The 'No news is good news' approach isn't always the case....I think people would prefer anything, even 'We got stuck on XYZ' or whatever. Nobody is expecting Cryptic to bust out people's W2's, iCal's, or Outlook meeting schedule's to audit what they have going on. We're not the IRS.
Maybe just do some more Dev Blogs, nothing serious.....and maybe when TB/TF makes guest appearances at ESD Zone chat could talk a little more about what's going on at the moment, maybe answer a few questions from people. Why does a 440MB patch take 5-6 hours to implement? Why do items getting fitted/unfitted from our ships take 30, 60, 90 seconds to move from inventory to ship and vice-versa? I can seriously make the changes in Spacedock, beam up and start to leave system before things begin to move. I think a lot of people would also like to know why it seems that bugs which are reported promptly remain in game for months at a time and some never get fixed at all. Why no patches that just apply bug fixes only?
^^^
This is EXACTLY what Cryptic did for the first 2 years of the game. When stuff changed, or got pulled (and they would sometimes state the reason why, and sometimes not - they'd just say 'it didn't work out as planned'...) AS A RESULT DStahl was called an outright liar; and many accused him of intentionally misleading the STO playerbase to 'keep the game alive...'
When he returned to STO from Zynga he had a forum dialogiue abot the situation and a lot of players on the forum saifd they'd rather NOT hear of the grandiose/long term hopes; just wait to announce something until it's 90+% sure it'll actually end up in the game <--- And that's what they've been doing since Season 5. (SAnd Dan still gets labeled a 'liar' by a bunch of people who refuse to believe anything he says until they see it in a server patch note.
I honestly DO miss the more open and upfront communication gthey had with the STO playerbase prior to F2P -- but that said, I completely understand why the changed the manner in which they now release info regarding what they're working on, and any no content for STO.
Formerly known as Armsman from June 2008 to June 20, 2012 PWE ARC Drone says: "Your STO forum community as you have known it is ended...Display names are irrelevant...Any further sense of community is irrelevant...Resistance is futile...You will be assimilated..."
^^^
This is EXACTLY what Cryptic did for the first 2 years of the game. When stuff changed, or got pulled (and they would sometimes state the reason why, and sometimes not - they'd just say 'it didn't work out as planned'...) AS A RESULT DStahl was called an outright liar; and many accused him of intentionally misleading the STO playerbase to 'keep the game alive...'
When he returned to STO from Zynga he had a forum dialogiue abot the situation and a lot of players on the forum saifd they'd rather NOT hear of the grandiose/long term hopes; just wait to announce something until it's 90+% sure it'll actually end up in the game <--- And that's what they've been doing since Season 5. (SAnd Dan still gets labeled a 'liar' by a bunch of people who refuse to believe anything he says until they see it in a server patch note.
I honestly DO miss the more open and upfront communication gthey had with the STO playerbase prior to F2P -- but that said, I completely understand why the changed the manner in which they now release info regarding what they're working on, and any no content for STO.
It was not the majority of forum posters who did that, only a vocal minority. That means Cryptic caved in and changed their "policies" because of the behavior of a minority, not because of the behavior of the majority. That is straight up weakling behavior.
You're right that it's a losing proposition, but you could always just pull a Scotty: announce what you're doing, but only announce the upper-end of when it'll be out. That way people are either happy it comes out sooner or satisfied you made the announced timeframe.
Ok, they have new Romulan related content, it'll be coming out sometime in May, maybe early June if things don't go according to plan.
Somewhere I remember seeing either Branflakes or DStahl mentioning that Cryptic has around 40 - 50 employees and they were still hiring. I don't think they're still hiring, but that still leaves us with around 40 - 50 employees. This is all very well and good...
...but what the heck are they doing?
What I want to know is how many employees are working on a given task at a given time. How many ship artists? How many systems guys? How many pencil-pushers are there? I think if the community had a better idea of what the team was made out of, we could understand the limitations better. If there was only one guy making costumes, then it would make sense as to why those are such a once and a while thing, but if there's five of them.....
Divide 40 by these teams:
Neverwinter (currently ramped up for its beta and release)
I honestly DO miss the more open and upfront communication gthey had with the STO playerbase prior to F2P -- but that said, I completely understand why the changed the manner in which they now release info regarding what they're working on, and any no content for STO.
Me too. It was easier to get excited about stuff. But yeah, people are jerks, so I too understand why they stopped.
It was not the majority of forum posters who did that, only a vocal minority. That means Cryptic caved in and changed their "policies" because of the behavior of a minority, not because of the behavior of the majority. That is straight up weakling behavior.
Is it really weak to want to avoid unneccesary bashing and stress?
The playerbase is passionate, they know that. But would YOU want a vocal minority bashing you for no good reason all the time? Changing their policies may not have had the desired effect, but they did so with the intention to avoid most of the 'serve-no-purpose-other-than-to-enrage-the-devs' posts... which only distract and stress them.
Even as they're a business, they ARE human too. Why can't people take that into account? (And no, that last part's not aimed directly at you; more of a general rant)
Was named Trek17.
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
Is it really weak to want to avoid unneccesary bashing and stress?
The playerbase is passionate, they know that. But would YOU want a vocal minority bashing you for no good reason all the time? Changing their policies may not have had the desired effect, but they did so with the intention to avoid most of the 'serve-no-purpose-other-than-to-enrage-the-devs' posts... which only distract and stress them.
Even as they're a business, they ARE human too. Why can't people take that into account? (And no, that last part's not aimed directly at you; more of a general rant)
The reality is, when you give in to someone's "bullying"(for lack of a better word) you are letting them control you. And letting someone control you is weak behavior. But putting aside their own ego, the devs should care enough about the majority of their customers who are well behaved not to cut them off because a small group of people misbehaved. Instead, they decided to punish the majority of people who were well behaved and not share info with them anymore just because a small group of people said mean things. So yes, on both accounts I call that weak behavior.
The reality is, when you give in to someone's "bullying"(for lack of a better word) you are letting them control you. And letting someone control you is weak behavior. But putting aside their own ego, the devs should care enough about the majority of their customers who are well behaved not to cut them off because a small group of people misbehaved. Instead, they decided to punish the majority of people who were well behaved and not share info with them anymore just because a small group of people said mean things. So yes, on both accounts I call that weak behavior.
The reality is, when you give in to someone's "bullying"(for lack of a better word) you are letting them control you. And letting someone control you is weak behavior. But putting aside their own ego, the devs should care enough about the majority of their customers who are well behaved not to cut them off because a small group of people misbehaved. Instead, they decided to punish the majority of people who were well behaved and not share info with them anymore just because a small group of people said mean things. So yes, on both accounts I call that weak behavior.
Giving up simply to stop it, then yeah. Giving up for different reasons (in this case, a simple case of wanting to avoid distractions and stress that would otherwise mar their abilities to make stuff for STO), I hardly think so for that particular case.
Giving up simply to stop it, then yeah. Giving up for different reasons (in this case, a simple case of wanting to avoid distractions and stress that would otherwise mar their abilities to make stuff for STO), I hardly think so for that particular case.
What exactly do you mean by "avoid distractions and stress"? Just because they post an engineering report does not mean they have to sit there and read all the replies. Are you suggesting that the devs lack the self control not to sit there and read every reply just because they post some information?
What exactly do you mean by "avoid distractions and stress"? Just because they post an engineering report does not mean they have to sit there and read all the replies. Are you suggesting that the devs lack the self control not to sit there and read every reply just because they post some information?
If you've seen a lot of the dev replies, it's pretty clear that's EXACTLY what they do (reading a lot of the replies). Do they have to? No, but they do so anyway sometimes, so I highly doubt it's a lack of self control, especially with this passionate a playerbase.
But like I said, they are human, and no one wants to have a vocal minority saying hurtful things to them for no reason. So when a minority says they're liars for posting 'wrong' info for a good year or so, despite all indications that schedules changed or stalled, they changed their policy afterward.
May or may not have had the desired effect (some still say find things to throw at them for no good reason), but there's nothing wrong with trying to avoid abuse. Calling it weak is like you expect them to just take it...
Was named Trek17.
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
If you've seen a lot of the dev replies, it's pretty clear that's EXACTLY what they do (reading a lot of the replies). Do they have to? No, but they do so anyway sometimes, so I highly doubt it's a lack of self control, especially with this passionate a playerbase.
But like I said, they are human, and no one wants to have a vocal minority saying hurtful things to them for no reason. So when a minority says they're liars for posting 'wrong' info for a good year or so, despite all indications that schedules changed or stalled, they changed their policy afterward.
May or may not have had the desired effect (some still say find things to throw at them for no good reason), but there's nothing wrong with trying to avoid abuse. Calling it weak is like you expect them to just take it...
Lets make sure we're both on the same page, so to speak, before going any further. There are far less dev posts these days than there used to be(branflakes isnt a dev). It sounds like we both agree they do not post as often because they got their feelings hurt by a small group of rude people.
So are they still reading the forums as much as they used to or not? If they are, then it is just as much a "distraction" now as it has ever been. There are still a small number of rude people who say rude things; that hasnt changed. So if that is what hurts the devs feeling, that is no different now than in the past.
So what has anyone gained from their lack of communication? If they are still reading the forums, then they are still being "distracted" and still getting their feelings hurt, and the playerbase has far less information about the game's development.
Now with all of that said, I have a very strong disagreement with punishing a large group of innocent people because of the bad behavior of a small group of people. Like I have said before, the majority of forum posters are well behaved people. A small group is loud and rude. You may not like the loud and rude group, but that does not justify cutting off your well behaved people from all the information they used to get.
What exactly do you mean by "avoid distractions and stress"? Just because they post an engineering report does not mean they have to sit there and read all the replies. Are you suggesting that the devs lack the self control not to sit there and read every reply just because they post some information?
Really? You realize if it was discovered they didn't read the replies; you'd then get posters claiming they completely ignore player feedback; and thus it's the reason 'STO sucks' and/pr 'Cryptic is incompetent'... etc.
[And again, I'm NOT saying this -- I posted the above to show how I believe the forum vocal forum readership would respond -- and we've seen exactly this in certain areas as - for a LONG time, a lot of avid PvPers believed no Cryptic employee was reading anything posted in the PvP section -- and I think somme still do; even though they've had Brandon and borticus posting in there that the devs do read the PvP forum posts.]
You can't tell me that if you were doing the best you cold in your day job -- if you were to constantly read a bunch of posts made by the people you work for (be they customers or otherwise); calling you a liar, incompetent, someone who should be replaced by another who knows what they're doing...,etc; that your attitude and job performance might be impacted negatively; and/or any passion you might have for the project dissipate.
Again, the people at Cryptic aren't machines. They're human beings and they have good days bad days, can be buoyed up by a compliment, and torn down by a negative remark.
MMO forums are notorious for leaning to the very negative aspect because those happy with the game, or who just use it as an occasional pastime to relieve stress themselves; don't venture or post in the forums often (if at all) - they just log in and play STO. the ones who come are most likely very passionate about the game and how the Star Trek material is handled; and become very vocal when they see/experience something in game they don't like; and have no qualms coming here, sometimes (not all the time) venting in the worst way possible; and then expect an immediate answer or resolution.
I don't call it 'weak' to want to try and manage expectations, or try and minimize any negative atmosphere on the forums by waiting to talk about content or changes until said content/change is 90+% certain to be coming to the game (and their still have been situations where some aspect of something announced since F2P has been further changed , or delayed <-- and when this has happened the STO forums erupt passionately and more often then not, trend to swell in negative posts.)
Formerly known as Armsman from June 2008 to June 20, 2012 PWE ARC Drone says: "Your STO forum community as you have known it is ended...Display names are irrelevant...Any further sense of community is irrelevant...Resistance is futile...You will be assimilated..."
Lets make sure we're both on the same page, so to speak, before going any further. There are far less dev posts these days than there used to be(branflakes isnt a dev). It sounds like we both agree they do not post as often because they got their feelings hurt by a small group of rude people.
So are they still reading the forums as much as they used to or not? If they are, then it is just as much a "distraction" now as it has ever been. There are still a small number of rude people who say rude things; that hasnt changed. So if that is what hurts the devs feeling, that is no different now than in the past.
So what has anyone gained from their lack of communication? If they are still reading the forums, then they are still being "distracted" and still getting their feelings hurt, and the playerbase has far less information about the game's development.
Now with all of that said, I have a very strong disagreement with punishing a large group of innocent people because of the bad behavior of a small group of people. Like I have said before, the majority of forum posters are well behaved people. A small group is loud and rude. You may not like the loud and rude group, but that does not justify cutting off your well behaved people from all the information they used to get.
Yeah, they don't post as often as they have in the past... but there is still evidence that they read a lot of the posts. When Season 7 came, there was a intentional change that removed all Dil rewards from STF's... which didn't go well, but got changed back.
Dstahl was in the main thread and replied to at least half of the posts, when he could just as easily avoided all the harsh (though justified) things they said. And that's just one example, but a good one.
As for distractions, for the most part, the devs read the forums on their own time (ie not their work time, unless that's part of their assigned work day). Reading no-good-reason flame posts would only stress them... which would distract them, I think. And because they were getting a lot of this by posting everything they planned, they changed their policy, to try and avoid the unnecessary abuse.
In a way, they were giving the playerbase what they wanted, at the time.
As for 'punishing' the larger group, I'm more in the gray area on that one: I don't mind being in the dark, and I fail to see how others like to be in the loop so much... but that's just me. And whatever my response to a particular game item, the devs are the ones who keep STO running and growing, so I want to make sure they do as good as they can. Hence, I want them to avoid the minority, so I'm perfectly fine with how things are.
Edit: oh, and I agree with a lot of what crypticarmsman said above me
Was named Trek17.
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
Basically, everything I said in my last post still applies. Neither they nor we have gained anything from their lesser communication. There is still a vocal minority saying rude things. If the devs still read the forums on a regular basis, they are still getting their feelings hurt. No change there. However, now we get far less information about the game's development. So the situation has not improved for the devs, and all the well behaved forum readers no longer get info. No one has benefited.
It was not the majority of forum posters who did that, only a vocal minority. That means Cryptic caved in and changed their "policies" because of the behavior of a minority, not because of the behavior of the majority. That is straight up weakling behavior.
A lot of things made them change. They used to share stuff on STOked, Priority One, the devs used to post stuff constantly, Engineering reports, tweet leaks, forum posts, etc etc. People ruined it, the few always ruin it for the masses....
For ex.. you remember when Bort posted about the lock boxes on Jupiterforce's forums and Massively took it and ran with it. Saying that Bort said STO would just drop the EU... The devs were dark for a long time after that. It was an instant halt in flow of information. It's something I will never forget that Massively did. It was tabloidish and they can go to hell.
People used to treat the Engineering reports as Gospel and go nuts over so called 'promises'. They don't promise you anything EVER... nothing should ever be considered a promise and if you think they owe you anything you are crazy. The game is free so it's take it or leave it and if you pay, their only promise to you is access to the shard and the perks for Gold for the time you have payed for. You get nothing, You loose, Good Day Sir!
Something happened with STOked... not sure what it was, but you know there was some bad mojo there and it was around the same time as the Massively fiasco...
People can't seem to realize that directions can change in business. You set out on a goal and sometimes half way there you realize that the goal line has changed or you realize it's much further or you have to do things differently. I worked on a multi-million dollar distributed processing platform that took an extra year to get out the door and we started chopping features that are just now being addressed a year later. Sometimes TRIBBLE like that happens. Get over it, don't call human beings who show up to work every day and bust their humps a bunch of liars.
So you know what.... I am glad they don't leak much anymore, I am glad they don't really share anything new with podcasts that the community doesn't already know is coming. I am glad they only release fluff news just prior to hitting holodeck after it's been sterilized and cleansed to avoid any misconceptions or promises that the community tends to latch on and scream like rabid monkey's when they don't show up. The community deserves it.
/angry
join Date: Sep 2009 - I want my changeling lava lamp!
No, what people "deserve" is based on their own actions, not those of others. The small group of rude people deserve to be kicked out. The majority of well behaved folks do not "deserve" to be treated differently. So if your argument is based on what people "deserve", then it just fell apart.
No, what people "deserve" is based on their own actions, not those of others. The small group of rude people deserve to be kicked out. The majority of well behaved folks do not "deserve" to be treated differently. So if your argument is based on what people "deserve", then it just fell apart.
This is not 5th Grade Cryptic is not a school teacher giving out gold stars.
Whenever a new season comes out it's really hard to find the so called good forums under the mass crazy of
Cryptic fail again, Lock boxes are killing the game, STO is dying because Cryptic, PWE overlords are greedy and want our money, The devs are liars, Cryptic hates the KDF and they wont get my money, this game is dying I'm going to X game....and my favorite..."Oh looks like nothing new in this season I'll be back in 6 months"
This is not 5th Grade Cryptic is not a school teacher giving out gold stars.
Whenever a new season comes out it's really hard to find the so called good forums under the mass crazy of
Cryptic fail again, Lock boxes are killing the game, STO is dying because Cryptic, PWE overlords are greedy and want our money, The devs are liars, Cryptic hates the KDF and they wont get my money, this game is dying I'm going to X game....and my favorite..."Oh looks like nothing new in this season I'll be back in 6 months"
Warning: the following posts contains actual "logic" that is going to disprove your argument. If you are afraid of "logic" or having your argument disproven, then read at your own risk.
Now then,
The reason you think those examples are the "mass" that the good folks are buried under is because those are what grab your attention the most. To use a real life example, imagine you are in a restaurant sitting next to a crying baby. All the people sitting around you may be talking quietly, but the crying baby is what you remember because it is what got on your nerves.
However, that does not change the fact that the majority of the people in the restaurant were talking quitely. Likewise, just because a small group of rude people may get your attention and annoy you, it does not change the fact that the majority of people are behaving well. You just dont notice the well behaved people as much as you notice the few who dont.
Warning: the following posts contains actual "logic" that is going to disprove your argument. If you are afraid of "logic" or having your argument disproven, then read at your own risk.
Those sentences have just seriously lowered our opinions of you imo, plus made possible assumptions about a number of things about you...
No one who's actually a respectful adult talks to others that way; we're not children
Was named Trek17.
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
Those sentences have just seriously lowered our opinions of you imo, plus made possible assumptions about a number of things about you...
No one who's actually a respectful adult talks to others that way; we're not children
Ad hominem has always been the last resort of people who do not have a real counter-argument. If you disagree with the logic of my previous post, then feel free to explain why. But trying to attack me personally only shows you have no real counter-argument.
Ad hominem has always been the last resort of people who do not have a real counter-argument. If you disagree with the logic of my previous post, then feel free to explain why. But trying to attack me personally only shows you have no real counter-argument.
Oh, I don't doubt your logic (and I could argue against it), but it's how you presented it that I have issues with... specifically with the 'Warning' bit.
It came off as condescending, and generally the type of tone you might say to a stupid person, or a child... neither of which is a good thing to imply to a group of adults.
Was named Trek17.
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
Oh, I don't doubt your logic (and I could argue against it), but it's how you presented it that I have issues with... specifically with the 'Warning' bit.
It came off as condescending, and generally the type of tone you might say to a stupid person, or a child... neither of which is a good thing to imply to a group of adults.
The "warning" comment was tongue in cheek, and if you took it otherwise I will simply tell you that it was said with good humor. However, regardless of your misinterpretation of my meaning, nothing I actually said was a specific personal attack against any person in this thread. You, on the other hand, proceeded to attack my personal character, resorting to the age old ad hominem strategy of the person who has lost an argument based on logic.
Warning: the following posts contains actual "logic" that is going to disprove your argument. If you are afraid of "logic" or having your argument disproven, then read at your own risk.
Now then,
The reason you think those examples are the "mass" that the good folks are buried under is because those are what grab your attention the most. To use a real life example, imagine you are in a restaurant sitting next to a crying baby. All the people sitting around you may be talking quietly, but the crying baby is what you remember because it is what got on your nerves.
However, that does not change the fact that the majority of the people in the restaurant were talking quitely. Likewise, just because a small group of rude people may get your attention and annoy you, it does not change the fact that the majority of people are behaving well. You just dont notice the well behaved people as much as you notice the few who dont.
ummmm no, what actually stands out in the hordes of madness that happens on the forums are the nice posts.
I come on the forums to see the crazy posts and the madness if there was no madness I would come on less.
The "warning" comment was tongue in cheek, and if you took it otherwise I will simply tell you that it was said with good humor. However, regardless of your misinterpretation of my meaning, nothing I actually said was a specific personal attack against any person in this thread. You, on the other hand, proceeded to attack my personal character, resorting to the age old ad hominem strategy of the person who has lost an argument based on logic.
I did attack your character, but only because of that misunderstanding... because it came off as condescending, initially.
But still, I'm not quite agreeing with your logic: blowing off the majority in favor of a few or one group not being okay sometimes. If I remember correctly, Kirk and crew did exactly that to save Spock (Starfleet = majority and Spock = one), and everything turned out for the better because of it.
Sometimes favoring the few can get you better results. Did it for Cryptic? That remains to be seen, but I don't blame them for trying.
Was named Trek17.
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
I did attack your character, but only because of that misunderstanding... because it came off as condescending, initially.
But still, I'm not quite agreeing with your logic: blowing off the majority in favor of a few or one group not being okay sometimes. If I remember correctly, Kirk and crew did exactly that to save Spock (Starfleet = majority and Spock = one), and everything turned out for the better because of it.
Sometimes favoring the few can get you better results. Did it for Cryptic? That remains to be seen, but I don't blame them for trying.
If you really want to cite Trek as an example, one of it's most famous quotes ever is from Spock: "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few". He was right, although Cryptic has done the reverse and punished the many for the deeds of the few.
If you really want to cite Trek as an example, one of it's most famous quotes ever is from Spock: "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few". He was right, although Cryptic has done the reverse and punished the many for the deeds of the few.
That's just it though: ST has examples of both working (Spock saved the Enterprise with 'many', ensuring that the Enterprise would keep saving the day... and Kirk saved Spock with 'few/one', ensuring the Earth was not destroyed in Voyage Home, among other acts that helped the Enterprise save the day), so we'd just be going in circles on that front.
But either way, I'm okay with what Cryptic is doing on that aspect, and you aren't. And I'm feeling we're not gonna get much further than that.
Was named Trek17.
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
Bottom line: alienating your customer base, fostering antagonism and distancing yourselves, is bad business.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
___________________________
Joined April 2008. Lifetime Subscriber. Original member of the original 2nd Fleet.
Expended $1,961 USD on this game - regretting it all. This game and some of its staff disappointed me, time and again, per every single cent spent!!!
Comments
^^^
This is EXACTLY what Cryptic did for the first 2 years of the game. When stuff changed, or got pulled (and they would sometimes state the reason why, and sometimes not - they'd just say 'it didn't work out as planned'...) AS A RESULT DStahl was called an outright liar; and many accused him of intentionally misleading the STO playerbase to 'keep the game alive...'
When he returned to STO from Zynga he had a forum dialogiue abot the situation and a lot of players on the forum saifd they'd rather NOT hear of the grandiose/long term hopes; just wait to announce something until it's 90+% sure it'll actually end up in the game <--- And that's what they've been doing since Season 5. (SAnd Dan still gets labeled a 'liar' by a bunch of people who refuse to believe anything he says until they see it in a server patch note.
I honestly DO miss the more open and upfront communication gthey had with the STO playerbase prior to F2P -- but that said, I completely understand why the changed the manner in which they now release info regarding what they're working on, and any no content for STO.
PWE ARC Drone says: "Your STO forum community as you have known it is ended...Display names are irrelevant...Any further sense of community is irrelevant...Resistance is futile...You will be assimilated..."
It was not the majority of forum posters who did that, only a vocal minority. That means Cryptic caved in and changed their "policies" because of the behavior of a minority, not because of the behavior of the majority. That is straight up weakling behavior.
Ok, they have new Romulan related content, it'll be coming out sometime in May, maybe early June if things don't go according to plan.
Divide 40 by these teams:
- Neverwinter (currently ramped up for its beta and release)
- STO
- Champions Online
- Company-wide staff (R&D, server/network admins, marketing/community management)
It's easy to see STO having 10 or fewer dedicated employees.Nope, the 40 number is just for STO:
http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?p=7846991#post7846991
Me too. It was easier to get excited about stuff. But yeah, people are jerks, so I too understand why they stopped.
Nope. Branflakes and DStahl said that's only for STO.
The playerbase is passionate, they know that. But would YOU want a vocal minority bashing you for no good reason all the time? Changing their policies may not have had the desired effect, but they did so with the intention to avoid most of the 'serve-no-purpose-other-than-to-enrage-the-devs' posts... which only distract and stress them.
Even as they're a business, they ARE human too. Why can't people take that into account?
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
The reality is, when you give in to someone's "bullying"(for lack of a better word) you are letting them control you. And letting someone control you is weak behavior. But putting aside their own ego, the devs should care enough about the majority of their customers who are well behaved not to cut them off because a small group of people misbehaved. Instead, they decided to punish the majority of people who were well behaved and not share info with them anymore just because a small group of people said mean things. So yes, on both accounts I call that weak behavior.
This is why we can't have nice things.
Not everything is so simple.
Unfortunately
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
What exactly do you mean by "avoid distractions and stress"? Just because they post an engineering report does not mean they have to sit there and read all the replies. Are you suggesting that the devs lack the self control not to sit there and read every reply just because they post some information?
But like I said, they are human, and no one wants to have a vocal minority saying hurtful things to them for no reason. So when a minority says they're liars for posting 'wrong' info for a good year or so, despite all indications that schedules changed or stalled, they changed their policy afterward.
May or may not have had the desired effect (some still say find things to throw at them for no good reason), but there's nothing wrong with trying to avoid abuse. Calling it weak is like you expect them to just take it...
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
Lets make sure we're both on the same page, so to speak, before going any further. There are far less dev posts these days than there used to be(branflakes isnt a dev). It sounds like we both agree they do not post as often because they got their feelings hurt by a small group of rude people.
So are they still reading the forums as much as they used to or not? If they are, then it is just as much a "distraction" now as it has ever been. There are still a small number of rude people who say rude things; that hasnt changed. So if that is what hurts the devs feeling, that is no different now than in the past.
So what has anyone gained from their lack of communication? If they are still reading the forums, then they are still being "distracted" and still getting their feelings hurt, and the playerbase has far less information about the game's development.
Now with all of that said, I have a very strong disagreement with punishing a large group of innocent people because of the bad behavior of a small group of people. Like I have said before, the majority of forum posters are well behaved people. A small group is loud and rude. You may not like the loud and rude group, but that does not justify cutting off your well behaved people from all the information they used to get.
Really? You realize if it was discovered they didn't read the replies; you'd then get posters claiming they completely ignore player feedback; and thus it's the reason 'STO sucks' and/pr 'Cryptic is incompetent'... etc.
[And again, I'm NOT saying this -- I posted the above to show how I believe the forum vocal forum readership would respond -- and we've seen exactly this in certain areas as - for a LONG time, a lot of avid PvPers believed no Cryptic employee was reading anything posted in the PvP section -- and I think somme still do; even though they've had Brandon and borticus posting in there that the devs do read the PvP forum posts.]
You can't tell me that if you were doing the best you cold in your day job -- if you were to constantly read a bunch of posts made by the people you work for (be they customers or otherwise); calling you a liar, incompetent, someone who should be replaced by another who knows what they're doing...,etc; that your attitude and job performance might be impacted negatively; and/or any passion you might have for the project dissipate.
Again, the people at Cryptic aren't machines. They're human beings and they have good days bad days, can be buoyed up by a compliment, and torn down by a negative remark.
MMO forums are notorious for leaning to the very negative aspect because those happy with the game, or who just use it as an occasional pastime to relieve stress themselves; don't venture or post in the forums often (if at all) - they just log in and play STO. the ones who come are most likely very passionate about the game and how the Star Trek material is handled; and become very vocal when they see/experience something in game they don't like; and have no qualms coming here, sometimes (not all the time) venting in the worst way possible; and then expect an immediate answer or resolution.
I don't call it 'weak' to want to try and manage expectations, or try and minimize any negative atmosphere on the forums by waiting to talk about content or changes until said content/change is 90+% certain to be coming to the game (and their still have been situations where some aspect of something announced since F2P has been further changed , or delayed <-- and when this has happened the STO forums erupt passionately and more often then not, trend to swell in negative posts.)
PWE ARC Drone says: "Your STO forum community as you have known it is ended...Display names are irrelevant...Any further sense of community is irrelevant...Resistance is futile...You will be assimilated..."
Dstahl was in the main thread and replied to at least half of the posts, when he could just as easily avoided all the harsh (though justified) things they said. And that's just one example, but a good one.
As for distractions, for the most part, the devs read the forums on their own time (ie not their work time, unless that's part of their assigned work day). Reading no-good-reason flame posts would only stress them... which would distract them, I think. And because they were getting a lot of this by posting everything they planned, they changed their policy, to try and avoid the unnecessary abuse.
In a way, they were giving the playerbase what they wanted, at the time.
As for 'punishing' the larger group, I'm more in the gray area on that one: I don't mind being in the dark, and I fail to see how others like to be in the loop so much... but that's just me. And whatever my response to a particular game item, the devs are the ones who keep STO running and growing, so I want to make sure they do as good as they can. Hence, I want them to avoid the minority, so I'm perfectly fine with how things are.
Edit: oh, and I agree with a lot of what crypticarmsman said above me
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
A lot of things made them change. They used to share stuff on STOked, Priority One, the devs used to post stuff constantly, Engineering reports, tweet leaks, forum posts, etc etc. People ruined it, the few always ruin it for the masses....
For ex.. you remember when Bort posted about the lock boxes on Jupiterforce's forums and Massively took it and ran with it. Saying that Bort said STO would just drop the EU... The devs were dark for a long time after that. It was an instant halt in flow of information. It's something I will never forget that Massively did. It was tabloidish and they can go to hell.
People used to treat the Engineering reports as Gospel and go nuts over so called 'promises'. They don't promise you anything EVER... nothing should ever be considered a promise and if you think they owe you anything you are crazy. The game is free so it's take it or leave it and if you pay, their only promise to you is access to the shard and the perks for Gold for the time you have payed for. You get nothing, You loose, Good Day Sir!
Something happened with STOked... not sure what it was, but you know there was some bad mojo there and it was around the same time as the Massively fiasco...
People can't seem to realize that directions can change in business. You set out on a goal and sometimes half way there you realize that the goal line has changed or you realize it's much further or you have to do things differently. I worked on a multi-million dollar distributed processing platform that took an extra year to get out the door and we started chopping features that are just now being addressed a year later. Sometimes TRIBBLE like that happens. Get over it, don't call human beings who show up to work every day and bust their humps a bunch of liars.
So you know what.... I am glad they don't leak much anymore, I am glad they don't really share anything new with podcasts that the community doesn't already know is coming. I am glad they only release fluff news just prior to hitting holodeck after it's been sterilized and cleansed to avoid any misconceptions or promises that the community tends to latch on and scream like rabid monkey's when they don't show up. The community deserves it.
/angry
No, what people "deserve" is based on their own actions, not those of others. The small group of rude people deserve to be kicked out. The majority of well behaved folks do not "deserve" to be treated differently. So if your argument is based on what people "deserve", then it just fell apart.
This is not 5th Grade Cryptic is not a school teacher giving out gold stars.
Whenever a new season comes out it's really hard to find the so called good forums under the mass crazy of
Cryptic fail again, Lock boxes are killing the game, STO is dying because Cryptic, PWE overlords are greedy and want our money, The devs are liars, Cryptic hates the KDF and they wont get my money, this game is dying I'm going to X game....and my favorite..."Oh looks like nothing new in this season I'll be back in 6 months"
Warning: the following posts contains actual "logic" that is going to disprove your argument. If you are afraid of "logic" or having your argument disproven, then read at your own risk.
Now then,
The reason you think those examples are the "mass" that the good folks are buried under is because those are what grab your attention the most. To use a real life example, imagine you are in a restaurant sitting next to a crying baby. All the people sitting around you may be talking quietly, but the crying baby is what you remember because it is what got on your nerves.
However, that does not change the fact that the majority of the people in the restaurant were talking quitely. Likewise, just because a small group of rude people may get your attention and annoy you, it does not change the fact that the majority of people are behaving well. You just dont notice the well behaved people as much as you notice the few who dont.
No one who's actually a respectful adult talks to others that way; we're not children
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
Ad hominem has always been the last resort of people who do not have a real counter-argument. If you disagree with the logic of my previous post, then feel free to explain why. But trying to attack me personally only shows you have no real counter-argument.
It came off as condescending, and generally the type of tone you might say to a stupid person, or a child... neither of which is a good thing to imply to a group of adults.
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
The "warning" comment was tongue in cheek, and if you took it otherwise I will simply tell you that it was said with good humor. However, regardless of your misinterpretation of my meaning, nothing I actually said was a specific personal attack against any person in this thread. You, on the other hand, proceeded to attack my personal character, resorting to the age old ad hominem strategy of the person who has lost an argument based on logic.
ummmm no, what actually stands out in the hordes of madness that happens on the forums are the nice posts.
I come on the forums to see the crazy posts and the madness if there was no madness I would come on less.
But still, I'm not quite agreeing with your logic: blowing off the majority in favor of a few or one group not being okay sometimes. If I remember correctly, Kirk and crew did exactly that to save Spock (Starfleet = majority and Spock = one), and everything turned out for the better because of it.
Sometimes favoring the few can get you better results. Did it for Cryptic? That remains to be seen, but I don't blame them for trying.
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
If you really want to cite Trek as an example, one of it's most famous quotes ever is from Spock: "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few". He was right, although Cryptic has done the reverse and punished the many for the deeds of the few.
But either way, I'm okay with what Cryptic is doing on that aspect, and you aren't. And I'm feeling we're not gonna get much further than that.
Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
___________________________
Joined April 2008. Lifetime Subscriber. Original member of the original 2nd Fleet.
Expended $1,961 USD on this game - regretting it all. This game and some of its staff disappointed me, time and again, per every single cent spent!!!