test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

I actually like the way the Klingon command BCs look.

olessiusolessius Member Posts: 0 Arc User
edited February 2015 in Klingon Discussion
...And I think it's sad that I seem to be in the minority on this. Sure, there are some issues with the different parts (the Klinzhai nacelles making all your windows disappear, and different parts not always fitting together perfectly), but all in all, I think that these ships have a supremely Klingon appearance with their Brutalist, utilitarian design schemes. I definitely feel that they are more traditionally Klingon-looking than both the Mogh and the Bortasqu' are (though those are certainly a couple of beautiful ships).

I may try to upload a screen shot of my current Command BC-look, but I really just wanted some positive words spoken about them, and to see if anybody else liked them too. There's definitely a lot of legitimate complaints that could (and should) be made about the game, but in my opinion, the Command BCs should not be the targets of as many of those complaints as they currently have been.
Post edited by olessius on
«1

Comments

  • lessley00lessley00 Member Posts: 1,200 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Are you trying to be funny? Those command BCs (all of them) look awful, the Romulan ships look futuristic but the Faeht looks a lot better, the Starfleet ones would look better if they were styled more off canon ships like the Guardian, and DO NOT get me started on those Klingon garbage scows (ships like the Qib and Mah'ta look so much better. I want the set designers to take this back to the drawing room especially the Klingon ones.
    Captain Joseph Riker, U.S.S. Odyssey==General V'Mar, U.S.S. Blackwater-A==Admiral Laura Holmes, U.S.S. Forward Unto Dawn
    Grand Master Thotok, son of Koloth, I.K.S. Sompek==Dahar Master Shanara, I.K.S. Balth'Quv

    Admiral R'Tath V'Tirex, R.R.W. Dhael Glohha'enh==Commander Ta'eth Korval, R.R.W Hachae ch'Rhian==Admiral Vranuk, R.R.W Delevhas
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I'm glad you like them. I seriously do and I hope more people will. Those ships need a nice home, too. :)
    I'm still on the fence about them myself - on one hand I want to do it since I really like the KDF and want to support it, plus I own most KDF ships. I'm still waiting to see them in Smirk's livestream tonight and maybe in some videos by players that bought them so I can reach a final decision.

    I'm with you on the utalitarian look, I have a special affintiy towards rough, rugged design and an acquired taste to what many would consider "ugly". :D The only thing these miss IMHO is that agressive look that the Mat'Ha, Mogh, Vor'cha and the BoPs have.
    But I'm glad people like them, you're not the first to make a thread about liking them - there ws another player in general as well and I've seen quite a few people that fancy them. :)
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • olessiusolessius Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    lessley00 wrote: »
    Are you trying to be funny?

    No.

    Personally, I find every part of the QIb to be much too flat for my liking, and something about the MatHa makes it difficult for me to get a sense of its scale which in turn makes it difficult for me to really enjoy its design. Then again, I like big ships that truly feel big, and I also like the almost Soviet-inspired look that you see in much of the truly classic Klingon ship design (Kamarag, Vor'Cha, Negh'Var and K'tinga to name a few ships with that type of brutalist design).
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    olessius wrote: »
    Then again, I like big ships that truly feel big, and I also like the almost Soviet-inspired look that you see in much of the truly classic Klingon ship design (Kamarag, Vor'Cha, Negh'Var and K'tinga to name a few ships with that type of brutalist design).

    Heh :) This sounded like an echo of myself. :D
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • olessiusolessius Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    shpoks wrote: »
    Heh :) This sounded like an echo of myself. :D

    I suppose we may be kindred spirits ...in this regard, at least. :D
  • potasssiumpotasssium Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I like them and will pick up the 3pk this weekend, I have no use for the Romulan or Fed ones at this time regardless of how good them look.
    Thanks for the Advanced Light Cruiser, Allied Escort Bundles, Jem-Hadar Light Battlecruiser, and Mek'leth
    New Content Wishlist
    T6 updates for the Kamarag & Vor'Cha
    Heavy Cruiser & a Movie Era Style AoY Utility Cruiser
    Dahar Master Jacket

  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    lessley00 wrote: »
    Are you trying to be funny? Those command BCs (all of them) look awful, the Romulan ships look futuristic but the Faeht looks a lot better, the Starfleet ones would look better if they were styled more off canon ships like the Guardian, and DO NOT get me started on those Klingon garbage scows (ships like the Qib and Mah'ta look so much better. I want the set designers to take this back to the drawing room especially the Klingon ones.

    Everyone has their own tastes in aesthetics, but here are my quick takes:

    There are some weird parts on the KDF versions of these ships, but when you play around with the pieces, it's not as bad as Cryptic's news page on the subject look. You can achieve a Negh'Var, Bortasqu'-like appearance and the ship has sufficient enough bulk to it, which was a big complaint on the Intel ships. The Qib I absolutely adore as a performer but appearance wise, looks like a weight was dropped on a pancake.

    The Rom versions do look great and I like that hawkish, forward wing sweep look. Good job whoever made up the design and the guys who put it into the game.

    The Fed versions? Did you know they are a nod to past canon Starfleet designs? It's namely in the traditional Saucer shapes (the round ones), the Excelsior-like long Engineering Hulls and Necks.

    Originally I thought they'd be the 2nd best looking ones. The Roms would be #1 in aesthetics, Feds #2, KDF a very far #3. But after seeing the pieces, I've concluded the Fed ones are the distant #3. I have problems with the Upper Hull sections being too bulbous. The same sections look separate from the Engineering hull and looks really off. This is made even worse since the Nacelle Pyloons are attached to the Upper Hull and not the Engineering Hull (Lower Hull). I was also very picky with how the Pylons are angled. They're either wayyyy too high or they don't achieve the classic angles of canon Starfleet Cruisers that allow the Nacelles to clear the hull and have a "LOS" to each other. There are some nice pieces, but the Upper Hulls and Nacelle Pylons being linked to them just kills the appearance if you want a more traditional Starfleet look.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • zeuxidemus001zeuxidemus001 Member Posts: 3,357 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    They just made some really horrible decisions tbh. I even attempted to get back into the game after doffing 4 characters and noticing the only thing I could tell about my characters was sector space I was like yeah even if I do buy these BC's I can't use them because its like reading chinese.
  • goodscotchgoodscotch Member Posts: 1,680 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I'm glad for anyone who thinks the new Klingon ships look good. I don't, but I'm glad for those who do.
    klingon-bridge.jpg




  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    You know, after watching the livestream with Nick and Ian, I kinda' see where they decided to go with these ships in particular. So in that regard, I certainly appreciate them more.

    For anyone that didn't watch, what they basically said is that they wanted to have all 3 sets of faction specific ships share a few common elements like the double nacelles and the round spinning thingies, but then in the KDF case they sad the concept artist had a sort of "gloves off" situation on purpose and was left to experiment with trying to make designs different and challenge the established standard. They said that they had a lot of debates about these and were on the edge themselves, but decided to go with something that would brake the mold this time. So in that regard, I can appreciate that.
    And the mixmatching is great - there are some parts that match up horribly, but Smirk managed to make a completely random ship from many different parts that actually looked pretty darn good.
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • olessiusolessius Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    shpoks wrote: »
    You know, after watching the livestream with Nick and Ian, I kinda' see where they decided to go with these ships in particular. So in that regard, I certainly appreciate them more.

    For anyone that didn't watch, what they basically said is that they wanted to have all 3 sets of faction specific ships share a few common elements like the double nacelles and the round spinning thingies, but then in the KDF case they sad the concept artist had a sort of "gloves off" situation on purpose and was left to experiment with trying to make designs different and challenge the established standard. They said that they had a lot of debates about these and were on the edge themselves, but decided to go with something that would brake the mold this time. So in that regard, I can appreciate that.
    And the mixmatching is great - there are some parts that match up horribly, but Smirk managed to make a completely random ship from many different parts that actually looked pretty darn good.

    Man, I guess I should've watched that livestream. It's ironic that their goal was to break molds as I feel they came closer to the true Klingon aesthetic with these ships than they have with all their more recent releases.

    But yeah, some of the parts really don't match well. You CAN make some cool combinations once you figure them out, though.

    Actually, here's a pic of my current look: EiqrLug
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    olessius wrote: »
    Actually, here's a pic of my current look: EiqrLug

    Smirk had a similar combination, but a bit better IMHO. I'm not 100% sure, but I think he used the Ty'Gokor head, Klinzhai main hull, Klinzhai upper hull, An'Quat pylons and not sure but either Ty'Gokor or An'Quat nacelles. (think they were Ty'Gokor) Looked pretty good to me.
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • olessiusolessius Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    shpoks wrote: »
    Smirk had a similar combination, but a bit better IMHO. I'm not 100% sure, but I think he used the Ty'Gokor head, Klinzhai main hull, Klinzhai upper hull, An'Quat pylons and not sure but either Ty'Gokor or An'Quat nacelles. (think they were Ty'Gokor) Looked pretty good to me.

    Interesting! I changed things up a bit (well, a LOT, really) after I read your post and here's my new look: Alr1tk8.jpg?1

    It doesn't translate perfectly to a screenshot, but I think it's an upgrade myself.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    The issues that come up with mixing and matching the pieces is with the neck ridges and alignment with the hull. Some of it just doesn't line up as well. Not as bad as the Sovereign/Regent models but it is noticeable when you've been staring at the thing long enough.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • tilarium1979tilarium1979 Member Posts: 567 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I like the way they look too. I never really liked the look of the intel ships, either the Klingon or the Feds. The Romulan ones were good though, I think. As for the command ships, I like the look of them all. On the Klingon ones though, I wish we could do away with the rotating AWAC disks. Would have loved to have some extra designer parts too. Also, my materials don't seem to work when I try and change it. Anyone else?
  • chookinchookin Member Posts: 67 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I think the klingon command cruisers look fantastic, and it's nice to be able to have 3 ships to kitbash from when you want to change it up. I think these may just convince me to stop using my bortasqu' :D
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    It is a matter of taste in the end. But I think you can make some pretty good (in the Klingon sense at least) ships. I think the "blocky" one will never be quite to my taste, but the others have pretty neat aspects.

    Also something interesting that one can't see from the screenshots - they all have a rotating section that seems to imply some kind of sensor or communications array that would seem fitting to a Command ship. A neat little detail, and I think these are pretty much the first ships to ever have such a detail. Other ships may have some special animations for certain scenarios (like BOPs with their attack wing mode, or the Veteran an Dyson ships with their mode changes), but nothing that is on permanently.
    The Fed versions? Did you know they are a nod to past canon Starfleet designs? It's namely in the traditional Saucer shapes (the round ones), the Excelsior-like long Engineering Hulls and Necks.
    Plus elements from the Oberth, that also had its nacelles attached more to the saucer than the engineering section.


    ---

    In the end, we can only hope that this sells well, because that will give Cryptic more reasons to make more KDF ships.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • suavekssuaveks Member Posts: 1,736 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I actually like the new BCs look now after I've seen them in game, and not just ugly flat angles.

    Ok, the An'Quat is fugly as hell on its own. I've got no idea what was going on in the designer's head when he designed that. Other two ships though, as well as the overall customization, look pretty decent.

    Heck, I'd go even as far as to say the ships overall are better than the Romulan ones. The Rommie ships look nice, but after playing with the customization I ended up disappointed, as they're all basically flying wings. Not to mention, they look horrible with FAW builds.

    The disappointing thing about the KDF BCs is that they have less customization options than other factions - windows, hull materials, even parts. Other than that though, they're OK. I may even end up flying one variant on one of my alts, after I've got the totally-not-op tactical trait.
    PyKDqad.jpg
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    suaveks wrote: »
    I actually like the new BCs look now after I've seen them in game, and not just ugly flat angles.

    Ok, the An'Quat is fugly as hell on its own. I've got no idea what was going on in the designer's head when he designed that. Other two ships though, as well as the overall customization, look pretty decent.

    Heck, I'd go even as far as to say the ships overall are better than the Romulan ones. The Rommie ships look nice, but after playing with the customization I ended up disappointed, as they're all basically flying wings. Not to mention, they look horrible with FAW builds.

    The disappointing thing about the KDF BCs is that they have less customization options than other factions - windows, hull materials, even parts. Other than that though, they're OK. I may even end up flying one variant on one of my alts, after I've got the totally-not-op tactical trait.

    Silly suaveks, FAW is for Feds. :D Single cannons are for Roms.
    I don't even want to imagine how a FAW Command Warbird looks like, I would never do such butchery to such a beautiful ship. But seriously, I find the Romulan Command birds gorgeous.

    But my complaint regarding the KDF Command ships is not in the design, as you said - after seing them in game they're not so unattractive as they seemed on the blog images. My complaint is that they look somehow unfinished to me. Like rushed or sloppy work was done. Yes I checked them out from any and every possible angle and there are just parts of these ships that seem.....don'r really know how to describe except unfinished. Leaves me feeling like there was suposed to be something more, but it was just glued togetehr without it. Or at least seems that there should be something more....

    *shrugs*
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • coldicephoenixcoldicephoenix Member Posts: 344 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Well honestly , the new ships can be made to look good. I've made mine look like a Bortas/Neghvar hybrid. its possible, you just need to play around the parts (assuming you got the pack of course)

    And with the Nukara shields they do look decent.. well of course, anything with Nukara looks great tho :p

    We still live!!!!! Hahahahahahahahaa! We live and we will conquer!!!!! Hahahahahaaha!

    -Roach, when asked about Klingon extinction!
  • suavekssuaveks Member Posts: 1,736 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    shpoks wrote: »
    My complaint is that they look somehow unfinished to me. Like rushed or sloppy work was done.
    Unfinished, rushed and/or sloppy work on KDF stuff?

    Naaaahhhh, surely you jest... ;>
    PyKDqad.jpg
  • synthiasuicidesynthiasuicide Member Posts: 458 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Well honestly , the new ships can be made to look good. I've made mine look like a Bortas/Neghvar hybrid. its possible, you just need to play around the parts (assuming you got the pack of course)

    And with the Nukara shields they do look decent.. well of course, anything with Nukara looks great tho :p

    got any pics of it? don't see many Shield Visual pics of KDF ships around lol.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • horridpersonhorridperson Member Posts: 665 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I wasn't impressed with the design of the command ships. I have my own opinions on the design aesthetics of Klingon ships and didn't feel they met my expectations. I did purchase the Fed ships. I think more effort was put into detailing the models and my idea of what constitutes a fed vessel is more forgiving; My standards are lower.

    That said if you do post some pictures of the new KDF ships I would appreciate having a better look at them. It feels like a bit of a trap and I don't know where the blame lies. On one hand my expectations were too high in spite of really wanting to like them. On the other I'm concerned that if I don't capitulate along with a fair number of other KDF fans we may not see another ship for a while; Is a ship of dubious quality better than none at all?
    battlegroupad_zps8gon3ojt.jpg

  • theredcomettheredcomet Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Its a junkyard bortas
  • potasssiumpotasssium Member Posts: 1,226 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I picked up the 3 pack, and piece built three different hulls I like, one for each.

    But the Tactical one is what I think looks best, at least in my oppinion.

    Using the Vet Skin, but the KHG shields can fix most sins.

    I see myself dismissing the ENG ship in the end, but the Tactical & Science cruisers arr both useful.

    But then I haven't used the war cruiser yet.

    Still not as good looking as the Kamarang, but these ships are a million times better than the Qib.

    I'll try and snap some screen caps of them later tonight.
    Thanks for the Advanced Light Cruiser, Allied Escort Bundles, Jem-Hadar Light Battlecruiser, and Mek'leth
    New Content Wishlist
    T6 updates for the Kamarag & Vor'Cha
    Heavy Cruiser & a Movie Era Style AoY Utility Cruiser
    Dahar Master Jacket

  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    potasssium wrote: »

    I'll try and snap some screen caps of them later tonight.

    Please do, when you have the time.
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • zeuxidemus001zeuxidemus001 Member Posts: 3,357 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    One thing I almost had forgotten about I wonder if this is supposed to be our c-store negh'var lol the one that kinda doesn't look like a vo'quv or bortasqu'.
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    One thing I almost had forgotten about I wonder if this is supposed to be our c-store negh'var lol the one that kinda doesn't look like a vo'quv or bortasqu'.

    I'm pretty sure the Mogh was our Negh'var Refit, in terms of preformance not design. I always suspected that the Mogh is that ship, only they decided to go with a more fresh design direction than just reusing the Negh'var skin and attaching two big underslug cannons.
    Ofcourse, I could be wrong, but I'm under that impression.
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • rodentmasterrodentmaster Member Posts: 1 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I believe the efforts that originally were described as a Negh refit did in fact evolve to produce the Mogh. Then it was so good they gave the feds a version of it... first. Before even giving the KDF their ship.

    I'm pretty sure this has been described somewhere in past commentary. It wasn't a deliberate track change, but more of a natural evolution of the project/idea behind "a new KDF battlecruiser ship."
  • olessiusolessius Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    I wasn't impressed with the design of the command ships. I have my own opinions on the design aesthetics of Klingon ships and didn't feel they met my expectations. I did purchase the Fed ships. I think more effort was put into detailing the models and my idea of what constitutes a fed vessel is more forgiving; My standards are lower.

    That said if you do post some pictures of the new KDF ships I would appreciate having a better look at them. It feels like a bit of a trap and I don't know where the blame lies. On one hand my expectations were too high in spite of really wanting to like them. On the other I'm concerned that if I don't capitulate along with a fair number of other KDF fans we may not see another ship for a while; Is a ship of dubious quality better than none at all?

    Here are a few pictures of the different combinations of parts that I've used.

    http://imgur.com/QCHGmJc

    http://imgur.com/Alr1tk8

    http://imgur.com/P7n5P2M

    I do feel quite forced to use the Klinzhai neck as it is the only one that really gives me the general outline of a Klingon ship.

    Y'know, though... since we discussed this in the other thread about the Klingon command ships, I've come to rethink my initial position. While these new ships are more Klingon than the Mogh or the Bortasqu' (which I now have cause to believe is in fact a shameless rip-off of the Terran battlecruiser), that does not make them GOOD Klingon ships. And in fact, there are a great number of flaws to their respective designs. Enough to strongly give me the impression that the person who designed them REALLY hasn't done his or her homework at all, and has instead taken direct inspiration from other franchises (mainly Starcraft, as is obvious with both the aforementioned Mogh and the Bortasqu'). Not only that - they've managed to mess up even the most iconic of the Klingon ships in ways that make them look so, SO much less cool than they are supposed to. Taking the Negh'Var as an example, practically everything about it has been watered down; the wingspan is smaller than it should be, the neck is both shorter and thinner than it's supposed to be, it's missing its massive underslung weapon pods and the entire ship is a great deal flatter than it really has any right to be.

    And the really sad part about this is the reference material is widely available. In fact, there are a bunch of diagrams floating around that give us a clear indication of how the designers were going about designing Klingon ships. Here are a few examples:

    Vor'Cha

    Vor'Cha 2

    Vor'Cha 3

    B'rel

    B'rel 2

    Negh'Var

    Negh'Var comparison

    Negh'Var comparison 2

    And this is just what I've been able to get my hands on via a cursory Googling of the ships in question and by checking these forums. The designers ought to have been able to get their hands on even more reference data than this. Frankly, it's an absolute miracle that the KTanco, Vo'quv, VoD'leh and the Qu'Daj, four ships for which there is (to the best of my knowledge) no canonical precedent, look as good as they do, and an absolute pity that the designers simply stopped making actual Klingon ships since then.

    So I'll still fly my Command BC, and to a certain point I will still enjoy the way it looks. However, I'm no longer going to be able to view it as a proper Klingon ship.
Sign In or Register to comment.