test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Design Your Ship Final Round [Alpha Vs Omega]

1910111315

Comments

  • tcreeper5tcreeper5 Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    Both of these designs are epic, but I went with alpha.
  • galattgalatt Member Posts: 708 Arc User
    #TeamOmega
    You know, since we're losing, I've been thinking, maybe I need to embrace my new pancake carrier. I bet I could land that sucker in the water at Risa and power board right out of those wide bays. ..
    The Adama maneuver with power boards
    I'm down with that.
    Can we have a cinematic of that for our arrival at the next Summer Festival?
    sig_picture_resize_by_gx_9901-db9d1v1.png
  • dirlettiadirlettia Member Posts: 1,632 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    Since it is now looking a foregone conclusion Omega will win, any chance of that mission pod being an optional extra on it?

    Still waiting to be able to use forum titles
  • eonriereonrier Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    #TeamOmega
    I love the Omega class but i do think the mission pod on top of the Alpha would look much better on top of the beautiful Omega.
  • wakeoflovewakeoflove Member Posts: 103 Arc User
    #TeamOmega
    I don't see this as getting the Jupiter class, that is a dreadnought. The difference between Alpha and Omega are pretty minimal, but I like the edges and the side opening of the Omega. Also, stop saying Omega because you want a Jupiter, Omega will not be the Jupiter, Omega is a carrier, Jupiter is a dreadnought, get it right!

    On the klingon side, the voquv used to show up as a dreadnought when your health was low enough to call in support, so just because something is a carrier doesn't mean it can't be a dreadnought. Not to mention the fact that the jem'hadar and xindi carriers are both called "dreadnought carrier"
    NebulaOdyssey1_zpsqjc6anjg.jpg
    The Nebula-configured Odyssey needs to be a thing.
  • jaturnleyjaturnley Member Posts: 1,218 Arc User
    edited October 2015
    #TeamOmega
    galatt wrote: »
    You know, since we're losing, I've been thinking, maybe I need to embrace my new pancake carrier. I bet I could land that sucker in the water at Risa and power board right out of those wide bays. ..
    The Adama maneuver with power boards
    I'm down with that.
    Can we have a cinematic of that for our arrival at the next Summer Festival?

    You mean the Adama Fiasco, where he sacrificed the larger, more modern warship that had a manufacturing plant onboard instead of the antiquated one that had taken significant damage and had one functioning launch pod? Good plan, that.
  • wyatt#6729 wyatt Member Posts: 37 Arc User
    TRIBBLE! Omega forces are striking back! Come on, Alpha, give them all you got!
  • sharpie65sharpie65 Member Posts: 679 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    We're only 300 votes behind...we've a day or two left before we admit defeat (NEVVVERRR!!)..Omega followers can always realise their mistake later on ;)
    MXeSfqV.jpg
  • makocallowaymakocalloway Member Posts: 455 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    Do we want to fly a pancake? I say nay! :D
    5rFUCPd.png

  • seperatefactionseperatefaction Member Posts: 17 Arc User
    #TeamOmega
    I voted Omega, because of the large hanger bays. No other carrier has them (i.e. no other carrier really looks like a carrier). I must admit thou that i like the placement of the impulse engines, and the spoiler on the Alpha better.
  • ssbn655ssbn655 Member Posts: 1,894 Arc User
    edited October 2015
    #TeamOmega
    I just hope that no matter which one wins it is a true carrier that can only mount point defense so those who use them have to actually use them as carriers and are forced to depend on the fighter shuttles to do the damage.
  • khamseenairkhamseenair Member Posts: 2,640 Bug Hunter
    #TeamAlpha
    ssbn655 wrote: »
    I just hope that no matter what one wins it is a true carrier that can only mount point defense so those who use these have to actually use them as carriers and are forced to depend on the fighter shuttles to do the damge. I have seen WAY to many of the Carrier Mafia play them like a cruisers albeit minimal damage cruisers. Wish they would get a hint that a carrier is not a ship of the line like a cruiser is but a standoff ship.


    Erm... that'll be a no. :tongue:
    ​​
    Join date is wrong, I've actually been around since STO Beta.
    True alters don't have a "main". Account wide unlocks for all unique event rewards!!
  • kelshandokelshando Member Posts: 887 Arc User
    #TeamOmega
    I voted Omega, because of the large hanger bays. No other carrier has them (i.e. no other carrier really looks like a carrier). I must admit thou that i like the placement of the impulse engines, and the spoiler on the Alpha better.

    Pretty much agree, I would like the engines of the alpha.. but the hull I feel for the Omega is where its at.. its looks like a carrier even down to having those control tower looking modules right next to the hanger... who know maybe we will get lucky and they will have some of the alpha parts as cosmetic changes and we can have best of both :-)
  • ssbn655ssbn655 Member Posts: 1,894 Arc User
    #TeamOmega
    ssbn655 wrote: »
    I just hope that no matter what one wins it is a true carrier that can only mount point defense so those who use these have to actually use them as carriers and are forced to depend on the fighter shuttles to do the damge. I have seen WAY to many of the Carrier Mafia play them like a cruisers albeit minimal damage cruisers. Wish they would get a hint that a carrier is not a ship of the line like a cruiser is but a standoff ship.


    Erm... that'll be a no. :tongue:
    ​​

    I am afraid you are right on that.
  • sharpie65sharpie65 Member Posts: 679 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    kelshando wrote: »
    who knows maybe we will get lucky and they will have some of the alpha parts as cosmetic changes and we can have best of both :-)

    Us Alpha voters can only hope so... ;)
    MXeSfqV.jpg
  • selinpeersselinpeers Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    #TeamOmega
    I really like both. The utility of the Omega's practicality and the lines of the Alpha. Couldn't we see Omega with some of Alpha's lines incorporated and the sensor pod? Otherwise, provide both as separate costumes to mix! Can't wait to see the end result!
  • northstar121403northstar121403 Member Posts: 46 Arc User
    #TeamOmega
    I was right in thinking that this was going to be difficult for me but in the end #TeamOmega just edges over Alpha in my book.
    Making Borg go *BOOM* since May 2010

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • damon7980damon7980 Member Posts: 18 Arc User
    #TeamOmega
    sharpie65 wrote: »
    kelshando wrote: »
    who knows maybe we will get lucky and they will have some of the alpha parts as cosmetic changes and we can have best of both :-)

    Us Alpha voters can only hope so... ;)

    Do not forget what I said earlier: "We shall neither forget that they do not say those ships won't come out at all, it only said that this votes was for a carrier, the others can come as they looks like(Example: Epsilon reminds me of an Escort)."
  • mayito2009mayito2009 Member Posts: 643 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    Well seems clear Omega is the winner. Good luck, I hope the devs put on that baby some nice items, otherwise I will spend ZEN on something else.
    Seek and ye shall find. Ask and ye shall receive. Rabboni
    Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" (Benjamin Franklin).

    Most unexpectedly, this turned into a flame-fest! Closed it goes!. /sigh What flamefestery is this? pwlaughingtrendy
  • sharpie65sharpie65 Member Posts: 679 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    damon7980 wrote: »
    Do not forget what I said earlier: "We shall neither forget that they do not say those ships won't come out at all, it only said that this votes was for a carrier, the others can come as they looks like(Example: Epsilon reminds me of an Escort)."
    Very true..as far I'm concerned, Epsilon/Sigma might make a semi-decent frigate pet for Omega.
    MXeSfqV.jpg
  • messahlamessahla Member Posts: 1,160 Arc User
    #TeamOmega
    i still wish they would add both alpha and omega in the game since so many like both designs and both would no doubt sell like hotcakes im just confused why they dont add them both :)
  • makocallowaymakocalloway Member Posts: 455 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    Trendy, I know this is a long shot, but any chance of a new bridge with this carrier?
    5rFUCPd.png

  • swamarianswamarian Member Posts: 1,506 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    So, next step is build. I'm curious what that entails.
  • cuchulainn74cuchulainn74 Member Posts: 831 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    Congratulations, Team Omega. Aside from the usual moaning, I've especially enjoyed this little experiment. My favorites didn't actually win, but that's okay. That's how voting works. If nothing else, I think the increasingly detailed art renderings for the designs as the voting moved along showed that even the "ugly" designs (to me) turned out pretty nice in the hands of talented artists. And it was fun being involved at all in a process that wouldn't usually even be visible. Great idea, and well done @pwlaughingtrendy!
    Fleet Admiral CuChulainn - U.S.S. Aegis KT Intel Dreadnought Cruiser
    vGdvFsX.jpg


  • keletteskelettes Member Posts: 488 Arc User
    #TeamOmega
    swamarian wrote: »
    So, next step is build. I'm curious what that entails.

    I'm guessing it'll involve weapons, console and BOff-seat layout :smile:

    Model will hash out the chosen design a bit more, and get her a final paint job.

    Then, release.

    Maaaaybe we'll get to hit it with a bottle of champagne and give her class a name too.
    "Ad astra audacter eamus in alis fidelium."
    -
    "To boldly go to the stars on the wings of the faithful."
  • s0mb3rs0mb3r Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    #TeamOmega
    #TeamOmega

    I think it just looks more like a Carrier with the Large Hangers on the side.
  • captainoblivouscaptainoblivous Member Posts: 2,284 Arc User
    Neither. Frankly, I dislike both.
    I need a beer.

  • officerhunter01officerhunter01 Member Posts: 16 Arc User
    #TeamOmega
    kelettes wrote: »
    swamarian wrote: »
    So, next step is build. I'm curious what that entails.

    I'm guessing it'll involve weapons, console and BOff-seat layout :smile:

    Model will hash out the chosen design a bit more, and get her a final paint job.

    Then, release.

    Maaaaybe we'll get to hit it with a bottle of champagne and give her class a name too.

    That last option sounds brilliant if they actually allow us to do that. Also, here's hoping that when we vote for the build of the ship, no one goes ahead and instantly jumps to voting the DPS only build that makes absolutely no sense for a carrier.
  • makocallowaymakocalloway Member Posts: 455 Arc User
    #TeamAlpha
    I think you underestimate the DPS crowd :P
    5rFUCPd.png

  • kelshandokelshando Member Posts: 887 Arc User
    edited October 2015
    #TeamOmega
    kelettes wrote: »
    swamarian wrote: »
    So, next step is build. I'm curious what that entails.

    I'm guessing it'll involve weapons, console and BOff-seat layout :smile:

    Model will hash out the chosen design a bit more, and get her a final paint job.

    Then, release.

    Maaaaybe we'll get to hit it with a bottle of champagne and give her class a name too.

    That last option sounds brilliant if they actually allow us to do that. Also, here's hoping that when we vote for the build of the ship, no one goes ahead and instantly jumps to voting the DPS only build that makes absolutely no sense for a carrier.

    Ya but people want a carrier to be able to compete... right now STO's meta is dps, dps and oh more dps.. and since carriers cant depend on there fighters and such for that dps.. the only way is to have the carrier itself have fire power... I would love to see a carrier work like there supposed to but I can see people voting for a more dps centered build just so they can compete.
Sign In or Register to comment.