test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

The "Lawsuit"...

12346»

Comments

  • marcusdkanemarcusdkane Member Posts: 7,439 Arc User
    Also the Axanar FB page was public... but heavily censored. Any sort of criticism was erased.
    Yeah, so much for 'being transparent' :D
  • redeyedravenredeyedraven Member Posts: 1,297 Arc User
    edited November 2016
    artan42 wrote: »

    'You've seen in the last few years'.

    I liked the KT films. So much more so than a few mins long clip of some people on a green screen and a short fauxumentary with overblown speeches, half hearted acting, and more Peters than anybody would need.​​

    Also really sad is that, even though the battle of Axanar was never explained in detail, to Peters and co. it *had* to be Federation versus Klingon Empire. The most cliché-route you could go no matter if it makes sense or not.

    Also, I kinda don't buy the narrative in general. Especially the idea that no ship prior to the Ares (which btw looks more modern than a certain 'next generation heavy cruiser' we are familiar with) could actually blow up a klingon cruiser and that the Ares would likely fail against the D7 because... it's bigger and newer. Phasers are Phasers I think.

    It's just bad writing. Some of the actors know how to deliver dialogue, but that doesn't change the quality of the narrative.
  • eldarion79eldarion79 Member Posts: 1,679 Arc User
    The weakest part of Prelude was Peters' acting.
  • admiralkogaradmiralkogar Member Posts: 875 Arc User
    Well ... only commenting on the freshness of a 'Documentary' approach to bringing Star Trek to the screen as seen in Prelude', I found the whole idea absolutely awesome. It was enough unlike anything else that you can make a solid argument that it was in fact, improving and adding imagination to a franchise that had become stuck in a tired formula. Right or wrong, I am sad that I may not get to see it finished.

    Qapla!
Sign In or Register to comment.