test content
Logo
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
What can we do to Help the Dev?
frankocasio2
Member Posts: 62 Arc User
I would like to know what kind of ship you would add to the game if you could.
If there is anything positive you have to add please
Most input is welcome.
No one wants to hear your option on the DEV's.
Think this is useless again then don't post.
A healthy Debate lets toss around ideas and solutions
The I can't crew can stay elsewhere.
P.S.
My hopes and prayers go out to the people of the Philippines
If there is anything positive you have to add please
Most input is welcome.
No one wants to hear your option on the DEV's.
Think this is useless again then don't post.
A healthy Debate lets toss around ideas and solutions
The I can't crew can stay elsewhere.
P.S.
My hopes and prayers go out to the people of the Philippines
Post edited by frankocasio2 on
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Secondly: Me personally, I prefer the way it currently is... I prefer most of the TOS/TMP era ships to stay as garbage scows or museum ships.
And judgeing from chats in-game and the forums here, I am not alone... far from it.
Also, every conceivable ship has been asked for already and the devs know it. There is no point in asking again, its does zero good.
I can, as long as he's not TRIBBLE. I AM pretty damn cute
There must be a Reason why the Dev have refused to add the ships you speak of.
I understand you like many have given up and that is cool however I'm not you.
If There is no other reason than they just don't feel like it, then that's what I want to hear so can move on to other games...Given up does no one any Good.
I give you his address on West 57st Street Oops.
They're not refusing anything. They just simply don't have the time to add everything that everyone asks for. I'm sure that if they somehow got the magical ability to add everything they wanted in the space of one week, we would see everyone's requests added and more.
But they don't have magical abilities, do they?
Why can't all the fans of Star Trek get there favorite Ships?
You're kidding me, right?
In the case that you're not, let me explain in very clear words.
Making ships takes time. Cryptic wants to produce money making ships, because they're a business. So, given that making ships takes time, they're only going to be working on ships that will make them money. They can't go and please every single person. Also, besides the fact that CBS has said flat out No to any old TOS ships being at anything more than T1, those ships wouldn't sell well. So Cryptic's not going to make them.
Hey I have an Idea why don't they just say so or have they threw you and your
Extrasensory perception..
Just because you want something doesn't mean 50k others also want it and are willing to buy it. They need to pick the projects that the most people are going to want to buy because they can only do so many of those projects a year.
Eyh. Don't knock him. -At least he uses commas and periods. -I would wish there where spacing between them tough.
So the K'Tinga and the Excelsior made it in how ?
... thank you for your expertise . :cool:
While I don't know for sure, I think it has been stated that the "CBS said no" is a myth. If any, they said the T1 TOS vanity connie which was a preorder reward shouldn't be widely available, not even that it shouldn't be T5.
I personally don't care. There is no reason not to have all ships available at endgame because it would strike me as something new if STO would make any rhyme or reason regarding ship age/dimensions/capabilities
Get the Forums Enhancement Extension!
Easy Tough Guy,Since you brought up making ships is so tough like I hoped you would.
Here's an easy way for them to get ships in I assume 3d Max Format or whatever format they want.Hold a Contest for starships allow the community to submit vessals they built from scratch and the winner gets he's ship in the game along with 10.000 zen.I can see you are one of those excuse guys I can't do this or I can't do that and that's the reason why this game is lacking.
The Original idea was to offer Dev help in making this game better.
I seem to keep getting reasons why we can't..
You need to be able to put together a compelling argument as to why something has to be in game. You cant make your request for content, ships or whatever sound like an "I want this" thread.
In your OP you listed a lot of things that you wanted but not good reasons as to why you want them. For example, you want a Soyuz or Saratoga class ship...ok, now tell me why this should be in the game?
This is essentially the entire point of the forums. Make posts about the game, what would make it better, what you don't like, what we could do to make things more fun, etc.
Ehehehehe...... Not going to happen:
This is why I wish that more Devs visited the forums.
Why I want Miranda Class ships and Variant's for admiral level is.
Star Trek story line Continuity.
Why I want a Federation Class DY series freighter or Oberth Variant is simply because it makes sense...I guess the Federation Transport service was sold to the ferengi.
Why I want more skins for starships that we buy.. hmmm...Call it Customer Service!!!!
That story doesn't even apply. If you read the fine print on any contest centered around making game content those rights are waved same as they are waved when you post an idea on these forums if you read their fine print. That guy in the story posted that on face book and as such his ideas remained his own property.
Trouble is, too many people equate a lack of a direct dev response (which is impossible; no dev is going to reply to every suggestion made on the forums) and a lack of action (devs may decide against making suggested changes for any number of reasons) with "not listening."
What are you Talking about? Did perfect world Created a rule against a ship making Contest?
I'm sure if it is in there best Interest to change that rule they may consider it...I call that smart business.
A good point..
The odyssey was Part of a contest, "design the next enterprise contest" so the skullgirl thing wouldnt apply, besides, one of the devs stated that they will not accept fan-made designs unless its through a contest, and since the rules of the contest state that said designs are Cryptics to use as they see fit.
In fact the Vet ships were other designs from that contest as well.
I think the bortasqu' series of ships and the klingon vet ship were a seperate design contest.
Note that I said old TOS ships. As for the fleet K'Tinga, perhaps the Klingons updated it and we don't know about it (think D'Kyr). Perhaps I should have been more clear; I was referring to old Fed ships.
Thank you..Constructive input finally...
dear dev, i'm sure u never heard it yet: develop PvP without "soon(tm)"
things boil down to several factors, "I want" or "we want" isnt always the best for everyone, it's abut creating a balance, a balance that also makes the game money. sometimes they have to sacrifice A to get B into the game. the fact that the Ambassador class is now in game shows that they are listening to the players.
They visit, a lot. They just don't post.
Most Devs don't engage in discussion of a given topic because their involvement often leads to incredible flame/troll wars. It is seen as better, overall, to "post from the heavans" as you put it, because they can get the info out, but not deal with flames. IMO, most of the topics players want to "discuss" are topics that they are already upset over, and have usually already made up their minds on. In this case, there is no real point to "discussion" as it will just be a battle of people declaring their point of view, and no one accepting or considering the other person's.
I disagree about us thinking of players as numbers. Discussions at work, all day, every day, involve how much fun something will be, or how players might react to a given change.
Most of my posts are inane, and more of an attempt to add levity to a thread than anything else. In the places where I do discuss things, it's always topics that I directly work with, and 90% of the time that is just explaining how a process works.
The post you quoted was me saying that the point of the forums was to give us feedback. And that it is. I did not say that the point of the forums was to have a discussion with the devs on any given topic.