test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

Crazy Ideas: Would you invest in a PvP kickstarter?

mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
edited December 2012 in PvP Gameplay
See my thread on C-Store kickstarters as well as the November Ask Cryptic.

What if Cryptic would fund the development of projects for the game in a kickstarter system. Let's say they come out and say: "Sorry, we can't make money making new Klingon ships / PVP systems. We just don't make enough money from them to be worth it. Unless we see some serious commitment by the players - more than we can normally ask from them, these things will not be done."

And let's say they offer a PvP kickstarter. A development project after which end you'd get a new PvP mode and a rebalance of all existing items, ships and powers. If enough people commit to it and invest in the kickstarter, the project will launch. If not, it won't, you get your money/Zen back, and that's it. If it launches and completes, every player will have access to it, not just those that paid, of course (so you're not necessarily getting any special privileges here, just the chance to ensure something gets done you want to have in the game.)

Would you be willing to invest in such a kickstarter? Under what conditions would you invest?
Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • Options
    darkfader1988darkfader1988 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    No thanks, it is too late for that, too late for everything.

    I don't even want better PvP in this game anymore they simply dont deserve any of this.

    This MMO and the meaning of MMO part simply failed and is a big disgrace. Ditch PVP and simply make it a Single player game with multiplayer PVE parts.


    Oh btw, if you didnt know yet, they already milked us (PVPers) enough in terms of money, like pvpers really gave **** to cryptic and didnt throw a single penny towards this system? We need to grab even more money and throw it at them while they dont even recognize that even lots of pvpers spent tons of cash on this godforsaken game?


    Well, that was an exciting kickstarter response now was it ? :O


    MT *No more Excuses* Ridiculous :p
    MT - Sad Pandas
  • Options
    zarathos1978zarathos1978 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    If we get new, separate from STO "Star Trek PvP only" game based on STO space combat model. And a game that will be:

    a) subscription based
    b) kept running by Cryptic (no further investements from our side)
    b) have completely NO ties to C-Store
    c) anything that will be added by Cryptic to it will need our (funders) approval. If we say "no" to some sort of console, power etc it will mean that Cryptic says "Yes, sir" and don't add it.
  • Options
    darkfader1988darkfader1988 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    If we get new, separate from STO "Star Trek PvP only" game based on STO space combat model. And a game that will be:

    a) subscription based
    b) kept running by Cryptic (no further investements from our side)
    b) have completely NO ties to C-Store
    c) anything that will be added by Cryptic to it will need our (funders) approval. If we say "no" to some sort of console, power etc it will mean that Cryptic says "Yes, sir" and don't add it.

    Sorry even ifit was just running and tied by Cryptic only I wouldnt even trust them to make anything acceptable, they are incompetent and they have shown it over the years. they cant even fix PvE properly Lulz.

    You know what? totally rip this game into two, give the other half to a proper MMO developer, and totally focus it on PvP, totally revamp the system, keep all the models, saves lots of work. make it 360 degree combat kkthx.

    Solved.
    MT - Sad Pandas
  • Options
    zarathos1978zarathos1978 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    It's not as if I trust them. I don't even play anymore, though I miss my Ker'rat fix and pissing old good Star in his "true warrior BoP" :D

    But under those conditions I may be willing to toss few $ into the kickstarter. Sure, it will be better if they gave up on PvP and licenced the STO model to someone competent for STO-PvP game. But this won't happen.
  • Options
    drkfrontiersdrkfrontiers Member Posts: 2,477 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    This is a brilliant idea. One I would gladly invest in.
  • Options
    caffran607caffran607 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Even if there was a separate from STO PvP game, I still wouldn't spend money on it. I only began playing at the beginning of 2012, but from what I have heard and read on the forums, they have been making false promises about fixing/revamping pvp for several years now. Also from my experiences it is obvious that they are out to make money no matter what the cost is to pvp.

    They brought out the Atrox carrier, and with that the Danube Runabouts. Many players complained about the carrier spam and especially the runabouts and what have they done about this? Firstly they released the Escort Carrier. Then they release the Vespa already with Danubes already in the hangar bay. To us PvPers it looked like they were taking the TRIBBLE, but it allowed role players out there to sit in STFs saying "Ok guys i'm going tosit back and send in my fighters to take out the Tac cube".

    With regards to things like consoles etc. AMS has been frowned upon since the beginning of time, many players said it should be only usable on the ship it comes with, so they gave it to the Klingons as well.

    Siphons had something done to it apparently, so HOORAY!! I dunno what tho, cos when I get siphoned I never stay in the match long enough to see.

    Even if Cryptic said "right we're going to make a separate PvP game just for you, BUT your gonna have to subscribe to get it" I would not even trust them in the first place to make a game which gave the players what they wanted, let alone leave it that way without trying to turn it into another P2W money making venture.

    The only circumstances under which I would spend money on a STO based PvP game, would be if it was produced and run by another company and if there was a system where players could create a game, choose maps, set rules like no Danubes, no AMS which block players from using/equipping them. Then make it available in the queues, and players choose from a list which map, and rules they would like to join. This would also hopefully mean players who rely on "cheese" would see less action and be forced to leave the game, or change the way they play.
  • Options
    dant158#3249 dant158 Member Posts: 11 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    I genuinley wouldn't give money to Cryptic Studios if they were a starving old man on the side of the street.
    And I'm a charitable guy.
  • Options
    robeasomrobeasom Member Posts: 1,911 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    They should let PVP die and not let it suffer the way it is and I am no longer giving money to Cryptic until they show they ail do stuff for KDF
    NO TO ARC
    Vice Admiral Volmack ISS Thundermole
    Brigadier General Jokag IKS Gorkan
    Centurion Kares RRW Tomalak
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    aquitaine985aquitaine985 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    I thought my lifetime membership, game purchases, prior subscription and C Store purchases were going into Development, now i'm expected to pay on top for something I should have AS A GIVEN? I think not.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    @Aquitaine985
    Lag Industries STO PvP Fleet - Executive
    A Sad Panda of Industrial calibre.
    2010: This is Cryptic PvP. Please hold the line, your call is very important to us...
  • Options
    upyournacelles2upyournacelles2 Member Posts: 197 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Cryptic has no dev that even understands game balance. Even if they wanted to take this on, they don't have the talent to do it. Second problem is that they don't understand their own code. If you can't even change a simple Bo power like FAW or DPB to work correctly because their code is "too complex", how the he k could they pull this off?

    I would invest, but not in cryptic. If another pvp oriented studio came in and made a completely seperate Sto pvp game, then I'd be in.
  • Options
    mavhaxmavhax Member Posts: 127 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    See my thread on C-Store kickstarters as well as the November Ask Cryptic.

    What if Cryptic would fund the development of projects for the game in a kickstarter system. Let's say they come out and say: "Sorry, we can't make money making new Klingon ships / PVP systems. We just don't make enough money from them to be worth it. Unless we see some serious commitment by the players - more than we can normally ask from them, these things will not be done."

    And let's say they offer a PvP kickstarter. A development project after which end you'd get a new PvP mode and a rebalance of all existing items, ships and powers. If enough people commit to it and invest in the kickstarter, the project will launch. If not, it won't, you get your money/Zen back, and that's it. If it launches and completes, every player will have access to it, not just those that paid, of course (so you're not necessarily getting any special privileges here, just the chance to ensure something gets done you want to have in the game.)

    Would you be willing to invest in such a kickstarter? Under what conditions would you invest?

    No, I wouldn't. I don't trust Cryptic or PWE enough to give them money even if it's allegedly earmarked just for pvp. They'd just pocket the cash and leave things as they are.

    STO is just a chat box. Nothing more. Quite literally anything else in the game has become mired behind a two bit azn grind knock off scheme that I want no part in it.

    Ontop of that frankly, we've already been basically told "new maps are impossible!" by various devs. They can't even figure out how to put respawn points into a map anymore they are so inept.
  • Options
    mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    It's nice we are all still very optimistic about the game's PvP future development.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • Options
    upyournacelles2upyournacelles2 Member Posts: 197 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    It's nice we are all still very optimistic about the game's PvP future development.

    Fool us once, shame on cryptic, fool us for 2+ years, shame on us. To invest further into a company that has lied about pvp development up to this point would be a foolish decision.
  • Options
    thepleasuredomethepleasuredome Member Posts: 308
    edited December 2012
    I would invest in an STO pvp only game if it were not Cryptic that was developing it, because of all the reasons MT and Mavhax have stated.
    Arawn & Ihasa
    OP *is* the new balance, whether you know it or not! Gecko says so.
    Season 7 - Exodus, available online. U buy nao!
    http://seekingalpha.com/article/738221-monetizing-perfect-world-s-latest-update
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    havamhavam Member Posts: 1,735 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Every Season has been more profitable and better then the last season. The staff has doubled, they might have even gotten coffee cups. Thats at least the official story, with that in mind....

    it's not a lack of funding that is keeping pvp development back. Gecko and stahl are to blame. no one else, once they go on to do other things, or a team is hired with the explicit responsibility for PvP things might turn for the better. iF they manage to stay with the company for more then a month in those positions that is. As far as i can tell, a kickstarted holds no promise to initiate the changes that would be necessary to stop the detoriating condition of STO pvp
  • Options
    sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Id chip in IF

    1 It would finally get the PVP people to stop moaning
    2 It was not going to interfere with my own operations
    3 No part of it was in anyway connected to reputation , starbases or anything else im involved with
    4 Ideally it was Not open to ANY FTP people
    Live long and Prosper
  • Options
    dant158#3249 dant158 Member Posts: 11 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    Id chip in IF

    1 It would finally get the PVP people to stop moaning
    2 It was not going to interfere with my own operations
    3 No part of it was in anyway connected to reputation , starbases or anything else im involved with
    4 Ideally it was Not open to ANY FTP people

    I'd chip in if they promised to ban you, to be honest.

    EDIT: I am aware that I am feeding the troll.
  • Options
    sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    You are EATING at the keyboard??

    I offer to pay towards content I would never use and you insult me
    AGAIN
    Live long and Prosper
  • Options
    dant158#3249 dant158 Member Posts: 11 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    You are EATING at the keyboard??

    I offer to pay towards content I would never use and you insult me
    AGAIN

    Actually, I believe I've shown remarkable restraint in the past in not insulting you before.
  • Options
    baudlbaudl Member Posts: 4,060 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    dantrainor wrote: »
    Actually, I believe I've shown remarkable restraint in the past in not insulting you before.

    ohh havent we all?!;)
    Srsly the day trollvax has something intelligent to contribute to...well, anything...i will..., oh forget it, won't happen anyway.
    Go pro or go home
  • Options
    p2wsucksp2wsucks Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    I did that here:

    http://www.robertsspaceindustries.com/

    No reason to throw good $ after bad w/the mgt here. Better to go w/those who've built a solid reputation.
    [Zone] Dack@****: cowards can't take a fed 1 on 1 crinckley cowards Hahahaha you smell like flowers
    Random Quote from Kerrat
    "Sumlobus@****: your mums eat Iced Targ Poo"
    C&H Fed banter
  • Options
    thepleasuredomethepleasuredome Member Posts: 308
    edited December 2012
    p2wsucks wrote: »
    I did that here:

    http://www.robertsspaceindustries.com/

    No reason to throw good $ after bad w/the mgt here. Better to go w/those who've built a solid reputation.

    Except here it's not been "good money" since season, um, 2? That was a long, long time ago.
    Arawn & Ihasa
    OP *is* the new balance, whether you know it or not! Gecko says so.
    Season 7 - Exodus, available online. U buy nao!
    http://seekingalpha.com/article/738221-monetizing-perfect-world-s-latest-update
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • Options
    wolverine595959wolverine595959 Member Posts: 726
    edited December 2012
    Kickstart....Please i would pay for an attempt to Kickemballz. They fooled me with a LTS and countless C-store/Zen dollars So i wouldn't give them a dime on something they promised.
    Hey I Used to be Captain Data, well I guess I still am in game but the account link really screwed everything up :rolleyes:
  • Options
    sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    baudl wrote: »
    ohh havent we all?!;)
    Srsly the day trollvax has something intelligent to contribute to...well, anything...i will..., oh forget it, won't happen anyway.

    Are you sure you two aren't related??
    Live long and Prosper
  • Options
    stevehalestevehale Member Posts: 437
    edited December 2012
    I thought that was basically what I did when I paid for a monthly subscription and eventually bought my lifetime account (just before they confirmed they were going to go F2P). I thought that was what I did when I invested my time and energy in testing on tribble and providing feedback on the forums.

    I want nothing but great things for this game. The vast untapped potential keeps me moderately hopeful.

    I do, however, reject the notion that we should pay to get them to support a feature they advertised when they sold us the game. PvPers already spend money and participate in the mainstream parts of the game. PvEers don't have to pay to play. Why should we? PvP is being treated like an after thought when it should be treated as a resource to appeal to a larger audience. Cryptic needs to diversify rather than putting everything into the PvE basket.

    When we donate money to a charity at work, often times we can name the one we want to receive that money. I would be interested in filling out a short survey or suggestion card with each z-store purchase to tell them what portion of the game I'd be more interested in seeing my money support.
    __________________________________________
    Foundry: Yet Another Borg Mission
    It's terrible but easy, and these Borg are way cooler than the mess STO and Voyager left us.
    May not actually be "way" cooler or even "slightly" cooler.
  • Options
    trueprom3theustrueprom3theus Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    I want somebody to fix geko's understanding about ballance. Them maybe well have some good pvp start.
    Hear! Sons of Kahless
    Hear! Daughters too.
    The blood of battle washes clean.
    The Warrior brave and true.
    We fight, we love, and then we kill...
  • Options
    sonicshowersonicshower Member Posts: 216 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    I've given Cryptic/PWE enough of my money for the past two years hoping for good PVP and lead astray. I will not be giving anymore. I stopped playing after seeing what a joke the New Romulus (Farmville) Adventure Zone was. They did however offer me a free Enterprise Era uniform unlock to come back(lol). Obviously im not their target audience and it's pretty much a given most of you in this forum are not as well. I appreciate your love for Star Trek everyone but it really is not enough to keep me PVPing in this game as I am not a TRIBBLE. I've been around almost two years so I don't need to elaborate on what would keep me in PVP as it's pretty much the same reason as other vet players have called it quits for the time being. If Stahl and company put in some try hard effort in regards to PVP I would be more than willing to dip my toes into the sandbox again on a more regular basis. *Drops mic* im out
    sh2sxc7.gif
  • Options
    overthetopsighoverthetopsigh Member Posts: 17 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    why should we kickstart something as big as PVP with obvious benefits to the game as a whole? PVP shouldn't be a kickstart this should be something that they should've invested in.

    PVP helps with endgame content, drives the in game economy, provides zen sales.
  • Options
    mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    why should we kickstart something as big as PVP with obvious benefits to the game as a whole? PVP shouldn't be a kickstart this should be something that they should've invested in.

    PVP helps with endgame content, drives the in game economy, provides zen sales.
    If Cryptic believed this to be true and working,wouldn't they have long done something like that?

    They had how many years now to make PvP great?
    Forget for a moment that this is Startrek Online PvP.

    Imagine some game company would launch a "Startrek - The Fall of Khitomer" Online Game that focuses on a war breaking out in the Alpha Quadrant. They promise to launch a game focusing on a war between Klingon and Federation, and stretch goals also include Romulans, Breen, Cardassians and Dominion Troops, and maybe a Borg, Specias 8742 and Iconians as PvE factions.

    They have a reasonable good looking engine for a free to play title and intersting game mechanics. And they have the license basically guaranteed as long as they can get the kickstarter off. Would you consider it?

    If you're saying "Only if it's not Cryptic" - fair enough. ;)
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • Options
    upyournacelles2upyournacelles2 Member Posts: 197 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    If Cryptic believed this to be true and working,wouldn't they have long done something like that?

    They had how many years now to make PvP great?
    Forget for a moment that this is Startrek Online PvP.

    Imagine some game company would launch a "Startrek - The Fall of Khitomer" Online Game that focuses on a war breaking out in the Alpha Quadrant. They promise to launch a game focusing on a war between Klingon and Federation, and stretch goals also include Romulans, Breen, Cardassians and Dominion Troops, and maybe a Borg, Specias 8742 and Iconians as PvE factions.

    They have a reasonable good looking engine for a free to play title and intersting game mechanics. And they have the license basically guaranteed as long as they can get the kickstarter off. Would you consider it?

    If you're saying "Only if it's not Cryptic" - fair enough. ;)

    Everyone knows a healthy diet and regular exercise is also good for your well-being, yet there are still fat people in the world. Just because we know something doesn't mean we do something
Sign In or Register to comment.