test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Delta Rising is the BEST expansion EVER and players LOVE it

1303133353657

Comments

  • trekkietravistrekkietravis Member Posts: 214 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    Delta Rising is not that bad. Yes, there is room for improvement, but this thread is pretty much a complete over-reaction and reads as a bunch of whiny children not getting their way.

    There are a few constructive posts here and a bunch of self-inflated nerds with a sense of entitlement.

    I am in no way saying Delta Rising is perfect, but anyone who is ******** obviously wasn't bere for the first 2 years of the game, because it's way better than anything we had back then.
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    I am in no way saying Delta Rising is perfect, but anyone who is ******** obviously wasn't bere for the first 2 years of the game, because it's way better than anything we had back then.

    Subjective is subjective.
  • lordmanzelotlordmanzelot Member Posts: 468 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    The thread was so awesome and now the story-tellers are back ...
    Subscribed For: 2300+ Days
  • js26568js26568 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    The thread was so awesome and now the story-tellers are back ...

    They're only 3% of the player base so we can ignore them
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Free Tibet!
  • leviathan99#2867 leviathan99 Member Posts: 7,747 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    Delta Rising is not that bad. Yes, there is room for improvement, but this thread is pretty much a complete over-reaction and reads as a bunch of whiny children not getting their way.

    There are a few constructive posts here and a bunch of self-inflated nerds with a sense of entitlement.

    I am in no way saying Delta Rising is perfect, but anyone who is ******** obviously wasn't bere for the first 2 years of the game, because it's way better than anything we had back then.

    Er. I obviously WAS there for the first two years and I was substantially more positive about that.

    The content is much better now, absolutely. I give props for that. And I think the initial F2P monetization approach (I'm iffy on how much of that rises to the level of true strategy but it was an approach) was better than the first two years, at least in the short run.

    But I think the current design direction and approach are worse than either the initial F2P approach and worse than what the game launched with, content and art direction aside (which have improved).

    And that ought to be obvious when you look at the level of feedback and communication. Or when the guy who had a hand in designing many of the systems says he doesn't understand how people are getting the DPS numbers they are when it is clearly outlined in the forums.

    That alone should be a red flag on the quality of the metrics.

    But, hey, everything is awesome. Business models are always awesome and short-term shareholder profit is why companies exist.
  • edited December 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    Delta Rising is not that bad. Yes, there is room for improvement, but this thread is pretty much a complete over-reaction and reads as a bunch of whiny children not getting their way.

    There are a few constructive posts here and a bunch of self-inflated nerds with a sense of entitlement.

    I am in no way saying Delta Rising is perfect, but anyone who is ******** obviously wasn't bere for the first 2 years of the game, because it's way better than anything we had back then.

    U mad bro?
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • maxvitormaxvitor Member Posts: 2,213 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    The thread was so awesome and now the story-tellers are back ...
    People were having fun, this is STO remember, you can't have that, so naturally someone had to come in here and take a dumb on things using the same old tired cliche's.
    If something is not broken, don't fix it, if it is broken, don't leave it broken.
    Oh Hell NO to ARC
  • jornadojornado Member Posts: 918 Arc User
    edited December 2014

    There are a few constructive posts here and a bunch of self-inflated nerds with a sense of entitlement.

    Edited: I really like the new Quarter Pounders at McDonalds.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    My guess is "hope" keeps people not playing but posting on the forums. For others, its a path of sad realization and closure. Grieving takes time. The worst "haters" here love the game, or did at some point.
  • nyxadrillnyxadrill Member Posts: 1,242 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    There are a few constructive posts here and a bunch of self-inflated nerds with a sense of entitlement.

    I am NOT self-Inflated! ... It takes at least a good 15 minutes with a foot pump :P :D
    server_hamster6.png
  • jornadojornado Member Posts: 918 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    My guess is "hope" keeps people not playing but posting on the forums. For others, its a path of sad realization and closure. Grieving takes time. The worst "haters" here love the game, or did at some point.
  • meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    murfy27 wrote: »
    Slow day at work...

    Haha! Very good! :)
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • maxvitormaxvitor Member Posts: 2,213 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    Ignore them, there are all kinds, people who care enough about something that they will speak up for what they believe rather than see what they care about fail, sheep that will go along with anything even if it may end up costing them dearly and those who say nothing but just walk away.
    I don't want see STO mismanaged into failure, if some don't like that stance, tough.
    If something is not broken, don't fix it, if it is broken, don't leave it broken.
    Oh Hell NO to ARC
  • ransom2375ransom2375 Member Posts: 243 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    questerius wrote: »
    Aware? probably.
    Mission accomplished!

    However they are also aware that those on the forum represent only a small portion of those who play the game.
    The 'minority' argument never gets old. Clever. There are countless examples over the years where Cryptic acted verifiably on player feedback in this very forum.

    They are also aware that the average forum poster will never receive an invite to Mensa.

    In addition to that they are aware that crowd mentalities, like the one displayed by the anti cryptic crowd lowers the residing IQ significantly.
    Did i get that right: crowd mentalities = less IQ ?

    And thus the developers correctly opt NOT to take the rants on the forum serious and instead rely on the unbiased metrics.
    If i would exclusively read biased rants, that would be understandable. But the forum is also filled with thoughtful unbiased player feedback. Only Cryptic can and will decide IF, HOW and WHEN they act. Unless you have insider knowledge, you cant even state that they dont take something of this serious.

    Although your post was really awesome, we still miss your 'real' contribution to this thread. ;)
    The thread was so awesome and now the story-tellers are back ...
    maxvitor wrote: »
    People were having fun, this is STO remember, you can't have that, so naturally someone had to come in here and take a dumb on things using the same old tired cliche's.
    Some of them are like those guys at your front door. You know they will come someday, and then they will give you info leaflets about truth and stuff. *shivers*
    maxvitor wrote: »
    I don't want see STO mismanaged into failure, if some don't like that stance, tough.
    /this!
    Star Trek Online: Foundry 02.12.2010 - 11.04.2019
  • jornadojornado Member Posts: 918 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    Too subtle? You decide.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    My guess is "hope" keeps people not playing but posting on the forums. For others, its a path of sad realization and closure. Grieving takes time. The worst "haters" here love the game, or did at some point.
  • knuhteb5knuhteb5 Member Posts: 1,831 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    Delta Rising is not that bad. Yes, there is room for improvement, but this thread is pretty much a complete over-reaction and reads as a bunch of whiny children not getting their way.

    There are a few constructive posts here and a bunch of self-inflated nerds with a sense of entitlement.

    I am in no way saying Delta Rising is perfect, but anyone who is ******** obviously wasn't bere for the first 2 years of the game, because it's way better than anything we had back then.

    Edited. The weather is pretty cold in Boston today btw.
    aGHGQIKr41KNi.gif
  • thutmosis85thutmosis85 Member Posts: 2,358 Arc User
    edited December 2014

    I am in no way saying Delta Rising is perfect, but anyone who is ******** obviously wasn't bere for the first 2 years of the game, because it's way better than anything we had back then.

    Hmmm 8 new Episodes per "Expansion" something they didn't even dare to say during the first 2 years, instead of 15 FE in 6 months, and a bunch of Patrols to fill in the gaps ... certainly feels like the 2nd year of STO :P ... naah to be fair, it's more like the Beta ...
    Patch Notes : Resolved an Issue, where people would accidently experience Fun.
  • hravikhravik Member Posts: 1,203 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    Here I go again on my own.

    Guys, guys. Don't engage with the doubters. We've had a mostly peaceful thread so far, let's not get it shut down.
  • purvee1purvee1 Member Posts: 360 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    Hmmm 8 new Episodes per "Expansion" something they didn't even dare to say during the first 2 years, instead of 15 FE in 6 months, and a bunch of Patrols to fill in the gaps ... certainly feels like the 2nd year of STO :P ... naah to be fair, it's more like the Beta ...

    Remember when the Patrols were pulled from the progression arc, for, what was it again... Something like "Not being up to the standards we can expect now" or something of that vein. At least with those patrols you'd warp in and sometimes find yourself with another 1-2 random players.
  • knuhteb5knuhteb5 Member Posts: 1,831 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    purvee1 wrote: »
    Remember when the Patrols were pulled from the progression arc, for, what was it again... Something like "Not being up to the standards we can expect now" or something of that vein. At least with those patrols you'd warp in and sometimes find yourself with another 1-2 random players.

    Just ignore the guy. He may be trying to get this thread shutdown.
    aGHGQIKr41KNi.gif
  • jornadojornado Member Posts: 918 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    knuhteb5 wrote: »
    Just ignore the guy. He may be trying to get this thread shutdown.

    Ignore what guy? Where? I don't see any guy.

    Also, good call on editing out responses - I have done the same.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    My guess is "hope" keeps people not playing but posting on the forums. For others, its a path of sad realization and closure. Grieving takes time. The worst "haters" here love the game, or did at some point.
  • purvee1purvee1 Member Posts: 360 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    knuhteb5 wrote: »
    Just ignore the guy. He may be trying to get this thread shutdown.


    I know, I know, hence why I've not done a picture of Hitler giving a salute and the caption
    "I Raised my Delta, THIS much, and ze players loved it!"

    My earlier one was a parody, The Great dictator.
  • gameleechgameleech Member Posts: 58 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    hey almost to 100 pgs and 1000 replies :P
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • edited December 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • naz4naz4 Member Posts: 1,373 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    Do you guys think Cryptic actually get the sarcastic banners or are they too arrogant to acknowledge it and actually take it as positive feedback?

    Leave votes here as:

    "Acknowledge" Taking feedback onboard

    or "Too arrogant" Head buried deep in the sand

    Obviously withe banner sigs as a given.
  • edited December 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • thutmosis85thutmosis85 Member Posts: 2,358 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    naz4 wrote: »
    Do you guys think Cryptic actually get the sarcastic banners or are they too arrogant to acknowledge it and actually take it as positive feedback?

    Leave votes here as:

    "Acknowledge" Taking feedback onboard

    or "Too arrogant" Head buried deep in the sand

    Obviously withe banner sigs as a given.

    Well ... "The Queues are not empty, it's a bug" ... do you need more ?

    PS : Everything is awesome ...
    Patch Notes : Resolved an Issue, where people would accidently experience Fun.
  • gameleechgameleech Member Posts: 58 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    It was never something I bothered with, but even the winter queue seems alot deader than previous years for it bein so early in the event. Its odd that now I do more ground stf than space, and Ive always hated ground :(
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • coupaholiccoupaholic Member Posts: 2,188 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    naz4 wrote: »
    Do you guys think Cryptic actually get the sarcastic banners or are they too arrogant to acknowledge it and actually take it as positive feedback?

    I'm pretty sure they do, I bet undiscovered tribes in the Amazon would recognise the sarcasm at play here.
  • purvee1purvee1 Member Posts: 360 Arc User
    edited December 2014
    valoreah wrote: »
    LMAO! Great sig. :P

    Thanks, I got the idea from the Spaceballs one.

    Been racking my brains to try and work out a Robbin Hood men in tights one.

    I had posted it up in here, on Sunday I think it was. However it seems to have gotten missed in the rush, and it flows better than re-writing Chamberlains "peace for our time" speech.

    in case you missed it:
    http://i.imgur.com/q6W32rB.jpg
This discussion has been closed.