test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Time frame perspective for missions

A lot of people don't seem to realize just how much time passes in game time during story arcs, which is mostly the fault of STO being a game, and not really being able to properly show time scale since that would be boring.

So, based on what we do know about how long the story takes, I have extrapolated about how much time most of the early arcs cover.
-We know that its 18 months from the start of the game to the end of the Borg Arc
-This would give us about 540 days
-There are(not counting the tutorial which only covers a day or two itself), there are 60 missions total in this time frame, from “Welcome to Earth Spacedock”, the first mission in the Klingon War arc, to “Fluid Dynamics”, the last mission in the Borg Advance arc
-This would mean that, on average, each mission takes 9 days apart from each other(obviously some missions immediately follow others, but this is just an average)

Going by this math
-The Klingon War(20 missions which includes the Specters sub arc) = 180 days, or about 6 months
-Yesterday's War(First 3 of 4 missions) = 27 days, aka, just under a month
-Wasteland(6 missions) = 54 days, or nearly 2 months
-Romulan Mystery + Cloaked Intentions(10 missions) = 90 days, aka 3months
-Cardassian Struggle + 2800(10 mission) = 90 days, aka 3 months
-Breen Invasion(5 missions) = 45 days, aka 1.5 months
-Borg Advance(5 missions = 45 days, aka 1.5 months

Now, a lot of this would just be travel time, and ship maintenance, and resupplying, and stuff like that, but these arcs, in general, would be far longer then they actually seem to be when we account for how much time passes.
«1

Comments

  • anodynesanodynes Member Posts: 1,999 Arc User
    You could even stretch that out a bit by not counting the go here and talk to someone missions (good rule of thumb is that if it has a grayed-out Replay button in the Journal, that's what it is) since there's no way those take 9 days, even with travel time.
    This is an MMO, not a Star Trek episode simulator. That would make for a terrible game.
  • leemwatsonleemwatson Member Posts: 5,503 Arc User
    anodynes wrote: »
    You could even stretch that out a bit by not counting the go here and talk to someone missions (good rule of thumb is that if it has a grayed-out Replay button in the Journal, that's what it is) since there's no way those take 9 days, even with travel time.

    Actually, depending on where you are going and according to canon it would take nearly 2 years to cross Federation space. I have forgotten what Warp Factor was specified, but I think it's Warp 6, which is standard cruise. Even at Warp 9.975 it would still take a considerable amount of time if there was no transwarp option. Kind of puts things into perspective when players are complaining about a 3 minute journey in-game!
    "You don't want to patrol!? You don't want to escort!? You don't want to defend the Federation's Starbases!? Then why are you flying my Starships!? If you were a Klingon you'd be killed on the spot, but lucky for you.....you WERE in Starfleet. Let's see how New Zealand Penal Colony suits you." Adm A. Necheyev.
  • foxman00foxman00 Member Posts: 1,517 Arc User
    leemwatson wrote: »
    anodynes wrote: »
    You could even stretch that out a bit by not counting the go here and talk to someone missions (good rule of thumb is that if it has a grayed-out Replay button in the Journal, that's what it is) since there's no way those take 9 days, even with travel time.

    Actually, depending on where you are going and according to canon it would take nearly 2 years to cross Federation space. I have forgotten what Warp Factor was specified, but I think it's Warp 6, which is standard cruise. Even at Warp 9.975 it would still take a considerable amount of time if there was no transwarp option. Kind of puts things into perspective when players are complaining about a 3 minute journey in-game!

    I once crossed (in a straight line) across alpha and beta quadrants at Warp 0.5. Took me about 3 hours to cover about 10 - 12 sectors (20 lightyears across, took me roughly 17 minutes per sector).

    I am already planning a trip to cover each sector in the game map once the alpha quadrant update is release. I am estimating it will take me 20 - 24 hours of ingame time to do it :)
    pjxgwS8.jpg
  • antonine3258antonine3258 Member Posts: 2,391 Arc User
    There is, in game from the Path to 2409 background, a vast network of transwarp gateways speeding up travel across the Federation; Romulan frontier to Cardassia is a lot faster for everyone.

    Most missions that are non-Borg versions aren't really in anymore, mind, but it's there. The 'modular rebulid' for a lot of ships to explain customization would probably speed up repair times if you can pop out a phaser bank for a working spare, and then repair the bank for the next starship respawning. :)
    Fate - protects fools, small children, and ships named Enterprise Will Riker

    Member Access Denied Armada!

    My forum single-issue of rage: Make the Proton Experimental Weapon go for subsystem targetting!
  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 11,001 Community Moderator
    @somtaawkhar

    How do you know that it's 18 months from the Tutorial to the end of the Borg Advance? I'm not doubting you, I'm just curious how you determined that.

    I know that the game (Tutorial) starts off in the year 2409, and that, according to the Delta Recruitment Event, by "Cold Storage" the year has progressed to June 2410.

    The game launched in February 2010, and if we assume that in-game it was also February in 2409, then we could say that roughly 16 months passed from Tutorial to "Cold Storage". If your 18 months is accurate, then the Borg Advance arc would take place over roughly a 2 month period to get to your 18 month timeframe.
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • anodynesanodynes Member Posts: 1,999 Arc User
    edited January 2017
    It isn't exactly 18 months. That figure is coming from the various Temporal Agents telling your Delta Recruit that they'd encountered a temporal incursion from no greater than 18 months in the future during their tutorial experience.

    The only hard dates are vague. Romulan tutorial says January of 2409, possibly even early January, I don't recall exactly, and that it's 2 weeks before the Borg attack on Vega, so the Starfleet tutorial takes place between January 15th and maybe January 29th, for liberal values of early. Aside from that, we have the vague reference to June of 2410 in Cold Storage for Delta Recruits. So for Romulans it could be almost 18 months to the day, or as low as 16.5 months, and for Starfleet it's somewhere in the 16 to 17.5 month range.

    Oh, and the Klingon tutorial is obviously much later, as the next time that they enter into orbit over Qo'noS after the tutorial in The Hunt is On, it is specifically stated that there are now Republic allied ships around, meaning that this is presumably after Turning Point, which has to be at least a little while into the year. How much later? Maybe sometime in March? I couldn't say.

    About the only other reference that we can go by that I can recall is Jarok's comment that Sela had disappeared 'last year" in What's Left Behind, clearly putting Cutting the Cord in 2409, so the year break happened somewhere after that. I am of the opinion that it's right after that, so that all of the Terran/True Way/New Link missions, the 2800 series and the Cold War series take place in 2410. I seem to recall mention of a dedication plaque for the Enterprise F that read 2410, and if that's true, then it dovetails nicely into the New Year falling somewhere soon after Cutting the Cord.
    This is an MMO, not a Star Trek episode simulator. That would make for a terrible game.
  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 11,001 Community Moderator
    @anodynes

    OK, I knew the 18 month reference sounded familiar and right, but couldn't place exactly where I'd heard it. If that's true, and it's a reference to the Delta Recruit temporal incursion, then that would mean that it's actually 18 months to the end of "Cold Storage" and not the end of the Borg Advance arc.

    STO launched February 2, 2010 with the in-game year given as 2409. I'd forgotten about the time references from the Romulan Tutorial of January 2409 and two weeks before the Borg invasion of Vega. That actually could confirm that the FED Tutorial and Vega takes place in February 2409, mirroring STO's launch of February 2010, and putting the Romulan Tutorial in mid January 2409.

    It's odd that you mention the Enterprise F having been launched in 2410. The Odyssey class launched in 2409, and I just assumed that the Enterprise F would've launched the same year. But the Enterprise F shows up for the first time during "Boldly They Rode" at the end of The Cardassian Struggle arc, which could actually be in 2410, given that the Breen arc immediately follows and we know that it ends in June 2410.
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • discojerdiscojer Member Posts: 533 Arc User
    I was under the impression that the game has stayed in 2410 for its whole existence, and with the next update, it will finally move into 2411

  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 11,001 Community Moderator
    @discojer

    No, the game starts in the year 2409, and "stayed" 2409 for the first 5 years of the game's existence. It wasn't until 2015's Delta Recruitment Event that we got an in-game acknowledgement that time had progressed to 2410.

    It's apparent now, though, that it turned 2410 at some point during missions that we originally thought were set in 2409. But as far as I know, there's not been any indication that we're progressing to 2411 any time soon.
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • anodynesanodynes Member Posts: 1,999 Arc User
    edited January 2017
    I don't know about the 1701 - F dedication plaque firsthand, so it's just hearsay, and the worst kind, too, since I don't recall the source.

    The calendar was first confirmed as having moved to 2410 during the opening cutscene of Surface Tension, but the Delta Recruit addendum to Cold Storage places that at June 2410, and there's no way that Surface Tension takes place before that, given that we haven't even met Cooper yet during Cold Storage as it stands now, and he's kind of important to the story of Surface Tension.
    This is an MMO, not a Star Trek episode simulator. That would make for a terrible game.
  • edited January 2017
    This content has been removed.
  • anodynesanodynes Member Posts: 1,999 Arc User
    edited January 2017
    anodynes wrote: »
    I seem to recall mention of a dedication plaque for the Enterprise F that read 2410, and if that's true, then it dovetails nicely into the New Year falling somewhere soon after Cutting the Cord.
    The Federation Starbase fleet holding has a plaque for the ENT-F, but it shows 2409 as the year.

    However, that may just be the year it was finished, and it wasn't officially launched into service until 2410. They would presumably want to do some testing of their brand new flagship before letting it out into full service.

    I decided to look it up, and the image that I found here of the dedication plaque gives a stardate of 87661.4 for the 1701-F's dedication. There are a number of slightly-different stardate calculators out there that give ranges from August of 2410 to 2422 for that date. I haven't found one that places it in 2409.
    This is an MMO, not a Star Trek episode simulator. That would make for a terrible game.
  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 11,001 Community Moderator
    anodynes wrote: »
    anodynes wrote: »
    I seem to recall mention of a dedication plaque for the Enterprise F that read 2410, and if that's true, then it dovetails nicely into the New Year falling somewhere soon after Cutting the Cord.
    The Federation Starbase fleet holding has a plaque for the ENT-F, but it shows 2409 as the year.

    However, that may just be the year it was finished, and it wasn't officially launched into service until 2410. They would presumably want to do some testing of their brand new flagship before letting it out into full service.

    I decided to look it up, and the image that I found here of the dedication plaque gives a stardate of 87661.4 for the 1701-F's dedication. There are a number of slightly-different stardate calculators out there that give ranges from August of 2410 to 2422 for that date. I haven't found one that places it in 2409.

    Well, even the August 2410 date cannot be correct. The Enterprise-F would've launched just before "Boldly They Rode" as Shon had just been given command. And we know that "Boldy They Rode" occurs well before "Cold Storage" which has been established to have occured in June 2410.
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • jorantomalakjorantomalak Member Posts: 7,133 Arc User
    leemwatson wrote: »
    anodynes wrote: »
    You could even stretch that out a bit by not counting the go here and talk to someone missions (good rule of thumb is that if it has a grayed-out Replay button in the Journal, that's what it is) since there's no way those take 9 days, even with travel time.

    Actually, depending on where you are going and according to canon it would take nearly 2 years to cross Federation space. I have forgotten what Warp Factor was specified, but I think it's Warp 6, which is standard cruise. Even at Warp 9.975 it would still take a considerable amount of time if there was no transwarp option. Kind of puts things into perspective when players are complaining about a 3 minute journey in-game!

    You forget the wonder of transwarp tech , it used to take a year or two at warp factor 6 WATCH OUT!! now they have transwarp tech we can do do it in 2 days ( ok i did a play on mccoys genesis speech )
  • This content has been removed.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    @discojer

    No, the game starts in the year 2409, and "stayed" 2409 for the first 5 years of the game's existence. It wasn't until 2015's Delta Recruitment Event that we got an in-game acknowledgement that time had progressed to 2410.

    It's apparent now, though, that it turned 2410 at some point during missions that we originally thought were set in 2409. But as far as I know, there's not been any indication that we're progressing to 2411 any time soon.

    It was Surface Tension that aired in April 2014 that had the time progress to 2410. The Delta Recruitment event was a year later.
  • nxenterprise02nxenterprise02 Member Posts: 70 Arc User
    Actually, it was said in one of the podcasts relating the Season 12, that the mission Of Signs and Portents is set in 2411. There was a post about it here in General discussions.

    And starkaos is right. We already knew we were in 2410 when Surface Tension arrived.
  • anodynesanodynes Member Posts: 1,999 Arc User
    edited January 2017
    anodynes wrote: »
    I seem to recall mention of a dedication plaque for the Enterprise F that read 2410, and if that's true, then it dovetails nicely into the New Year falling somewhere soon after Cutting the Cord.
    The Federation Starbase fleet holding has a plaque for the ENT-F, but it shows 2409 as the year.

    However, that may just be the year it was finished, and it wasn't officially launched into service until 2410. They would presumably want to do some testing of their brand new flagship before letting it out into full service.
    anodynes wrote: »
    I decided to look it up, and the image that I found here of the dedication plaque gives a stardate of 87661.4 for the 1701-F's dedication. There are a number of slightly-different stardate calculators out there that give ranges from August of 2410 to 2422 for that date. I haven't found one that places it in 2409.
    1. Never trust Cryptic's stardates, 99% of the time they use just a totally random number, or one that corresponds to the real world date.

    2. From the Federation Fleet Starbase
    3xuoIYP.jpg

    I know full and well about the Fleet Starbase Wall of Enterprises, thanks. It doesn't hold with the Stardate is what I'm saying. You can also say the same about canon Stardates, at least at times. Some of those Stardate calculator sites even go into how certain ones are off, and the 1000 units per year don't always add up, which is likely where certain differing assumptions come in that give us a range of 12 years or more by the early 25th century.

    By the way, if I'm never to trust their Stardates, how am I to trust their Earth dates? Truth is that you really can't. For amusement's sake, go look at the dates for the Iconian War blogs. Those things are all over 2410, from well before the June date for Cold Storage to way late in the year. Some of them even go backwards, and are dated before blogs that clearly would have happened prior to them, both in blog release order, and in points of in-game reference order. It's almost as if both canon Trek and STO just sort of make things up as they go along. ;)
    This is an MMO, not a Star Trek episode simulator. That would make for a terrible game.
  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 11,001 Community Moderator
    starkaos wrote: »
    @discojer

    No, the game starts in the year 2409, and "stayed" 2409 for the first 5 years of the game's existence. It wasn't until 2015's Delta Recruitment Event that we got an in-game acknowledgement that time had progressed to 2410.

    It's apparent now, though, that it turned 2410 at some point during missions that we originally thought were set in 2409. But as far as I know, there's not been any indication that we're progressing to 2411 any time soon.

    It was Surface Tension that aired in April 2014 that had the time progress to 2410. The Delta Recruitment event was a year later.

    Ok, I stand corrected.

    So, the release of "Surface Tension" in April 2014 is the first time we learn that time has progressed from 2409 to 2410 in-game. BUT we learn from 2015's Delta Recruitment that it was June 2410 during "Cold Storage." Non-DR characters don't get the cutscene that makes this time reference, so players who don't have Delta Recruits wouldn't be aware of the year's progression until "Surface Tension". Do I have that right now? And we're postulating that the new year (2410) began sometime or directly after "Cutting the Cord," yes?
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • This content has been removed.
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    I can't believe what I just read...

    Like you guys are talking about time progression in a game...

    Nerd levels over nine thousand.

    Why exactly are you hanging around, with 170 posts, on the forums for said game?​​
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • edited January 2017
    This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 11,001 Community Moderator
    To add onto this, assuming that the new missions "Of Signs and Portents" really does move the timeline to 2411, and assuming Cryptic doesn't go back and retroactively make the change happen earlier(like they did with the Delta Recruit event moving the 2409/2410 change to long before "Surface Tension"), that means everything AFTER the Borg arc took place in the span of 6 months.

    To put into perspective
    -6 months = 184 days
    -There are 63 missions starting from “New Romulus Aid” in the New Romulus arc, to “Echoes of Light” in the New Frontiers arc
    -This means that, on average, missions happen every 2.9 days
    -At this rate
    1. The New Romulus arc took around 29 days
    2. The Solanae Dyson Sphere arc took around 26 days
    3. The Delta Quadrant arc took about 84 days
    4. The Iconian War arc took about 23 days
    5. The Future Proof arc took around 17 days

    OFC, these numbers are skewed because things like many of the Kobali ground battlezone missions play one immediately after each other.

    And this doesn't factor in the Nukara Battlezone since its the only battlezone to be basically its own arc, but not have any missions, whereas the Badlands Battlezone ties into the Future Proof arc, the Kobali Battlezone ties into the Delta quadrant Arc, and the New Romulus Battlezone ties into the New Romulus arc, etc. etc.

    Well, obviously that's all screwed up. If for no other reason than I cannot believe, no matter how good the combined engineering efforts of Starfleet, the KDF, the Romulan Republic, and the Krenim are, they could NOT have built the Annorax in less than 23 days.
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • edited January 2017
    This content has been removed.
  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 11,001 Community Moderator
    That was a hella short war...
    Well, obviously that's all screwed up. If for no other reason than I cannot believe, no matter how good the combined engineering efforts of Starfleet, the KDF, the Romulan Republic, and the Krenim are, they could NOT have built the Annorax in less than 23 days.
    The Iconian War didn't last very long at all really.

    It was seriously less then two months going by the story blogs IIRC.

    To be clear, I don't mean that your calculations are incorrect. We ARE guesstimating based on what "concrete" information we have. No, I mean that Cryptic's timeline for the story is implausible. "A Day on the Farm" from the Romulan Tutorial takes place in January 2409, the earliest known setting of STO. And now, "Of Signs and Portents" will advance us to 2411. So, everything that has happened so far takes place in the course of 2 years?! To quote phrase, "Inconceivable!"
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • This content has been removed.
  • flumfflumf Member Posts: 68 Arc User
    Implausible timelines are not limited to sto, Star Trek in general has never had a very coherent timeline and that's not even counting all the time travel. Of course you add in all of the time travel stories through the T.V. series, movies, and sto on top of that and it's going to make any effort to try and figure out anything resembling a coherent timeline a frustrating effort in futility.

  • baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 11,001 Community Moderator
    To be clear, I don't mean that your calculations are incorrect. We ARE guesstimating based on what "concrete" information we have. No, I mean that Cryptic's timeline for the story is implausible. "A Day on the Farm" from the Romulan Tutorial takes place in January 2409, the earliest known setting of STO. And now, "Of Signs and Portents" will advance us to 2411. So, everything that has happened so far takes place in the course of 2 years?! To quote phrase, "Inconceivable!"
    IS that really that hard to believe though?

    I mean, the last two years of TNG and the first two years of DS9, and the latter 5 years of DS9 and the first 5 years of Voyager, all ran concurrently.

    Not to mention some of the TNG movies happening the same time both DS9 and Voyager were running.

    Trek always has had A LOT of stuff going on in short time spans.

    Yes, if happening concurrently, but since your captain is present at all of these events (outside of the Faction exclusive ones), that's what makes it implausible.
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    can you even begin to guess how long 'future proof' even takes? forward in time, half way across the galaxy, backwards in time... it's like a distilled version of the whole sto timeline, improbably in the extreme
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
Sign In or Register to comment.