test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Ship Tier Revamp Proposal.

18910111214»

Comments

  • dkeith2011dkeith2011 Member Posts: 595 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    :tongue:

    Too bad these new forums made such a train wreck out of our past posts.
  • centersolacecentersolace Member Posts: 11,178 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    dkeith2011 wrote: »
    :tongue:

    Too bad these new forums made such a train wreck out of everything.

    Fixed for accuracy. Good day sir. :cool:
  • dkeith2011dkeith2011 Member Posts: 595 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    Fixed for accuracy. Good day sir. :cool:

    Good point, thanks. :biggrin:
  • ironyogaironyoga Member Posts: 23 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    dkeith2011 wrote: »
    Live on so they can continue to be ignored by the powers that be, but still... :tongue:


    True but you still have to voice your opinion for it to be heard. I really like this idea and I vote yes!
    So you decided to attack some spelling error to don't have to deal with the contain and when you did you didn't have the brain to can answer it.
  • bghostbghost Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    bump cause it needs to be bumped
  • dkeith2011dkeith2011 Member Posts: 595 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    Who thinks this system overhaul would be a better use of Dev resources than a revamp of the dismally unpopular PvP system?

    1 vote here.
  • sparhawksparhawk Member Posts: 796 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    dkeith2011 wrote: »
    Who thinks this system overhaul would be a better use of Dev resources than a revamp of the dismally unpopular PvP system?

    1 vote here.

    Ditto. As I see things, it would also benefit PVP anyway.
  • dkeith2011dkeith2011 Member Posts: 595 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    I would think PvP would benefit from a little surprise.

    This kind of customization could make PvP a guessing game where players don't know eachothers builds at a glance.
  • suricattasuricatta Member Posts: 230 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    Pretty angry right now. In the latest interviewv on Priority One with Al Riveria they asked about this proposal. Al said he hadn't seen the proposal or read it (so much for forwarding it to the relevant devs) and then dismissed how it would work without even bothering to look at it! I'm happy with what he talked about with the Fleet system, but really annoyed that he didn't bother to read it or get it passed to him :mad:
  • dkeith2011dkeith2011 Member Posts: 595 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    Nice of him to dismiss the idea he never looked at so offhandedly.
  • phyrexianherophyrexianhero Member Posts: 768 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    The question was brought up in Priority One 86 Supplemental around the 50:55 mark. Rivera said the system could not be done around 52:10.
    suricatta wrote: »
    Pretty angry right now. In the latest interviewv on Priority One with Al Riveria they asked about this proposal. Al said he hadn't seen the proposal or read it (so much for forwarding it to the relevant devs) and then dismissed how it would work without even bothering to look at it! I'm happy with what he talked about with the Fleet system, but really annoyed that he didn't bother to read it or get it passed to him :mad:

    Is there any way to make the system work without changing the number of slots? If that's the core of it, then it's not compatible without a massive rewrite of the underlying code. If it can be done without changing slots, then the idea was not dismissed.
    Playing since January 2010. STOwiki administrator. Accolade hunter.
    My STOwiki page | Reachable in-game @PhyrexianHero
    Fed Armada: Section 31 (level 730, 2700+ members)
    KDF Armada: Klingon Intelligence (level 699, 2100+ members)
  • amayakitsuneamayakitsune Member Posts: 977 Arc User
    edited June 2012
    Is it possible... that instead of dismissing it offhand, as you all assume he did, that he had seen it and did not remember it? He is a busy man after all. Also if I recall, when asked about it, and provided the link he got a 404 which means he wasnt able to look at it during the course of the interview to jog his memory.

    Even the interviewer didnt know the Suricata's was the one he described to Al... he just said it was one he had seen...

    I'm much more willing to believe that Geko, in his busy life didnt remember reading or seeing it than just dismissing it.
    7NGGeUP.png

  • allyoftheforceallyoftheforce Member Posts: 736 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    Just keep trying I guess. Eventually they will listen or flat out say no. I still dig this revamp.
  • dkeith2011dkeith2011 Member Posts: 595 Arc User
    edited July 2012
    The copout answer has been given, everything else is irrelevant as far as the Devs are concerned.
Sign In or Register to comment.