test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Season 9 Upcoming Ships?

2»

Comments

  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    I would not hesitate to drop some cash on this. Just wish Cryptic would use a fan design. So much better. I can't take another Cryptic Fed design.

    Well I must say, I don't really like that one, just looks kinda' weird to me. But, since we're talking about fan designs from the 'design the next Enterprise contest', I feel obliged to throw >this one< in. Now, she's got the look! ;)
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • virusdancervirusdancer Member Posts: 18,687 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    Korok's D5 Tanker variant as a Heavy Raptor Carrier...just saying.
  • jexsamxjexsamx Member Posts: 2,803 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    I would not hesitate to drop some cash on this. Just wish Cryptic would use a fan design. So much better. I can't take another Cryptic Fed design.

    Fuzzyprise? Fuzzyprise.

    *high five*
  • tucana66tucana66 Member Posts: 710 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    shpoks wrote: »
    Well I must say, I don't really like that one, just looks kinda' weird to me. But, since we're talking about fan designs from the 'design the next Enterprise contest', I feel obliged to throw >this one< in. Now, she's got the look! ;)
    Man, I remember that entry! Let me second the nomination to get that ship in-game. Makes me think it's a solid replacement as the NCC-1701-G. ;)
  • f8explorer#7814 f8explorer Member Posts: 1,328 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    shpoks wrote: »
    Well I must say, I don't really like that one, just looks kinda' weird to me. But, since we're talking about fan designs from the 'design the next Enterprise contest', I feel obliged to throw >this one< in. Now, she's got the look! ;)

    THAT one is my fave of all the designs from that contest.

    They did tell us they had rights for the submissions and can create or adapt them for the game.
    Joint Forces Commander ... / ... proud member of ... boq botlhra'ghom / AllianceCenCom!
    " We stand TOGETHER and fight with HONOR!"

    U.S.S. Maelstrom, NCC-71417 (Constitution III-class/flagship) --- Fleet Admiral Hauk' --|-- Dahar Master Hauk --- I.K.S. qu'In 'an bortaS (D7-class / flagship)
  • outlaw51825outlaw51825 Member Posts: 172 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    Isnt that design just a hybrid of the Envoy class and this ugly brick http://sto.gamepedia.com/File:Redacted_Exploration_Cruiser_Variant.jpg?version=1509565d1dbd0e6c367f72dd4cf50525 ?

    And i think i read somewhere hat they wanted to make a playable U.S.S. Dauntless (The fake federation ship from VOY) Could make sense since we are in the Delta Quadrant now.

    And broadside Cannons? For what? For cruisers? Cannons with a firing arc of 45° ona slow turning cruiser. Stupid. They could make Beam Arrays more powerful but not broadside cannons. And escorts dont need broadside cannons they have the Turnrate.

    We have never seen a ship firing a cannon broadside. BoP and Vor`Cha as well as the Defiant have Front cannons and for every other direction use Beams.

    Yes you have. But you're thinking of a different kind of ship all together.

    Naval Vessels almost never had forward guns until the advent of modern weapons.

    With the design of most cruisers i've been wondering if someone would finally have the smarts to put turrets on the sides of a ship (as potentially a special module or an outright design choice.) to allow that style of firing once again. Which is called a Broadside in naval terms.

    Also Turrets fire in all directions so its not quite as hard as you might think. (They use the cannon style as well)

    What i could see as a possible set up for this is if the user chooses to throw cannons on their ship they wont have access to the forward beam arrays and be limited to that 45 degree angle maybe even a smaller 30 degree arc but would have the firepower (and SERIOUS vulnerability) Of having those cannons.

    For the record however as for ships i expect to see.

    I expect the Super Capital Class to be introduced.
  • cavaleriuscavalerius Member Posts: 126 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    AHAHAHA! It's the constipated butt-prise! I was wondering when this would come up again and would love to see Perpetual's ship flying about, grazing its hind quarters on some planetoid or asteroid just so I could laugh my face off!

    And if its not added officially then BEST April fools joke ever! Though the amount of rage generated when it disappears the next day...


    Ok, now i've stopped laughing, lets see here.
    This ship would be a good replacement for Cryptic's outdated Excalibur that's in-game, and I could see Cryptic heavily modifying this one to balance the ship design, but can't see them doing a good job with that.

    Overall in my opinion Fed ships created by Cryptic aren't doing so well at all, to the point where I'm over their designs. I made a debate about this in the Art of STO for anyone to look at: http://sto-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1076671
    Beta Antares Shipyards advanced Starship development project.
    CLASSIFIED
    [SIGPIC]the_forseeable_future_by_jetfreak_7-d3dvsud.png
    [/SIGPIC]
    SUPPORT LOGICAL FEDERATION STARSHIP DESIGNS!
  • mustrumridcully0mustrumridcully0 Member Posts: 12,963 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    Huh, confusing since both were used by the Marquis.

    I am almost certain that the TNG/DS9/VOY guys used the same model as basis at least, but they are canonically different ships.
    Star Trek Online Advancement: You start with lowbie gear, you end with Lobi gear.
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    tucana66 wrote: »
    Man, I remember that entry! Let me second the nomination to get that ship in-game. Makes me think it's a solid replacement as the NCC-1701-G. ;)
    genhauk wrote: »
    THAT one is my fave of all the designs from that contest.

    They did tell us they had rights for the submissions and can create or adapt them for the game.

    I'm going to be perfectly honest here - if this ship becomes availible, I might even swap my Galaxy for it. :eek:
    I just have a thing modern designs that are extrapolated from the classic TOS/TMP designs and I see this one as a fine example of that.
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • artan42artan42 Member Posts: 10,450 Bug Hunter
    edited April 2014
    Norway Class dammit.
    22762792376_ac7c992b7c_o.png
    Norway and Yeager dammit... I still want my Typhoon and Jupiter though.
    JJ Trek The Kelvin Timeline is just Trek and it's fully canon... get over it. But I still prefer TAR.

    #TASforSTO


    '...I can tell you that we're not in the military and that we intend no harm to the whales.' Kirk: The Voyage Home
    'Starfleet is not a military organisation. Its purpose is exploration.' Picard: Peak Performance
    'This is clearly a military operation. Is that what we are now? Because I thought we were explorers!' Scotty: Into Darkness
    '...The Federation. Starfleet. We're not a military agency.' Scotty: Beyond
    'I'm not a soldier anymore. I'm an engineer.' Miles O'Brien: Empok Nor
    '...Starfleet could use you... It's a peacekeeping and humanitarian armada...' Admiral Pike: Star Trek

    Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
  • edgecrysgeredgecrysger Member Posts: 2,740 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    That ship is horrible, i hope we never see "that" in-game.
  • capnmanxcapnmanx Member Posts: 1,452 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    Meh. While there were some fantastic ships submitted for the 'Design the next Enterprise' contest, they were all meant to be Enterprises; so they're a little grandiose for my tastes generally speaking. Personally, I want a few more cruiser options that aren't trying to be the next Sovereign.
  • wast33wast33 Member Posts: 1,855 Arc User
    edited April 2014
    hell, that nelson really catched my eye! :) some of the others are quite nice as well, but that one looks like a link to mobius and wells.
  • edited April 2014
    This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.