test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Galactic News Network [PC]

FEDERATION COMMAND CARRIER BUNDLE!

baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 10,901 Community Moderator
edited November 2022 in Galactic News Network [PC]
The Federation Command Carrier Bundle brings you two new Carrier Ships in the Zen Store!

https://www.playstartrekonline.com/en/news/article/11528723
GrWzQke.png
Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
----> Contact Customer Support <----
Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
Tagged:

Comments

  • pottsey5gpottsey5g Member Posts: 4,251 Arc User
    “Supplementary Coordination Network (Starship Trait)”
    Personally, I think this trait needs a rework as its the 3rd trait that reduces Captain Recharge ability on launching hangar pets. The other two traits are considered poor, and this is an even worse version.
  • fleetcaptain5#1134 fleetcaptain5
    fleetcaptain5#1134
         Member Posts: 5,051 Arc User
    Meh.

    I'm not too impressed with the ships. They look nice, but knowing that the carrier is based on a small freighter, one of the cheapest ships from one of the old games makes it a bit of a strange thing.
    The Norway has a nice weapon slot configuration, but ultimately it's just another escort-like ship, only this time with a hangar bay. I already have the Alita which I greatly enjoy flying so I'm just hoping for a legendary treatment of that one eventually.


    All in all these ships are just not special enough. Same for the attributes I could use on other ships: I've got so many traits and consoles that I barely get to use the ones I already have. So I don't really need more. Their effects seem fun to try out, but they'd probably remain unused quickly after, not making it worth the purchase for just that.
  • finsches123finsches123 Member Posts: 158 Arc User
    pottsey5g wrote: »
    “Supplementary Coordination Network (Starship Trait)”
    Personally, I think this trait needs a rework as its the 3rd trait that reduces Captain Recharge ability on launching hangar pets. The other two traits are considered poor, and this is an even worse version.
    What we probably need is more hangars with 20s base recharge (= really 0 seconds). I don't think the traits are all bad with those. :smile:
    What's the third one anyway? The new one, Relaunch and Repair, and what else?

    On a different note, do both ships really have the same hull modifier? That would be a lot for the Norway.
  • phoenixc#0738 phoenixc
    phoenixc#0738
         Member Posts: 5,841 Arc User
    I like the idea of an auxiliary carrier, and it would be perfect for my merchant division character (it would be a great step up from the Kobyashi Maru I initially made her for). The Valdres is also tempting due to the heavy tractor console which is something that would be great for the Fesarian offshoot characters I have.

    Unfortunately, even with the discounts the package will probably not be affordable and if I decide to get them it would probably have to be with the campaign token next year.
  • pottsey5gpottsey5g Member Posts: 4,251 Arc User
    finsches123 wrote: »
    pottsey5g wrote: »
    “Supplementary Coordination Network (Starship Trait)”
    Personally, I think this trait needs a rework as its the 3rd trait that reduces Captain Recharge ability on launching hangar pets. The other two traits are considered poor, and this is an even worse version.
    What we probably need is more hangars with 20s base recharge (= really 0 seconds). I don't think the traits are all bad with those. :smile:
    What's the third one anyway? The new one, Relaunch and Repair, and what else?

    On a different note, do both ships really have the same hull modifier? That would be a lot for the Norway.
    We have 3 support carriers that give us a trait that reduces Captain Recharge ability on launching hangar pets and All Hands-on Deck being the other option.
  • wizbane02wizbane02 Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    Might have to just get the fleet version.

    What I like is that the carrier has the look of classic Star Fleet Battles fed carriers.

    As for the trait and consoles, meh, don't need them since I have better choices already.

    So not planning on buying them. Getting the fleet version will give a use of the glutton of Dil and fleet modules I have on my main toon.
  • avoozuulavoozuul Member Posts: 3,215 Arc User
    edited October 2022
    Really disappointed with the Norway's stats, similar setup as the Alita with only one ltcom seat but additionally one less tactical console slot, I already guessed that they would only give it only 4 tac slots, I also wasn't hoping for a strike wing escort. Sadly this one is a pass for me, I can at least hope a legendary version comes out in the future.
    I stream on Twitch, look for Avoozl_
  • finsches123finsches123 Member Posts: 158 Arc User
    wizbane02 wrote: »
    What I like is that the carrier has the look of classic Star Fleet Battles fed carriers.
    That's exactly what I was thinking of as well.oknmm55agzix.jpg
    axygch789b38.jpg


  • applederry#4448 applederry
    applederry#4448
         Member Posts: 13 Arc User
    As others here already expressed I would very much like to see the Seneca trait be changed. It is completely underpowered and basically a weaker copy of already existing traits.

    I opened a thread for this reason exactly and address the issue well ahead of release:

    https://www.arcgames.com/en/forums/startrekonline#/discussion/1268491/devs-upcoming-senneca-hiawatha-carrier-trait-is-almost-a-carbon-copy-of-an-existing-trait
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited October 2022
    This content has been removed.
  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,488 Arc User
    When looking away from the current meta and the beaten path these ships, traits and console become quite useful all of a sudden.

    I expected the console on a Terran version of the Nebula though.
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,008 Arc User
    > @questerius said:
    > When looking away from the current meta and the beaten path these ships, traits and console become quite useful all of a sudden.
    >
    > I expected the console on a Terran version of the Nebula though.

    My tractor tow boat nebula is exactly what I'd want that super tractor beam for. I'll definitely get a Norway for the campaign token as soon as possible.
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
    #TASforSTO
    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • questeriusquesterius Member Posts: 8,488 Arc User
    angrytarg wrote: »
    > @questerius said:
    > When looking away from the current meta and the beaten path these ships, traits and console become quite useful all of a sudden.
    >
    > I expected the console on a Terran version of the Nebula though.

    My tractor tow boat nebula is exactly what I'd want that super tractor beam for. I'll definitely get a Norway for the campaign token as soon as possible.

    Pull hostiles + drop trico mines + engage temporary invulnerability = Fun
    Learned to warn teammates in advance if i do that or otherwise they get caught in the blast/ distracted by the pretty explosions.
    This program, though reasonably normal at times, seems to have a strong affinity to classes belonging to the Cat 2.0 program. Questerius 2.7 will break down on occasion, resulting in garbage and nonsense messages whenever it occurs. Usually a hard reboot or pulling the plug solves the problem when that happens.
  • annemarie30annemarie30 Member Posts: 2,694 Arc User
    I'm kinda liking them. I may just buy this bundle. it would have been nice if the seneca had a secondary deflector or an extra weapon slot
    We Want Vic Fontaine
  • pertunepertune Member Posts: 39 Arc User
    edited October 2022
    (Flaming, trolling comments moderated out. - BMR)
    Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
  • coaldust#7044 coaldust
    coaldust#7044
         Member Posts: 104 Arc User
    I'll echo the sentiments for the Seneca trait. It doesn't stand out compared to other bridge officer cooldown traits. Could we add some pet damage buffs to it? Or pet HP maybe?
    "We've learned that friendship isn't always easy. But there's no doubt it's worth fighting for."
  • phoenixc#0738 phoenixc
    phoenixc#0738
         Member Posts: 5,841 Arc User
    edited November 2022
    Things finally went right, and with the sale I was able to afford the package this time :)

    I have not been able to play much this week or so and am still setting up the Seneca on my merchant marine "pirate hunter" captain, but it looks promising so far despite the seating being nothing exceptional (though not actively bad either).

    As for the trait, as people have said already it could probably use a buff (just going by the description so far) and since it is a science carrier a good candidate for that buff would be to have the network incorporate the fighters' deflectors as a sort of weak deteriorating-type secondary deflector (in fact, that would be a great thing to have for science carriers in general). It could even scale with the number of surviving fighters in flight if the devs want to get fancy.
  • ronthefanronthefan Member Posts: 53 Arc User
    edited November 2022
    (Flaming, trolling comments removed. Video link of ranting and objectionable language removed. - BMR)
    Post edited by baddmoonrizin on
This discussion has been closed.