test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

T6 Mogh and B'rel inbound!

2»

Comments

  • narthaisnarthais Member Posts: 452 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    Because its canon most likely. along with the T'varo and Defiant it fills the 'Iconic Escorts' role
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    patrickngo wrote: »
    only question I've got, is why the B'rel??

    the Haj variant Hegh'ta is a better looking ship, as is the Norgh...

    LOL, the B'Rel is canon goodness. Everything else can go to hell, as well as most every other non-canon ship design in STO :cool:
    XzRTofz.gif
  • jaguarskxjaguarskx Member Posts: 5,945 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    Hopefully the T6 BoP will be released before Fallout 4 is released because once that happens I will likely be taking a long hiatus from STO.
  • orangeitisorangeitis Member Posts: 5,222 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    However, it seems that the Armitage-Ar'kif-New Raptor Carrier are all going to be "Escort Carriers"
    Where do the leaks specify that a "Flight-Deck Raptor" and a "Tactical Warbird Carrier" now count as "Escort Carriers"?
  • erei1erei1 Member Posts: 4,081 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    orangeitis wrote: »
    Where do the leaks specify that a "Flight-Deck Raptor" and a "Tactical Warbird Carrier" now count as "Escort Carriers"?
    The leaks says T6 armitage/ar'kif and KDF equivalent. Considering both of those ships are escort carriers, it's not a far stretch to imagine the KDF equivalent will also be an escort carrier.
    Now, you can call that whatever you like, flight deck raptor, escort carrier, flying pony, it's all the same.

    Also, this is Cryptic post DR. They are not going to design something new, when they can re-release something they already done for 30$ a piece. They'll copy and paste the BOFF seating from the armitage T6 (which is already the T5 seating with some universal station) to the other 2, call it a day, and sell the multifaction pack for an outrageous price. And make s**ton of money by spending much less time and work than they used to.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • potasssiumpotasssium Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
    I can hardly wait for a T6 T'Varo, and I could use that B'rel trait on my KDF battle cruisers, but my wish list for us coming content is in my signature.

    for those who have spoken of the Mogh, I also found the ship to be a dramatic disappointment, the Mat'Ha is everything I wish that was and then some.
    Thanks for the Advanced Light Cruiser, Allied Escort Bundles, Jem-Hadar Light Battlecruiser, and Mek'leth
    New Content Wishlist
    T6 updates for the Kamarag & Vor'Cha
    Heavy Cruiser & a Movie Era Style AoY Utility Cruiser
    Dahar Master Jacket

  • tom61stotom61sto Member Posts: 3,674 Arc User
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    Take note of this folks: A KDF ship that actually can have a ship specific console set to it! :D

    Anyways, the Mogh isn't my ideal but we still have tons of believers in the T5 version.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • tom61stotom61sto Member Posts: 3,674 Arc User
    Take note of this folks: A KDF ship that actually can have a ship specific console set to it! :D

    Anyways, the Mogh isn't my ideal but we still have tons of believers in the T5 version.

    Could be interesting or redundant depending on the console set. If it has the same one as the Mogai (two-set is a weapon power cost reduction) it'd be reduntant. If it's not... who knows.

    I was thinking about Upgrading the Mogh for Gateway to Grethor, as I needed more base survivability than my Fleet Mat'ha had when disabled with all the probe spam. Decided against it as I figured a T6 ship of some sort would eventually take it's place... I did not expect the replacement to be so direct or so soon (presumably in the next two weeks).
  • aurigas7aurigas7 Member Posts: 488 Arc User
    Holy TRIBBLE is that T6 Mogh ugly.
    Vorcha_forward.jpg
  • narthaisnarthais Member Posts: 452 Arc User
    edited June 2015
    aurigas7 wrote: »
    Holy TRIBBLE is that T6 Mogh ugly.

    Damn good thing it can use the T5 skin then, that said there are parts of it that look nice, that head needs to go though.

    Edit:On an unrelated note the censorship filtering on these new forums is downright draconian.
    Edit 2: And apparently editing a post removes the filter....
  • kyrrokkyrrok Member Posts: 1,352 Arc User
    edited July 2015
    narthais wrote: »
    aurigas7 wrote: »
    Holy TRIBBLE is that T6 Mogh ugly.

    Damn good thing it can use the T5 skin then, that said there are parts of it that look nice, that head needs to go though.

    Edit:On an unrelated note the censorship filtering on these new forums is downright draconian.
    Edit 2: And apparently editing a post removes the filter....

    I too am glad not only can it use the T5 skin, but the Mogh hull color too. Whose idea was it to put that much yellow on a Klingon ship anyway? It's bad enough the Negh'tev has a deflector dish with the cowards color, but now more than half the nacelles are yellow? Klingon battles cruisers aren't designed to win beauty contests, they're designed to win battles. But that much yellow makes it preposterously ugly. The artist should either make the black hull with all red lights or be fired as far as I'm concerned
Sign In or Register to comment.