test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

BoP Pilot Ships?

chezmazterchezmazter Member Posts: 0 Arc User
edited May 2015 in Klingon Discussion
The new pilot ships were a perfect opportunity for Cryptic to finally introduce T6 Birds of Prey. Instead we got more Raptors. Any chance we're ever going to get a T6 BoP?
Post edited by chezmazter on
«1

Comments

  • kelshandokelshando Member Posts: 887 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Read the blog on making of the new pilot ships.. they sort of address this.

    quote from the blog.

    "Klingons were a little harder to pin down. Some of us gravitated toward having a Bird-of-Prey for the Pilot ship, but this wasn’t a great fit as they aren’t quite analogous to Escorts. Birds-of-Prey really are their own beast. For this reason we decided that the Klingon ship category should really be a Raptor."

    Given the raider bonus and the universal console lay out of BOP's I can see why they said this. I'm sure the BOP will come out with a new "iconic" ship bundle.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    There's been talk of a T6 BOP in the works. I haven't seen anything official about it but we can only wait. Or speculate while we're waiting.

    I can understand the desire to see Pilot Spec BOPs. The Pilot Ships are nice. But let's wait to see what a T6 version would be like.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • corelogikcorelogik Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    chezmazter wrote: »
    The new pilot ships were a perfect opportunity for Cryptic to finally introduce T6 Birds of Prey. Instead we got more Raptors. Any chance we're ever going to get a T6 BoP?

    If the Raptors had a battle cloak and raider flanking, they would BE BoP's in all but name. They're maneuverable, small and with one mission reward console, turns better than my Fleet B'Rel,...

    The only thing really lacking, as noted, is the battle cloak and raider flanking. I am no longer pining away for a T6 BoP. Will I buy it if released, probably. Right Along with a T6 Defiant and T6 T'Varo,... but as far as I am concerned, no rush.
    "Go play with your DPS in the corner, I don't care how big it is." ~ Me
    "There... are... four... lights!" ~Jean Luc Picard
  • kapla1755kapla1755 Member Posts: 1,249
    edited May 2015
    There's been talk of a T6 BOP in the works. I haven't seen anything official about it but we can only wait. Or speculate while we're waiting.

    I can understand the desire to see Pilot Spec BOPs. The Pilot Ships are nice. But let's wait to see what a T6 version would be like.


    Depends on who had a hand in designing it i guess could be as below.....

    corelogik wrote: »
    If the Raptors had a battle cloak and raider flanking, they would BE BoP's in all but name. They're maneuverable, small and with one mission reward console, turns better than my Fleet B'Rel,...

    The only thing really lacking, as noted, is the battle cloak and raider flanking. I am no longer pining away for a T6 BoP. Will I buy it if released, probably. Right Along with a T6 Defiant and T6 T'Varo,... but as far as I am concerned, no rush.


    or could be a Copy-Paste of the MU Ki'Tang sold to us for $50


    only time will tell.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • corelogikcorelogik Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    chezmazter wrote: »
    The new pilot ships were a perfect opportunity for Cryptic to finally introduce T6 Birds of Prey. Instead we got more Raptors. Any chance we're ever going to get a T6 BoP?
    kapla1755 wrote: »
    Depends on who had a hand in designing it i guess could be as below.....





    or could be a Copy-Paste of the MU Ki'Tang sold to us for $50


    only time will tell.

    I'm telling you, from my personal experience flying the thing, the only things missing from the Raptors that BoP's have, aside from universal Boff seating, is battle cloak and raider flanking. All else, performance wise, is just like flying my B'Rel.
    "Go play with your DPS in the corner, I don't care how big it is." ~ Me
    "There... are... four... lights!" ~Jean Luc Picard
  • rickpaaarickpaaa Member Posts: 637 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    I suspect what we will see next is an Iconic Tactical Pack featuring a T-6 B'Rel, Defiant, and T'Varo, thus rounding out the holy trinity for each faction.
    giphy.gif
    Member since December 2009


  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Well, even with the B'Rel making it to T6, there's still a few more canon Non-Fed faction ships that need to make it.

    B'Rel
    Vor'Cha
    D-7/K'Tinga

    And for the Roms:
    T'Liss/T'Varo
    Mogai
    D-7 (hey, the Roms DID use D-7's in TOS)
    and............




    Scimitar :eek:
    XzRTofz.gif
  • blessedladyboyblessedladyboy Member Posts: 349 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Hehe t6 scimitar....it has to happen eventually.

    T6bop..can't wait..as much as I'd like it to have manuevers (in fact would be nice for all ships as it's solo much fun...love my pilot ship) it would go against how the other specialised ship releases have gone and would undermine them.

    However I'm guessing its likely the bops will have universal and hybrid boff stations so it can at least use pilot boff skills.
  • corelogikcorelogik Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    rickpaaa wrote: »
    I suspect what we will see next is an Iconic Tactical Pack featuring a T-6 B'Rel, Defiant, and T'Varo, thus rounding out the holy trinity for each faction.

    I will be all over that in a heartbeat. In fact, I'm already saving Dil/Zen/$ for it. Those are my three favorite ships. Until the pilot ships, I used the Fleet T5-U of each of those. I will hang on to them not matter what.
    "Go play with your DPS in the corner, I don't care how big it is." ~ Me
    "There... are... four... lights!" ~Jean Luc Picard
  • kyrrokkyrrok Member Posts: 1,352 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    I agree, I would like to see a T6 Defiant/B'rel/T'varo pack and I might just get that pack myself if it did hit.

    I would prefer even more a T6 pilot Akira/Hegh'ta/Mogai pack.
  • trillbuffettrillbuffet Member Posts: 861 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    kyrrok wrote: »
    I agree, I would like to see a T6 Defiant/B'rel/T'varo pack and I might just get that pack myself if it did hit.

    I would prefer even more a T6 pilot Akira/Hegh'ta/Mogai pack.

    The Akira, Hegh'ta, Mogai pack sounds really good. I sort of kind of agree with the concept bops are their own beast so I wouldn't exactly view them as pilot ships. I think what Cryptic is most likely to do is make another category/specialization that more fits bops and heavy type smaller craft like these. Although I am not sure where raptors fitted into all of this though being they usually were much larger than the pilot based ships.
  • narthaisnarthais Member Posts: 452 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Raptors as the pilot ships were a no-brainer from day 1, they are and always have been the closest analogue to fed escorts. So just like the last few ship packs cryptic could use that with as little stat differences between the factions as possible.

    But as with the pathfinder gaining intel, and the iconic pack, its also a no brainer that a BoP should be the next kdf pilot ship. the only issue is rommies and feds have no close analogue to the BoP line, rommies have battle cloaks, feds have A raider, neither have full universal boff stations.

    Which leaves cryptic with three choices
    A: Make a standalone BoP release
    B: Release a ship pack where the factions ships are not stat clones of each other with minor tweaks
    C: Give the rommies and Feds a BoP with minor stat tweaks to make them faction flavoured.
  • senatorvreenaksenatorvreenak Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Pilot BoP's just don't make much sense to me.
    They are hit and run craft, they are not meant for dogfighting in a sustained firefight.

    If anything we need an Intel BoP, as that fits more thematically with BoP's being able to hit fast and hit hard and slip back into cloak preparing for another attack.
  • trillbuffettrillbuffet Member Posts: 861 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Pilot BoP's just don't make much sense to me.
    They are hit and run craft, they are not meant for dogfighting in a sustained firefight.

    If anything we need an Intel BoP, as that fits more thematically with BoP's being able to hit fast and hit hard and slip back into cloak preparing for another attack.

    Most likely there will be another specialization grind coming it'll be raider ones and federation and romulan characters can unlocked the specialization if they get something from a lockbox which will entail some new alien lockbox that will give them iconian raiders or something to that nature lol. So in the end they will claim they did something for the KDF which will the bops/KDF on par with the other factions as of season 7 but will still be behind as of season 10/DR.
  • stofskstofsk Member Posts: 1,744 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    narthais wrote: »
    Raptors as the pilot ships were a no-brainer from day 1, they are and always have been the closest analogue to fed escorts. So just like the last few ship packs cryptic could use that with as little stat differences between the factions as possible.

    But as with the pathfinder gaining intel, and the iconic pack, its also a no brainer that a BoP should be the next kdf pilot ship. the only issue is rommies and feds have no close analogue to the BoP line, rommies have battle cloaks, feds have A raider, neither have full universal boff stations.

    Which leaves cryptic with three choices
    A: Make a standalone BoP release
    B: Release a ship pack where the factions ships are not stat clones of each other with minor tweaks
    C: Give the rommies and Feds a BoP with minor stat tweaks to make them faction flavoured.
    I think a stand alone release makes the most amount of sense, because it means only KDF will buy it and even then not by much, no matter how much we cry about the lack of T6 BoP representation we're just a handful who bother posting here. And so Geko can then go on P1 and claim 'See??? We tried to be the good guys but we lost money making it.'

    It'll be a T6 B'Rel, when someone asks 'hey what about the K'vort' Geko will then rebut 'Lol isn't that the size of the Death Star? LOL BIRD OF PREY SIZE OF SMALL MOON HAHA WHAT' and then go onto the next question.
    Most likely there will be another specialization grind coming it'll be raider ones and federation and romulan characters can unlocked the specialization if they get something from a lockbox which will entail some new alien lockbox that will give them iconian raiders or something to that nature lol. So in the end they will claim they did something for the KDF which will the bops/KDF on par with the other factions as of season 7 but will still be behind as of season 10/DR.
    I don't think that makes sense. The next specialisation grind that will come out is fleshing out the commando tree, which will be ground-only I bet like pilot is space-only. I really doubt they'd make a whole new spec tree for one type of ship which is only represented by KDF.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Yeah, I concur that Commando will be the next thing. It'll be fleshed out to a full 30 spec tree like what happened with Pilot and maintain it's 100% ground specialization.

    That's great, actually. Because I can ignore 100% the "new thing" and work up something else and not feel I'm losing out on something :cool:
    XzRTofz.gif
  • trillbuffettrillbuffet Member Posts: 861 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    stofsk wrote: »
    I don't think that makes sense. The next specialisation grind that will come out is fleshing out the commando tree, which will be ground-only I bet like pilot is space-only. I really doubt they'd make a whole new spec tree for one type of ship which is only represented by KDF.

    Eh for people who know all the broken away team/ground combat functions the commando tree doesn't really do anything and has been so awful for years now that people won't even bother doing it even its *fleshed out*.

    Most likely we will see raider or warship skills named after star trek hero one liners. Like we will get a raider/bop skill that will be called target engines. What will happen is if it blows up your target it randomly will select a random boff to replace it until you can change it back lol.

    In all its not that they don't do a good job at cryptic for development its mostly just in my case I just find it to be the same old stuff I've already grinded up and looking more for play for fun than play for free grind.
  • theraven2378theraven2378 Member Posts: 6,016 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    I agree on a T6 Bird of Prey, as long as the B'rel skin can be used on it
    NMXb2ph.png
      "The meaning of victory is not to merely defeat your enemy but to destroy him, to completely eradicate him from living memory, to leave no remnant of his endeavours, to crush utterly his achievement and remove from all record his every trace of existence. From that defeat no enemy can ever recover. That is the meaning of victory."
      -Lord Commander Solar Macharius
    • alopenalopen Member Posts: 1 Arc User
      edited May 2015
      kelshando wrote: »
      Read the blog on making of the new pilot ships.. they sort of address this.

      quote from the blog.

      "Klingons were a little harder to pin down. Some of us gravitated toward having a Bird-of-Prey for the Pilot ship, but this wasn’t a great fit as they aren’t quite analogous to Escorts. Birds-of-Prey really are their own beast. For this reason we decided that the Klingon ship category should really be a Raptor."

      Given the raider bonus and the universal console lay out of BOP's I can see why they said this. I'm sure the BOP will come out with a new "iconic" ship bundle.

      See this is where I'm at a loss. The concept of a pilot ship sort of makes sense (DS9 + Voyager gave certain aspects of space combat a fighter like feel at times) but then their process of which ships to choose makes none whatsoever. Instead of even considering for a moment that the BOP was the ship deep behind enemy lines and doing all kinds of fancy manuvers (DS9 along with the defiant) one would think that would the be the appropriate ship to use.

      However, our resident geniuses ignored canon completely and focused on continuing their own ship layouts. So the BOP which did do pilot like manuvers in the shows is NOT the pilot ship because in STO it has universal boff layout and raider status. While the raptor which was only seen in the enterprise as a dead ship* and never pulling off any fancy manuvers IS the pilot ship of choice because it has a more prototypical escort boff layout . . . .

      And we wonder why this game can't stay close to canon Trek. :rolleyes:

      *Disclaimer: that Enterprise episode is the only one I can think of with a Raptor. I'm sure others will enlighten me. Just remember we're talking about fancy manuvers when you do enlighten me. :D
    • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
      edited May 2015
      alopen wrote: »
      *Disclaimer: that Enterprise episode is the only one I can think of with a Raptor. I'm sure others will enlighten me. Just remember we're talking about fancy manuvers when you do enlighten me. :D

      Nope, you're spot on it's the only episode it was ever in...and it was a scout and not a destroyer of some kind.
    • senatorvreenaksenatorvreenak Member Posts: 0 Arc User
      edited May 2015
      People seriously need to quit whining about canon ships and get it into their heads that this is the 25th century, of course new ship designs are going to be better than old canon ones, as well they should be. :rolleyes:
    • rezkingrezking Member Posts: 1,109 Arc User
      edited May 2015
      chezmazter wrote: »
      The new pilot ships were a perfect opportunity for Cryptic to finally introduce T6 Birds of Prey. Instead we got more Raptors. Any chance we're ever going to get a T6 BoP?

      If BoPs are universal, then it wouldn't matter.
      Console allocations, though...I think 1Eng/4Sci/5Tac is acceptable.
      NO to ARC
      RIP KDF and PvP 2014-07-17 Season 9.5 - Death by Dev
    • corelogikcorelogik Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
      edited May 2015
      rezking wrote: »
      If BoPs are universal, then it wouldn't matter.
      Console allocations, though...I think 1Eng/4Sci/5Tac is acceptable.

      I don't. I need a minimum of 2/2/X and since we won't get 7 console slots. 3/3/5 is where it's at for the moment.

      1 console slot in a 'department' is simply too few to be of any practical use. Some of us actually use Engineering and Science consoles,...
      "Go play with your DPS in the corner, I don't care how big it is." ~ Me
      "There... are... four... lights!" ~Jean Luc Picard
    • edited May 2015
      This content has been removed.
    • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
      edited May 2015
      patrickngo wrote: »
      okay, your statement makes zero sense to ME-Pilot abilities are all about hit-and-run, as opposed to stand-and-fight.

      The Key to it, the real key, is that Federation Players don't buy raiders, and they're releasing new ships as cross-faction templates. (same basic layout and stat-block, only differences are detail and artwork)

      They have been doing this recently a lot, but the Delta Rising Pack was a bit different.

      I suspect they might try to release more ships in some kind of faction "bundle"d format. A lot of people will buy the bundle that might otherwise only buy the ship for one faction, and that's their ticket to ensure they don't miss anything.

      But that doesn't mean they'll do it for all. And of ocurse, if they actually sold a Raider with Battle Cloak on the Fed side... It would sell like crazy. But of course, that would make KDF players angry...
      Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
    • rezkingrezking Member Posts: 1,109 Arc User
      edited May 2015
      corelogik wrote: »
      I don't. I need a minimum of 2/2/X and since we won't get 7 console slots. 3/3/5 is where it's at for the moment.

      1 console slot in a 'department' is simply too few to be of any practical use. Some of us actually use Engineering and Science consoles,...

      It's an Engineering slot...it may as well say "Universal Console" slot.
      NO to ARC
      RIP KDF and PvP 2014-07-17 Season 9.5 - Death by Dev
    • narthaisnarthais Member Posts: 452 Arc User
      edited May 2015
      But that doesn't mean they'll do it for all. And of ocurse, if they actually sold a Raider with Battle Cloak on the Fed side... It would sell like crazy. But of course, that would make KDF players angry...

      No it would make a few KDF players angry, I imagine so long as we got a t6 BoP that stayed true to the BoP line many of us wouldn't care if the feds got one as well.

      **** some of us have even encouraged it. Personally while I'd prefer there be at least some differences between factions, that hasn't been Cryptics approach and so its the best way to actually get new things for the kdf and rommie players instead of every new shiny going to feds.
    • corelogikcorelogik Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
      edited May 2015
      rezking wrote: »
      It's an Engineering slot...it may as well say "Universal Console" slot.

      For you. Personally I use at least 2 engineering consoles that ARE NOT universal and cannot be slotted anywhere else. I would suspect, I'm not the only one.
      "Go play with your DPS in the corner, I don't care how big it is." ~ Me
      "There... are... four... lights!" ~Jean Luc Picard
    • edited May 2015
      This content has been removed.
    • rezkingrezking Member Posts: 1,109 Arc User
      edited May 2015
      corelogik wrote: »
      For you. Personally I use at least 2 engineering consoles that ARE NOT universal and cannot be slotted anywhere else. I would suspect, I'm not the only one.

      ...you're referring to neutroniums, aren't you :rolleyes:
      NO to ARC
      RIP KDF and PvP 2014-07-17 Season 9.5 - Death by Dev
    Sign In or Register to comment.