test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Time to nerf Aux to Batt

124»

Comments

  • wast33wast33 Member Posts: 1,855 Arc User
    edited March 2015
    woodwhity wrote: »
    You can also shoot yourself into the knee and still walk ;)

    lol... it may even now could work in pvp with conn holo in terms of pre dr, but yeah... a2b ftw, eh?! :rolleyes:

    irrelevant discussion is irrelevant as dr made most discussions regarding powercreep obsolete anyway...
  • jaydenomega812jaydenomega812 Member Posts: 149 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    I see a lot of bashing on A2B in this thread, but apparently you forget that A2B does have its drawbacks. If I use HE or TSS while A2B is active it's not going to provide maximum healing since all my aux power has been drained away. Saying A2B is op is like say aux power is useless which it so is not. Not to mention though having to have 3 techs slotted t get the maximum use from A2B means I'm out there as well cause I could use those 3 slots for other doffs to help buff my abilities. As well the T4 nukara traits become worthless for me using A2B since my aux power is always drained away.

    Now if this thread had been A2D is op then I could agree, but A2B op...nope don't agree not even .000001% in my wildest dream. Auxiliary to damps....pfff....where is my damps power level at? Why does A2D not even drain aux power away at all?? Why not just call A2D...Auxiliary to bonuses with no penalties???
  • jarvisandalfredjarvisandalfred Member Posts: 1,549 Bug Hunter
    edited April 2015
    The reason A2B drains aux power is because it grants power to other subsystems in return. A2D and A2SIF don't drain aux because they don't grant power levels elsewhere.

    Remember, without Technicians, A2B is simply a method of getting more non-aux power at the cost of aux power.
    SCM - Crystal C. (S) - [00:12] DMG(DPS) - @jarvisandalfred: 8.63M(713.16K) - Fed Sci

    SCM - Hive (S) - [02:31] DMG(DPS) - @jarvisandalfred: 30.62M(204.66K) - Fed Sci

    Tacs are overrated.

    Game's best wiki

    Build questions? Look here!
  • lucho80lucho80 Member Posts: 6,600 Bug Hunter
    edited April 2015
    I see a lot of bashing on A2B in this thread, but apparently you forget that A2B does have its drawbacks. If I use HE or TSS while A2B is active it's not going to provide maximum healing since all my aux power has been drained away. Saying A2B is op is like say aux power is useless which it so is not. Not to mention though having to have 3 techs slotted t get the maximum use from A2B means I'm out there as well cause I could use those 3 slots for other doffs to help buff my abilities. As well the T4 nukara traits become worthless for me using A2B since my aux power is always drained away.

    Now if this thread had been A2D is op then I could agree, but A2B op...nope don't agree not even .000001% in my wildest dream. Auxiliary to damps....pfff....where is my damps power level at? Why does A2D not even drain aux power away at all?? Why not just call A2D...Auxiliary to bonuses with no penalties???

    On dual aux2bat, the aux power amount float up with each subsequent use, so this "drawback" doesn't work too well. I've said it before, just force the base aux power down to 5 (and no efficient skill boosts) while aux2bat doffed is active.

    Then again, with reciprocity, all hands on deck, maco set bonus, bio neural gel, and fleet elite deflectors, who the hell needs aux2bat anymore?
  • jaydenomega812jaydenomega812 Member Posts: 149 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    The reason A2B drains aux power is because it grants power to other subsystems in return. A2D and A2SIF don't drain aux because they don't grant power levels elsewhere.

    Remember, without Technicians, A2B is simply a method of getting more non-aux power at the cost of aux power.

    Because as the game is there is not power levels for structural integrity field or damps hence the reason none of them transfer power anywhere...but should they? Should there be power levels for these things. Or should A2D really appropriately be named "Click here for bonuses" because that's basically what it is. It's not used to escape tractor beams as needed...or TBR as needed...It's spammed for bonuses.
  • jarvisandalfredjarvisandalfred Member Posts: 1,549 Bug Hunter
    edited April 2015
    Because as the game is there is not power levels for structural integrity field or damps hence the reason none of them transfer power anywhere...but should they? Should there be power levels for these things. Or should A2D really appropriately be named "Click here for bonuses" because that's basically what it is. It's not used to escape tractor beams as needed...or TBR as needed...It's spammed for bonuses.

    Literally every ability could be called 'click here for bonuses'.
    SCM - Crystal C. (S) - [00:12] DMG(DPS) - @jarvisandalfred: 8.63M(713.16K) - Fed Sci

    SCM - Hive (S) - [02:31] DMG(DPS) - @jarvisandalfred: 30.62M(204.66K) - Fed Sci

    Tacs are overrated.

    Game's best wiki

    Build questions? Look here!
  • darkjeffdarkjeff Member Posts: 2,590 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Literally every ability could be called 'click here for bonuses'.

    I'd call Boarding Party "click here for nothing noticeable". :D
  • woodwhitywoodwhity Member Posts: 2,636 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    A2B must be nerfed so the new iconic ships wont be unstoppable...

    The horse is dead, Jim!
  • thegcbaconthegcbacon Member Posts: 434 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Official Dev AtB answer in my sig, enjoy :)
  • woodwhitywoodwhity Member Posts: 2,636 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    thegcbacon wrote: »
    Official Dev AtB answer in my sig, enjoy :)

    Considering the time, I guess you also have the prioritylist for the fix in you sig too ;)
  • jaydenomega812jaydenomega812 Member Posts: 149 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Literally every ability could be called 'click here for bonuses'.

    But all abilities except A2D don't provide bonuses that stay up as long as A2D and have no drawbacks. Confusing I know but hear me out....Eng team...a hull heal with a 5 second cleansing effect on say a viral matrix yet with a cooldown of 30 seconds. EPTW gives bonus damage and power for 30 seconds with a global cooldown of 15 seconds. Close those ept abilities come but at most they only give 4 bonuses(epts, 1)shield regen 2)insta shield heal 3)shield power 4)damage redux) versus the 1)kinetic damage rez boost, 2) crew death rez boost, 3)increased flight speed boost, 4)increased turn rate boost 5)immunity to disable and 6)immunity to repel of A2D. All the while never actually transferring any power anywhere. As well...ept abilities have a 45 second individual cooldown so they can't be permanently kept up without assistance from other things like A2B tech doffs. The only other thing remotely close to A2D is A2SIF...a damage rez boost for 10 seconds and hull heal with a global cooldown of 10 seconds making it possible to keep it up in 2 copies. But the damage rez boost is half what it is for A2D though it's an all versus kinetic the A2D doff adds the rest of the damage res boost not to mention the ability to indefinitely keep A2D up which no A2SIF doff adds. Plus the duration is extended so long with A2D it will account for any lag in clicking the ability to keep it up as well as provide a stack of everything A2D does be it only for a 3-5 second window.

    Otherwise.....Nothing else in 2 copies can be kept up while providing half the bonuses A2D does. Even without the doff A2D can be kept up. Again I say you..."Click here for bonuses" and no drawbacks from cooldowns or power lose to any subsystem.

    On a side note...boarding party "click here for nothing noticeable" LOLZ so true.
  • jarvisandalfredjarvisandalfred Member Posts: 1,549 Bug Hunter
    edited April 2015
    darkjeff wrote: »
    I'd call Boarding Party "click here for nothing noticeable". :D

    Okay, you win this one.
    SCM - Crystal C. (S) - [00:12] DMG(DPS) - @jarvisandalfred: 8.63M(713.16K) - Fed Sci

    SCM - Hive (S) - [02:31] DMG(DPS) - @jarvisandalfred: 30.62M(204.66K) - Fed Sci

    Tacs are overrated.

    Game's best wiki

    Build questions? Look here!
  • jaydenomega812jaydenomega812 Member Posts: 149 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    xD...nerf A2B??? pfff....I hope you brought extra clips for your nerf gun xD
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Wow a call to nerft a build that isn't even the most OP out there, just one of the easiest to make.

    #facepalm
  • cptjhuntercptjhunter Member Posts: 2,288 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Ah, Aux2Bat whine, it feels like 2013 again. :)

    Late 2013,2011 to early 2013 was "Tacscorts are too OP plz Nerf."
    When that wish was granted, it moved to the A2B whine.
  • spyralpegacyonspyralpegacyon Member Posts: 408 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    A minor necro thread, but timely. I've been poking at future ships for my Delta KDF and have been thinking of eventual builds like A2B.
    Yes, it has a place. I'm not a fan of that place; because if I was flying a gal-x or guardian without reciprocity, I'd just run TT1+Conn doffs +2xFAW, or in the Gal-R, TSS+Boarding party clear doff+2xFAW, and dragon it out if need be - they've got the engineering stations. Of course, that's not the highest dps setup; but I wouldn't be going for max dps in a Guardian or Galaxy anyway.

    Either of those two with [Amp] and Nukara would out-perform an A2B, though?
    tumblr_n1hmq4Xl7S1rzu2xzo2_400.gif
  • imruinedimruined Member Posts: 1,457 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    The only advantage Aux2Batt has any more is that it's a cheap setup, that delivers some good results, but is far from being the top build in-game...
    The entitlement is strong in these forums...

    not_funny_Q_shadows_small.jpg
  • dpsloss88dpsloss88 Member Posts: 765 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    I question the motive of someone who wants to nerf something that top players do not use, but that allows free to play players to actually complete advanced STFs....
  • ladymyajhaladymyajha Member Posts: 1,428 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    dpsloss88 wrote: »
    I question the motive of someone who wants to nerf something that top players do not use, but that allows free to play players to actually complete advanced STFs....

    Motive? I question their actual knowledge of the game outside of reading reddits that are a year old.

    My guess... OP gets owned in PvP. OP goes to research and sees all the Aux2Bat builds out there... figures not knowing any different that it must have been a Aux2Bat build that crushed him... comes in and cries for a nerf... never realizing that they're an idiot and their information is out dated.
  • ry0ku83ry0ku83 Member Posts: 57 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    jermbot wrote: »
    Hey, I also fell asleep in season 7 and woke up yesterday, but I was planning an Aux2Bat build for my Delta Recruitment officer.

    Please expand on why Aux2Bat is irrelevant now?

    A2B Builds are still good for new players/characters, especially If you don't have Reciprocity trait from the Phantom Intel Escort and/or the All Hands on Deck Trait from the new Tactical Command Battle Cruiser variants.
  • architect13architect13 Member Posts: 1,076 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Good lord this is a tired subject . . . just Go Home :D
    Have you tried the new forum on your phone?
Sign In or Register to comment.