test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

How Consles, Weapons Power, Tac buffs, and Skill points actually work

carl103carl103 Member Posts: 1 Arc User
edited December 2012 in PvP Gameplay
As a result of an ongoing discussion I decided to get busy doing some tests on how consoles, skills points and weapons power interact with each other and how all this interacts with tac buffs. The tests where all done with energy weapons, so the results may be different for projectile weapons, i'd need to check.


1. All tac buffs, (plus APO), are straight multipliers on damage after all other effects. If several are active then the modifiers stack additively with each other and the final total is the multiplier.

2. Consoles only provide half the listed boost to damage and this boost is applied to the weapons base damage before skill point bonuses are added on.

3. Skill point bonuses are then added on separately of this total, in effect consoles neither benefit from skill points, nor themselves benefit skill points.

4. Weapons power is a multiplier on the total damage after additions from consoles and skill points. It is not additive with consoles as many have claimed as the benefit from consoles, (in percentage terms), remains constant from 50 power to 125 power. However at power settings below 50 the Console bonus does in fact begin to decrease. I have no concrete theory for this behavior except to suggest that an entirely separate and different formulae is used at below 50 power than at above 50 power and that at these setting the consoles interact differently with weapons power.


5. Tactical Fleet's listed damage modifier is wrong. It's actually 17.5%, not 30%.


So here's the current actual formulae for damage at weapons power setting of 50 or more:


(B + (B*S) + (B*(C/2)))*(0.02*(W-50)))*(APA+TF+APO+GDF)

Where:

B = Base weapons damage without Skill or any other modifiers.

S= Total benefit from skill points as decimal, (0.5 at 9 point sin all relevant skills).

C = Total console benefit as a decimal, (1.5 for 5 MkXII purple consoles).

W= Weapons Power

APA = Attack Pattern Alpha (0.5 at 100 Attack pattern skill)

TF = Tactical Fleet (0.175)

APO = Attack Pattern Omega (0.25 at 100 attack Pattern Skill)

GDF = Go Down Fighting, (0.248 at 100% hull remaining)


Figured te PvP forums would be the most intrested in the results, still need to figure out how BoFF skills besides APO interact with this though, mainly BO.


Okay BO worked out.

It adds damage to the base damage that is then multiplied by everythign else, (consoles, weapons power, tac bufs, everything).

The modifiers are +500% for BO1, +625% for BO2, and +750% for BO3. Or more simply base damage multiplied by 6/7.25/8.5.
Post edited by carl103 on
«1

Comments

  • th3xr34p3rth3xr34p3r Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Thank you for putting in the time and effort with this. For all new and old players alike it will help get a better understanding of how things fit together.
    [SIGPIC]Click to visit Subspace-Radio[/SIGPIC]
    Twitter | Blog | Original Join Date: Dec 2007 | Gaming Setup | Raptr Profile | Gamer DNA
    The opinions expressed in my posts are my own views and do not reflect on any other entity(s) or person(s) I may or may not represent at the time.
  • dontdrunkimshootdontdrunkimshoot Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    carl103 wrote: »
    1. All tac buffs, (plus APO), are straight multipliers on damage after all other effects. If several are active then the modifiers stack additively with each other and the final total is the multiplier.

    oh, having 5 tac consoles isn't that big of a deal. SURE. RIGHT.

    the tac buffs multiply the adjusted tool tip displayed damage huh? from what i've seen i'll believe that. no wonder 5 console ships hit so much harder when fully buffed.


    good job doing all this testing
  • bitemepwebitemepwe Member Posts: 6,760 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    I thought all Tac buffs where suppossed to be applied to base weapon damage?

    So the effects of ApA buff my base DHC damage, then CRF buffs the base DHC, then ApO, etc. Not ApA buffs then CRF buffs (ApA+base) then ApO buffs (ApA+CRF+base)m etc.
    Leonard Nimoy, Spock.....:(

    R.I.P
  • thishorizonthishorizon Member Posts: 1,158
    edited November 2012
    algebraic.

    *horizon consumes data*

    have fun kill bad guys
  • p2wsucksp2wsucks Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    IIRC, there was a ship's tier multiplier as well. But, that may have been w/the old skill system.

    (B + (B*S) + (B*(C/2)))*(0.02*(W-50)))*(APA+TF+APO+GDF)

    Also, if B = 1 and no tac boosts and 125 weapon power and B=1

    (1 +(1*.5) + (1*.5))*(0.02*75)*(0+0+0+0)=(1+.5 +.5)(1.5)(0)=0

    Something seems off and how you wrote your formula.

    Perhaps,

    (B + (B*S) + (B*(C/2)))*(0.02*(W-50)))*(APA+TF+APO+GDF) + (B + (B*S) + (B*(C/2)))*(0.02*(W-50)))

    since often the tac multiplyer would be less than 1?

    Edit: Also, irrc the weapon power influence was nonlinear.
    [Zone] Dack@****: cowards can't take a fed 1 on 1 crinckley cowards Hahahaha you smell like flowers
    Random Quote from Kerrat
    "Sumlobus@****: your mums eat Iced Targ Poo"
    C&H Fed banter
  • heinekoheineko Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    carl103 wrote: »
    So here's the current actual formulae for damage at weapons power setting of 50 or more:


    (B + (B*S) + (B*(C/2)))*(0.02*(W-50)))*(APA+TF+APO+GDF)

    Where:

    B = Base weapons damage without Skill or any other modifiers.

    S= Total benefit from skill points as decimal, (0.5 at 9 point sin all relevant skills).

    C = Total console benefit as a decimal, (1.5 for 5 MkXII purple consoles).

    W= Weapons Power

    APA = Attack Pattern Alpha (0.5 at 100 Attack pattern skill)

    TF = Tactical Fleet (0.175)

    APO = Attack Pattern Omega (0.25 at 100 attack Pattern Skill)

    GDF = Go Down Fighting, (0.248 at 100% hull remaining)
    So if I'm reading this correctly:

    1) Tac console benefit is actually rather small compared to the benefit from skills. So does this prove that it is better to get a torp console, then stack energy type consoles if you run a DBB, DHC, DHC, torp on fore, as the base damage of a torp is very much higher than an energy weapon and so will get more significant effect from just 1 console vs stacking all 5? This assumes that the torp is hitting bare hull.

    Or is stacking all 5 a better idea, because each console benefits rather little and therefore you need more to get out of your weapons?

    But if anything, this proves that pretty much whatever spec you are you should get all the base weapon talents

    Do you know where does the crit multiple apply? Is it by multiplying this entire formula (and hence giving us the insane 100k lolcrit on BO3 we tacs are infamous for?)
    carl103 wrote: »
    Figured te PvP forums would be the most intrested in the results, still need to figure out how BoFF skills besides APO interact with this though, mainly BO.
    Hope to read about what you've found :)

    carl103 wrote: »
    Okay BO worked out.

    It adds damage to the base damage that is then multiplied by everythign else, (consoles, weapons power, tac bufs, everything).

    The modifiers are +500% for BO1, +625% for BO2, and +750% for BO3. Or more simply base damage multiplied by 6/7.25/8.5.

    ...that means after everything applied BO3 will hit like a twuck. But I also want my CRF2 and APO3. Dilemmaz. :(
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Captain Ruri Gokou of the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk
    Catian Atrox Carrier
  • carl103carl103 Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    @P2W: I think I see what I did there, the tac modifiers should be (1+(APA+TF+APO+GDF)). Regardless is tac modifiers are 0 that section of the equation can be dropped. Your version may be correct too, a bit too tired to think it through, just woke up. Also I only checked at 50/75/100/125 power but it is currently linear at a rate of +0.02% per point of power. At values below 50 a different formulae is in effect that i wasn't able to work out. Suffice to say given how it interacts with consoles my guess is it's an even bigger negative than previously thought as i suspect it interacts with skil points, and maybe tac buffs in the same way.

    @Dontdrunkimshoot: the difference between a 4 and 5 console ship with MkXII purples is +7% across the board. Because of the way they fail to interact with skill points and their halved real magnitude of benefit, for someone running 9 ranks in all relevant skills the magnitude of benefit can be determined by adding up all console percentages, converting to decimal, and then dividing by 3. Add a 1 on the front of the result and this is your modifier. Or basically 5 MkXII purples are a 1.5 multiplier whilst 4 are a 1.4 multiplier.

    @bitemepwe: That?s what I thought, but it isn't what i found. Sorry.

    Anyway gtg. Work.
  • dalnar83dalnar83 Member Posts: 2,420 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Wouldn't it be better if the consoles improved +weapon skills /+projectile or whatver instead giving some % bonus ?
    "Cryptic Studio’s Jack Emmert (2010): Microtransactions are the biggest bunch of nonsense. I like paying one fee and not worrying about it – like my cellphone. The world’s biggest MMO isn’t item based, even though the black market item GDP is bigger than Russia … microtransactions make me want to die.”
  • queue38queue38 Member Posts: 158 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    I put this in another thread a long time ago. but it explains how torpedo damage work.

    It might help get the energy nailed down. last time i checked it was dead on with in game values.

    "each torpedo type has a base damage(standard issue below mk 1) i know not every has a standard issue level but they do have a number.

    the base numbers are

    Photon - 1352.00
    Transphasic - 978.20
    Chroniton - 1157.75
    Plasma - 1061.00
    Tricobalt - 4153.50
    Quantum - 1503.00

    now for all the things that add damage.

    rarity is 2.5% per level (so very rare is 7.5%, rare is 5.0%, uncommon is 2.5%)

    Skills is .5% per point (so 49.5% for 99points in starship weapons training 49.5% for starship projectile weapons and 12.5% for doff +25 bonus)

    going form base damage to mk 1 is 8.1362%

    every mk after is 10.2% per level (so at mk xii you have a total bonus of 120.3365%

    player lvl adds .0388468615825ish lol per level (lvl 50 total bonus is 1.94%)

    Dmg modifier is 5% each (so Dmgx3 is 15%)

    tactial consoles add a what they say they add (5 consoles at 30% is 150%)

    now for set bonuses i think they work like consoles (so breen 30% or honor guard 25%)

    the rules 62 console i think is the same way (11%?)

    so adding together 7.5%(very rare), 15%(dmgx3), 111.5%(99 points, 99 points, and 25 points), 120.34%(MK XII), 1.94%(level 50) 150.63%(5 Tactical Consoles), 30%(breen set), 11%(rule 63 console) you get 447.9% total bonus on transphasic torpedos

    978.2 * 447.9% is 4381.3

    4381.3 plus the base damage of 978.2 is 5360

    so the max damage per torpedo without any powers is 5360"

    I will see if i can find my excel file that did all the math for you, you just picked what you had.
    I am @allenlabarge in game :D
  • bitemepwebitemepwe Member Posts: 6,760 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    carl103 wrote: »

    @bitemepwe: That?s what I thought, but it isn't what i found. Sorry.

    No worries.
    Leonard Nimoy, Spock.....:(

    R.I.P
  • carl103carl103 Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    @Queue83: I haven't had chance to get into the nitty gritty of torps yet. But i can tell you 5 +30% energy consoles are NOT adding +150% to the damage, not even close. Nor is the total skill bonus anywhere near what your suggesting, i haven't looked into the individual benefits of each skill but the total of the two is +50% of base damage, not +50% per skill.

    I'm not saying your torp figures are wrong btw, just that there's clearly a diffrent system at work IMHO, though all my tests where done at lv50 so it's impossibble to factor out the possibble benfit of that. On the other hand i'm only intrested in how the base damage of an energy weapon, (so damage without consoles, @ 50 weapons power, and with nio skill effects), is affected by everything else, so how that base is calculated isn't so important. Though running quick math your thing about weapon mk and rarity may well explain the apparent console odditties since it would add a defuallt +100% to base damage, (approx, their was some small error margins on the percentages i got, but with

    Here's my current corrected formulae to take account of my late night math errors when constructing it from the basic rules i'd established:


    (B + (B*S) + (B*(C/CV)))*(1+(0.02*(W-50))))*(1+(APA+TF+APO+GDF))

    Where:

    CV = Console Variable. I need to check if this really varies with weapons Mk as Queue38's post suggests, all my tests where done with eitheir MK10 purples, (basic figures) or MK10 whites, (BO).

    I'm going to try and do some more tests on skill points, Sensor Analysis, and Weapon Mk effects. But first i need my afternoon after work nap :).
  • shookyangshookyang Member Posts: 1,122
    edited November 2012
    oh, having 5 tac consoles isn't that big of a deal. SURE. RIGHT.

    the tac buffs multiply the adjusted tool tip displayed damage huh? from what i've seen i'll believe that. no wonder 5 console ships hit so much harder when fully buffed.


    good job doing all this testing
    I checked to see how much more my DPS increased when I went from 3 to 4 mk XII purple consoles, and it went up by 90-ish.

    I expect it to go up another 90-ish when I get my Fleet Tactical Escort Retrofit.

    This was when I was orbiting ESD, so all of the modifiers should have been in play.

    I believe, with all of the attack buffs, it will probably only increase the DPS by 500-1000 if you add all of the weapons together.
  • queue38queue38 Member Posts: 158 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    ok it does add what the exact %. but it is off the base base damage it might be a mk I but my math was off of the standard issue.

    it is harder to test if you are not level 1 about get a standard issue beam array and any console you want. it will match very close. hover over the stauts menu to see. no matter what the console you pick will always add the same mount.

    i have to do some shopping. so when my son takes a nap i will see what i can come up with.

    my standard issue beam array was 102 then i add a 22.5% console and it went to 124.5

    the math said it should be 124.95. but i am at level 50 so the base is more then like 100.

    like i said i will get back to you.
    I am @allenlabarge in game :D
  • carl103carl103 Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    No problem having been asleep and having got more than 5 brain cells lined up your littile formulae makes sense.

    TheB value in my formulae is bassiclly the base damage modified for Mk and Rariety. A Mk 10 once you knock skill and consoles off is just fractionally over +100% base damage with the lv50 modifier added in. This means the two skill benefits would appear to be +25% ech, not +50%, and the console base magnitudes would also appear to be halved. In fact when i use your exact math i get the exact return is should, (a 26.2% console was actually showing a 12.7% boost and skill points where 48.7% total but i put the variable down to statsital errors due to the small numbers involved, but if i account for the fractionally larger than base 100% modifer from Mk and rareity i can replicate exact numbers).

    I'm still going to try and confirm it with some Mk12 whites though, just to be absolutly certain everything is working as we think. I also want to check each skill in turn as i've seen other data that's conflictoray about this. Also i want to know how tis interacts with my BO deductions. I suspect BO may actually be a +1200/1500/1700% base damage modifier but we need to confirm that.


    For whoever asked earlier i think crits et all multiply the final output.
  • bareelbareel Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Consoles add a flat amount that doesn't care what the weapons actually damage is from mark or rarity, just the type. Simple way to test is to equip two weapons of the same type but different mark.

    Test was done on toon with NO skill points invested at level 50 with no relevant accolades at 50 weapon power.

    Mk 6 white tetryon beam array with 0 consoles gives 159.2 DPV, 2 consoles (52.4%) change damage to 211.7 DPV an change of 52.5 DPV

    Mk 11 purple tetryon beam array with a single [Dmg] mod and two other mods with 0 consoles gives 222.7 DPV, 2 consoles (same as before) change damage to 275.2 DPV a change of.....52.5 DPV

    Follow up test, 0 consoles, 50 weapon power, maxed tier 1 Weapon skill ONLY

    Mk 6 white tetryon beam array deals 208.7 DPV, or 49.5 DPV increase
    Mk 11 purple tetryon beam array deals 272.2 DPV, or a ..... 49.5 DPV increase

    I don't pretend to know what they are a % of, nor do I care. But they only take into account the weapon type beam array/cannon/etc.

    The actual DPV formula is pretty simple to my understanding but I do not pretend to know the details of how a weapon gets it's numbers from.

    Weapon + Console Mod + Skill Mod = Base
    Base * Power Mod * Damage Mod from abilities/accolades/etc = Raw DPV
    Raw DPV * Enemy Resistance Mod = True DPV

    What the Console Mod and Skill Mod are derived from I have no idea. It is a % of a number based on the weapon type and I'm guessing character level possibly. Skill Mod works the same way. What does this mean you ask?

    Every single upgrade you gain, be it a better weapon or better console, has a negligible effect on your actual DPV because of how everything gets added together instead of multiplied.

    This is also why Tac captain abilities are so insanely strong at increasing your DPS along with resistance debuffs like Attack Pattern Beta.
  • carl103carl103 Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    @Bareel: Cheers for that, sounds like queu38 is correct then.
  • bareelbareel Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Did more testing and I think I have a theory.

    Console DPV mod is based on the damage a Mk 0 weapon would deal. IE to calculate the mod you would take the true base of the weapon type (a Mk 0) and multiply it by the mod.

    Reason is simple, a base Mk 0 beam array would deal 98 DPV and the beam arrays are gaining about 52.5 DPV from a pair of consoles added together mod by 52.4%. If you take 98 * .524 you get 51.4 which is close enough for it to be a rounding error with the consoles having a bit more mod that is not shown.

    I'm going to guess that skill bonus is the same. You do not really get the previously assumed 25% or anything like that. Instead I found the tier 1 skill adding 49.5 DPV to a beam array. Guess what 98 * .4995 is 48.9 and once again close enough for me.

    *edit extra info*
    In addition each tier for beam array adds 10.2 DPV.
    Each Quality upgrade adds 2.5 DPV (IE 5 DPV if blue)
    Each [Dmg] mod adds 5 DPV.

    So revised formula for beam array DPV would look like this:

    Base = 98 + (Mark * 10.2) + (Console * 98) + (Skill *98) + (Quality * 2.5) + (Dmg * 5)
    Base * Modifiers * Power Mod = Displayed DPV

    Should be pretty darn close for beam arrays. So lets say we have a fleet mark 12 beam array on a fleet defiant with 5 Mk 12 purple consoles maxed skills. Then we go at max weapon power with say a 10% boost from Epower to Weapons.
    Base = 98 + 122.4 + 147 + 98 + 10 + 15 : 490.4 DPV
    Displayed DPV = 490.4 * 2.5 * 1.1 : 1348.6 DPV

    And we fire at a target with no shields and -30% resists for a DPV of 1753.
    *edited did bad math with weapon power mod fixxed now*
  • carl103carl103 Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Console DPV mod is based on the damage a Mk 0 weapon would deal. IE to calculate the mod you would take the true base of the weapon type (a Mk 0) and multiply it by the mod.

    This is exactly what queue38 said ;).

    Dosen't make my originol stuff any less useful as it confirms how tac buffs and such like interact, but yeah that sounds about right. Gonna do some more testing of my own on other stuff mind.
  • queue38queue38 Member Posts: 158 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    ok it took me most the after noon but i modified my torpedo excel file so now i have both torpedo and energy weapons.

    all you have to do is put in the weapon and any bonuses you have.

    doesn't do buffs yet :D

    one problem i don't know how to get anyone else the file. any ideas?
    I am @allenlabarge in game :D
  • aussieastroaussieastro Member Posts: 7 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    man loved the info.
    Spent 3 days charting out my Trico Bomber trying to squeeze more out of it and its a real pain thank god for advanced combat tracker and some patient Fleet members for being Brick walls for my weaps.

    2 x Trico Mines Mk XII [CrtD]x3 Base DPS 29235.8

    with Skill tree to 9 on Energy weaps specialization and Projectile Weaps specialization.

    With 5 TCD Mk XII purp consoles DPS 42140.6

    AP Omega 1 APA3 TF2 GDF and FOMM3 Buffed DPS 87357.4

    Then Chuck on DPB3 and then 4 x DPS 87357.4 thats without the Crit Chance

    would love to see the Spreadsheet "I will see if i can find my excel file that did all the math for you, you just picked what you had."

    now having fun Doing the Reverse CSE ISE and KASE

    Now called The T-CSE T-ISE and T-KASE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ327VVNME8&feature=plcp
  • bareelbareel Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    carl103 wrote: »
    This is exactly what queue38 said ;).

    Dosen't make my originol stuff any less useful as it confirms how tac buffs and such like interact, but yeah that sounds about right. Gonna do some more testing of my own on other stuff mind.

    Yeah I just no longer take anything at face value until I personal test it.

    Too much out of date info and misinformation gets spread I got burned too many times.
  • queue38queue38 Member Posts: 158 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    i don't mind i test stuff myself also. i know my numbers are off a little but i think the values should be within a few points.

    any idea how to get the file out there?
    I am @allenlabarge in game :D
  • aussieastroaussieastro Member Posts: 7 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Quote one problem i don't know how to get anyone else the file. any ideas?



    Use google Docs..
  • queue38queue38 Member Posts: 158 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    well lets see if this works. I have all the table hidden. if anyone wants to mess around with numbers you will have to unhide them.

    https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B23llRckDIOuejFiT0NYVzRLRE0
    I am @allenlabarge in game :D
  • queue38queue38 Member Posts: 158 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    man loved the info.
    Spent 3 days charting out my Trico Bomber trying to squeeze more out of it and its a real pain thank god for advanced combat tracker and some patient Fleet members for being Brick walls for my weaps.

    2 x Trico Mines Mk XII [CrtD]x3 Base DPS 29235.8

    with Skill tree to 9 on Energy weaps specialization and Projectile Weaps specialization.

    With 5 TCD Mk XII purp consoles DPS 42140.6

    AP Omega 1 APA3 TF2 GDF and FOMM3 Buffed DPS 87357.4

    Then Chuck on DPB3 and then 4 x DPS 87357.4 thats without the Crit Chance

    would love to see the Spreadsheet "I will see if i can find my excel file that did all the math for you, you just picked what you had."

    now having fun Doing the Reverse CSE ISE and KASE

    Now called The T-CSE T-ISE and T-KASE

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZ327VVNME8&feature=plcp

    i totaly forgot about mines i will add them as soon as i can.
    I am @allenlabarge in game :D
  • aussieastroaussieastro Member Posts: 7 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Spreadsheet works great.

    Can you add the [Crt modifiers ?


    cheers astro
  • bareelbareel Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Ok I know I'm just dumb but...

    How does one change the values on the sheet? It is read only for me :confused:
  • queue38queue38 Member Posts: 158 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    you only change the cells that are a little blue. if you click on the cell you should get a drop down arrow to the right of the cell you can use that to slecte what you want. you can just type in the weapons power level.

    hope that helps.

    a note you can type in want you want but it has to be an exact match to what i have so it is easyer to just pick from the drop down.
    I am @allenlabarge in game :D
  • bareelbareel Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Wooten got it to work, it was on my end the error.

    Funny thing, compared green Mk X DHCs with 4 green Mk X consoles to all purple Mk XIIs. A whopping 9% increase for all that extra its kinda sad really.
  • deletedgeardeletedgear Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    queue38 wrote: »
    well lets see if this works. I have all the table hidden. if anyone wants to mess around with numbers you will have to unhide them.

    https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B23llRckDIOuejFiT0NYVzRLRE0

    Thanks for this - amazing work!

    A couple of things:

    - What about the various sets that give an additional percentage boost based on weapon type (Jem'Hadar set - +7.6% to Polaron weapons, Temporal Warfare set - +27.4% to Chroniton projectiles, etc.)

    - FYI, I once read in a now ancient archived post (pre-Season 5, I believe) about how rarity and the damage mod affects the dpv of a weapon. IIRC if a weapon had the [DMG] mod it was +5% dpv, but if it was a different mod ([Acc], etc.) it was only something like +.25% dpv. The [DMG] mod didn't stack with the extra +.25%. So for example if you had a very rare weapon with three non-[DMG] mods, you'd only get a +.75% increase to dpv, and if you had a very rare weapon with one [DMG] mod you'd get a +5.5% increase to dpv. Food for thought - I'm not sure if this info is still relevant any longer (and I intend on testing as soon as I can), but thought I'd throw it out there in case it was useful. EDIT: did a quick test on a DHC in game and the values are VERY close - only a 2.3 dpv difference - I'm thinking this info above no longer applies. Again, well done!
Sign In or Register to comment.