test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Feedback› Klingon Discussion

1000 day veteran ship revealed.

masterkampmasterkamp Member Posts: 89 Arc User
edited October 2012 in Klingon Discussion
The 1000 day Vetaran ship is revealed. Here it is. For the KDF

https://twitter.com/STOJamesLee/status/254666774421860352/photo/1
Post edited by masterkamp on
«1

Comments

  • thorodalthorodal Member Posts: 182 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    masterkamp wrote: »
    The 1000 day Vetaran ship is revealed. Here it is. For the KDF

    https://twitter.com/STOJamesLee/status/254666774421860352/photo/1

    Let's see... BoP-Head, Cruiser-Spine and Raptor-Wings... Bird-of-cruisin'-Raptor?
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,891 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I don't know, it is kinda cute...though I hope maybe they will tone down the size of the nacelles a bit.
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • thechugsterthechugster Member Posts: 12 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    wow, both 1000 day ships are real dogs, not bothered about them at all, being unable to sub for various reasons I was worried I might be missing out but im not
    Looking for a great fleet, then try the UFP/House of Kular, visit ufplanets.com for more info
    A forum post should be like a woman's skirt, long enough to cover the subject matter but short enough to keep things interesting.
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited October 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • dan512dan512 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Destroyer not cruiser.

    Difference.
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    patrickngo wrote: »
    Meh. Another cruiser.

    Destroyer... not Cruiser...
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    pwebranflakes wrote: »
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • dan512dan512 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    its funny the people that dont pay attention to stuff and go its just another cruiser, when they have no idea about this lil beast.
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,891 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Will be interesting to see the stats of the ship, maybe will have a interesting boff layout. I would hope this thing has 10 consoles, because lets face it this ship isn't exactly easy to obtain.

    Before people go on and say I'm biased...I'm not :P. I'm only around the 300 day level of vet rewards.
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited October 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • pottsey5gpottsey5g Member Posts: 4,251 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    patrickngo wrote: »
    okay, so a cruiser with a thin skin and poor sheild multiplier. It looks like an overweight Raptor, and I kind of expect it's going to handle like one.
    All the other destroyers act like Escorts, why would this one be different? Destroyers tend to have a turn rate off around 15, I see no reason why this one would be much different.
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited October 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • dan512dan512 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I would take your negative views out of this thread since you have NO clue what its going to do, because we dont want them here. This is a discussion about it, not a bashing before it comes out, which from how your acting i can tell its already a TRIBBLE in your mind.
  • pottsey5gpottsey5g Member Posts: 4,251 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    patrickngo wrote: »
    Not all turn rates with the same multiplier work the same way-observe the Raptor pivot, and they're allegedly "escorts". A cruiser with a fast turn? still turns like a cruiser.

    Ergo, "Another thin-skinned cruiser with two device slots". Given the layout in the art as linked, I suspect it's going to be basically a slower turning Raptor, something in between a Vor'cha and a Qin.
    Since when do Destroyer class ships turn like cruisers? Why are you calling Destroyer class ships thin skinned crusiers? I am not aware of any Destroyer's that turn like crusiers.
  • voporakvoporak Member Posts: 5,621 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Wow. That ship looks like they took a modified Bortas body and slapped a different head and nacelles on it.
    I ask nothing but that you remember me.
  • dan512dan512 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Actually its a submission from the next enterprise contest, it was like 2nd or 3rd place, so was before the bortas was even shown, so technically the bortas ripped from it :)
  • jnohdjnohd Member Posts: 5 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    dan512 wrote: »
    Actually its a submission from the next enterprise contest, it was like 2nd or 3rd place, so was before the bortas was even shown, so technically the bortas ripped from it :)

    Um... what? Fairly sure voporak was talking about the KDF ship, which I doubt placed in the Enterprise design contest... :D
    Wampaq@Jnoh, Fleet Leader: ..Bloodbath and Beyond [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] 'Iw HaH je Hoch!
    ALL HOLDINGS FINISHED! - Starbase 5-5-5-5 || Embassy 3-3-3 || Mine 3-3-3 || Spire 3-3-3
    A laid back KDF fleet welcoming independent, casual, & part-time players and groups. Roms & alts welcome.
    Send in-game mail to Wampaq@Jnoh, visit our recruitment thread and FB page for more info.
  • jnohdjnohd Member Posts: 5 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Oh, and PLEASE give us a different head on that thing!

    Not a fan of rounded pre-k toy looking KDF bridgesections. A pointy, bearded, Briok raptor look might be nice... or a mean looking Haj head?

    This one is a bit too old-school B'rel or QulDun derived, and clearly the Empire had designed pointier, meaner, more dangerous looking heads since then.
    Wampaq@Jnoh, Fleet Leader: ..Bloodbath and Beyond [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] 'Iw HaH je Hoch!
    ALL HOLDINGS FINISHED! - Starbase 5-5-5-5 || Embassy 3-3-3 || Mine 3-3-3 || Spire 3-3-3
    A laid back KDF fleet welcoming independent, casual, & part-time players and groups. Roms & alts welcome.
    Send in-game mail to Wampaq@Jnoh, visit our recruitment thread and FB page for more info.
  • malkarrismalkarris Member Posts: 797 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    As a request, can one of the vets who gets this thing put up a vid on youtube or something to show it off? I'd love to see what this thing could do. Thanks.
    Joined September 2011
    Nouveau riche LTS member
  • khayuungkhayuung Member Posts: 1,876 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    This ship is supposed to be able to transform from SV to escort to cruiser on the Fed side...

    ...does that mean your's have BoP, battlecruiser, and carrier modes?

    "Last Engage! Magical Girl Origami-san" is in print! Now with three times more rainbows.

    Support the "Armored Unicorn" vehicle initiative today!

    Thanks for Harajuku. Now let's get a real "Magical Girl" costume!
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited October 2012
    This content has been removed.
  • murmurhem187murmurhem187 Member Posts: 49 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    looks like a bigger fighter. wheres Capt.Logan when you need him? Of course I'll never be over a 700 day vet so whatever.
    Koopa27 -X-treme
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    A friend remarked it looks like an F5 from Star Fleet Battles (not to be confused with Starfleet Command) but I thought it reminded me of something else.
    Took me ling enough but it looks like the NoQ'Duj scouts from Star Trek Armada:

    http://gaming.trekcore.com/armada2/shipsandstations/klinnuqduj.jpg
  • notapwefannotapwefan Member Posts: 1,138 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    5 tac consoles
    4 engineering consoles
    1 sci console

    4x forward and 4x rear weapon mounts
    1x hangar bay

    1x universal commander
    2x universal lt. commander
    2x universal lt tac
    1x universal ensign


    Battle cloak

    +15 weapon power
    +10 aux power
    +10 engine power


    Turn rate: 21
    shield modifier 1.25
    impulse modifier: 1.50



    Then we will talk
    Grinding for MkIV epic gear?
    Ain't Nobody Got Time for That

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • tenkaritenkari Member Posts: 2,906 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    notapwefan wrote: »
    5 tac consoles
    4 engineering consoles
    1 sci console

    4x forward and 4x rear weapon mounts
    1x hangar bay

    1x universal commander
    2x universal lt. commander
    2x universal lt tac
    1x universal ensign


    Battle cloak

    +15 weapon power
    +10 aux power
    +10 engine power


    Turn rate: 21
    shield modifier 1.25
    impulse modifier: 1.50



    Then we will talk

    bout time KDF get an OP ship :p I wonder if Levi3 has suggested the same stats for the Fedside version.
  • badname834854badname834854 Member Posts: 1,186 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    Was this ship designed by Beanie Babies? It's so damn squatty....
  • erraberrab Member Posts: 1,434 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    One of the hosts of Priority one mentioned that the 1000 Day KDF vessel was pure win and hinted that it had and incredible console setup.

    The ship is mentioned in this week?s Priority one episode 99.

    Has a Lifer since the 2nd week of open beta I?ll have access to both vessels soon enough (If not already), maybe they?ll both be cool enough to make me want to play STO again.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • skyranger1414skyranger1414 Member Posts: 1,785 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    errab wrote: »
    One of the hosts of Priority one mentioned that the 1000 Day KDF vessel was pure win and hinted that it had and incredible console setup.

    Based on some of their previous comments on ship layouts and design I wouldn't put much stock in them calling it "pure win". They make a fun podcast to listen to and are true, dedicated fans... but their comments on ships sometimes.... lets say no one can be good at everything.
  • jnohdjnohd Member Posts: 5 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    http://sto.perfectworld.com/news/?p=706571
    • Hull Strength: 34,500
    • Shield Modifier: 0.833
    • Crew: 750
    • Weapons: 4 Fore, 3 Aft
    • Device Slots: 3
    • Bridge Officer Stations: 1 Commander Tactical, 1 Lieutenant Engineering, 1 Lieutenant Science, 1 Universal Ensign, 1 Universal Lieutenant Commander
    • Console Modifications: 4 Tactical, 3 Engineering, 2 Science
    • Base Turn Rate: 14 degrees per second
    • Impulse Modifier: 0.22
    • Can equip Cannons
    • Regenerative Mode (Innate): +5 Auxiliary Power, +30 Starship Shield Systems
    • Console ? Universal ? Dynamic Tactical System: Tactical Mode (Disables Regenerative Mode, +5 Weapon power, +30 Starship Targeting Systems), Tachyon Inversion Beam (Requires Regenerative Mode), Disruptor Lotus (Requires Tactical Mode)
    • Advanced Quantum Slipstream Drive
    • Battle Cloak

    Hrm...

    Compared to my Fleet Qin:

    5% Less hull, 10% less shields, MUCH more crew (almost 4x), 1 more device, 1 less console (???), BATTLE cloak (!!!), 2/3 lower Weapons Power bonus, higher Impulse modifier, slightly lower turn (but then again, pivot point), awesome console...

    I just wish it had a slightly different head on it. And one more console slot.
    Wampaq@Jnoh, Fleet Leader: ..Bloodbath and Beyond [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] 'Iw HaH je Hoch!
    ALL HOLDINGS FINISHED! - Starbase 5-5-5-5 || Embassy 3-3-3 || Mine 3-3-3 || Spire 3-3-3
    A laid back KDF fleet welcoming independent, casual, & part-time players and groups. Roms & alts welcome.
    Send in-game mail to Wampaq@Jnoh, visit our recruitment thread and FB page for more info.
  • tenkaritenkari Member Posts: 2,906 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    jnohd wrote: »
    http://sto.perfectworld.com/news/?p=706571


    Hrm...

    Compared to my Fleet Qin:

    5% Less hull, 10% less shields, MUCH more crew (almost 4x), 1 more device, 1 less console (???), BATTLE cloak (!!!), 2/3 lower Weapons Power bonus, higher Impulse modifier, slightly lower turn (but then again, pivot point), awesome console...

    I just wish it had a slightly different head on it. And one more console slot.

    rememeber, regenerative mode is innate to the ship. meaning remove the console to turn into Tac mode and you still get the regenerative mode bonuses. so that makes up a little bit for the missing console. if someone never plans on running in tac mode they can remove the console and free up a slot.


    and i dont think this ship should be Better than Fleet ships. its a free ship you can get to use while grinding up to a fleet ship. however, should they add a fleet version of this ship to the game, i think those who are vets that own the ship should get it for free. or at the reduced C-store price of 1 FSM.
  • yreodredyreodred Member Posts: 3,527 Arc User
    edited October 2012
    I've been waiting for a Cruiser-Escort hybrid since i started playing STO in feb 2010. Since then i always felt that Cryptic made Cruisers way too passive and escorts - well i just hate escorts.
    I always wanted to get a ship which is in between those two extemes.
    In addition, i find it looks really nice and pleasing, which happens only rarely with cryptics designs.


    And now this ship is only availlable to someone who has subscribted for 1000 days or is willing to pay 200$ for it?
    Sorry but i am really annoyed. :mad:
    "...'With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured...the first thought forbidden...the first freedom denied--chains us all irrevocably.' ... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we're all damaged. I fear that today--" - (TNG) Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie

    A tale of two Picards
    https://youtu.be/d-f3bscZa0E?t=105
    (also applies to Star Trek in general)
Sign In or Register to comment.