test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

DISCOVERY & IT'S EFFECT ON STO:

captainperkinscaptainperkins Member Posts: 379 Arc User
So I'm excited for Star Trek Discovery. I know I'm not the only STO'er who will shell out cash for the new ships and uniforms as well as weapons we're bound to see in Discovery, to come to Star Trek Online. The one thing that I have been bothered by however, is that due to the contemporary needs of younger audiences us older trek fans have to watch Discovery massacre our beautiful 23rd century designs... There's something to be said for glowing jewel buttons and that retro-futurism seen in the 1960's world fair, that Thomas and team have done such a great job of keeping alive in STO.

With Thomas' new Constitution Refit we see the bonus Cage Era Constitution (with the clunkier bridge and impulse elements as well as the warp nacelles with those antennae on them... This is important because Star Trek Discovery takes place at the same time as that old Enterprise with the antennae on the nacelles. So already we are seeing some links in to Discovery time line/Cage era timeline appearing in STO.

We have a BEAUTIFUL K13 fleet holding with special TOS fleet technology. What I am going to suggest is to tap in to that story to bring discovery in. Also, in the mean time can we please consider getting Cage era Laser Pistols as well as the Cage uniforms (those sweater looking turtle necks we see worn by the actors in Axanar fan film.) It would be great to have cage era excursion jackets as well. It would be especially fun if a kit could be purchased to beam down one of those ground based laser canons that channels the ships power like we see Number 1 use to sheer off the rock face and save Captain Pike... These cage era goodies would usher in a discovery timeline nicely and complete the K13 fleet holding as in TOS we would often see Cage era laser pistols used by stationed personnel as well as the old uniforms still worn by certain fleet members.

I realize that a lot of players hate the idea of going "backward" in time and featuring old trek so much. I argue that if we only had new Trek STO would cease to feel like star trek. Even if the old series wasn't and isn't your aesthetic, you can still appreciate it. I also like what the Dev's say about STO being a virtual Trek Theme Park, which means there's room for all forms of Trek. Do you guys think Discovery will be added to STO and if so would you be open to honoring the Cage era and having STO tell a story that ties Discovery in to original trek (provided Discovery leaves some gaps.)?
«1345678

Comments

  • davefenestratordavefenestrator Member Posts: 10,690 Arc User
    I won't be excited about Discovery until after it is out, and after it is outside of the silly CBS-channel paywall.

    There's no way I'm paying for Matlock Online just to get one show that might be great, or might need to be "hauled away AS garbage."
  • szimszim Member Posts: 2,503 Arc User
    2017 marks the 30th anniversary of TNG, so I wouldn't expect to see much new TOS content in the near future. Much of the TNG movies still remain untouched by STO. Ships, stories, weapons and equipment...

    We might get some Discovery content later this year (November, December) though. It all depends on how negotiations went between Cryptic and CBS.
  • garaks31garaks31 Member Posts: 2,845 Arc User
  • silverlobes#2676 silverlobes Member Posts: 1,953 Arc User
    I'm not excited for Discovery, but I am interested to see what things this will introduce to the game :sunglasses: I'm not a huge fan of the Kelvin Timeline movies (although I can enjoy them as 'sit down, tune out and enjoy' "Pretty pictures for the masses." - Cmdr Ed. Straker) And yet I find myself enjoying the KT content available in-game. I have a Dreadnought, and, as ugly a beast as I think the design is, there's still an unusual appeal about it which I can't deny, and its performance, is unquestionably good :) I'm going to be getting a Konstitution for one of my AoY alts as their post L50 T6 'level progression' ship. I use the red matter capacitor on all my builds where I have one available, so even if I might not enjoy Discovery itself, I'm sure there will be stuff like kits or manuals or weapons and such, which will still be useful and fun to use :sunglasses:
    "I fight for the Users!" - Tron

    "I was here before you, I will be here after you are gone. I am here, regardless of your acknowledgement or acceptance..." - The Truth
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,897 Arc User
    I hope that piece of trash never has any effect on STO...it's a horrible looking piece of junk that takes a great big deuce all over canon...basically them saying "It's our Trek or no Trek".
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • hanover2hanover2 Member Posts: 1,053 Arc User
    I do hope they introduce that ship, make it free and easily obtainable. I'll fly it on at least one toon just to annoy the self-important pedants who think they get to define "real" Star Trek for everyone else.
  • darakossdarakoss Member Posts: 850 Arc User
    I won't be excited about Discovery until after it is out, and after it is outside of the silly CBS-channel paywall.

    There's no way I'm paying for Matlock Online just to get one show that might be great, or might need to be "hauled away AS garbage."

    Yep. ^This.

    Pretty bad when CBS makes me pay for CBS streaming on top of Netflix when the rest of the world only needs Netflix. A CBS show that won't be on CBS lol.
    i-dont-always-funny-meme.jpg
    original join date 2010

    Member: Team Trekyards. Visit Trekyards today!
  • This content has been removed.
  • hanover2hanover2 Member Posts: 1,053 Arc User
    azrael605 wrote: »
    There is a whole lot on All Access besides Discovery. I have been subscribed for over a year now & I don't regret it at all as I can now watch a dozen shows, new & old, not available on any other streaming service nor can they be watched via broadcast tv, at least not in my area. Discovery is just icing on the cake & I hope anyone trying to view it illegally is prosecuted to the fullest possible extent of the law.

    Preemptively inoculating them with an excuse for the show's failure?
  • unotetsuunotetsu Member Posts: 662 Arc User
    If they release a DVD or BluRay of it, I may watch it, I like having physical media for my shows, I was watching something on Netflix and they yanked it... kinda defeats the idea of a streaming service....

    I am a Physical Media Only since that wonderful "experience"
    I must warn you, I am quite Isane! I am Grand Duchess of the Abh Empire: Beneej Letopanyu Spoor!
  • crypticarmsmancrypticarmsman Member Posts: 4,115 Arc User
    lianthelia wrote: »
    I hope that piece of trash never has any effect on STO...it's a horrible looking piece of junk that takes a great big deuce all over canon...basically them saying "It's our Trek or no Trek".
    ^^^
    What? It's not 1987 - and we're not talking about how TNG was initially received back then by the majority of Star Trek fans in that year...oh, wait... ;)
    Formerly known as Armsman from June 2008 to June 20, 2012
    TOS_Connie_Sig_final9550Pop.jpg
    PWE ARC Drone says: "Your STO forum community as you have known it is ended...Display names are irrelevant...Any further sense of community is irrelevant...Resistance is futile...You will be assimilated..."
  • darakossdarakoss Member Posts: 850 Arc User
    azrael605 wrote: »
    There is a whole lot on All Access besides Discovery. I have been subscribed for over a year now & I don't regret it at all as I can now watch a dozen shows, new & old, not available on any other streaming service nor can they be watched via broadcast tv, at least not in my area. Discovery is just icing on the cake & I hope anyone trying to view it illegally is prosecuted to the fullest possible extent of the law.

    Just went through the all access show list and most I can watch on hulu or netflix or dvr OTR. But if you like it that's cool too.
    i-dont-always-funny-meme.jpg
    original join date 2010

    Member: Team Trekyards. Visit Trekyards today!
  • jbmonroejbmonroe Member Posts: 809 Arc User
    Please don't use centered paragraphs, OP. It's very difficult to read.
    boldly-watched.png
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,897 Arc User
    lianthelia wrote: »
    I hope that piece of trash never has any effect on STO...it's a horrible looking piece of junk that takes a great big deuce all over canon...basically them saying "It's our Trek or no Trek".
    ^^^
    What? It's not 1987 - and we're not talking about how TNG was initially received back then by the majority of Star Trek fans in that year...oh, wait... ;)

    Except TNG was in its own era...it wasn't trying to rewrite history with ugly ships that don't look like they even remotely belong and completely mutating races that already have established images.

    But nice try!
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • silverlobes#2676 silverlobes Member Posts: 1,953 Arc User
    lianthelia wrote: »
    I hope that piece of trash never has any effect on STO...it's a horrible looking piece of junk that takes a great big deuce all over canon...basically them saying "It's our Trek or no Trek".
    I hope the series never makes it to air... But if/when it does, Some good traits or consoles etc might be released based on it, which may still be worth using, regardless of if you enjoy the show or not :sunglasses:

    "I fight for the Users!" - Tron

    "I was here before you, I will be here after you are gone. I am here, regardless of your acknowledgement or acceptance..." - The Truth
  • This content has been removed.
  • captainperkinscaptainperkins Member Posts: 379 Arc User
    jbmonroe wrote: »
    Please don't use centered paragraphs, OP. It's very difficult to read.

    You're welcome not to read :)
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,476 Arc User
    lianthelia wrote: »
    lianthelia wrote: »
    I hope that piece of trash never has any effect on STO...it's a horrible looking piece of junk that takes a great big deuce all over canon...basically them saying "It's our Trek or no Trek".
    ^^^
    What? It's not 1987 - and we're not talking about how TNG was initially received back then by the majority of Star Trek fans in that year...oh, wait... ;)

    Except TNG was in its own era...it wasn't trying to rewrite history with ugly ships that don't look like they even remotely belong and completely mutating races that already have established images.

    But nice try!
    Um, that weird-azz oval "saucer" perched atop something that looked like a McQuarrie design? Klingons, previously established as "looked like Puerto Ricans and dressed in gold lame", suddenly become "heavy metal bikers from the dead, with frizzy hair and leather pants and lobsters on their heads"? Romulans, established in TOS as being visually indistinguishable from Vulcans, suddenly having weird dual ridges on their foreheads? And let's not even get into what TNG did to the relatively sleek designs for Klink and Rom ships, turning them into those massive, unwieldy, unbalanced flying fortresses.

    Oh, and I mentioned the space footie jammies from the first two seasons, right? I mean, apparently by the 24th century we're teaching calculus to grade-school children, but Starfleet officers haven't mastered tying their shoes or even pulling on their boots...

    (I'm old enough to remember the fighting. As well as the complaints about DS9, and how they couldn't tell any stories because "they don't go anywhere!")
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • This content has been removed.
  • silverlobes#2676 silverlobes Member Posts: 1,953 Arc User
    jonsills wrote: »
    lianthelia wrote: »
    lianthelia wrote: »
    I hope that piece of trash never has any effect on STO...it's a horrible looking piece of junk that takes a great big deuce all over canon...basically them saying "It's our Trek or no Trek".
    ^^^
    What? It's not 1987 - and we're not talking about how TNG was initially received back then by the majority of Star Trek fans in that year...oh, wait... ;)

    Except TNG was in its own era...it wasn't trying to rewrite history with ugly ships that don't look like they even remotely belong and completely mutating races that already have established images.

    But nice try!
    Um, that weird-azz oval "saucer" perched atop something that looked like a McQuarrie design? Klingons, previously established as "looked like Puerto Ricans and dressed in gold lame", suddenly become "heavy metal bikers from the dead, with frizzy hair and leather pants and lobsters on their heads"? Romulans, established in TOS as being visually indistinguishable from Vulcans, suddenly having weird dual ridges on their foreheads? And let's not even get into what TNG did to the relatively sleek designs for Klink and Rom ships, turning them into those massive, unwieldy, unbalanced flying fortresses.

    Oh, and I mentioned the space footie jammies from the first two seasons, right? I mean, apparently by the 24th century we're teaching calculus to grade-school children, but Starfleet officers haven't mastered tying their shoes or even pulling on their boots...

    (I'm old enough to remember the fighting. As well as the complaints about DS9, and how they couldn't tell any stories because "they don't go anywhere!")
    Like lianthelia said, TNG was its own era, not retreading the same ground. Klingons: Change established over the course of the movies, and reported as what had aleays been intended. Romulans: A fair point, but, remember the episode where theey were spying on a proto-Vulcanoid culture? What did they look like? Vulcans, or Romulans? The attempt was at least made to show the trait as being part of the overall species genome. As for the space-jammies comment, very disingenuous to try and use hyperbole against the real world requirement of needing to keep the material taut, as if that is somehow a valid observation between the cognitive abilities of children and adults in-show, who, by your 'logic' suddenly can't tie their own shoes. And if you were to ask Gene about why they didn't have to tie their boots, then I'd wager that his reply would be akin to his response about Data's skin color (what if what you have is better than skin) or why Picard was bald (in the 24th century, no one will care about it) so probably something like "What if they have a better way to fasten their boots then tying laces?"

    TNG trod new ground, so it had variations. The makers of Discovery specifically chose the time period of 10 years prior to Kirk and the Enterprise, they specifically chose to say that the series was being set in the Prime Timeline, but they then go out of their way to produce content which would be perfectly fitting in either the Kelvin Timeline, or 10 years after Nemesis.

    I believe they only chose that time period because it's what Axanar were doing. I believe, they've gone with the Kelvin Timeline-esque aesthetics, because that's the aesthetic folks are most used to seeing from recent Trek productions, and I also believe, as I've said before, that this will be a series which will be 'Star Trek' in name-only, like the recent Baywatch movie. It might have the named characters, and the plot reads (I haven't seen it) like any episode of the series, albeit with a more comedy spin, and yet apparently, it absolutely bombed. (and I'm not surprized, because audiences seem to be getting sick of reboot/makes) I'm sure they chose to use Star Trek, rather than Adventures in Space (or even Space Command) as the flagship show for the streaming service, because they know that Trek fans are the geese which keep laying the golden egg, and will shell out for anything with the magic words in the title :wink:


    "I fight for the Users!" - Tron

    "I was here before you, I will be here after you are gone. I am here, regardless of your acknowledgement or acceptance..." - The Truth
  • This content has been removed.
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,897 Arc User
    edited July 2017
    I had another argument planned...but it's obvious the replies are obviously completely evading my point that TNG was in a completely different era doing a completely new thing compared to TRIBBLE trying to tread all over TOS.

    But there is no point because people will still evade the truth...because it doesn't suit their argument.

    They saw how good JJTrek is doing and this is basically their way to rewrite everything...like I've said multiple times before this is a obvious "Our Trek or no Trek"

    People who are supporting this obviously aren't fans of Star Trek or you'd actually care how much they're utterly butchering it to turn it into what *THEY* think Star Trek should be.


    Even JJ was more loyal to established canon than this show is...and it took place in a different universe.
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • ssbn655ssbn655 Member Posts: 1,894 Arc User
    szim wrote: »
    2017 marks the 30th anniversary of TNG, so I wouldn't expect to see much new TOS content in the near future. Much of the TNG movies still remain untouched by STO. Ships, stories, weapons and equipment...

    We might get some Discovery content later this year (November, December) though. It all depends on how negotiations went between Cryptic and CBS.

    Sorry there is more TNG (I put DS9 and Voyager in this due to events in both having effects across the board and take place all at the same time.) content here then anything else.
  • ssbn655ssbn655 Member Posts: 1,894 Arc User
    Even if the show sucks getting those super klingons in game will make it alright by me.

    Oh god no... those are 100% JJ universe. CBS is lying through it's teeth about this being set in the TOS universe.
  • This content has been removed.
  • ssbn655ssbn655 Member Posts: 1,894 Arc User
    edited July 2017
    jonsills wrote: »
    lianthelia wrote: »
    lianthelia wrote: »
    I hope that piece of trash never has any effect on STO...it's a horrible looking piece of junk that takes a great big deuce all over canon...basically them saying "It's our Trek or no Trek".
    ^^^
    What? It's not 1987 - and we're not talking about how TNG was initially received back then by the majority of Star Trek fans in that year...oh, wait... ;)

    Except TNG was in its own era...it wasn't trying to rewrite history with ugly ships that don't look like they even remotely belong and completely mutating races that already have established images.

    But nice try!
    Um, that weird-azz oval "saucer" perched atop something that looked like a McQuarrie design? Klingons, previously established as "looked like Puerto Ricans and dressed in gold lame", suddenly become "heavy metal bikers from the dead, with frizzy hair and leather pants and lobsters on their heads"? Romulans, established in TOS as being visually indistinguishable from Vulcans, suddenly having weird dual ridges on their foreheads? And let's not even get into what TNG did to the relatively sleek designs for Klink and Rom ships, turning them into those massive, unwieldy, unbalanced flying fortresses.

    Oh, and I mentioned the space footie jammies from the first two seasons, right? I mean, apparently by the 24th century we're teaching calculus to grade-school children, but Starfleet officers haven't mastered tying their shoes or even pulling on their boots...

    (I'm old enough to remember the fighting. As well as the complaints about DS9, and how they couldn't tell any stories because "they don't go anywhere!")
    Like lianthelia said, TNG was its own era, not retreading the same ground. Klingons: Change established over the course of the movies, and reported as what had aleays been intended. Romulans: A fair point, but, remember the episode where theey were spying on a proto-Vulcanoid culture? What did they look like? Vulcans, or Romulans? The attempt was at least made to show the trait as being part of the overall species genome. As for the space-jammies comment, very disingenuous to try and use hyperbole against the real world requirement of needing to keep the material taut, as if that is somehow a valid observation between the cognitive abilities of children and adults in-show, who, by your 'logic' suddenly can't tie their own shoes. And if you were to ask Gene about why they didn't have to tie their boots, then I'd wager that his reply would be akin to his response about Data's skin color (what if what you have is better than skin) or why Picard was bald (in the 24th century, no one will care about it) so probably something like "What if they have a better way to fasten their boots then tying laces?"

    TNG trod new ground, so it had variations. The makers of Discovery specifically chose the time period of 10 years prior to Kirk and the Enterprise, they specifically chose to say that the series was being set in the Prime Timeline, but they then go out of their way to produce content which would be perfectly fitting in either the Kelvin Timeline, or 10 years after Nemesis.

    I believe they only chose that time period because it's what Axanar were doing. I believe, they've gone with the Kelvin Timeline-esque aesthetics, because that's the aesthetic folks are most used to seeing from recent Trek productions, and I also believe, as I've said before, that this will be a series which will be 'Star Trek' in name-only, like the recent Baywatch movie. It might have the named characters, and the plot reads (I haven't seen it) like any episode of the series, albeit with a more comedy spin, and yet apparently, it absolutely bombed. (and I'm not surprized, because audiences seem to be getting sick of reboot/makes) I'm sure they chose to use Star Trek, rather than Adventures in Space (or even Space Command) as the flagship show for the streaming service, because they know that Trek fans are the geese which keep laying the golden egg, and will shell out for anything with the magic words in the title :wink:


    Sorry no to this "Trek fans are the geese which ... will shell out for anything with the magic words in the title". Star Wars fans that would be true look at the drek 1,2,3, were along with the "special editions that Lucas spewed out instead of new stories and the rewrite of Episode 3 that JJ Star Wars The Force Awakens was. Those are the mindless geese shelling out cash for TRIBBLE with the magic title Star Wars in it.
    As far as the look goes it is to comply with Neu Trek and ignores pretty much everything in all the series before it.
  • This content has been removed.
  • vetteguy904vetteguy904 Member Posts: 3,942 Arc User
    TAS before Discovery, k thanks bye
    sig.jpg
  • ssbn655ssbn655 Member Posts: 1,894 Arc User
    I'm not excited for Discovery, but I am interested to see what things this will introduce to the game :sunglasses: I'm not a huge fan of the Kelvin Timeline movies (although I can enjoy them as 'sit down, tune out and enjoy' "Pretty pictures for the masses." - Cmdr Ed. Straker) And yet I find myself enjoying the KT content available in-game. I have a Dreadnought, and, as ugly a beast as I think the design is, there's still an unusual appeal about it which I can't deny, and its performance, is unquestionably good :) I'm going to be getting a Konstitution for one of my AoY alts as their post L50 T6 'level progression' ship. I use the red matter capacitor on all my builds where I have one available, so even if I might not enjoy Discovery itself, I'm sure there will be stuff like kits or manuals or weapons and such, which will still be useful and fun to use :sunglasses:

    This line "I'm not a huge fan of the Kelvin timeline." is kind of funny given you have a JJ ship in your comments.
  • ssbn655ssbn655 Member Posts: 1,894 Arc User
    Voyager proved people would watch any drivel no matter how poorly made, poorly cast, or poorly written.

    Nah that would be most of TNG and all of DS9.
This discussion has been closed.