test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Requesting T6 Vorcha Plz

andyxvers2andyxvers2 Member Posts: 122 Arc User
i'd like to request a T6 Vorcha Class
and maybe if we could add Kamarang Ship costume to it, that would be cool as well.
«1

Comments

  • narthaisnarthais Member Posts: 452 Arc User
    andyxvers2 wrote: »
    i'd like to request a T6 Vorcha Class
    and maybe if we could add Kamarang Ship costume to it, that would be cool as well.

    I second this, I've got a captain who recently finished grinding t6 traits and went back to his fleet vor'cha, I've bumped the turn rate and innertia so much through gear and traits that im swinging it around like an escort now. its fun as hell and I'd love a T6 variant.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    Vor'Cha is a canon Klingon ship and makes it guaranteed to get the T6 conversion because there are so few canon Klingon, Romulan ships. The list of canon Klingon ships?
    D-7 / K'T'Inga - T5
    B'Rel - T5 and T6 very soon
    Vor'Cha - T5
    Negh'Var - T5 and T6 already

    2 of the 4 canon Klingon ships have made it or are about to make it to T6. Vor'Cha I believe is a shoe-in to make it sometime, most especially since it is a newer design than the D-7 / K'T'Inga.

    My prediction? The T6 Sovereign and Vor'Cha will release at the same time. Both the Sovereign-class and Vor'Cha-class are the last of the big name, significant Cruisers of Starfleet and the Klingons that have to be converted.

    The D-7 / K'T'Inga's future is cloudy because it is very old. It was already quite old during the Dominion War which was decades before STO's 25th century setting. I won't complain if the D-7 / K'T'Inga make it to T6 but I'll be surprised if it does. If it DOES make it to T6? Man, the Feds and Roms are going to be pissed! Where's the T6 Connie? Where's the Romulan D-7! :D
    XzRTofz.gif
  • narthaisnarthais Member Posts: 452 Arc User
    My prediction? The T6 Sovereign and Vor'Cha will release at the same time. Both the Sovereign-class and Vor'Cha-class are the last of the big name, significant Cruisers of Starfleet and the Klingons that have to be converted.

    I quite agree with you there, pairing it with a sovvie T6 makes the most sense, both are semi comparable in ability as well which helps that case.

    You also forgot one canon ship. although it was only seen in one episode of Enterprise the Somraw Raptor at T2 (with a T5 and T5F version available) is canon. Course its design is older than the D7 in universe so that's just as debatable.
  • andyxvers2andyxvers2 Member Posts: 122 Arc User

    The D-7 / K'T'Inga's future is cloudy because it is very old. It was already quite old during the Dominion War which was decades before STO's 25th century setting. I won't complain if the D-7 / K'T'Inga make it to T6 but I'll be surprised if it does. If it DOES make it to T6? Man, the Feds and Roms are going to be pissed! Where's the T6 Connie? Where's the Romulan D-7! :D

    well they released a T6 Excelsior, so anything is possible i guess
  • potasssiumpotasssium Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
    The Heavy Cruiser is canon too in terms of Fed Ships, as well as the Nebula. Technically the Horizon was in all good things...

    I'd love a T6 Vor'cha & Heavy Cruiser. Both are maneuverable Cruisers I could see with a lt Pilot/Hybrid.
    Thanks for the Advanced Light Cruiser, Allied Escort Bundles, Jem-Hadar Light Battlecruiser, and Mek'leth
    New Content Wishlist
    T6 updates for the Kamarag & Vor'Cha
    Heavy Cruiser & a Movie Era Style AoY Utility Cruiser
    Dahar Master Jacket

  • narthaisnarthais Member Posts: 452 Arc User
    *Starts theory crafting.

    We've seen plenty of examples of T5 to T6 revamps now so since I have an hour to kill at work with nothing to do I figured I'd mock up what i think the stats of a T6 Vor'cha might be, using the fleet T5 as the base point.

    T6 Vorcha Battlecruiser
    Hull: 45,500 (50,000 at fleet) (rounded numbers for ease of example)
    Shield Mod 1.0 (1.1 at fleet)
    Weapons: 4/4, Can equip dual cannons
    Crew: 1500

    Boffs: Cmdr Engineer, Lt Cmdr Tactical/Pilot, Lt Universal, Lt Tactical, Lt Engineer (this is what I might expect)
    Alternative Boffs: Cmdr Engineer, Lt Cmdr Tactical, Lt Cmdr Universal/Pilot , Lt Tactical, Ens Engineer (what I might hope for/prefer)

    Device Slots: 3
    Consoles: 4 Tactical, 4 Engineering (5 at fleet), 2 Science
    (Would prefer a 5th tac sure but the T5-U token gives it engi and that's how the conversions have worked so far)

    Base Turn: 10
    Impulse Mod: 0.15
    Inertia Rating: 30
    Bonus Power: +10 Weapons +10 Engines

    Standard Cloak
    Cruiser commands:
    -Strategic Maneuvering
    -Shield Frequency Modulation
    -Weapons Systems Efficiency

    Now all of that is pretty par for the course for a T6 re-release, couple options presented for the boff layout since that's the most malleable of the stats to buff.

    The real speculation comes with the mastery trait and console. Which if its included in a cross faction pack which is to be expected, the trait and console may very much depend on what gimmick they want to give the fed ship (sovereign refit if it was up to me, rommies would probably need a brand new ship as the only analogue for this style they have left is already T6 for the arbiter/mogh pack)

    So what gimmick has the sovereign shown in the movies that has yet to make it into game. Wide angle Quantum is there. Metreon gas is there. Manual flight stick, that's the rational for giving it pilot. An anti-cloak Fire At Will clicky based on their performance in Nemesis maybe. Captains yacht launchable pet comparative to the Aeroshuttle or Aquarius?

    The FAW could even be a mastery trait potentially, modifying the FAW power with a chance to hit cloaked ships, this would easily be usable as a cross faction trait and since most NPC's don't cloak Cryptic can rest easy knowing they haven't given canon ships a must have trait. (I may be a little cynical)

    Now the launchable captains yacht, at first glance most people might say this couldn't work for the Vorcha. Something I read a long time ago and may be mis-remembering though is the Mission pod on the Vorcha was supposed to be a detachable scout ship, never seen on screen of course but I believe it was listed in a technical manual.

    The advantage of the rommies needing a new ship of course is that whatever console or trait is applied they can build the ship to fit it.

    Anyway those are my thoughts, and my time at work has ended so I'm headed home to give my new Kor a spin.
  • icsairgunsicsairguns Member Posts: 1,504 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    they will just TRIBBLE it up and probably give it command abilities or something.


    id like to see one with

    lt.cmdr -tac
    lt.cmdr -eng
    lt.cmdr -sci
    lt.cmdr-uni/intel
    en -tac


    4 engineer slots
    3 science slots
    4 tac slots

    4 fore weapons 4 aft weapons

    NO HANGER BAY

    battle cloak

    science ship sensor package
    secondary deflector
    Trophies for killing FEDS ahh those were the days. Ch'ar%20POST%20LoR.JPG


  • kyrrokkyrrok Member Posts: 1,352 Arc User
    m
    icsairguns wrote: »
    they will just TRIBBLE it up and probably give it command abilities or something.


    id like to see one with

    lt.cmdr -tac
    lt.cmdr -eng
    lt.cmdr -sci
    lt.cmdr-uni/intel
    en -tac


    4 engineer slots
    3 science slots
    4 tac slots

    4 fore weapons 4 aft weapons

    NO HANGER BAY

    battle cloak

    science ship sensor package
    secondary deflector

    That would be the first T6 ship I've seen without a full commander boff. I wouldn't get it.
  • narthaisnarthais Member Posts: 452 Arc User
    Ita also quite broken balance-wise.
  • icsairgunsicsairguns Member Posts: 1,504 Arc User
    edited November 2015
    kyrrok

    ahh i know it don't have a commander seat and kinda why i did it like that. no way feds would cry about us having it. but for my play-style it would fulfill everything i ever wanted out of a vorcha, because we all know we will not get commander sci station or tac station. and commander skill in engineering ( what we always get on a battle cruiser isn't that great anyways.

    if you can look past what you think is a flaw and start looking at the possibilities compared to any other kdf battle cruiser you might come around.

    narthais

    how is any conversation about balance even remotely applicable these days in this game ?

    But i would agree to me that is the OP seating arrangement beating out anything i have seen in the game to date.


    i just see all these posting about ideal boff seating and back in the day people loved the seating on the MOGH compared to the torkaht . i just never seen it, all the mogh had going for it was the 5th fore weapon but cant run 5 cannon up front because of the buggy firing cycles if you add in the 5th. everything else the Vorcha had it beat on . of every new ship since fleet ships came into the game the Tork and the pilot sci raptor and kor are the only purchases i have been happy with. everything EVERYTHING else was junk or just there for the trait grinder.
    Trophies for killing FEDS ahh those were the days. Ch'ar%20POST%20LoR.JPG


  • kyrrokkyrrok Member Posts: 1,352 Arc User
    icsairguns wrote: »
    kyrrok

    ahh i know it don't have a commander seat and kinda why i did it like that. no way feds would cry about us having it. but for my play-style it would fulfill everything i ever wanted out of a vorcha, because we all know we will not get commander sci station or tac station. and commander skill in engineering ( what we always get on a battle cruiser isn't that great anyways.

    if you can look past what you think is a flaw and start looking at the possibilities compared to any other kdf battle cruiser you might come around.

    narthais

    how is any conversation about balance even remotely applicable these days in this game ?

    But i would agree to me that is the OP seating arrangement beating out anything i have seen in the game to date.


    i just see all these posting about ideal boff seating and back in the day people loved the seating on the MOGH compared to the torkaht . i just never seen it, all the mogh had going for it was the 5th fore weapon but cant run 5 cannon up front because of the buggy firing cycles if you add in the 5th. everything else the Vorcha had it beat on . of every new ship since fleet ships came into the game the Tork and the pilot sci raptor and kor are the only purchases i have been happy with. everything EVERYTHING else was junk or just there for the trait grinder.

    I never even went so far as to say it's a flaw, just that I wouldn't get it. If I seemed hostile it was not intentional.

    As for what the Fed-trolls would squeal like pigs over, take any ship that gets borked in 3 ways and enhanced in just 1 and they are live pigs on a rotisserie over the 1 enhanced aspect of it. There's just no getting around it.
  • goodscotchgoodscotch Member Posts: 1,680 Arc User
    edited February 2016
    Would love to see a T6 Vorcha. I would buy it in a heartbeat. Still hoping they do something with the K'tinga though despite its age. I fly my T5-U Fleet K'tinga retro more than any other ship I have. Best case scenario...incorporate some of the K'tinga and Koro'tinga visuals...maybe even pieces of the Kamarag. Mix'n'match would be grand, like they did with the Vor'cha, Tor'khat and Vor'kang.
    Post edited by goodscotch on
    klingon-bridge.jpg




  • aethon3050aethon3050 Member Posts: 599 Arc User
    T6 Fleet Vor'cha? My Gorn tac flies the T5F version with the Vor'Kang skin; damned good ship. I would buy one the day they came out if we got a T6 Fleet version.
  • eradicator84eradicator84 Member Posts: 1,116 Arc User
    I suggest to you the T6 Kurak and Fleet Mogh T6, are T6 Vorcha substitutes.

    Those fit the role of what an imaginary T6 Vorcha would be, to a T.
    AFMJGUR.jpg
  • narthaisnarthais Member Posts: 452 Arc User
    Good as the T6 Mogh is, and it is a very good ship, it is not a Vorcha. Not in feel and certainly not in looks. while the base stats are not that greatly different i still feel that vorcha performs better overall when im flying her, the moghs 5 forward weapons is a definate plus in her favour mind you, but for the life of me i cant pull off manouvers in her like i can my T5F-U Vorcha.
  • icsairgunsicsairguns Member Posts: 1,504 Arc User
    agreed with narthais i have never liked the mogh it does not have the boff seating to compare with the fleet torkaht . you have to choose if you want dps or life in a mogh, tork you get both . and if your a cannon user the 5 fore weapons isnt such a good thing i have firing rate glitches in any of the 5 fore weapon ships unless your a FAW beam spamming.
    Trophies for killing FEDS ahh those were the days. Ch'ar%20POST%20LoR.JPG


  • gaalomgaalom Member Posts: 531 Arc User
    I would like to see the old tier what is four now, what was tier five, carriers for the KDF to get a serious major buff. After that released as tier six, only to anger the feds though. They complained about those KDF carriers over the years so much it was truly a sad sight.
  • goodscotchgoodscotch Member Posts: 1,680 Arc User
    Posting to an old thread to bump it up. I'm a bit disappointed that a T6 Vor'cha hasn't appeared yet. I've given up on the possibility of a T6 upgrade for the K'tinga, but am still hoping for the Vor'cha.
    klingon-bridge.jpg




  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    It will come. I can't say when but the Vor'Cha and the D-7 are the only canon Klingon ships to have to make the transition to T6. But the smart money is on the Vor'Cha because it's a newer ship and was very heavily featured from TNG, DS9/Dominion War and is a very common sight in KDF NPCs in STO.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • icsairgunsicsairguns Member Posts: 1,504 Arc User
    edited February 2016
    It will come. I can't say when but the Vor'Cha and the D-7 are the only canon Klingon ships to have to make the transition to T6. But the smart money is on the Vor'Cha because it's a newer ship and was very heavily featured from TNG, DS9/Dominion War and is a very common sight in KDF NPCs in STO.

    and it also canon for the vorcha skin to be in the future for the kdf . back to the Enterprise Archer/Daniels time travel episode vorcha was clearly in battle even in our distant future.
    Trophies for killing FEDS ahh those were the days. Ch'ar%20POST%20LoR.JPG


  • sovereign010sovereign010 Member Posts: 641 Arc User
    It should be pointed out that the Vor'cha already has its T6 counterpart, in the shape of the the Mat'Ha raptor, which is a Vor'cha in all but name.
  • stofskstofsk Member Posts: 1,744 Arc User
    Uh

    The Mat'Ha is a raptor, not a battlecruiser.

  • goodscotchgoodscotch Member Posts: 1,680 Arc User
    It should be pointed out that the Vor'cha already has its T6 counterpart, in the shape of the the Mat'Ha raptor, which is a Vor'cha in all but name.

    How do you figure? One ship is a raptor class with 200 crew...the other is a battlecruiser with 1500 crew.
    klingon-bridge.jpg




  • sovereign010sovereign010 Member Posts: 641 Arc User
    goodscotch wrote: »
    It should be pointed out that the Vor'cha already has its T6 counterpart, in the shape of the the Mat'Ha raptor, which is a Vor'cha in all but name.

    How do you figure? One ship is a raptor class with 200 crew...the other is a battlecruiser with 1500 crew.
    Yes, but the Mat'Ha design is clearly based on the Vor'Cha. And since the crew mechanic is getting removed that's one fewer distinction.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    The Matha Raptor isn't a Vor'Cha.

    It's not uncommon for different ship designs taking ques from others. The KDF's Raptors, Battlecruisers share many common appearances, yet they are different. They retain the traditional central hull with wings jutting out to the side and nacelles at the end. You have the Pilot Raptors taking the "double prong saucer" approach also.

    In addition, the Matha is a Cmdr TAC ship with a 5/2 weapons layout. The Fleet T5U Vor'Cha is a Cmdr ENG ship with Cruiser Commands (Battlecruiser subset) and a 4/4 weapons layout. I'm 99% sure that when a T6 Vor'Cha comes out, it would follow and evolve from the Fleet T5U Vor'Cha's stats.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • hugin1205hugin1205 Member Posts: 489 Arc User

    copying my line from other T6 Vor'cha topic:
    considering the rate cryptic is pumping out new ships, I would not be surprised.
    New specs tree (strategy) coming up - probably with new abilities, ie: tons of new ships.
    Using an older model will both be efficient and wanted by the Players.
    18 characters
    KDF: 2 tacs, 2 engs, 3 scis
    KDF Roms: 3 tacs, 1 eng, 1 scis
    FED: 2 tacs, 1 eng, 2 scis
    TOS: 1 tac
    all on T5 rep (up to temporal)
    all have mastered Intel tree (and some more specs Points)
    highest DPS: 60.982
  • goodscotchgoodscotch Member Posts: 1,680 Arc User
    Still running with a T5-U Fleet Tor'khat kitted out with Vor'cha skin. Enjoying the heck out of it. Have shelved the T5-U Fleet K'tinga for a bit. Just got a new universal console Fluid Dynamics to increase the turn rate so it handles as good as the K'tinga.
    klingon-bridge.jpg




  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    hugin1205 wrote: »
    copying my line from other T6 Vor'cha topic:
    considering the rate cryptic is pumping out new ships, I would not be surprised.
    New specs tree (strategy) coming up - probably with new abilities, ie: tons of new ships.
    Using an older model will both be efficient and wanted by the Players.

    Going by past release history, the actual, "Strategy" Specialization ships (i.e. Cmdr Hybrid stations) will not be retreads of a previous ship but will be completely new ships. The Specialization Ships, i.e. Intel, Command, Pilot Ships were all new designs for STO. Still that won't mean that subsequent T6 "Strategy" ships without the Cmdr Hybrid stations won't come out.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • hugin1205hugin1205 Member Posts: 489 Arc User
    like the command Negh'var, the piloting B'rel, the T6 Guremba (Kolasi) and Bortas?
    18 characters
    KDF: 2 tacs, 2 engs, 3 scis
    KDF Roms: 3 tacs, 1 eng, 1 scis
    FED: 2 tacs, 1 eng, 2 scis
    TOS: 1 tac
    all on T5 rep (up to temporal)
    all have mastered Intel tree (and some more specs Points)
    highest DPS: 60.982
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    hugin1205 wrote: »
    like the command Negh'var, the piloting B'rel, the T6 Guremba (Kolasi) and Bortas?

    Correct. Though they did transition to T6 and got a Hybrid Station, none were full fledged, Specialization ships with Cmdr Hybrids. Most especially so the canon ships, none of them at any of the playable factions have Cmdr Hybrids. That's not too bad though I'd prefer the Cmdr Hybrid for a lot more flexibility and being able to be fully committed to that Specialization. But some of the LtCmdr Hybrids are still pretty powerful.
    XzRTofz.gif
Sign In or Register to comment.