Might be best to walk away and just accept your point was somewhat convuluted in your original post and the discussion did nothing to try and get your point across until the end.
Flaming other users for pointing this out doesn't help either, this is a teachable moment but I have my doubts that he'll ever be able to appreciate it.
PS for interest: here's an example from another thread for how to constructively hypothesis test on a forum with an analysis technique (binom.test in R) which could be applied to the random PVE system and simple observations (ex. is bias in initial player choice for the feeder system [ie. grouping players with those already waiting] so significant that it effectively makes the system non-random, with respect to a given queue or set of queues.)
With all the purple options are you angling for a twitch prime promo deal or something?
Chance (binomial probability of 3/12 purple with conventional colors and shades: 0.1045, p-value on a test of binomial expectations: 0.072 (>0.05, not significantly different from random)) or making a point to give a few more options to Jem'Hadar characters looking to Dominion-up their allies ships.
Post edited by duncanidaho11 on
Bipedal mammal and senior Foundry author.
Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
I did not need to run and post a full experiment design with control group and pear review. That simple 1 tiny part of all the testing is enough evidence to backup what I was saying, which has been proven correct.
The problem here is not that you failed to prove a point. The problem is that while you did prove A point(that your method of choosing what to play doesn't mesh with the new UI), you leapt to a conclusion unsupported by that point(that most players would dislike it).
Might be best to walk away and just accept your point was somewhat convuluted in your original post and the discussion did nothing to try and get your point across until the end.
Flaming other users for pointing this out doesn't help either, this is a teachable moment but I have my doubts that he'll ever be able to appreciate it.
It’s the other way around this should be a teachable moment for you. I was defending myself against your lies and your flame attacks. I did not flame you as what I said was not unfounded but the truth and the truth is not a flame attack. While what you said is clearly not the truth and everyone can see that. So pretend otherwise as much as you like. The rest of us can see the truth.
ucgsquawk is right I should walk away as you have shown your true colours and there is no point continuing this. Just like last time you are never going to admit what you did wrong no matter the facts. So bye for now.
As I'm reading this there is a lot of talk about people trying to make others change their gaming style. For example change your build to something more balanced. Why should anyone have to? Let everyone play the way they want to it's their choice. My only worry as I have stated many times is randoms coming in and ruining a run. Put in the filters. Ground/Space and most important to me Random/Manual. Make it our choice. Here's what the argument to that will be. "Well if you don't let the randoms join with the manuals it's doomed to fail." Let it fail. If it's not good enough to stand on it's own then so be it. Why did they filter out the Elite TFO's? I think we all know the answer to that. There would be ALOT more uproar then there is already from those Elite players that spend the money. I don't join Elite TFO's cause I respect those players and I don't want to ruin their runs. I have enough trouble with people that don't know the maps ruining runs on advanced already. This will just make the fail rate just that much worse as someone stated before. I'm not against this idea at all I hope it works for all those in favor I honestly do. I just don't understand why those in favor can't respect those not in favor and let us just opt out of the random part entirely.
You can join my elite ground runs anytime you like, as long as you move and atleast shoot your gun. Elite space is a different story though...
Comments
Flaming other users for pointing this out doesn't help either, this is a teachable moment but I have my doubts that he'll ever be able to appreciate it.
PS for interest: here's an example from another thread for how to constructively hypothesis test on a forum with an analysis technique (binom.test in R) which could be applied to the random PVE system and simple observations (ex. is bias in initial player choice for the feeder system [ie. grouping players with those already waiting] so significant that it effectively makes the system non-random, with respect to a given queue or set of queues.)
Notable missions: Apex [AEI], Gemini [SSF], Trident [AEI], Evolution's Smile [SSF], Transcendence
Looking for something new to play? I've started building Foundry missions again in visual novel form!
My character Tsin'xing
ucgsquawk is right I should walk away as you have shown your true colours and there is no point continuing this. Just like last time you are never going to admit what you did wrong no matter the facts. So bye for now.
You can join my elite ground runs anytime you like, as long as you move and atleast shoot your gun. Elite space is a different story though...