test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Support› C-Store, ZEN, and Promotions

Federation Dreadnought Cruiser VERY POOR QUALITY!

SystemSystem Member, NoReporting Posts: 178,019 Arc User
edited August 2010 in C-Store, ZEN, and Promotions
OR just very badly bugged?

Please fix immediately: Federation Dreadnought Cruiser This Tier 5 ship may have bug? If not fixed I would like a refund, this ship is tier 4 at best.

*4 weapon slots in front, but only 3 in the back? ( Only 3 in the back? ) (Tier 5 have 4 on each side)

* Bridge officer slots 1 Commander, 1 LT Commander= Engineering.
1 Lieutenant, 1 Ensign= Tactical? ( this should be an Engineering Ensign? )

* Why is the Hull so weak it is nothing compared to Jem Hadar Dreadnought Cruiser? ( weak hull? )

So I think their may be something worth looking at?

I bought the ship yesterday, I was shocked and unsatisfied, My Assault Cruiser is much better than the so called Federation "Dreadnought" Cruiser. My hull melted so fast I thought I was in a Tier 4 ship? The Phaser Lance was not that great, hard to aim and was not a super weapon of any type. It did not even knock down facing shield. 2000 CP was much to steep, I would of only set the price at 800 based off my inspection of its quality, Some one needed to look that thing over before it left space dock, QUALITY CONTROL!
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited August 2010
    The base hull of all T5 cruisers is the same - 39.000 points. The Galaxy-X hull is affacted by the "Assault Cruiser Captain" skill.
    By the way, there are about a few dozen threads just about this ship :rolleyes:
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited August 2010
    The BO setup for the Galaxy X is the same as for the Assault Cruiser. And the "missing" stuff is a trade-in for the cloak and the phaser lance. All this information is also freely available. Next time check it before you spend your money. :)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited August 2010
    *4 weapon slots in front, but only 3 in the back? ( Only 3 in the back? ) (Tier 5 have 4 on each side)

    They said this was intentional. That the phaser lance is supposed to make up the difference.
    * Bridge officer slots 1 Commander, 1 LT Commander= Engineering.
    1 Lieutenant, 1 Ensign= Tactical? ( this should be an Engineering Ensign? )

    This one is definitely intended and works out as normal. It's an assault cruiser setup in terms of Bridge Officer slots. The Galaxy Retrofit gets the extra engineering ensign.
    * Why is the Hull so weak it is nothing compared to Jem Hadar Dreadnought Cruiser? ( weak hull? )

    No clue about this one.
    I bought the ship yesterday, I was shocked and unsatisfied, My Assault Cruiser is much better than the so called Federation "Dreadnought" Cruiser.

    Aw man. You should have said something. And given some of us a chance to talk you down off that ledge. I know I'd have told you as best as I could how the assault cruiser is better than the Galaxy X. And that unless you want it for looks, it's not worth the money.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited August 2010
    I am so jumping ! LOL

    All this info is not in the C-Store Bio as the other ships have, how disappointing!
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited August 2010
    picardalpha2clearance wrote: »
    I am so jumping ! LOL

    Noooooooo!!!!!
    All this info is not in the C-Store Bio as the other ships have, how disappointing!

    Yeah, consistency with their info boxes is pretty haphazard in this game. There's a lot of info they really could and should put into the game.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited August 2010
    Buyer Beware ;)


    And btw, I've found much of the info about the Galaxy-X on the forums, so maybe you should just search better.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited August 2010
    Let me get this right, we pay Cryptic to swap one ability for another ability?

    I'm tempated to buy but after reading that theres only 3 rear weapon slots, thats a turn off. I'm thinking any good escort player tails galaxy-x ships if they have any sense and if thats not a good enough reason not to bother buying I don't know what is.

    I will only buy if that spinal lazer has a decent cooldown and really does make a difference.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited August 2010
    Why did you make 2 threads?

    http://forums.startrekonline.com/showthread.php?t=175866
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited August 2010
    picardalpha2clearance wrote: »
    All this info is not in the C-Store Bio as the other ships have, how disappointing!

    Idd, this should defiantly be in the info!

    Edit: Sorry, thought this would be attached to the last post, I was to slow i guess.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited August 2010
    I think now is a good time to mention that Cryptic never intended for the Galaxy-X to go up on the C-Store.
    It was only put there because people where complaining you could only get it through the Refer a Friend program, and because some nuts were actually bought 5 copies of the game + 1 month subs for each, just to get the stupid ship.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited August 2010
    Moral of the story - do your homework before you spend 2000 C Points. I chose to buy the ship from the C Store and none of those issues were surprises. There are tons of FAQs on here that tell you all the pros and cons of the Galaxy-X.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited August 2010
    I find this thread pretty funny and ironic.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited August 2010
    The Galaxy X is a TOY - Not a tool :cool:

    There's a bunch of threads about this since day one it was in the c-store

    You get a 'fun' phaser and cloak - and you pay for it... :eek:
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited August 2010
    This thread made me laugh, is it a joke?

    If it isn't...
    The Galaxy-X is a tier 4.5 NOT higher, nor is it a win all ship...
Sign In or Register to comment.