Question: with the design simular to that of the constitution class (refit) would the sto community be willing to accapt the ship as an advancement on the Exter design allready in game? If so would the community accapt the Exter as an additional option for the avanger insted?
Question: with the design simular to that of the constitution class (refit) would the sto community be willing to accapt the ship as an advancement on the Exter design allready in game? If so would the community accapt the Exter as an additional option for the avanger insted?
1. Don't see the similarity.
2. Therefore no, the Avenger is not related to the Exeter in any way beyond "They're both Starfleet cruisers."
3. Therefore no, the unrelated Exeter isn't an acceptable option for the Avenger.
Also, "simular", "accapt", "allready", "insted". If you use Firefox, Chrome, or Opera, you get this red line underneath improperly spelled words. You can right-click those words to get spelling corrections. If you want people to take you seriously, you should start with proper spelling.
I'm not going to nit-pick your grammar, just your spelling since that is stupidly easy to correct. I get the impression English is not your first language.
Avenger is a cruiser, it's in no way shape or form an Exeter.
Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!
Also, "simular", "accapt", "allready", "insted". If you use Firefox, Chrome, or Opera, you get this red line underneath improperly spelled words. You can right-click those words to get spelling corrections. If you want people to take you seriously, you should start with proper spelling.
I'm not going to nit-pick your grammar, just your spelling since that is stupidly easy to correct. I get the impression English is not your first language.
Question: with the design simular to that of the constitution class (refit) would the sto community be willing to accapt the ship as an advancement on the Exter design allready in game? If so would the community accapt the Exter as an additional option for the avanger insted?
if this is another t5 connie/exeter/whatever else thread, the answer is that it wont happen.
T6 Miranda Hero Ship FTW. Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.
Although im totally in favor with there being T5 versions of the connie, miranda and exeter, it simply wouldn't happen as an alternate skin for the avenger. Exeter was built for exploration and patrolling, Avenger was built for battle only.
Comments
1. Don't see the similarity.
2. Therefore no, the Avenger is not related to the Exeter in any way beyond "They're both Starfleet cruisers."
3. Therefore no, the unrelated Exeter isn't an acceptable option for the Avenger.
Also, "simular", "accapt", "allready", "insted". If you use Firefox, Chrome, or Opera, you get this red line underneath improperly spelled words. You can right-click those words to get spelling corrections. If you want people to take you seriously, you should start with proper spelling.
I'm not going to nit-pick your grammar, just your spelling since that is stupidly easy to correct. I get the impression English is not your first language.
Avenger is a cruiser, it's in no way shape or form an Exeter.
Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!
http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
BEHOLD! the Grammar/Spelling TRIBBLE Strikes!
if this is another t5 connie/exeter/whatever else thread, the answer is that it wont happen.
Been around since Dec 2010 on STO and bought LTS in Apr 2013 for STO.