test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Having the ARGO from Nemesis as a mount

cosmoscolacosmoscola Member Posts: 0 Arc User
I would love being able to have mounts to be able to cross ground terrains faster. While I realize many of them are still to small, in some of the larger groundmaps and in the future this would be grest. Maybe to start of with the ARGO shuttle along with that crazy car.
Post edited by cosmoscola on
«1

Comments

  • daan2006daan2006 Member Posts: 5,346 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    love it great ide !!!!!!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    swimwear off risa not fixed
    system Lord Baal is dead
    macronius wrote: »
    This! Their ability to outdo their own failures is quite impressive. If only this power could be harnessed for good.
  • chequepleasechequeplease Member Posts: 31 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    No thanks. The ARGO was a bad idea, I mean, if you've got a shuttle that can travel across a planet in a matter of minutes/hours, why use a car?

    Personally, the ARGO shouldn't have been in Trek full stop.
    The Artist formerly known as Paddoxx
  • arcademasterarcademaster Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Yeah mounts would be cool but the usefulness would be limited with the small maps. It would really kick TRIBBLE for that ground STF with the endless valley and its optional timer though.

    What this game needs in general is more types of items to collect. Ground equipment is done with just two pieces of defense and a weapon (kits are "done" at Mk XI). We need more stuff to collect, tweak and customize outselves with.

    It might be overkill to be like most MMOs with magic jewelry, bracers, wristbands, waistbands, trousers shoes etc etc but there is a point to it. More stuff to collect is longer moitivation to keep playing.
  • thoroonthoroon Member Posts: 409 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Yeah mounts would be cool but the usefulness would be limited with the small maps.

    I didn't kept the devs from creating EV suits to sell.
    If we all cry long enough for mounts, we will get them sooner or later. Only the ZEN will stop us from having them.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • cosmoscolacosmoscola Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    daan2006 wrote: »
    love it great ide !!!!!!

    Think of it. Star Trek as all about exploration. Sadly the narrow maps makes this difficult. With larger maps comes the ability to add new things and there if really no limit in terms of exploration what we migh be able to find in this universe. And the usefullness of various items and artifacts are also endless. It would be just soo much fun having several maps that you could spend hours upon hours to explore if you wanted it. If you don't want it, then you don't have to.
  • critical1critical1 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    What this game needs in general is more types of items to collect. Ground equipment is done with just two pieces of defense and a weapon (kits are "done" at Mk XI).

    MK XI? Funny i thought the highest kit was a purple Mk X.

    Have I missed something?
  • arcademasterarcademaster Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    You are probably right, I didn't look at my kits in months. I just knew they were maxed out earlier than normal.
  • jjumetleyjjumetley Member Posts: 281 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    No thanks. The ARGO was a bad idea, I mean, if you've got a shuttle that can travel across a planet in a matter of minutes/hours, why use a car?
    1) Because a car is much lighter than a shuttle. What about planets with rich flora? A shuttle can't land everywhere and can't get everywhere.
    2) What if you need to get somewhere without others knowing it? A shuttle is easier to get picked up by tracking systems.
  • jafobss1701jafobss1701 Member Posts: 102 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    jjumetley wrote: »
    1) Because a car is much lighter than a shuttle. What about planets with rich flora? A shuttle can't land everywhere and can't get everywhere.
    2) What if you need to get somewhere without others knowing it? A shuttle is easier to get picked up by tracking systems.

    Maybe that why shuttles have transporters?

    Im sry i thought the ARGO kinda jumped the shark!
  • skhcskhc Member Posts: 355 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Military ground vehicles generally don't stand up to critical analysis in Star Trek too well, imo. Why would you need one when 99% of the time you can transport / fly a shuttle to exactly where you want to be. And if you need to destroy something on a planet, you can usually do it from orbit. And if you can't it's usually because it's a shielded building / underground cavern that you can use a vehicle in anyway.

    That was probably why we never saw one before Nemesis.

    Besides which, I can't really think of any place you could use one in the game anyway. Most of the social maps are space station interiors (I'm sure Captain Kurland would love someone driving an ARGO down the Promenade) and the mission maps are generally too small to need something like that.

    So unless the introduced a massive exploration system with massive ground maps on it (not a bad idea in itself, tbf, but it ain't coming any time soon if ever), the game can't accomodate one.
  • trek21trek21 Member Posts: 2,246 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    The fact still remains that the Argo is canon. Nemesis has it's faults (the space battle not being one of them), but it's still canonically what happened... and therefore, so is the Argo.

    If it were ever to get in-game, it could be a special Captain's perk, to drive around on uninhabited planets like Risa. (And I say uninhabited because it could otherwise upset ground combat and ground missions)
    Was named Trek17.

    Been playing STO since Open Beta, and have never regarded anything as worse than 'meh', if only due to personal standards.
  • pyryckpyryck Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    No to ground mounts in STO.

    Nope. Nyet. Nein. Never. No way. No how. Fuggedaboutit. :(

    I don't care if they are canon with cannons that cannon canon. Just NO.

    If ya wants yer mounts in an MMO, WoW is over THAT way and TOR is over THAT other way!
  • kobayashlmarukobayashlmaru Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    The problems with Argo are many:
    1. Maps are too small. There's only one I can think of that could support it.
    2. All NPC's would have to adjust speeds to accommodate it.
    3. Can you imagine using one on those old genesis exploration sector missions? Go off hte path, get stuck in a lava tree, no way out until you die. It would be brutal.
    4. You would have to re-write existing content or develop new content specifically for it like they did with shuttles.
    5. How will you avoid exploits such as kiting? Or if this is non-combat, Can you think of any mission other than the Obisek one that requires more than 30 seconds to walk from objective A to objective B?

    Now having said that, ground-based shuttle missions would be interesting. I wonder why we only have one cut scene with shuttles on the ground at this point. As I recall planetary landing was one of the main appearances shuttles made on the shows.
    Kobayashi Maru
    Join Date: Sept 2008


    "Holographic tissue paper for the holographic runny nose. Don't give them to patients." - The Doctor
  • keppabar42keppabar42 Member Posts: 60 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    I never got the point of the ARGO either, the only possible point could be if you had an area of several square kilometers with transporter dampeners, but no kind of ground based sensors to detect movement on the surface. In other words, a technically advanced, but STUPID enemy.
    Then add the fact you need a frikking HUGE cargo shuttle to land the thing because for some reason the ship's transporters, that are capable of shifting a 30 ton whale, can't move a 500kg dune buggy!
  • kamiyama317kamiyama317 Member Posts: 1,295 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    I would love to have a hoverboard, but they aren't canon as far as I know.

    I have to agree the ARGO didn't make any sense. A shuttle can go more places than a car can.
  • captrayvenwingcaptrayvenwing Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    pyryck wrote: »
    No to ground mounts in STO.

    Nope. Nyet. Nein. Never. No way. No how. Fuggedaboutit. :(

    I don't care if they are canon with cannons that cannon canon. Just NO.

    If ya wants yer mounts in an MMO, WoW is over THAT way and TOR is over THAT other way!

    This because sure as heck once they mounts they will driving them though esd.

    Second would make the game more like halo
    The Account formally known as Rayvenwing
    Actual Join Date : Feb 2010

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • centersolacecentersolace Member Posts: 11,178 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    This because sure as heck once they mounts they will driving them though esd.

    One of the better mental Images I've had all day.. :D
  • dood98998dood98998 Member Posts: 389
    edited August 2012
    Maybe that why shuttles have transporters?

    Im sry i thought the ARGO kinda jumped the shark!

    Yet star wars had speeder bikes, and they didn't adversly affect the story. Forgett that shuttle- we can't use shuttles at low altitude, so the ARGO would be an excellent idea.
    When in doubt, (hehe) c4!
    This sig dedicated to the many random objects the Mythbusters crew has blow to smitherines :D
  • kimmerakimmera Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    dood98998 wrote: »
    Yet star wars had speeder bikes, and they didn't adversly affect the story. Forgett that shuttle- we can't use shuttles at low altitude, so the ARGO would be an excellent idea.

    Star Wars didn't have transporters.
  • darkstarkiriandarkstarkirian Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    The Argo, like it or not, was a specialized piece of equipment for special situations.
    Nemsis, they couldn't be beam down due to a nearby ion storm and it was a lowtech world where flying around would have been "disruptive". So...

    In every war there is that one weapon, that one vehicle, that one piece of equipment that really stands out as "apart of that war". Like the Huey helicopter is most often related with the Vietnam war, the F-117 Stealth Fighter is with the Gulf War, etc.

    The Argo ground vehicle could ony be used in Large maps like the Nopada Desert in Coliseum, and even there it takes just a few minutes to just run straight across ignoring everything on foot. (I know because i did that with the Lobi Scavenger Hunt. Once I was in the desert, i just ignored all the objectives and ran for the Lobi.)

    Being only 1 large grond map where the Argo is useful would make it less useful than shuttles are currently in game.

    Multiple new Large and open terrain maps would be needed for it to be useful, but if they made those maps with the "Argo like vehicle" only sold in the store, there would be complaints that there were no free, on map ones.

    i would love a Nopada Desert capture and hold PvP map with ground vehicles, imagine running/driving around Halo style on that huge map capturing points.
    But I don't see the Argo or those maps happening.
    [SIGPIC]Handle: @kirian_darkstar
    Registered: Oct/2009 , LTS : Feb/2011
    Fleets: Warriors of the Phoenix, Kirian Industries[/SIGPIC]
    Three years and still no Captain Klaa hair...
  • kimmerakimmera Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    trek21 wrote: »
    The fact still remains that the Argo is canon. Nemesis has it's faults (the space battle not being one of them), but it's still canonically what happened... and therefore, so is the Argo.

    If it were ever to get in-game, it could be a special Captain's perk, to drive around on uninhabited planets like Risa. (And I say uninhabited because it could otherwise upset ground combat and ground missions)

    Are you equally in favor of space hippies? Those are canon too. So are whale probes that 'incidentally' knock out power to entire solar systems.

    Many things are canon that are best forgotten.
  • cormorancormoran Member Posts: 440 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    The Argo, like it or not, was a specialized piece of equipment for special situations.
    Nemsis, they couldn't be beam down due to a nearby ion storm and it was a lowtech world where flying around would have been "disruptive". So...

    They were plenty disruptive with the argo. They engaged the locals in a car chase, they killed atleast some of those locals with energy weapons and to top it off they flew off into space with the argo shuttle right in front of them anyway.

    I think it would be awesome to do a story in STO where we find out Picard and crew actually killed that planets equivalent of abraham lincoln and ruined their chances for a more peaceful, free and equal society. It would include a scene at Picards courtmartial where he sheepishly points at Worf and exclaims "He did it!".
    kimmera wrote: »
    Are you equally in favor of space hippies? Those are canon too.

    LOL, I love these forums. Everytime I'm reminded of the space hippies I remember a poster on here years back who mistook Khan for Sevrin and I then proceed to blow my own mind thinking of what "the Wrath of Sevrin" would have been like. :eek:
  • dood98998dood98998 Member Posts: 389
    edited August 2012
    This because sure as heck once they mounts they will driving them though esd.

    Second would make the game more like halo

    Ground combat sucks in this game. Don't agrue the point- its 100 percent true, and we all know it. Sto could use a touch of halo. As for the transporter argument, cryptic don't care. The only thing they losten to is money, and at 5 bucks a pop, argo could be a great way for cryptic to milk the rp'ers (and me! :D). I just want it b/c maps such as cure, where you must move quickly.
    When in doubt, (hehe) c4!
    This sig dedicated to the many random objects the Mythbusters crew has blow to smitherines :D
  • doomiciledoomicile Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    Instanced Ground Mission Areas are so tiny, a mount of any kind would be pointless and Cryptic has more important things to work on. No Dev should be wasting time on even considering mounts, let alone working on them.

    Ground is an afterthought and it's only real purpose is to conduct trade and requisitions.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • wraithshadow13wraithshadow13 Member Posts: 1,728 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    It's funny because in Champions they're developing vehicles as a travel power and claim that there will be levels that revolve around being in them. Personally i think this would fit nicely in STO as well, albeit slightly out of canon (though not entirely) would add a nice bit of variety. There's plenty of things I'm sure from the trek canon that would make great ground mounts, and god knows the slow sprint speed is pretty rough on the larger levels. I'd even settle for something like the driving levels in gears 2. It's basically the Nukara hard mission but on a moving platform.
  • raj011raj011 Member Posts: 987 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    The Argo, like it or not, was a specialized piece of equipment for special situations.
    Nemsis, they couldn't be beam down due to a nearby ion storm and it was a lowtech world where flying around would have been "disruptive". So...

    In every war there is that one weapon, that one vehicle, that one piece of equipment that really stands out as "apart of that war". Like the Huey helicopter is most often related with the Vietnam war, the F-117 Stealth Fighter is with the Gulf War, etc.

    The Argo ground vehicle could ony be used in Large maps like the Nopada Desert in Coliseum, and even there it takes just a few minutes to just run straight across ignoring everything on foot. (I know because i did that with the Lobi Scavenger Hunt. Once I was in the desert, i just ignored all the objectives and ran for the Lobi.)

    Being only 1 large grond map where the Argo is useful would make it less useful than shuttles are currently in game.

    Multiple new Large and open terrain maps would be needed for it to be useful, but if they made those maps with the "Argo like vehicle" only sold in the store, there would be complaints that there were no free, on map ones.

    i would love a Nopada Desert capture and hold PvP map with ground vehicles, imagine running/driving around Halo style on that huge map capturing points.
    But I don't see the Argo or those maps happening.

    This is correct, the Argo ground vehicle was used because the transporters could not work on the planet but you can argue that they still could of used the shuttle to get around which also is true, If not the Argo car defiantly the Argo shuttle should be in the game. :)
  • midpoint1midpoint1 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    We could have Argo races on Risa, they already have the paths available...:D
  • romuzariiromuzarii Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    The ARGO is the dumbest thing in the history of Star Trek(ok, almost the dumbest), and it's not just the ARGO, it's that entire scene it was involved in. While I guess it's okay they used some lame excuse to fit it in because they do that a lot with the fictional situations to advance the show/movie, the only reason that scene even took place is probably because it would make Patrick a lot happier about doing the movie(in case you hadn't noticed, he isn't into Star Trek very much) That's the only conceivable reason. Peeps can spin it however they like to justify it to themselves but it's just plain stupid in the Star Trek universe.

    Now you could say that at the end of the day that it's still in our blood, human or alien, to want to ride around in a buggy because yes it is fun. We're attracted to such things. But it is not practical ever for Starfleet to condone it. At best they would say, "go use a holodeck, or do it on your own time during vacation" or whatnot.

    What would have made much more sense in the trek universe, if it was done for trek and not for an actor, is a type of hover mobile such as what we saw in Star Wars which is easily possible in the trek universe and probably has been done and I'm just not remembering it(oh right, they did it in Star Trek with the cop chasing down mini Kirk so, yeah) And that's assuming a trek producer somewhere didn't get lazy about it and just went with a shuttle instead because it does the same job and faster.

    So, whatever, sure. I'd take an ARGO. But all it will ever be good for is wasting your money because they will surely never put it to good use in game for anything ever because they are already struggling with everything else. Designing content for the ARGO will be about as likely as focusing on the KDF. But personally I rather have a hover bike because it's a lot more trek as far as I care. I'm certain wheels still exist well into the future but it's probably for novelty reasons and for practical reasons it's all hover vehicles.
  • leviathan99#2867 leviathan99 Member Posts: 7,747 Arc User
    edited August 2012
    I keep saying this every time someone calls it impractical but what if you have to do a mission on a pre-warp world with bad access to transporter signals?

    That is an extremely common scenario in Trek.

    I'd think using a shuttle increases risk of contamination.

    In the wrong hands, one shuttle is more terrible than thousands of atom bombs.
Sign In or Register to comment.