corrections.
A guide to the symbols will be in a video that is coming out this next week, but I think it might be an idea to add a key to the chart itself too.
Just a quick note on spelling. You spelt Sabre and Ionised the US way, but Point Defence the correct (:P) way. Also the Dreadnought cruiser makes no mention of the Venture X skin available.
Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though. JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.
#TASforSTO
'...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
'...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
'...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek
Sorry, I missed your question about my graphic viewer:
All of my common picture viewer couldn t handle the picture, only IrfanView could manage it.
Problem is, when I want to zoom the picture, and that I have to do, I must autofire on the zoom button to make the picture bigger.
Sorry, I missed your question about my graphic viewer:
All of my common picture viewer couldn t handle the picture, only IrfanView could manage it.
Problem is, when I want to zoom the picture, and that I have to do, I must autofire on the zoom button to make the picture bigger.
Dont have Gimp right now at the moment to try.
No worries. Thanks for that.
So long as you have something you can open it in that's great! As soon as the next lock box comes out it's going to get bigger though.
Just a quick note on spelling. You spelt Sabre and Ionised the US way, but Point Defence the correct (:P) way. Also the Dreadnought cruiser makes no mention of the Venture X skin available.
"The 'correct' way." That was funny
Yes, I will update the Dreadnought with that note later this week with the other changes.
Thanks again for all the corrections and suggestions. Very much appreciated.
Comments
The right handside (cstore) Heavy Escort Carrier (akira) should have 2 not 3 science consoles. Should also mention +15 weapon power, noticed when compared to the steamrunner next to it. (a bunch of other ships are missing the + power)
Next on the left, the tier 3 Fleet Science Vessel Retrofit (the improved version of the two novas) has the wrong bridge officer layout.
Sto Wiki says; Tac 3, Eng 2, Sci 4, Sci 2, Sci 1
Both versions of the nova have 14 turn rate instead of 15.
Something else that might want to include on all the ships is the impulse modifier...
Final wish, any chance of putting the lock box ships up?
Anyhow Great Work! Keep it up!
http://starfish1.co.uk/chart1.jpg
Thanks for that. Very much appreciated.
According to the ingame requisition screen it seems the fleet store Novas have 15 turn rate. I don't actually own one so I can't verify. If someone can, that would be excellent, as requisitions might be wrong.
The power layouts on the fleet ships are there because they are sorted by tier, and not by type. In the VA section the typical power layouts are in the title block on the left. Only where it varies have I added the ships power layout, except for the Vesta variants because they don't seem to follow the normal rules. :P I've actually taken the layout off the Steamrunner, as it was added in error.
Okay, this is where my chart gets political... I haven't added the lock box or lobi ships on purpose. I only wanted to add ships that were reasonably obtainable. Some may disagree with that, and it might be my undoing, but it's a choice I've made and plan on sticking to for as long as I continue doing this. I've only added the Chel Grett as it's basically free.
I might add the impulse modifier at some point. I should probably have done that to begin with.
Many thanks again, for yours and everyone elses comments.
Looks great.
Don't have any of the fleet Novas, however i clearly remember patchnotes mentioning their turn rate bumped from 14 to 15 a while back. So i'd think the wiki's got the old turn rate listed.
Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.
Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
Well I understand your view and respect it, and agree a little - I just think everyone wants a chart that has everything.
Still your doing the work so it up too you how much or little you do. Looks great and hope you change your mind.
/salute
Updated to include this weeks changes to the shield modifiers and the addition of the Fleet Ambassador.
http://www.starfish1.co.uk/chart1.jpg
Changes have been taken from the shipyard in-game.
As always, if you spot anything wrong, let me know.
Now if only there was a KDF chart...
Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.
Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
The Fleet science vessel retrofit (Fleet Nova) should have a Lt.Comm. Tac boff slot instead of Lt. and vice versa (the Lt.Comm. Sci boff slot should be Lt. only).
Those aren't Vice-Admiral (and Lt. General), but Rear Admiral (and Brigadier General) level ships, unlike all others in this chart.
Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.
Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
Thank you very much for that Toiva. Much appreciated. Well spotted, and sorry about that mistake.
I have corrected it and uploaded, so that should be correct now.
You're welcome, that's the least I can do.
Toi'Va, Ti'vath, Toivia, Ty'Vris, Tia Vex, Toi'Virth: Add Tier 6 KDF Carrier and Raider.
Tae'Va, T'Vaya, To'Var, Tevra, T'Vira, To'Vrak: Give us Asylums for Romulans.
Don't make ARC mandatory! Keep it optional only!
Too many changes to list them all, but basically:
All Federation faction playable ships and shuttles now added
Chart re-orientated and transposed to a new 'portrait style'
Created a device graphic to replace the text
Impulse modifier added
Inertia rating graphic added
Ship base hull graphic area updated
Console block updated to include console image
Colour coded 'bonus power' graphics section added (my favourite bit)
Graphic to represent dual cannons
Graphics to represent sensor analysis and subsystem targeting
Race specific watermarks added to appropriate ships
Hope you like all the changes. There is potentially an overview and tutorial video to follow later, which some might find useful.
Before anyone asks, yes a KDF chart is already in the works, and the first version will probably be ready in the next week or so. I will likely create a separate thread for the KDF to keep all the suggested corrections specific to its particular chart, so keep your eyes open if you are interested in that one too.
As always, please let me know if you spot any errors. It takes a fair bit of time and concentration to put something this big together, so a few errors might creep in (no matter how careful I might be).
Please let me know what you think. If I know people are still using it and continue to find it useful (and I hope they do) it helps motivate me to keep updating it and make changes like these ones above.
Many thanks for all your support, Starfish1
Thanks for that
Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.
#TASforSTO
'...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
'...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
'...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek
Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
Wonderfull chart.
May I suggest a few things?
- Background is pretty dark. Maybe bright elements (like SpiderMitch's beam effect) could lighten up a little.
- Have you thought of doing the chart from left (Starter ships) to right (End/Fleet Ships)? Using the common reading order, it would be nicer to navigate.
- I can't open the chart with Firefox or the standard Microsoft Picture Viewer. Both programs say the file is broken.
By the way, when do we see your next vid?
Agree with a previous poster that this should be stickied.
I'll bet there is more work in this than in most foundry projects. Shame we can't tip you with some dilithium!
Thanks Manfred.
The background is dark on purpose. When I began this chart back last year I could see we were heading in the direction of lots more ships, so I wanted to create something that could be easily cut and pasted. Each frame and each block are modular. It makes for a plain design, but it's super easy for me to keep it updated, or expand it if I need to (and I suspect I will need to for some time to come). I only have Microsoft Word and MS Paint, if I ever get something more professional, I might be able to do more with it. Keeping it easy to update though means that I am more likely to do so, and not get burn out or fed up with it.
I tested opening it with Chrome and Microsoft Internet Explorer and in Windows Photo Viewer. You can't open it with Paint anymore as it's so big now, it claims it is an invalid file. It could be that your Microsoft Picture Viewer is having that same issue. Out of interest, what have you managed to open it in?
The vids are taking a rest I'm afraid. I will resume making those later in the year, and have lots of ideas, but I want to do the charts and maybe a tutorial or two first. But next week (I think) will be a short tutorial video with the fleet KDF chart which some people might find useful. I also want to make a tutorial video on the basics of using Demo Record (or how I use it at least), so people can take epic screenshots or make their own videos.
With regards of the right to left, I changed it to the style it's in now to make it different to the charts that already exist from Spidermitch and Suricata, but that's not to say that I won't change it again at some point if the mood ever takes me.
Thank you, you are very kind. No dilithium is necessary though, just knowing that people find the chart useful is more than enough of a reward for the effort of making it.
And thanks for the comment Artan42. Very much appreciated.
I hope you didn't take my post to personally.
Sometimes my posts sound very harsh as I found out.
You know how much I admire your work
My only criticism is that the Advanced Transwarp Drive is not a universal console included with the Advanced Heavy Cruiser Retrofit; it is an innate ability that gives the ship additional transwarp destinations. The universal console that provides the Efficiency buff is included with purchase of the commander level Advanced Heavy Cruiser only.
You know, I had a funny feeling about that when I was creating that frame. Thank you very much. Much appreciated. I will get that altered and upload it as v3.1 in the next few days. I will add a new post here as usual when I do.
Thanks again.
I didn't think your post sounded harsh at all, and didn't read anything negative in it.
Besides, you're my 'number one' fan!
Just a few tiny things:
- On the Wells and Mobius class it shows the image of the Jem'Hadar bridge instead of the 29th century one.
- You might want to put in a key to all thode symbols to make it easier to read.
- I noticed you have the link to the chart in your sig. However posting a textlink as agraphic is not exactly the most user-friendly version. I would suggest using actual text peaople can copy, or just actually link your signature to the chart.
Enaough of the nitpicking already. Keep up the great work!
Always welcoming new Members. Check us out here!
Thanks for the feedback!
I can't believe I let those wrong bridge images sneak in, and I should have spotted that before I uploaded it. I have an image of the 29th Century bridge which I thought I had used, so it's an easy alteration to make. I will add that to the list of changes, and upload that next week with the other corrections.
A guide to the symbols will be in a video that is coming out this next week, but I think it might be an idea to add a key to the chart itself too.
Good ideas. Many thanks again.
Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.
#TASforSTO
'...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
'...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
'...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek
Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
All of my common picture viewer couldn t handle the picture, only IrfanView could manage it.
Problem is, when I want to zoom the picture, and that I have to do, I must autofire on the zoom button to make the picture bigger.
Dont have Gimp right now at the moment to try.
I always look forward to these.
Only problem is the Vertical format makes a poor screen saver LOL.
A screensaver... now there is an idea...
I did consider releasing the ships in frames of 9 per sheet of paper, so people could print them out like playing cards if they wanted.
No worries. Thanks for that.
So long as you have something you can open it in that's great! As soon as the next lock box comes out it's going to get bigger though.
"The 'correct' way." That was funny
Yes, I will update the Dreadnought with that note later this week with the other changes.
Thanks again for all the corrections and suggestions. Very much appreciated.