test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Time and Tide: choosing your allies - description may contain spoilers on the new episode

risian4risian4 Member Posts: 3,711 Arc User
The Na'Kuhl representative and Noye make some good points: the Federation and its allies wiped out an entire species, and condemned another one to become refugees. They then want to preserve the timeline because it suits them well, while one might argue that the current timeline itself is a huge violation. It is kind of hypocritical.

Then again, the Tholian ambassador also said that they would would agressively enforce the Accords. Could the Na'Kuhl be responsible for a violation of the timeline against the Tholians and the Tholians' response thus be merely self-defense? So could it be possible that the Na'Kuhl themselves are to blame for what happened to their star?

What do you think? Would you side with Noye to undo the damage to the victims of the Federation's tampering with the timeline (if given the chance of course)? Would you support the Na'Kuhl? Both? Or would you defend the Accords? Or do we simply not have enough information yet?


Time and Tide: choosing your allies - description may contain spoilers on the new episode 65 votes

I would side with Noye, but not with the Na'kuhl
1%
eugenesys 1 vote
I would side with the Na'kuhl, but not with Noye
4%
kodachikunodarthmeow504alphahydri 3 votes
I would side with both Noye and the Na'kuhl
1%
miirik 1 vote
I would not side with Noye or the Na'kuhl and defend the Accords
36%
saurializardsentinel64arliekkosrattler2ksathra2captaind3jam3s1701fulleatherjackettylermaxwelljim625donitiartomgonjinn23mikeflx10110100valarauko43warpangeljarmnemikoto8472gemnstarrazurealli4nce 24 votes
We do not have enough information yet to make an informed choice
47%
commanderkassytimv94alchevsk1992oldravenman3025garaks31kjwashingtonmeimeitookitsunesnoutlordsteve1joeykorickyrrokrisian4shadowwraith77dragnridrmarkhawkmanletsfadeawayghostwoldjbmaverickchastity1337azurehero5588 31 votes
Other
7%
nightkendaniela1055warmaker001bvaloreahspiritwalker1969 5 votes
«1

Comments

  • davefenestratordavefenestrator Member Posts: 10,693 Arc User
    Thread TITLE is a spoiler too, please edit to fix.
  • jbmaverickjbmaverick Member Posts: 935 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    We do not have enough information yet to make an informed choice
    Noye's wife was the one who called for the action that wiped out her species, and she did so knowingly. The event when this occurred was obviously ill-advised but it's not like the Federation wanted to wipe them out, and because of how time was changed they didn't even know it had happened. Noye is understandably upset but I think his anger is misplaced.

    Time travel is and will always be difficult to write perfectly, too many ways things can interact with each other or even itself. As for which timeline to support with the Accords, I take it as the way of thinking isn't "our timeline is best" so much as this is the timeline we have, and rather than risk something cataclysmic by doing something unpredictable in an attempt to fix something, we'd be better off staying with what we already know is at least stable. We've already seen what happens when we try to change something without fully understanding the consequences: a race was nearly wiped from existence. And as for why the Accords didn't reverse the effects of the above, it could quite easily be a self-fulfilling paradox (going back in time to fix the issue ends up destroying the Accords, resulting in nobody going back to fix it, etc.) or something that they didn't/couldn't detect in the 28th century. There's not enough information there.

    The universe has a wonderful sense of humor. The trick is learning how to take a joke.
  • risian4risian4 Member Posts: 3,711 Arc User
    We do not have enough information yet to make an informed choice
    At this point I don't think we have enough information yet, but I could certainly understand the Na'kuhl and Noye's anger.

    I don't think he'll be the same 'bad guy' as Annorax. Annorax was mostly correcting his own mistakes and wiping entire civilisations in the process. Noye is trying to undo the damage caused by the Federation and one could argue he's acting in self defense.

    Great story btw so far. I really like it :)
  • risian4risian4 Member Posts: 3,711 Arc User
    We do not have enough information yet to make an informed choice
    Thread TITLE is a spoiler too, please edit to fix.

    Done, I thought it wouldn't hurt, but you are right.
  • alchevsk1992alchevsk1992 Member Posts: 280 Arc User
    We do not have enough information yet to make an informed choice
    The problem with all of this is we don't know when it happened the FIRST time around. For example, a traveler from the future comes to the past and informs us of certain events. Centuries later, the "traveler" goes to the past and does same thing what the traveler from... well you get the point. As far as we know, same thing happened a hundred or even a thousands times. Like I said before, we don't know when it happened very first time.

    Temporal Mechanics is a headache that you will never get rid of... ever :angry:
    tumblr_no772wVUH31u41vjso1_r1_1280.png


    "Our history, our past, our present and our future is now forever changed. All we can do is preserve what is left and continue onwards. This is not a surrender nor defeat, we will continue the fight. This is our last hope, our last chance... for victory."

    Vlasek D. Lasor - 4.19.3580

    Star Trek Online: Foundry Storyline Series
  • lordsteve1lordsteve1 Member Posts: 3,492 Arc User
    We do not have enough information yet to make an informed choice
    I think we need more info first but I'd still never side with him. His wife never really existed in our timeline after the event with the timeship changed everything.
    But even if the Federation hadn't done anything the Iconians would have won and wiped out the galaxy so he seems to be missing the point in his anger. We did what had to be done to save the galaxy, and also his "wife" devised the plan herself!
    SulMatuul.png
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • risian4risian4 Member Posts: 3,711 Arc User
    We do not have enough information yet to make an informed choice
    lordsteve1 wrote: »
    But even if the Federation hadn't done anything the Iconians would have won and wiped out the galaxy so he seems to be missing the point in his anger. We did what had to be done to save the galaxy

    I was going to include this in the OP, but decided against it. As the events in Butterfly turned out to be unnecessary and actually didn't play a role in 'defeating' the Iconians in the end.

    But yeah, I agree his anger is somewhat... simple. We were at war and desperate, and it was not just the Federation who agreed to try it.
  • captaintroikacaptaintroika Member Posts: 210 Arc User
    There's no option in that poll to shoot the Talaxian.
  • risian4risian4 Member Posts: 3,711 Arc User
    We do not have enough information yet to make an informed choice
    There's no option in that poll to shoot the Talaxian.

    Well I also didn't include an option to shoot the Xindi who sounded a lot weirder. Or the Lukari who's basically falling in love with the player character at some point xD
  • zellkarrathzellkarrath Member Posts: 182 Arc User
    We do not have enough information yet to make an informed choice
    Not enough info. I said in another thread that I think Noye, the Na'kuhl, and the Sphere Builders are justified in their resentments towards the accords, but that doesn't mean their own goals are necessarily any more reasonable, or morally acceptable than the accords are. Frankly they all seem to be going to extremes so far, so I'm inclined to still be unsure on this. That being said though, I wouldn't mind learning more about the other players in this temporal conflict, and what their motivations are.
  • captaind3captaind3 Member Posts: 2,449 Arc User
    I would not side with Noye or the Na'kuhl and defend the Accords
    I'm of two minds about this, me who knows and my Captain who suffers.

    I KNOW that if the Temporal War escalates, we'll be looking at a situation where the Na'khul enslave humanity under the TRIBBLE the Federation is never born and many other species suffer.

    My Captain knows that the Temporal Accords are a good thing. It's not just about restricting our enemies but ourselves. A human could wish to go back and prevent the Xindi attack on Earth. That's six million lives saved. BUT that would prevent Archer from visiting the Delphic Expanse and the Sphere Builders would get to attack in our present possibly costing 600 million or more lives. We're not just locking in our good future, but locking in our bad outcomes too.


    Ultimately this is a problem of Noye being a miserable lonely jerk in the new timeline and wanting avenge his lost life on us. Bringing back the Tuterians and his grand revenge scheme is just his way of rationalizing it and making it something great rather than selfish.

    Noye is just as hypocritical seeking revenge that will condemn other species to death while trying to chastise someone else. He just wants to pic the victors of history vs the Temporal Accords that just wants to leave things as they are. The sad thing is he's doomed to fail just like Annorax was.

    Time travel is an easy out. A way to skip the tough choices. You do something wrong, well just go back and change it. And change it and change it, until you get the outcome you want. If you get the outcome you want. Noye needs to learn Annorax's lesson. Ironically, Noye is flying around in the solution to his problem. The main issue is that it removes the solution to the Iconian War from the equation and we all get conquered by L'Mirren and her pissed off sister so the Tuterians are likely better off in subspace. That said, the Annorax is not the only way we can time travel.

    But if he would set a temporal incursion targeting the timeship itself it would erase itself from time and he would get Clauda and their kid back. But he's too pissed off to see that.

    jbmaverick wrote: »
    Noye's wife was the one who called for the action that wiped out her species, and she did so knowingly. The event when this occurred was obviously ill-advised but it's not like the Federation wanted to wipe them out, and because of how time was changed they didn't even know it had happened. Noye is understandably upset but I think his anger is misplaced.

    Time travel is and will always be difficult to write perfectly, too many ways things can interact with each other or even itself. As for which timeline to support with the Accords, I take it as the way of thinking isn't "our timeline is best" so much as this is the timeline we have, and rather than risk something cataclysmic by doing something unpredictable in an attempt to fix something, we'd be better off staying with what we already know is at least stable. We've already seen what happens when we try to change something without fully understanding the consequences: a race was nearly wiped from existence. And as for why the Accords didn't reverse the effects of the above, it could quite easily be a self-fulfilling paradox (going back in time to fix the issue ends up destroying the Accords, resulting in nobody going back to fix it, etc.) or something that they didn't/couldn't detect in the 28th century. There's not enough information there.

    That's why this problem is so infuriating. Did he not study the mission logs from the timeship? We weren't targeting the Tuterians. We were trying to deassimilate Romulus and somehow ended up giving the Borg an edge. I don't see him trying to get rid of the cube that destroyed that fleet. Instead of saving one world, we ended up with two dead ones. That's what happens when you ignore the law of equivalent exchange.


    The problem with all of this is we don't know when it happened the FIRST time around. For example, a traveler from the future comes to the past and informs us of certain events. Centuries later, the "traveler" goes to the past and does same thing what the traveler from... well you get the point. As far as we know, same thing happened a hundred or even a thousands times. Like I said before, we don't know when it happened very first time.

    Temporal Mechanics is a headache that you will never get rid of... ever :angry:
    EVER.
    I had to abort the episode because I refuse to fire on Na'kuhl vessels. They are ABSOLUTELY right to defend their world and this all went to TRIBBLE the moment we buried the Tox Uthat rather than use it one last time to fix their star. That is unforgivable.​​

    I have a policy of scrapping any ship that is stupid enough to fire on my ship and crew for any reason.

    However. Burying the Tox Uthat instead of reigniting their star first is the very first time I've felt rail-roaded to stupidity since Divide et Impera, which was apparently removed by temporal incursion instead of y'know, upgraded and given it's proper sequel. But it just made no sense, other than to establish why the Na'khul hate us. It really made no sense.

    That said, the Na'khul don't seem to have the same hatred towards the Tholians as they do towards us, which I find asinine.
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo9_r1_400.gif
    "Rise like Lions after slumber, In unvanquishable number, Shake your chains to earth like dew, Which in sleep had fallen on you-Ye are many — they are few"
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    Other
    I would gather the Alliance for support and crush the ever living TRIBBLE out of the Na'kuhl and Noye. I can understand the Na'kuhl's anger, but Noye was completely wrong in his assessment. Anyways, not here to change minds. I'd be there to crush what threatens the Alliance.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • This content has been removed.
  • lopequillopequil Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
    I must not have been paying attention. Which species did the Feds wipe out? The Na'khul? Granted, I wondered too why we didn't fix their star before burying the macguffin, but it was still the Tholians who snuffed it out in the first place. The Tuterians? I'd say it was the Borg who started offing them then Noye and his other half who finished the job.
    Q9BWcdD.png
  • valarauko43valarauko43 Member Posts: 227 Arc User
    I would not side with Noye or the Na'kuhl and defend the Accords
    I played 'Butterfly' at least 24 times across 6 characters so I know why Clauda is gone and I know it's not the feds fault. What happened to the Na'kuhl is also not the federations fault or even the alliances fault. I don't control Kal Dano, I don't 'boss' the Tholians, I am also not responsible for making sure that the temporal shielding on the Annorax was foolproof. I can't say much more without spoilers but at least this time 25th century UFP, KDF, and RRW personnel are not to blame. Amyone who thinks I'm just being an 'alliance apologist' should replay the story arc and pay attention to the dialogue.
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    We do not have enough information yet to make an informed choice
    captaind3 wrote: »
    I have a policy of scrapping any ship that is stupid enough to fire on my ship and crew for any reason.

    However. Burying the Tox Uthat instead of reigniting their star first is the very first time I've felt rail-roaded to stupidity since Divide et Impera, which was apparently removed by temporal incursion instead of y'know, upgraded and given it's proper sequel. But it just made no sense, other than to establish why the Na'khul hate us. It really made no sense.

    That said, the Na'khul don't seem to have the same hatred towards the Tholians as they do towards us, which I find asinine.
    For whatever reason we couldn't use it to help the Na'kuhl. It would be nice to know why, but yeah.

    I kinda think the Na'kuhl are using the Feds as a scapegoat because they don't want to confront the Tholians.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • tomgonjinn23tomgonjinn23 Member Posts: 204 Arc User
    I would not side with Noye or the Na'kuhl and defend the Accords
    In my opinion the Accords is basically the Federation ensuring its own survival. As a wise man once said the Needs of the Many out weight the needs of the few. There are nearly infinitely more people in the Federation then there are in the Na"kuhl or those Noye lost. As it was said in the episode one man can change history and prevent the Federation from existing. This is why I voted to defend the Accords.
  • nightkennightken Member Posts: 2,824 Arc User
    Other
    they threatened the empire. personal policy says build a throne of their destroyed ships and use noye's skull for my bloodwine... and possible for a little shakespeare.
    risian4 wrote: »
    There's no option in that poll to shoot the Talaxian.

    Well I also didn't include an option to shoot the Xindi who sounded a lot weirder. Or the Lukari who's basically falling in love with the player character at some point xD

    well with the continues wars, my dahar masters may not have time to find a proper wife good to have a back up some where. gotta keep the house going. :P

    if I stop posting it doesn't make you right it. just means I don't have enough rum to continue interacting with you.
  • warpangelwarpangel Member Posts: 9,427 Arc User
    I would not side with Noye or the Na'kuhl and defend the Accords
    risian4 wrote: »
    lordsteve1 wrote: »
    But even if the Federation hadn't done anything the Iconians would have won and wiped out the galaxy so he seems to be missing the point in his anger. We did what had to be done to save the galaxy

    I was going to include this in the OP, but decided against it. As the events in Butterfly turned out to be unnecessary and actually didn't play a role in 'defeating' the Iconians in the end.

    But yeah, I agree his anger is somewhat... simple. We were at war and desperate, and it was not just the Federation who agreed to try it.
    The events in Butterfly didn't directly play a role in ending the Iconian war, but indirectly they did. Specifically, they convinced the alliance that the temporal weapon was too unpredictable, which led to the Annorax's alternate use for conventional time travel in Midnight.

    As extrauniversal observers we know that the only reliable way to undo the temporal weapon's changes is to erase the weapon itself from history. That would also erase Midnight and the Iconians would win.


    Noye seems to be, if anything, just insane. He reads from some file that in another timeline he was married, so he goes on some mad quest to change history...to what? Annorax at least remembered his wife, it made sense he still loved her and wanted to bring her back, it wasn't just something he'd read about on a computer.

    As for the Na'kuhl, Kal Dano obviously broke the Temporal Accords. Ether he was trying to change the timeline by saving the star and failed, or he actually did change the timeline by not fixing the star after recovering the Tox Uthat. It's unfortunate the player doesn't get a say in that.

    If the game gave me a chance to go back in time, fetch the Tox Uthat, figure out how to fix the star with it then take it back, I would gladly do it. It's not even changing history for us, since its our "present," even if the future people prefer one outcome or another. However, the Na'kuhl themselves are clearly not acting rational enough to be trusted with time travel or a star-manipulating device. Not in the 25th century and not in the 28th.
  • alchevsk1992alchevsk1992 Member Posts: 280 Arc User
    We do not have enough information yet to make an informed choice
    If I met Noye, I would tell him this: "Noye, what's done is done! There is nothing you can do so just give up. I know you had a wife and unborn kid! When Annorax built the original ship and used it, he lost his wife and then tried everything to bring her back. By removing species after species from the timeline, only to fail miserably! What he didn't realize is, if he destroyed that ship the timeline will reset and his wife would be back. You have two choices, move on or attempt to restore the timeline in which your wife, the unborn child and her race still exist by destroying that ship! But if you do that, Iconians would've conquered the galaxy, enslaved or killed millions of races. That includes you, your family and everybody else in this galaxy! Do you want that? And I highly doubt you want your family to live as servants of the Iconians for the rest of your lives with little or no personal freedom at all."
    tumblr_no772wVUH31u41vjso1_r1_1280.png


    "Our history, our past, our present and our future is now forever changed. All we can do is preserve what is left and continue onwards. This is not a surrender nor defeat, we will continue the fight. This is our last hope, our last chance... for victory."

    Vlasek D. Lasor - 4.19.3580

    Star Trek Online: Foundry Storyline Series
  • chastity1337chastity1337 Member Posts: 1,608 Arc User
    We do not have enough information yet to make an informed choice
    valoreah wrote: »
    I think all this time travel stuff stinks and would love to get back to exploring strange new worlds.

    Massively agree. Timetravel is BS
  • warpangelwarpangel Member Posts: 9,427 Arc User
    I would not side with Noye or the Na'kuhl and defend the Accords
    captaind3 wrote: »
    I have a policy of scrapping any ship that is stupid enough to fire on my ship and crew for any reason.

    However. Burying the Tox Uthat instead of reigniting their star first is the very first time I've felt rail-roaded to stupidity since Divide et Impera, which was apparently removed by temporal incursion instead of y'know, upgraded and given it's proper sequel. But it just made no sense, other than to establish why the Na'khul hate us. It really made no sense.

    That said, the Na'khul don't seem to have the same hatred towards the Tholians as they do towards us, which I find asinine.
    For whatever reason we couldn't use it to help the Na'kuhl. It would be nice to know why, but yeah.

    It would be entirely plausible the star was too far gone to be fixed by the device. Or Kal Dano could've been lying about not knowing the whole incident and intentionally let the star be destroyed because his history books said so. But he doesn't say anything about it and we can't ask him.

    The audience not knowing the reason wouldn't be a problem if he'd just taken the device and jumped out in his timeship. But since the player goes with him and helps him hide the device, the story seems to be missing a part where he explains why we aren't fixing the star first.
  • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    We do not have enough information yet to make an informed choice
    Stupid bugged mission has the Lukari Delegate missing (you need to rescue 4, and she's not in her room). Great going, Cryptic.
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    edited January 2016
    I would side with the Na'kuhl, but not with Noye
    Being both an Imperialist Romulan and OOC someone that would really love to see the UFP kicked in the nuts in general, I'd go with the Na'kul. Even during the last episode I was like 'Wait wtf? why are we going back in time to hide this thing BEFORE we fix their sun?!?!?!' Noye tho, while I can empathize.... that dude's train drove off the cliff a while ago, not really interested in followin him.
    tumblr_mr1jc2hq2T1rzu2xzo1_400.gif
    tacofangs wrote: »
    STO isn't canon, and neither are any of the books.
  • saurializardsaurializard Member Posts: 4,404 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    I would not side with Noye or the Na'kuhl and defend the Accords
    I definitely understand the Na'kuhl' motives and sympathize with them for losing their homeworld and being given the shaft in the Accords, being merely considered collateral damage...


    BUT these guys (at least those in charge and selected to interact with other species) aren't helping and are so freaking antagonistic I can understand why everyone is unwilling to listen to them:

    -first, they blame the Federation for having a device that can kill a sun. OK, very understandable and we botched our explanation so badly to make it look like we made a device dedicated to destroy stars.

    -then, they don't want the Federation to come back. Understandable since it's one of their members that caused their planetary troubles, but a bit of a bad thinking to do as the alliance offered to help them, especially considering the grim situation. At least, accept the help but tell the Federation they won't forgive them.

    -then, they say the Federation refused to help. Errr, hello? It offered the help, several times according to the blogs, and they declined aggressively. Then, bureaucracy put the situation into a deadlock, also due to the Na'kuhl' future actions into the past. Heck, according to the blogs, they even started taking refugees on Federation worlds like Trill, Bajor and Denobula. Yes, some members of the Federation seriously messed up but the Na'kuhl government definitely didn't help.

    -even with time-travel, they don't/didn't/won't even try to rescue their world, they try/tried to destroy those they hold responsible (and not even the Tholians, unless they tried and failed).

    I'd love to hear the point of an average Na'kuhl instead of the jerks we have right now.


    For Noye... well:
    -he's insane,
    -was a colossal jerk before becoming insane, blames everyone for mistakes that are often his (like the scenarii of incursions and the failed incursion in Butterfly, even if he's the lead researcher),
    -nearly kills a fellow Krenim for finding out what he was planning to do,
    -nearly blows up a whole lab of Krenim (who are an endangered species following what happened to all their colonies),
    -hijacks a highly dangerous starship able to modify timelines for his own use,
    -he has a goatee,
    -like the Na'kuhl, instead of trying to restore his people, he tries to destroy those he holds responsible.

    I want him to get lost outside the timestream forever!
    #TASforSTO
    Iconian_Trio_sign.jpg?raw=1
  • spiritwalker1969spiritwalker1969 Member Posts: 406 Arc User
    Other
    I blame the Ferengi, they have probably sold the movie rights to the final battle and are manipulating the whole show to avoid refunds :smile:
  • kylethetruekylethetrue Member Posts: 205 Arc User
    I would not side with Noye or the Na'kuhl and defend the Accords
    Even if Noye were justified in his grievance, he's going to evil means to get his way. While everyone, even the Nakul and the Tholians were willing to talk things over, he just busts in and starts shooting and taking hostages. No, he is definitely the badguy.
    "Thou shalt respect the weak and shalt constitute thyself defender of them."
    -3rd Commmandment of Chivalry
    FAWhard_zpsssqnai1l.jpg
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    We do not have enough information yet to make an informed choice
    -he has a goatee,
    Yeah, people called the heel turn when the timeline was changed simply due to him getting the Goatee of Evil. :)
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.