test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Does anyone else think the Nandi...

kayajaykayajay Member Posts: 1,990 Arc User
...looks AWFUL? I just saw the photo and it's camper than any Risian ship ever was and is just plain fugly. There's absolutely no, "Very impressive design" to it at all.
Post edited by Unknown User on
«13

Comments

  • induperatorinduperator Member Posts: 806 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    kayajay wrote: »
    ...looks AWFUL? I just saw the photo and it's camper than any Risian ship ever was and is just plain fugly. There's absolutely no, "Very impressive design" to it at all.

    It's mostly "Meh" to me but whether or not it is "Good" or "Bad" can't really be decided as it would be different for different people.

    If you don't like it then you can just enjoy the other parts of the Summer event.
  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    I think it looks cool, though I'm not a fan of the color scheme on it. (Though that can be fixed fairly easily.)
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
  • orion0029orion0029 Member Posts: 1,122 Bug Hunter
    edited June 2015
    I'll admit it's not very attractive... Though I'm partial to the hotness of an Akira, or K'tinga...

    I will likely fly it anyway, if it's as awesome 'under the hood' as rumors suggest it'll be worth dealing with the appearance. :)
  • bloodyrizbloodyriz Member Posts: 1,756 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    I am simply hoping for it to have the bridge functions similar to (or surpassing) the D'Kora.
    signature.png
    We come in peace, SHOOT TO KILL!
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    I was expecting it to look bigger and bulkier, but it looks like a cheap toy. I was wondering whether I should bother with the Summer event this year (I hadn't before) but this ship, honestly, does nothing for me. I much prefer flying FED/KDF ships anyway.
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • thecosmic1thecosmic1 Member Posts: 9,365 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    It is a waste of energy to debate subjective concepts. You like Fords I like Chevy. I think your Ford is ugly and you think my Chevy is ugly. Nothing either of us says will change that.

    If you do not like the look of the Nandi do not waste your energy trying to get it. Problem solved. :)
    STO is about my Liberated Borg Federation Captain with his Breen 1st Officer, Jem'Hadar Tactical Officer, Liberated Borg Engineering Officer, Android Ops Officer, Photonic Science Officer, Gorn Science Officer, and Reman Medical Officer jumping into their Jem'Hadar Carrier and flying off to do missions for the new Romulan Empire. But for some players allowing a T5 Connie to be used breaks the canon in the game.
  • induperatorinduperator Member Posts: 806 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    orion0029 wrote: »
    if it's as awesome 'under the hood' as rumors suggest it'll be worth dealing with the appearance. :)

    That's the definition of the Kinetic Outing Beam.
  • rattler2rattler2 Member, Star Trek Online Moderator Posts: 58,725 Community Moderator
    edited June 2015
    Well... there aren't that many Ferengi ships to draw upon for reference materials. We've got the D'Kora, a shuttle, and the small 22nd Century ship and that's it. I can see some influence from the D'Kora in the Nandi.
    db80k0m-89201ed8-eadb-45d3-830f-bb2f0d4c0fe7.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcL2ExOGQ4ZWM2LTUyZjQtNDdiMS05YTI1LTVlYmZkYmJkOGM3N1wvZGI4MGswbS04OTIwMWVkOC1lYWRiLTQ1ZDMtODMwZi1iYjJmMGQ0YzBmZTcucG5nIn1dXSwiYXVkIjpbInVybjpzZXJ2aWNlOmZpbGUuZG93bmxvYWQiXX0.8G-Pg35Qi8qxiKLjAofaKRH6fmNH3qAAEI628gW0eXc
    I can't take it anymore! Could everyone just chill out for two seconds before something CRAZY happens again?!
    The nut who actually ground out many packs. The resident forum voice of reason (I HAZ FORUM REP! YAY!)
    normal text = me speaking as fellow formite
    colored text = mod mode
  • azniadeetazniadeet Member Posts: 1,871 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    I think it looks like a modern Ferengi ship. So, spot on.
  • binebanebinebane Member Posts: 557 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    kayajay wrote: »
    ...looks AWFUL? I just saw the photo and it's camper than any Risian ship ever was and is just plain fugly. There's absolutely no, "Very impressive design" to it at all.
    i did expect uglier ship. for ferengi ship she is a beauty:D
  • tancrediivtancrediiv Member Posts: 728 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    thecosmic1 wrote: »
    It is a waste of energy to debate subjective concepts. You like Fords I like Chevy. I think your Ford is ugly and you think my Chevy is ugly. Nothing either of us says will change that.

    If you do not like the look of the Nandi do not waste your energy trying to get it. Problem solved. :)

    Perfectly stated.

    And frankly, it is just another 4/4 destroyer. Like every other ship in the game, completely playable. All ships are just numbers and code with a skin. Play what you like, everyone, and don't whine until hurt. Be glad you have a race specific ship for your Ferengi.

    Player and forumite formerly known as FEELTHETHUNDER

    Expatriot Might Characters in EXILE
  • chalpenchalpen Member Posts: 2,207 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    I thought all new ships look terrible by default?
    Should I start posting again after all this time?
  • centaurianalphacentaurianalpha Member Posts: 1,150 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    The Nandi doesn't look any worse (to me) than the Defiant, or most of the T6 faction ships. The real beauty is where form follows function, so if the Nandi is a solid performer, that will be its own thing of beauty... :)
    Expendables Fleet: Andrew - Bajoran Fed Engineer Ken'taura - Rom/Fed Scientist Gwyllim - Human Fed Delta Tac
    Savik - Vulcan Fed Temporal Sci
    Dahar Masters Fleet: Alphal'Fa - Alien KDF Engineer Qun'pau - Rom/KDF Engineer D'nesh - Orion KDF Scientist Ghen'khan - Liberated KDF Tac
    Welcome to StarBug Online - to boldly Bug where no bug has been before!
    STO player since November 2013
  • drakethewhitedrakethewhite Member Posts: 1,240 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    Very ugly, will likely sit unopened in a bank slot unless it has some special feature that's too good to pass up.
  • lexxie1983lexxie1983 Member Posts: 80 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    Not so keen on the ferengi starship design. so it will fill up a slot in my bank,

    maybe if i ever (very doubtful) start a ferengi character he or she will fly it.
    n8eym7c.jpg

    click for bigger image
  • lordmanzelotlordmanzelot Member Posts: 468 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    Lol i think a lot "new" ships look awful :rolleyes:
    Subscribed For: 2300+ Days
  • eazzieeazzie Member Posts: 4,308 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    For me what a ship looks like is second. If it kicks butt that's first and foremost for me.
  • kiralynkiralyn Member Posts: 1,576 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    A lot will depend on how the materials/colors/patterns work on it, I think.
  • kimonykimony Member Posts: 571 Arc User
    edited June 2015

    #SaucersForever #TrianglesCutDeep #TeamBeta #ShipOneisNumberOne
  • thatcursedwolfthatcursedwolf Member Posts: 1,617 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    The Corvette did set a high bar for good looking ships.

    Which is probably why they decommissioned the line. Newer ships just couldn't compete with it.
    This is my Risian Corvette. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  • induperatorinduperator Member Posts: 806 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    The Corvette did set a high bar for good looking ships.

    Which is probably why they decommissioned the line. Newer ships just couldn't compete with it.

    In this case I have to disagree

    The Corvette looks like a dual Bread Container, and there are lot's of newer ships that are aesthetically pleasing FYI, the Fa'het, Command Cruisers, Aelahl, Dauntless... ect...
  • thatcursedwolfthatcursedwolf Member Posts: 1,617 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    In this case I have to disagree

    The Corvette looks like a dual Bread Container, and there are lot's of newer ships that are aesthetically pleasing FYI, the Fa'het, Command Cruisers, Aelahl, Dauntless... ect...

    The Aelahl does have nice lines and actually looks like a Romulan ship.

    The Rom Command Cruisers look like they lost the ability craft curved structures for some reason.

    The Federation ones are pretty much of the normal Federation blah style.

    The KDF ones... Yeah, there's a reason they keep all the official pictures poorly lit.
    This is my Risian Corvette. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  • induperatorinduperator Member Posts: 806 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    The Aelahl does have nice lines and actually looks like a Romulan ship.

    The Rom Command Cruisers look like they lost the ability craft curved structures for some reason.

    The Federation ones are pretty much of the normal Federation blah style.

    The KDF ones... Yeah, there's a reason they keep all the official pictures poorly lit.

    There are some good and bad designs but not "all" of them are bad I like the new Ateleth design and the Qib was nice too.
  • lebtronlebtron Member Posts: 296 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    I dont like a lot of fed, kdf or rom designs. But I really like that new ferengi ship. Especiallly with that ferengi color design, hopefully we are flexible on that:)
  • woodwhitywoodwhity Member Posts: 2,636 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    kayajay wrote: »
    ...looks AWFUL? I just saw the photo and it's camper than any Risian ship ever was and is just plain fugly. There's absolutely no, "Very impressive design" to it at all.

    Its not a risian ship.
  • fovrelfovrel Member Posts: 1,448 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    The other day I saw a player with a D'Kora. You don't see them much and with the new ferengi ship coming, I took a good look at it. I have to say, I don't like the design, but I thought, if fore was aft and aft was fore it would be much better looking. Same as my Garumba, if you put it upside down, I think it looks better.

    Design comes for me first. I don't use the Sarr Thein and the Kobali cruiser. Good ships, but I don't like them. I do fly a Destiny, a science ship. Bought a couple of them cheap on the Exchange. It is T5, but it looks damn fine.
  • vawlkusvawlkus Member Posts: 348 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    It looks like a cross between a Marauder and a Breen Sar Therin.

    FUGLY IMHO, and I'm not interested.
  • bendalekbendalek Member Posts: 1,781 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    I just hope those are beam weapon shots and not impulse/warp trails in the image.

    I think they have the ship flying the wrong way round. Then again, it's a 4 x 4 weapon ship, so I guess, I'' just go everywhere in reverse if it is.
    Oh, hoho hohhhhh, Oh,, hoho, hohhhhh
    My%20STO%20Sig%20Clear_zps5etu86s1.png
  • alphahydrialphahydri Member Posts: 391 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    There are some good and bad designs but not "all" of them are bad I like the new Ateleth design and the Qib was nice too.
    The Ateleth wasn't a "new" design. Cryptic took the ship straight out of Star Trek: Enterprise.
  • cuatelacuatela Member Posts: 296 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    Am I the only one who thinks the ship is backwards? The way it looks in the promo pic, the three prongs are pointed toward the rear of the ship (whereas on the D'kora, they're pointed forward). The way it looks now, it looks like a Cardassian/Ferengi hybrid to me.

Sign In or Register to comment.